
Market in motion: Policy crossroads and the electrification curve
Total industry volume hit 816,700 units last year, a historic peak, but 2025 forecasts suggest a soft landing, with projections ranging between 750,000 and 792,000 units.
The sector might not draw much consumer attention, but industry observers are noticing a more stable gear after the post-pandemic demand surge and backlog clearances.
What looks like easing demand is more than a number, underneath it lies a deeper reconfiguration – policy pivots, shifting consumer incentives, and a tightening race towards electrification.
Two-speed market emerges
The policy landscape is not background noise; it has always been the steering wheel.
The first looming change is CKD (completely knocked down) vehicle excise duty treatment, set for January 2026, as planned, would add to car prices, likely creating a spike in advance purchases in late 2025.
An intended long-term pricing structure causing short-term demand.
The second potentially more transformative shift is the RON95 fuel subsidy rationalisation.
Designed to ease the fiscal burden and redirect RM8bil annually toward more targeted support, this policy is set to reshape buyer purchase considerations.
As fuel prices reflect global markets, the government is creating stronger incentives for consumers to choose more efficient, lower-emission vehicles.
This aligns fiscal reform and green mobility to support a scalable transition in the near term.
This is expected to cause a short-term slowdown in car sales.
However, economists generally believe that the demand for personal cars will continue, as car ownership remains a necessity for many Malaysians, especially outside cities.
Even in towns without access to good public transport, families still see cars as essential for work, school and daily errands, even if fuel prices rise.
Lower-income B40 (bottom 40%) and much of the M40 (middle 40%) groups are expected to retain protection, but for upper M40 and T20% (top 20%) consumers, the calculations will change.
Rising fuel costs will shift preferences toward hybrids (HEVs) and electric vehicles (EVs), not only as lifestyle choices, but as economic ones as well.
Through the rationalisation of fuel subsidies, the transition towards more fuel-efficient and electrified vehicles, including HEVs and EVs, will likely accelerate.
The tax breaks for EVs further enhance their appeal, creating a combined positive effect that helps the country's environmental goals.
Together, these shifts highlight how reactive the market is to policy change and is producing a two-speed market: one where affordability remains protected for some, while others begin to hedge against rising long-term costs through tech-forward vehicle choices.
For manufacturers, the signal is clear, diversification is key.
EV momentum, policy uncertainty
Electrification is gaining traction, but beyond the headlines, there are subtle nuances.
EV registrations in Malaysia jumped 110% year-on-year in February 2025, with 2,160 units sold, surpassing HEVs for the first time.
The unmistakable momentum in EVs could account for 5% of total car sales in 2025 – a small but fast-growing slice.
Behind the surge is a mix of incentives, expanding model choices, and stronger narratives around environmental responsibility.
Proton's e.MAS 7, for instance, led February's EV chart with 580 units, becoming a homegrown success made possible by Geely partnership support and government backing.
For the first time, the idea of a mass-market Malaysian EV doesn't feel aspirational but attainable and parked in driveways.
Chinese manufacturers are also throwing out the old playbook.
BYD has overtaken Nissan to break into Malaysia's top 10 automakers, while Chery continues its upward trajectory.
Their aggressive pricing and bundled service offerings are disrupting the established order of legacy players, forcing them to adapt or risk losing out, and reinforcing Malaysian buyers' preference for value above all.
In the wider Asean context, the EV market share grew from 9% in 2023 to 13% in 2024, with Thailand and Indonesia actively aiming to be the top EV hub, while Malaysia aims for xEVs to make up 20% of new car sales by 2030 and a bold goal of 80% by 2050.
This shows a regional competition for EV dominance, which could lead to more regional trade and robust supply chains integration across member countries.
But even as momentum builds, a crucial policy hurdle looms: Malaysia's current EV tax exemptions expire at the end of 2025.
There is, as yet, no clarity on what comes next.
Without a signal of continuity, investor confidence and consumer adoption risk stalling, echoing the early 2010s, when HEVs were first introduced, derailing momentum by removing policy support.
The success of Malaysia's xEV landscape and long-term electrification goals depend not just on product, but on stable and inclusive policy frameworks that do not alienate but fortify existing automotive supply chains.
Hybrids: From stopgap to strategic segment
While much attention focuses on EVs, the HEV segment deserves a second look.
As charging infrastructure expands unevenly and energy grid concerns persist, HEVs offer a flexible, lower-barrier entry point into electrification.
Fuel-efficient, range-assured, and infrastructure-light, they present a practical choice for cautiously optimistic adopters.
Recent global trends suggest that HEVs and plug-in EVs (PHEVs) are entering a second wind.
