logo
OnePlus' 2-in-1 USB cable charges your phone and smartwatch at the same time

OnePlus' 2-in-1 USB cable charges your phone and smartwatch at the same time

The Verge4 days ago
OnePlus announced a new USB-C charging cable that does more than just pass power and data from one device to another. The OnePlus 2-in-1 Supervooc Cable features an inline pogo pin connector that can be used to charge the company's OnePlus Watch 3, Watch 2, and Watch 2R smartwatches while also charging a connected smartphone. It's a more convenient solution for travelers and can help reduce desk clutter by eliminating at least one redundant charging cable.
It's available now through OnePlus' online store for $29.99 and comes in a single length that's just over 47 inches long. It's the same price as the OnePlus Watch Charging Base that doesn't actually come with a USB-C cable, potentially making the new 2-in-1 solution an even better deal.
The 2-in-1 Supervooc Cable can deliver up to 80W of power when connected to a single device like a laptop or smartphone. With a smartwatch attached power delivery is split between the two with up to 10W going to the wearable and up to 67W going to what's ever connected over USB-C.
The charging cable's functionality is similar to the Universal Cable for Apple Watch that Nomad released earlier this year. That cable features an inline magnetic Apple Watch charger on one end and a much steeper $100 price tag. But instead of accusing OnePlus of stealing Nomad's idea, we should be encouraging other cable makers to follow suit. Assuming it's technically feasible, a multifunction USB-C charging cable with an inline wireless charging puck would be incredibly useful.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SPACs Are Back - You Should Be Worried
SPACs Are Back - You Should Be Worried

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

SPACs Are Back - You Should Be Worried

SPACs aren't new. Their rise and fall are a clear case of market memory loss. From 2020 to early 2021, special purpose acquisition companies exploded into the spotlight. Hundreds launched, raising over $160 billion. They were sold as a faster, more flexible alternative to IPOs, a way to take private companies public without the regulatory drag. But underneath the surface, most were hype machines. Celebrities joined the party. Shaquille O'Neal. Jay-Z. Even former House Speaker Paul Ryan. Their names were plastered on term sheets while pre-revenue companies were rushed into the market and pitched as the next Tesla or Amazon. Few investors stopped to ask the obvious: why were these companies avoiding the standard IPO route? By late 2022, the bubble had burst. SPACs that once traded at premiums dropped below their $10 NAV floors. Goldman Sachs reported that 77% of post-merger SPACs from the 2020–2021 class traded below their issue price within a year. High-profile failures like Nikola and Lordstown Motors burned a lot of capital and credibility. These companies weren't just struggling for scale or profits; some barely had functioning products. And yet, retail investors piled in, drawn by slick investor decks and the promise of early access. More News from Barchart OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Calls DeepSeek's Bluff: 'I Don't Think They Figured Out Something Way More Efficient' Vanguard Is Now the Top Investor in MicroStrategy Stock. Should You Buy MSTR Too? Warren Buffett Used These 4 Simple Rules to Acquire 76 Businesses Worth Over $173 Billion Our exclusive Barchart Brief newsletter is your FREE midday guide to what's moving stocks, sectors, and investor sentiment - delivered right when you need the info most. Subscribe today! Now, SPACs are making a quiet comeback. Deal volumes are creeping up again. Promoters are talking about "next-gen" structures and stronger governance. But underneath, little has changed. A SPAC is only as good as the business it merges with. Most of the time, it still ends in disappointment. Why They Took Off Last Time And Why They Failed The SPAC craze had nothing to do with sound investing. It was hype from the start. Retail investors, riding stimulus checks and fresh off big pandemic gains, were desperate to jump into the next big thing. SPACs gave them what looked like front-row access. Unlike traditional IPOs, where institutions get first pick, anyone could buy into a SPAC at $10. Wall Street sponsors knew how to frame the story. They pitched SPACs as democratized dealmaking. But they buried the fine print, loaded fees, generous promoter shares, and exit strategies that let them cash out long before the retail crowd knew what they owned. The real problem wasn't access. It was the quality of the business. Many weren't just unprofitable; they had no revenue at all. Take Nikola, which reached a multi-billion-dollar valuation based on a prototype that didn't work. Or Clover Health, which marketed itself as a tech-forward insurer but was later revealed to be under federal investigation. These weren't outliers. They were standard. Investor decks promised 10x revenue growth and market dominance. Cash flow was always "just a year or two away." SPACs operate on a two-year deadline to complete a deal or return capital. That timeline created urgency, not quality. Many sponsors pushed through weak deals to meet the clock. Due diligence suffered. As a result, over 60% of SPACs from that boom now trade under $5. Some are down over 90%. Investors didn't buy businesses. They bought marketing slides and a dream. What's Different Now? Not Enough Wall Street doesn't have a long memory. And it rarely admits mistakes. As SPACs reappear in the headlines, the narrative has shifted. Sponsors say this new batch is more disciplined: better targets, tighter structures, and improved governance. The pitch has changed, but the incentives haven't. Sponsors still get paid if a deal closes, no matter how it performs. Their promoter usually hands them 20% of the post-merger equity for little or no cost. That means millions in upside for getting a deal across the line—even if the company craters. Meanwhile, retail investors are left with stock in businesses that may have less cash, fewer assets, and no clear plan. Redemptions are another warning sign. In many recent SPACs, more than 80% of the initial capital was withdrawn before the merger. That leaves the company underfunded on day one. Sponsors patch the gap with last-minute PIPEs or debt deals, moves that weaken the structure further. And retail still comes in last. By the time the average investor hears about the deal, the best terms are already taken. PIPE investors get their discounts. Sponsors take their free shares. What's left is a press release, a public ticker, and a lot of misplaced optimism. As one hedge fund analyst put it to me, "Sure, the paint looks fresh. But the engine's still busted." The Illusion Of Cheap Some SPACs now trade well below trust value. On paper, they look like bargains. But cheap prices often signal something deeper: real risk. The incentives haven't changed. Sponsors still hold upside through warrants and promote shares that dilute common shareholders. Most deals still include preferred equity, convertibles, or earn-out structures that cut into future gains if the stock doesn't run. Then comes dilution. These post-merger companies often need new capital quickly. That means issuing stock at lower prices, repricing warrants, or cutting side deals with PIPE investors. Shareholders get diluted. Ownership shrinks, even if the stock doesn't move. Liquidity is another problem. Many of these stocks have thin floats and wild price action. It only takes a small group of traders to move the price 10% or more in a day. That illusion of volume can vanish fast. Meanwhile, insiders and early backers often have structured ways to exit while retail is still buying. Just because a SPAC trades at $3 doesn't make it a bargain. If it's got no cash, weak fundamentals, and layers of dilution, it's not discounted. It's dangerous. What to Watch If You Must Play Not every SPAC is a dud. A few have created value. But the good ones don't come with billboards and buzz. If you're still going to fish in these waters, use better bait. Start with the sponsor. Do they have a track record of building real businesses? Or are they serial promoters chasing fees? Look for personal capital at risk and evidence they're not just passing through. Next, check the cash. How much money will the company have after redemptions? A deal that closes with an empty trust account is already in trouble. Insider behavior is key. Are they buying shares in the open market? Participating in the PIPE? Or lining up the exits? Follow the money, not the marketing. And finally, evaluate the business. Is there revenue? Margins? A clear path to profitability? If it relies on projections five years out with no current traction, it probably won't deliver. Real Opportunities Live Elsewhere You don't need to chase SPACs to find upside. There are cleaner plays with better setups and stronger alignment. Spin-offs, for example, are consistently fertile ground. When companies split off divisions, it often unlocks value, especially when insiders keep equity and focus on performance. These are companies with an operating history, not just a pitch deck. Broken IPOs are another space worth watching. These are stocks that went public at overhyped prices and got crushed. But when the smoke clears, the underlying business may still be strong, cash flowing, growing, and forgotten by the crowd. Turnarounds offer potential too. They're messy and often unloved. But when you find a name with a clean balance sheet, management alignment, and early signs of operational recovery, the upside can be real. It takes work. But it's real investing. SPACs didn't fade because they worked. They faded because they failed. Their return isn't a sign of progress. It's a sign that markets forgot what happened the last time. You don't need to short SPACs. But you don't need to step back into the fire either. Investors chasing yesterday's fantasy are likely to relive yesterday's outcome. You want asymmetric payoff? Look where others aren't. On the date of publication, Jim Osman did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Sign in to access your portfolio

