US Air Force wants to develop smarter mini-drones powered by brain-inspired AI chips
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Generate Key Takeaways
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
Although neuromorphic computing was first proposed by scientist Carver Mead in the late 1980s, it is a field of computer design theory that is still in development. | Credit:Scientists are developing an artificial intelligence (AI) chip the size of a grain of rice that can mimic human brains — and they plan to use it in miniature drones.
Although AI can automate monotonous functions, it is resource-intensive and requires large amounts of energy to operate. Drones also require energy for propulsion, navigation, sensing, stabilization and communication.
Larger drones can better compensate for AI's energy demands by using an engine, but smaller drones rely on battery power — meaning AI energy demands can reduce flying time from 45 minutes to just four.
But this may not be a problem forever., Suin Yi and his team at the University of Texas have been awarded funding by the 2025 Air Force Office of Scientific Research Young Investigator Program (part of the Air Force Office of Scientific Research ) to develop an energy-efficient AI for drones. Their goal is to build a chip the size of a grain of rice with various AI capabilities — including autonomous piloting and object recognition — within three years.
AI-powered miniature drones
To build a more energy-efficient AI chip, the scientists propose using conducting polymer thin films. These are (so far) an underused aspect of neuromorphic computing; this is a computer system that mimics the brain's structure to enable highly efficient information processing.
The researchers intend to replicate how neurons learn and make decisions, thereby saving energy by only being used when required, similar to how a human brain uses different parts for different functions.
Although neuromorphic computing was first proposed by scientist Carver Mead in the late 1980s, it is a field of computer design theory that is still in development. In 2024, Intel unveiled their Hala Point neuromorphic computer , which is powered by more than 1,000 new AI chips and performs 50 times faster than conventional computing systems.
RELATED STORIES
—Intel unveils largest-ever AI 'neuromorphic computer' that mimics the human brain
—Tiny AI chip modeled on the human brain set to boost battery life in smart devices
—New brain-like transistor goes 'beyond machine learning'
Meanwhile, the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center develops AI software and neuromorphic hardware. Their particular focus is on developing systems for sharing all sensor information with every member of a network of neuromorphic-enabled units. This technology could allow for greater situational awareness, with applications so far including headsets and robotics.
Using technology developed through this research, drones could become more intelligent by integrating conducting polymer material systems that can function like neurons in a brain.
If Yi's research project is successful, miniature drones could become increasingly intelligent. An AI system using neuromorphic computing could allow smaller and smarter automated drones to be developed to provide remote monitoring in confined locations, with a much longer flying time.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why is Trump calling on the CEO of Intel to resign?
President Trump called on Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to resign on Thursday, prompting a slide in the technology company's stock. "The CEO of Intel is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately," Trump posted on Truth Social, without providing additional details. "There is no other solution to this problem. Thank you for your attention to this problem!" Intel did not immediately respond to CBS MoneyWatch's request for comment. Its shares slipped 64 cents, or 3%, to $19.77 on Thursday. The president's call for Tan's resignation comes after Sen. Tom Cotton, a Republican from Arkansas, sent a letter to Intel Chairman Frank Yeary on Tuesday expressing concern over Tan's investments and ties to Chinese businesses. "Mr. Tan reportedly controls dozens of Chinese companies and has a stake in hundreds of Chinese advanced-manufacturing and chip firms," Cotton wrote in the letter. "At least eight of these companies reportedly have ties to the Chinese People's Liberation Army." Cotton went on to mention Cadence Design Systems, the multinational tech company where Tan served as CEO from 2009 to 2021, and which pleaded guilty last week to unlawfully exporting its products to a Chinese military university and transferring its technology to an associated Chinese semiconductor company without obtaining licenses. "These illegal activities occurred under Mr. Tan's tenure," Cotton wrote. The senator asked Yeary to respond to a series of questions on Tan's ties to the Chinese companies by Aug. 15. Tan, a technology investor and veteran of the semiconductor industry, was appointed as CEO of Intel in March. Sneak peek: The Strange Shooting of Alex Pennig Neil deGrasse Tyson weighs in on plans for a moon-based nuclear reactor Why Trump is calling for Intel CEO's immediate resignation Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Save Intel's fabs before 'the rust of time makes them worthless': Four former Intel board members want a joint venture between Nvidia, Qualcomm, Google, Amazon, Apple, Broadcom and others to create an 'American Foundry'