As EV demand begins to stabilise after its initial surge and fanfare, HEVs are quietly reclaiming ground, offering continuity where full electrification still feels uneasy, especially among those unwilling to fully rely on chargers, or who value range consistency in semi-urban settings.
The bigger insight?
Electrification isn't binary. It's a spectrum.
HEVs/PHEVs represent practical, scalable steps that can reduce emissions without overburdening infrastructure.
They offer access without demanding sacrifice, while building public confidence for deeper electrification later.
Policy must meet the moment
Malaysia's green mobility agenda is ambitious. Targets of 20% xEV share by 2030 and 80% by 2050 position the nation as a regional contender.
Good news: we are well on our way. But ambition needs scaffolding.
There's an urgent need for a post-2025 policy roadmap – one that doesn't just extend tax breaks but sets out a coherent long-term vision.
Such a framework should:
> Ensure continuity for xEV incentives, especially for local production and R&D investments;
> Include HEVs, PHEVs, and even fuel-cell EVs (FCEV) in the green transition toolkit;
> Provide clear policy signals that don't alienate existing supply chain players;
> Coordinate with Asean partners on interoperability, trade integration, and component localisation.
With Malaysia chairing Asean in 2025, the opportunity is ripe.
As Thailand and Indonesia race ahead in EV manufacturing, Malaysia's strength may lie in integration: establishing itself as the connective tissue between production, assembly, and battery innovation across the region.
Conclusion: Calibrating the climb
2025 will not be the year Malaysia's automotive market slows – it is the year it recalibrates.
Policy has always played a pivotal role, driving at the heart of purchasing decisions.
Electrification is no longer fringe, rather an unfolding reality. The winners of this next chapter won't be the loudest marketers or the cheapest importers.
They will be the ones who understand the nature of reform, who localise their offering without losing ambition, and who see the road ahead not as a straight path but a multifaceted climb towards a robust, thriving, economically and environmentally sustainable automotive industry for all.
The views expressed here are the writer's own.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Bank Rakyat charts new course
BANK Kerjasama Rakyat Malaysia Bhd, or more commonly known as Bank Rakyat, has never been the typical commercial bank. Established in 1954 under the Cooperative Ordinance 1948, it began as a small cooperative banking initiative meant to serve rural Malaysians and civil servants. Cancel anytime. Ad-free. Full access to Web and App. RM 13.90/month RM 9.73 /month Billed as RM 9.73 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter. RM 12.39/month RM 8.63 /month Billed as RM 103.60 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.


Borneo Post
6 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Supercars roar through KK as Shell launches 'Feel-It-All' nationwide campaign
Teo, the owners of the supercars and Jimnys, Shell Dealers' Committee and staff at the event on Sunday. KOTA KINABALU (July 20): Heads turned and engines roared as 11 supercars and six Suzuki Jimnys gathered at Shell Jalan Sulaman on Sunday, marking the spectacular launch of Shell Malaysia's 'Feel-It-All' nationwide campaign in Sabah's capital. The event, hosted by Station Markmaju Corporation Shell Jalan Sulaman and its owner Datuk Harry Teo, was organised in collaboration with the Sabah Shell Dealers' Committee, who worked tirelessly to bring the excitement to local car enthusiasts and the public. Car lovers were treated to an impressive display of premium automotive engineering, with supercars such as Ferrari, McLaren, Porsche, Mustang and the iconic Nissan Skyline GTR lined up alongside eight Suzuki Jimnys from the spirited Sabah Jimny Group. The showcase, led by The Next Wrap, offered fans the chance to snap memorable photos at specially set-up photobooths. One of the day's highlights was undoubtedly the thrilling convoy through the streets of Kota Kinabalu. Flagged off at Shell Plaza 88, the convoy blazed a trail through Lintas, Jalan Kolam, Foh Sang, SICC and 1Borneo before arriving at Shell Jalan Sulaman – turning heads and adding a splash of high-octane colour to the city. Shell's 'Feel-It-All' campaign aims to bring the excitement of high-performance driving closer to Malaysians. Customers stand a chance to win a VIP Experience and Meet & Greet at the Formula 1 Singapore Grand Prix, promising fans an adrenaline-charged experience like never before. On top of that, Shell will announce more incredible prizes every week throughout the campaign, celebrating its dedication to innovation and performance. In addition, with every purchase of Shell Helix Ultra or Shell Helix Power lubricants, customers can redeem an exclusive 1:24 scale model of the Ferrari F1 SF-24, driven by Charles Leclerc in the 2024 season – a prized collectible available exclusively from Shell Malaysia. For more details, visit The Shell Dealers' Committee extended their heartfelt appreciation to all participating vehicle owners, Life Water Berhad, The Next Wrap and AAR Outdoor for their generous sponsorship and unwavering support in making the event a roaring success.