How Much Richer Is Elon Musk Than Donald Trump?
How Much Richer Is Elon Musk Than Donald Trump?

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

How Much Richer Is Elon Musk Than Donald Trump?

Elon Musk has a lot more money than President Donald Trump. In terms of billionaires, their fortunes aren't even close. The richest person in the world, Musk has a net worth of over $400 billion, as of July 2, 2025. On the other hand, Trump is valued at a little over $5 billion, meaning Musk is nearly 78 times richer. While reaching a multibillion net worth is impressive, Trump is still only the 741st wealthiest person in the world, according to Forbes. Keep reading to learn more about how the former friends built their empires. Find Out: Read Next: Elon Musk's Wealth Journey Musk's journey as a serial entrepreneur began 30 years ago, with Zip2. Founded in 1995, the company provided online newspapers with maps and business directories. He sold Zip2 to now-defunct computer manufacturer Compaq for $307 million in 1999 and proceeded to found online financial services company which ultimately evolved into PayPal. In 1999, PayPal was sold to eBay in an acquisition valued at $1.5 billion. By 2002, Musk was serving in a variety of roles at SpaceX, including CEO. He joined the Telsa board in 2004 and became CEO of the electric automaker in 2008. He still holds this title, but has also founded several other companies — SolarCity, The Boring Company and Neuralink Corp. Additionally, Musk purchased social media company Twitter for $44 billion in October 2022. He served as the company's CEO until May 2023. Most recently, Musk joined the Trump administration as the head of the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency. His tenure was short term, as he vacated the role in May 2025. Discover More: Donald Trump's Wealth Journey Before becoming president, Trump was a real estate magnate. In 1971, he took the helm of his father's real estate development company, rebranding it as the Trump Organization. At present, the private company's portfolio includes a variety of residential and commercial properties, golf clubs, hotels and a winery. Trump also owns club Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida, which is his private residence, too. The property has been valued at $18-$28 million by the Palm Beach County property appraiser and has an initiation fee of $1 million, according to the Wall Street Journal. Additionally, Trump owns a nearly 11,000-square-foot triplex in New York City's Trump Tower, according to Forbes. The penthouse is worth an estimated $52 million. Not just a businessman, Trump starred on 'The Apprentice' from 2004-2015. He's also published multiple books, including 'The Art of the Deal.' More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 4 Housing Markets That Have Plummeted in Value Over the Past 5 Years The 5 Car Brands Named the Least Reliable of 2025 This article originally appeared on How Much Richer Is Elon Musk Than Donald Trump? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Best eSIM Plans for Travelers in Europe
Best eSIM Plans for Travelers in Europe