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Four former Intel board members say Intel is in the process of "gradual exit" from chip manufacturing and the US needs to act fast to save the company's fabs before "the rust of time makes them worthless". Writing in Forbes, the four industry veterans paint a dire picture of the state of Intel. Charlene Barshefsky, Reed Hundt, James Plummer, David B. Yoffie have combined tenure of over 70 years on the Intel board and it's safe to say they are worried, really, really worried. The quartet describe "missed deadlines, poor execution, and a misguided strategy" for Intel's current woes, the consequence of which is that the "once-leading Intel" now appears to be "dropping out of the race" to manufacture the most advanced chips. Intel itself, of course, has warned that it may have to give up on cutting-edge chip manufacturing if a major customer for its future 14A node can't be found. So, even Intel agrees that the future of its fabs are in the balance. The Forbes four also lament that their recommendations to spin off Intel's fabs into a separate entity in order to give them a "fighting chance" have yet to be adopted. The broad thrust of their argument is that while it likely makes commercial sense for Intel itself to exit advanced chip manufacturing, Intel's fabs are too strategically important to the US to allow them to be wound down. "All of these announcements strongly imply a gradual exit from the chip manufacturing business, turning Intel into a fabless company over time. Given that Intel's internal demand is no longer big enough to justify continued capital investment in leading-edge technology, this may be the right strategy for Intel. "Still, it is the wrong strategy for the United States. With Intel's likely retreat from advanced chip manufacturing, America's future and the future of its leadership in AI and all advanced electronics will be firmly in the hands of two firms: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation (TSMC) and Samsung, two firms headquartered on the other side of the planet," the open letter says. So, what's the solution? 'Operation Warp Speed II' apparently, a reference to the US government effort to drive development of a vaccine for COVID-19, known as Operation Warp Speed. "The Trump administration should build a public-private partnership, where future customers (e.g., Nvidia, Qualcomm, Broadcom, Google, Amazon, Apple and others), Japanese investors such as Softbank, and private equity, backed by government financing and/or investment, would buy Intel's fabrication assets before the lack of investment and the rust of time makes them worthless and leave the United States dangerously dependent on a single manufacturing firm." There is, the four conclude, no time to waste in building this new "American Foundry". That note of urgency obviously chimes with other industry observers, such as the analyst who recently gave Intel 18 months to find a major customer for its fabs else see its ambitions to be a cutting-edge chip manufacturer wither. To say the very least, these are unnerving times for Intel. But there does seem to be gathering momentum for the idea that Intel's fabs need to be spun off into a separate entity if they are to be saved, and it needs to happen sooner rather than later if the effort is to succeed.
Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
Trump turns the screws on the Fortune 500
EARNINGS SEASON — Shares of Intel, the semiconductor manufacturer, tanked today after Donald Trump called on the company's CEO to resign because of his past business dealings in China. It's too early to make any assessments about the president's claims about CEO Lip-Bu Tan, which appeared to draw on a letter from Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) to Intel's board of directors earlier in the week. But the public demand for a Fortune 500 CEO to resign, delivered via social media, tells us something important about what Trump has learned in the seven months since he returned to the White House — and how that is leading to a creeping encroachment into every institution and corner of American life. He's systematically taken on every institution he's come across — academia, government, the legal system, and the media, among others — and bent them to his will. Now the Fortune 500, which contains many of the largest companies in the world, is being put through the wringer. While Intel took it on the chin today, Trump went on the attack two days earlier against some of the nation's biggest banks, including JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, accusing them of discriminating against him in recent years and being biased against conservatives in general. This wasn't his first go at either bank — Trump confronted BOA CEO Brian Moynihan during a virtual question and answer session at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland earlier this year. Over the years, including in his first term, Trump has taken potshots at any number of individual companies, not