The Star
7 hours ago
- The Star
Contradictheory: Parking hell in KL
I live in a neighbourhood that's just around the corner from a bustling commercial area. It's got almost everything, from a few mamak stalls, a supermarket, and a wet market to a hospital even, across the road. Yes, there are no playgrounds or libraries, but it's still a pretty good place to be. Now, when I say it's 'just around the corner', I mean it's a five-minute drive. But sometimes, it's actually faster to take the 20-minute walk. Why? Because finding parking is like playing musical chairs, if it's a game with 20 moving players looking at 30 full seats, one of which is occupied by a Vellfire that's actually too big for its space. Things get even more chaotic on Fridays during prayer time, or on pasar malam days. And if there's a Ramadan bazaar? Forget it. I imagine some might find it worthwhile taking taxis from where they park. To be fair, enforcement is hard. Malaysians find it easy to forget to pay for their parking, which then means there's no cost to keeping the car there for as long as they like. How bad is it? According to Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL), there are 59,000 street parking bays in KL and prior to 2024, they generated about RM12mil a year from these spots. This now becomes one of those maths word problems. Let's assume a parking rate of 80 sen per hour (this is the lowest rate, which is about a third of the maximum possible). How many parking bays do you need filled up Monday to Saturday, from 7.30am to 6pm, to generate that much revenue? Answer: Just over 4,500 parking lots need to be occupied full time for a whole year. This represents about 7.7% of all street parking bays available. Which might mean over 90% of people who park don't pay for parking, and really should. It's OK, because these malefic transgressors will then be fined, and we will get income through that, right? Except that parking related fines only contribute an additional RM3mil annually (and that includes those who parked on a yellow line, or double park). While it's easy for us to bemoan Malaysians and their lack of civic-mindedness, I should point you to a study on Bangkok which reported that, in 2020, only 18% of motorists paid their fines. Meanwhile in the United States, one study showed more than 20% of drivers don't pay for their parking, depending on the city. All this of course results in less income for the local authority. For example, DBKL projected in its 2025 budget presentation that they will collect RM34.12mil in parking revenue, representing 1.41% of its budget. You will note that its anticipated earnings is significantly higher than the RM12mil quoted before. The bulk of it is because they hope to be stricter in enforcement – or at least the perception of it. As the DBKL Enforcement Department director said, 'When people see enforcement officers on the ground, they're more likely to pay for parking'. However, I'm fairly reluctant for the city to fund itself by fining its citizens. It almost creates a perverse incentive where you're hoping as many people as possible break the law so you can collect more money. Indeed, there is a news report from 2013 where in order to meet quotas set by councils in London, civil enforcement officers (fundamentally, privatised traffic wardens) were pressured to issue more tickets, with threats of withholding holidays or overtime pay. But I'll even go one step further. I think city councils should not see parking lots as a cash cow to maximise profits. They should see them as tools with which to manage traffic flow in and around the city. Take for example an initiative in New York City in 2012. The city introduced higher parking rates during peak hours, which then discouraged long-term parking, and encouraged turnover. The result? People parked 20% less long in time, more people found available spaces (18% increase in unique visitors), and overall traffic dropped by 7% as people stopped having to circle endlessly looking for spaces. Seattle, in the state of Washington, meanwhile tries to find the lowest hourly rate that leaves at least one or two parking spaces available on every block throughout the day. They adjust their rates three times a year, and use time of day, day of the week, and events to modify rates. Amsterdam increased parking rates by 65%, resulting in fewer cars from outside the local area coming in, and more space for locals who have parking permits, and better traffic flow during rush hour. The point isn't profit, but to help the people in the city. Parking that is expensive enough also discourages people from taking cars, and encourages us to take public transport. Of course, all of this only works if enforcement works, and is seen to be fair. And, at least in the short term, fines should be used to fund strong enforcement teams. The other requirement is improved public transportation links, which further reduce overall traffic. My personal hope is that somewhere like KL's Bukit Bintang area will be car free. And if we're really hopeful, in some future utopia with self-driving cars and artificial intelligence- aided traffic control, all this will be irrelevant. But until then, parking availability is part of an integral system, rather than just a piecemeal add-on feature to a neighbourhood. Imagine how much more we would benefit if we could erase the parking lines, take away cars, and build – dare I say – playgrounds and libraries. Logic is the antithesis of emotion but mathematician-turned-scriptwriter Dzof Azmi's theory is that people need both to make sense of life's vagaries and contradictions. Write to Dzof at lifestyle@ The views expressed here are entirely the writer's own.