Avocado alert as popular fruit's future in doubt warns new study
A new study has issued a warning that avocados could disappear from our plates if native vegetation doesn't survive alongside crops. Avocado trees, originally from Mexico and Central America, are now cultivated in various parts of the globe, including Australia.
Australian scientists have discovered that the survival of avocado crops may hinge on preserving patches of native vegetation near farmland. The research, published in the journal Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, highlights the crucial role these habitats play in sustaining the insects vital for crop pollination and maintaining our brunch menus.
The team from Curtin University found that insect communities in avocado orchards next to native remnant vegetation fed on more than double the number of plant species during periods of limited crop flowering, compared to those in orchards bordered by pasture, reports Surrey Live.
Avocado future and crop pollination
They explained that insects with a diverse diet are more likely to survive and pollinate crops, suggesting a potential strategy to ensure global food security. With estimates suggesting that up to 10 billion people worldwide will need access to safe and nutritious food by 2050, agricultural productivity may need to increase by as much as 75%.
Lead researcher Dr Joshua Kestel, who carried out the work during his PhD studies at Curtin, described the study as "particularly compelling" since it had historically been challenging to measure the variety of pollen gathered by complete insect populations - especially across expansive farming regions.
He said: "Using a novel method pioneered at Curtin University, we applied a cutting-edge biodiversity assessment technique - environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding - to pan traps to identify the diversity of pollen transported by entire insect communities collected during sampling. This approach allowed us to demonstrate that natural vegetation adjacent to orchards may enhance the resilience of insect communities, potentially contributing to greater food security."
'Healthy insect communities are needed'
Co-researcher Professor Paul Nevill, from Curtin's School of Molecular and Life Sciences, described the findings as crucial given that insects are responsible for pollinating 75% of all farming crops, despite many species facing extinction threats. He said: "In order to meet the food needs of the planet, diverse and healthy insect communities play a critical role in supporting essential ecosystem services such as pollination and the biological control of pests.
"In Australia alone, an estimated 320,000 insect species exist, yet only 35% have been formally identified - and the plant resources many of them rely on remain largely unknown." He added: "By using sophisticated eDNA metabarcoding capable of detecting the trace of a single grain of pollen or even the footprint of a bee, we're helping to close these knowledge gaps and better understand how these insects might contribute to safeguarding global food security."
The scientists gathered over 2,000 insect samples and pinpointed more than 250 plant varieties through eDNA analysis, encompassing crops, weeds and indigenous Australian vegetation. The research team suggested integrating standardised biodiversity assessments into routine agricultural monitoring, preserving ecosystems through recognising the importance of natural plant life and replanting barren areas within farming operations.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
How to reduce your food footprint: if it's better for you, it's better for the planet
Food production globally accounts for nearly 30% of greenhouse gas emissions, with the average Australian diet contributing more than 3kg of Co2 per person per day. And what's worse, we waste about 35% of the food we bring home. If we keep this up, it has been estimated the already unsustainable environmental cost of the food system will nearly double by 2050. Calculating the precise impact your individual food choices have on the environment isn't simple, but research suggests the actions we can take to bring that impact down are – and they aren't just better for the environment, they're better for our health too. A 2021 CSIRO study found that sticking to its healthy eating guidelines while choosing lower-carbon options could reduce the climate impact of our diets by as much as 42%. Another released last year, which conducted life-cycle assessments on more than 60 thousand products available on Australian shelves, found that switching to lower-emission options within similar categories could bring our food footprints down by an impressive 71%. Prof Simone Pettigrew, program director of food policy at the George Institute for Global Health and an author of the latter study, says: 'There's four biggies that sit at the top of the list for being the least sustainable: traditional red meats, dairy products, and then to a lesser extent – but perhaps more upsettingly – coffee and chocolate.' Consumers, she says, can make a 'massive, massive difference' to the sustainability of their entire food basket simply by limiting or switching out those items. In practical terms this might look like choosing poultry, seafood or kangaroo instead of lamb or pork, switching dairy milk for plant-based options, drinking just one less coffee a day or choosing sweet treats with low or no cocoa content. Even if we can do that some of the time, the difference can be significant, according to Pettigrew. When it comes to carbohydrates and fresh produce, Pettigrew says a solid rule of thumb is the better it is for you, the better it probably is for the planet. Choosing fresh fruits and vegetables to snack on rather than processed biscuits or bars, for example, will dramatically reduce your diet's carbon footprint. And while there are production and processing differences between more nutritionally similar items such as pasta and rice, Pettigrew says overall they are largely comparable in terms of sustainability. 'Anything that is plant based is going to be much less environmentally costly than anything animal based. 'We understand it's hard for consumers to make really big changes in one hit, but it is relatively easy to make small incremental ones.' If you already eat a healthy, plant-rich diet, limit your ultra-processed food intake and are keeping your coffee and chocolate habits in check, you've made a great start. Beyond that, Dr Lilly Lim-Camacho, principal research scientist with CSIRO Agriculture and Food, says one of the most helpful things consumers can do to maximise these gains is to 'shop with intent'. Food waste accounts for more than a third of all household waste, so only purchasing what you need combined with small efforts such as 'learning how to use up leftover veggies in the crisper' and resisting impulse buying will not only make your diet significantly more sustainable, but healthier and more economical too. She urges people to also keep in mind that wasting unhealthy food is doubly bad. 'Not only do discretionary foods create more emissions, our bodies don't actually need them.' Those emissions are essentially being wasted regardless of whether you consume the food or not, she suggests. If you'd like to take things a step further, apps such as ecoSwitch, developed by the George Institute, get into the nitty gritty of comparing the carbon ratings associated with more specific items. This can help if you want to know, for example, which brand of tinned tomatoes or tofu is best. The George Institute study found that opting for near identical but lower-impact options alone could bring your food footprint down by 26%. Neither Pettigrew nor Lim-Camacho want to take the fun out of food or expect consumers to forgo the odd burger or chocolate ice-cream, but agree that by prioritising our health we will naturally make better choices for the planet, and vice versa. 'It's a win-win,' says Pettigrew. 'There is always going to be an environmental cost to our food. But it's important for people to know that you actually can make an enormous difference if you want to.'