Time Business News

time3 hours ago

  • Time Business News

Best eSIM Plans for Travelers in Europe

An eSIM, which stands to represent embedded SIM, is the current alternative to the age-old physical SIM cards. Rather than sliding a plastic card into your phone, an eSIM lets you directly download a mobile plan to your device. This will facilitate a different carrier switch, and it will be more convenient, particularly to travelers who travel often across borders. The development of international routes and the digital world has caused eSIMs to be the popular option among all global users, including those going to Europe. Researching the best available eSIM in Europe, a number of such providers have flexible plans that are suitable for short and long-term travelers. Such popular companies are Airalo, Holafly, Nomad, and Truphone. These suppliers provide the data packages that cover various European nations, and this enables you to operate with ease across Europe. Telcavoip also provides the eSIM for Europe as another competitive alternative at a reasonable price, with wide coverage and an easy installation procedure. The considerations that you should use when making your decision to use a certain provider include data limits, validity period, and roaming coverage. To the majority of travelers, buying an eSIM for Europe is a worthwhile investment. It saves the first and foremost time and headaches at airports, no more running around looking for local SIM cards, and overcoming language barriers in mobile shops. Second, a lot of eSIM companies provide beforehand planning and installations, thus you are up and running as you roll off the plane. Moreover, eSIM plans typically have improved regional coverage, at least in the case when they are intended to be used when traveling across Europe. eSIMs offer great value for money given the possibility of switching plans easily and, as a result, depriving oneself of high international roaming charges. There are a variety of benefits to using an eSIM when traveling to Europe. Travelers have the benefit of instant activation, that is, you can organize when you are still at home. The majority of vendors will have clear rates and no additional fees, and in the event that you run out of data, you can make a top-up as desired. Since you do not have to deal with a physical SIM, your gadget remains unaffected and safe. Additionally, certain eSIMs give access to local networks within different countries, and they are applied in case of faster and more reliable data connections in comparison to international roaming. Since there are numerous advantages, the use of an eSIM has a couple of limitations. You also have to ensure that your phone can be compatible with the eSIM, since not every smartphone is compatible with the technology. More than that, after deleting an eSIM profile, it may not be recovered anymore, like it is with an actual SIM, which can be inserted into the phone once again. The same can apply to customer service and technical support offered by the provider, who may be quite slow to respond to your inquiries, especially in case you experience some technical problems on the road. Lastly, not every eSIM plan may provide support to voice calls or SMS because in this case, the plans may be data-only. Perhaps the greatest question that travelers face today is whether or not to ride with physical SIM cards or to upgrade to eSIMs. The usage of traditional SIM cards has not become obsolete yet, and they provide stable performance even by local mobile operators. Nevertheless, using and exchanging SIMs may be troublesome. In comparison to this, eSIMs make the process easier by providing instant activation and having multiple profiles that can be controlled with just one device. The decision is yours, it depends on your travelling style and on the ability of your phone, and use it with eSIM services. I know that some of you might want to use a physical SIM card; you can use travel SIMs by such companies as Orange Holiday Europe and Three UK, which will operate at the European continent level. They are usually paired with large data, voice, and text packages, which are valid in most European countries. Nonetheless, e-sim rises in popularity, especially the esim for Europe, making it a more preferable option among technically advanced travellers. Offering connection to a plethora of local networks and the possibility of immediate setup, eSIMs are more convenient, faster, and affordable than a SIM card. The majority of the European eSIM plans have broad coverage and include France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, Austria, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. The plans go further to Eastern Europe: Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic. On selecting a provider, maintain the countries on your itinerary to be reflected on the plan. Numerous providers disclose all available countries, and thus it is a must to visit the coverage map prior to purchasing a product. With Europe being a more and more popular tourist destination, often visited by digital nomads, it is essential to have a stable and reasonably priced mobile connection. eSIMs are an effective and locally innovative alternative to carrying spare SIM cards around and risking the stressful process of purchasing roaming subscriptions. As various providers are providing competitive plans and the coverage of the services is extensive in Europe, travelers do not need to forego high-speed internet and effortless service whenever they travel. The decision to buy the appropriate eSIM to travel to Europe can make your travel experience as well as productive and much more enjoyable. TIME BUSINESS NEWS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store