to mention Big Tech, Big Pharma and other sectors. What's different now is that he has more tools than ever to wreak havoc on corporate America — executive orders, absolute control of the executive and legislative branches, a social media megaphone — and less incentive than ever to dial back his impulses. The captains of industry have noticed — and it explains their extraordinary submissiveness to date. They have learned that an American president untethered from traditional political constraints, unrestrained by Congress and uninterested in preserving the global trading system can do an untold amount of mischief to their brand or bottom line. This is true up and down the corporate pecking order, and especially across the S&P 500, the Nasdaq and the Russell 2000. Bloomberg reported earlier this year that during first-quarter earnings calls, executives 'touted their 'Made in America' credentials or domestic production capabilities at a record rate, with firms in the S&P 500 Index calling out their domestic production over 200 times, compared with a 25-year average of around 50 mentions per earnings season.' Further, Bloomberg found, there is limited evidence that the investments they are touting are new. 'Companies may be touting their 'Made in America' credentials to calm investors and avoid White House scrutiny, rather than actually investing in new US-based production,' the report said. Some of the biggest companies in the world when measured by market cap have bent over backwards in the service of placating the president. They treat Trump like a friendly pit bull, doting on him, petting and feeding him, but always aware of the lingering menace and the capacity to inflict damage. With Trump's threat to slap tariffs on Apple iPhones looming in the background, Tim Cook, chief executive of Apple, has publicly praised Trump, including at a much publicized White House gathering of tech titans in May. One day before Trump's broadside against Intel, Cook was again at the White House, this time joining Trump to announce that Apple would devote $100 billion in additional investment in the United States. Last month, Jensen Huang, CEO of Nvidia, joined the chorus as part of his vigorous courtship of the White House. The California-based chip designer, a key player in the artificial intelligence boom, saw its dominance initially threatened by the Trump administration's restriction on AI chip sales to China. Trump even casually mentioned at a recent AI event that he had once considered breaking up Nvidia to promote competition. But Huang, speaking at the same event, had nothing but admiration and effusive praise for Trump. 'America's unique advantage that no other country can possibly have is President Trump,' Huang said. With second quarter earnings season well under way, it's not hard to see how Trump is shaping the behavior of some of the nation's top companies and CEOs. The impact of tariff and trade policies on corporate earnings is treated gingerly in earnings calls and statements. There's little mention of the president's name attached to tariff-related worries and uncertainty, but the winners — like Cleveland Cliffs, one of the largest steel producers — are eager to credit the administration. The experience of wireless carrier AT&T was one of the more revealing. Roughly a month after the president put the company on blast with several Truth Social posts ripping AT&T for technical issues that disrupted a conference call he held with faith leaders (and not long after the Trump Organization announced it had licensed the Trump name to a new wireless phone service, Trump Mobile), all was forgotten. In a statement reporting its second-quarter earnings, AT&T noted the financial impact of the newly passed Trump tax bill and its intention to plow much of the savings into its network to accelerate its fiber internet build-out. 'AT&T expects to realize $6.5 to $8.0 billion of cash tax savings during 2025-2027 relative to the guidance it provided at its 2024 Analyst & Investor Day due to tax provisions in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.' Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas at nightly@ Or contact tonight's author at cmahtesian@ or on X (formerly known as Twitter) at @PoliticoCharlie. What'd I Miss? — FBI agrees to help chase down quorum-breaking Texas Democrats: The FBI approved Sen. John Cornyn's request to locate the contingent of quorum-breaking Texas Democrats, the senator said today, though it remains unclear how the agency would proceed in the absence of a breach of federal law. The Texas Republican penned a letter to the FBI on Tuesday asking for federal assistance to punish the fleeing Democrats amid a broader battle over the absentee lawmakers, whom the state's GOP leaders are hoping to expel from office. — Florida moves toward joining national redistricting push: The nation's redistricting war is now officially coming to Florida. Citing a recent court ruling on the state's congressional map, state House Speaker Daniel Perez said today he's creating a select committee to look at drawing up new districts seven years ahead of the normal schedule. 