Daily Mirror
2 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Anyone who drinks wine issued 'don't do it' warning this summer
Supermarket giant Tesco has issued advice for wine drinkers after it emerged that Brits are throwing away 624 million bottles of wine every year - here's what you need to do Tesco, the retail giant, has sounded an alarm for wine buyers. Echoing the well-known guidance to limit alcohol intake to no more than 14 units a week, Tesco has pointed out another thing to remember. For those who are conscious of their alcohol consumption - and there are many good reasons to be - it's possible that a bottle of red, white or rosé might not be finished in one sitting. To put things into perspective, a standard bottle of wine typically holds about nine to 10 units of alcohol. However, if you don't intend to finish off the bottle within a few days, the thought of pouring it down the sink can feel like a terrible waste. While it may come as a surprise to some, wine can be frozen, but Tesco has issued a clear alert: "Don't freeze in the bottle," they warn. Instead, Tesco suggests that leftover wine from an opened bottle can be safely stored in ice cube trays. For those with a larger quantity of wine left, Tesco recommends using a freezer bag as an alternative storage solution, reports the Express. What to do with frozen wine Leftover red wine could be added to Bolognese "for depth of flavour" whereas white wine could be added to risottos. Why cutting down on wine is good for you The NHS highlighted the short and long-term benefits of drinking less alcohol In the short-term, drinking less alcohol can make you: Feel better in the mornings Feel less tired and more energetic Have better-looking skin Save money In the long-term, reducing how much alcohol you drink can lead to: Lower blood pressure Lower risk of stroke, hypertension, cancer and liver disease Lower cholesterol levels better mood, memory and quality of sleep And help with weight management Anybody struggling to cut down on how much they are drinking can seek support from Alcohol Change UK.
Daily Mirror
2 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Just one natural item will remove toilet stains in a matter of minutes
We've all tried using harsh chemical cleaners to remove stains but there is a simple natural alternatives and one cleaning guru tells us how you can save money and remove limescale stains Maintaining a sparkling loo can often seem like an endless task, but if you're grappling with stubborn stains that won't shift, you might need more than just a toilet brush. Limescale is a tenacious stain commonly found in toilets and occurs due to mineral build-up from hard water left behind after evaporation. Many people fall into the trap of attempting to scrub away these toilet stains with cleaning products like bleach, but it's futile as no disinfectant can dissolve the minerals. Using bleach on limescale will merely lighten the stain, yet the mineral deposits will persist and become even tougher to remove as they continue to accumulate. However, Sophie, a cleaning guru and the brains behind Sustainably Lazy, has revealed that the most effective way to tackle toilet stains is actually through natural cleaning alternatives such as citric acid. Sophie explained: "The acid of my choice is citric acid because it is cheap and plastic-free. Alternatively, you could use white vinegar but I find citric acid is more effective and works out cheaper." Limescale solidifies over time and clings to surfaces, meaning these stains must be dissolved with an acidic agent to be fully eradicated. Citric acid is naturally derived from the juice of citrus fruits like lemons or oranges, making it gentle enough for your loo and safe for cleaning, yet potent enough to break down limescale. It is eco-friendly, biodegradable and incredibly affordable as a crystallised version of citric acid can be found in most supermarket cleaning aisles. At Tesco and ASDA, a box of citric acid only costs £1.75. You can also use white vinegar to get rid of limescale if you have any in your kitchen, but it has a very strong pungent smell so many people dislike using it in an enclosed space like a bathroom. How to get rid of limescale using citric acid Instead, boil the kettle, let the water cool down slightly and then pour it down the toilet bowl. Then, add 120g of citric acid to the toilet bowl. Let the citric acid and warm water sit for at least 30 minutes but preferably leave it overnight. Citric acid needs time to break down the limescale, and it will need longer if it is a particularly stubborn stain. When the time is up, simply scrub your toilet bowl with a toilet brush and any remaining limescale stains should easily come away. This is an easy and almost effortless way to keep your toilet clean so you never have to spend ages scrubbing at it ever again.