'Exploring these questions now, at the mid-decade point, would potentially allow us to seek legal guidance from our supreme court without the uncertainty associated with deferring those questions until after the next decennial census and reapportionment,' Perez explained in a memo sent out to House members. — Vance meeting doesn't immediately convince Indiana leaders to redistrict: Republican Gov. Mike Braun remained noncommittal about a mid-decade redistricting push following his meeting with Vice President JD Vance in Indiana on Thursday. 'We covered a wide array of topics. We listened,' Braun told reporters in response to a question about whether an agreement was reached. The meeting — which took place amid sustained booing by protesters gathered inside the statehouse — went 'pretty good,' Braun said. — Trump plans to force new disclosure of college admissions data: President Donald Trump will force colleges and universities to disclose more student admissions data as the White House seeks to crack down on the use of race in the higher education application process. Colleges have been barred from considering race in admissions since 2023, when the Supreme Court gutted decades of precedent that allowed institutions to factor in race in a narrowly-tailored manner. Trump's directive would intensify scrutiny of schools and their admissions process while they're still grappling with the ruling and their goals of enrolling diverse freshman classes. — Federal judge orders two-week construction pause at 'Alligator Alcatraz': A federal judge today ruled construction must temporarily stop at 'Alligator Alcatraz' as hearings challenging the Everglades-based detention center's environmental impact continue. District Judge Kathleen Williams ordered the state to, at the very least, stop installing additional lighting, infrastructure, pavement, filling or fencing and to halt excavation for 14 days. She called the request for the temporary restraining order from the plaintiffs, which represent environmental groups, 'pretty reasonable' to prevent further interruption to the ecosystem. The judge, an Obama-era appointee, said the plaintiffs had introduced evidence of 'ongoing environmental harms.' AROUND THE WORLD SET A DATE — Russian leader Vladimir Putin will meet with U.S. President Donald Trump 'in the coming days,' the Kremlin confirmed today. Trump had issued an ultimatum for a ceasefire by Friday. 'At the suggestion of the American side, an agreement was made in principle to hold a bilateral meeting at the highest level in the coming days … a meeting between President Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump,' Kremlin presidential aide Yuri Ushakov told reporters from Russian state media. The high-stakes bilateral comes after Trump showed signs of increasing frustration with Putin slow-walking ceasefire negotiations for the war in Ukraine. The U.S. president threatened to levy harsh tariffs on Russia and on countries that continue to do business with it in a bid to force Putin to the negotiating table, setting Friday as the deadline for a ceasefire. Trump has already hit India with 50 percent tariffs, citing its continued purchases of Russian oil. Trump on Wednesday briefed European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on his plan to meet with Putin in the coming days, and also floated holding a trilateral with the Russian president and Zelenskyy. In his evening address Wednesday, Zelenskyy said 'Russia now seems to be more inclined toward a ceasefire,' adding 'the pressure is working.' OCCUPATION PLANS — Israel plans to move forward with a total occupation of the Gaza Strip, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said today in an interview with Fox News. The comments, which came just before Netanyahu intended to meet with his security cabinet, are likely to further roil the international community. Global condemnation of Netanyahu's offensive in the strip has grown in recent weeks, with critics charging he has devastated the millions of Palestinians still living there and left the region on the brink of famine. 'We intend to, in order to assure our security, remove Hamas there, enable the population to be free of Gaza and to pass it to civilian governance that is not Hamas and not anyone advocating the destruction of Israel,' Netanyahu said when asked if Israel will take control of all of Gaza. 'That's what we want to do. We want to liberate ourselves and liberate the people of Gaza from the awful terror of Hamas.' Netanyahu added that Israel does not plan to maintain long-term control of Gaza or act as a governing body in the embattled enclave, but rather to set up a 'security perimeter' and hand over control to 'Arab forces.' Nightly Number RADAR SWEEP DON'T TRY THIS AT HOME — What does it take to become someone who can, over and over again, do ludicrous tricks like sinking a basketball from hundreds of feet away? These types of videos — where someone performs a 'trick shot' of some kind — have been ultra-popular since the early days of YouTube. But in a TikTok-focused, short-form age, they've become even more likely to go viral. And in the quest for internet attention (and the money that comes with), content creators have driven themselves to the brink in attempts to create the perfect trick-shot video. For The Guardian, Richard Godwin goes deep into the world of the trick-shotters. Parting Image Did someone forward this email to you? Sign up here.
