PSU dividends to Centre almost double since 2020; over 40% comes from five fuel PSUs
The analysis of company-wise dividend data from the Department of Investment and Public Asset Management (DIPAM) for the last five years shows that five fuel-related PSUs accounted for 42% of the total dividends the government has collected since the financial year 2020-21. The analysis excluded dividends from the Reserve Bank of India and the nationalised banks.
These companies — Coal India Ltd, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC), Indian Oil Corporation (IOC), Bharat Petroleum Corporation (BPCL), and Gail (India) — contributed ₹1.27 lakh crore, or 42.3% of the total ₹3 lakh crore dividends the Centre received from non-banking PSUs between 2020-21 and 2024-25.
Minimal cut in petrol prices
The data also shows that the two directly-owned public sector oil marketing companies (OMCs) — IOC and BPCL — together saw a 255% increase in their dividend payouts to the government since 2022-23 and a 65% decrease in oil prices. However, they only passed on a 2% decrease in petrol prices to the public.
The third public sector OMC, Hindustan Petroleum, is owned by ONGC, and not directly by the government.
The total dividends from non-banking PSUs have also grown consistently since the COVID-19 pandemic. The government collected ₹39,558 crore as dividends from these companies in 2020-21, which almost doubled to ₹74,017 crore by 2024-25.
High dividends offset slow disinvestment
According to sources in the government, this is due to a 'calibrated' approach to balance revenues from disinvestments and dividends.
'The government's disinvestment policy announced during the pandemic is still very much in place, but it is not progressing as fast as it was initially hoped,' the official told The Hindu. 'At the same time, many PSUs are turning profitable and so the government is maximising the dividends it can earn from them.'
The disinvestment policy, officially called the Public Sector Enterprises Policy, stated that the government would maintain a minimum presence in strategic sectors and would exit from all non-strategic ones. It was first announced as a part of the government's COVID-19 Atma Nirbhar Bharat package in May 2020.
However, since then, enhancing dividends has also become a part of official policy.
Mandatory minimum dividends
An office memorandum sent out by DIPAM in November 2024 to all departments of the government and the managing directors of all PSUs laid out new rules for how much dividends these companies must pay their shareholders, the largest of which is the government of India.
According to the new rules, every Central PSU must pay a minimum annual dividend of 30% of its Profit After Tax (PAT) or 4% of its net worth, whichever is higher. In fact, the government has pushed these PSUs to pay dividends much higher than this mandatory amount.
'The minimum dividend as indicated in para 5.1 above is only a minimum benchmark,' the office memorandum said. 'The CPSEs are advised to strive paying higher dividend taking into account relevant factors such as profitability, capex requirements with due leveraging, cash reserves and net worth.'
High payouts
IOC and BPCL saw their combined dividend payouts to the government increase 255% between 2022-23 and 2024-25, from ₹2,435 crore to ₹8,653 crore. Dividends of OMCs are paid from their profits, which themselves rise if the selling price of their fuel is higher than the cost of their inputs.
While the price of crude oil has fallen 65% — from $116 a barrel in June 2022 to $70 a barrel in July 2025 — the retail price of petrol has only been reduced by ₹1.95 per litre, or 2%, over this period.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Local rare-earth production to take time, govt support needed for EV sector: Kinetic Green CEO
Sulajja Firodia Motwani, Founder and CEO of Kinetic Green , has called for government intervention in the rare-earth materials issue, stating that while the Indian electric vehicle (EV) sector has managed to cope in the short term, it will face significant challenges ahead, as "it's not easy to change your product design and supply chain." Kinetic Green founder emphasised that it could take at least two to three years for the players in the automobile sector to localise the supply chain or adopt alternative technologies. "It will impact the industry if it's not solved because it's not easy to change your product design and supply chain. The EV sector is scrambling somehow to manage for the short run. But I think there has to be a government-to-government solution very soon in the medium term. Because it will take two to three years to try to localise the supply chain or change the technology altogether. So I think it's important that this is resolved," Sulajja Firodia Motwsaid during the unveiling event of the company's electric Luxury Golf & Lifestyle Cart in partnership with Tonino Lamborghini SpA of Italy. She further added, "We faced a similar situation in COVID on semiconductors; if you remember, the government did follow through and resolve it. I'm hopeful that something will emerge from this." She added that until the issue is solved, the company is working on developing alternative technologies to mitigate the adverse impact of such restrictions arising from global geopolitical moves. "But in the meantime, we are finding alternatives so that the business can continue, but it's not ideal to do that, and also maybe not everybody can. So it (restrictions on rare-earth material by China) will impact the sector," she added. The central government has earmarked ₹1,345 crore to incentivise rare earth magnets production in India. For context, early this April, China announced a decision to implement export controls on certain rare earth-related items, pushing a supply shortage across the world, including India. Meanwhile, India is in touch with the Chinese side, seeking predictability in the supply of rare earth metals -- which had been put under the export controls regime by the Xi administration. China's overwhelming control of global rare earth processing - commanding over 90 per cent of the world's magnet production capacity - has created significant vulnerabilities for industries worldwide. These materials are critical across multiple sectors, including automobiles, home appliances, and clean energy China, there are only a few alternative suppliers of critical minerals. The Union Cabinet in January 2025 approved the launch of the National Critical Mineral Mission (NCMM) with an expenditure of Rs 16,300 crore and an expected investment of Rs 18,000 crore by Public Sector Undertakings. Recently, Union Minister for Coal and Mines G Kishan Reddy said the central government is actively encouraging private companies to mine and explore critical minerals overseas and bring them back into the country to serve the needs of the domestic industry. Speaking on the incentives to the industry, Motwani said, "The government has to continue supporting the adoption of EVs. Once we come to, today we are at about 7-8 per cent EV. Once we come to 25-30 per cent EV, then we'll have critical mass on supply chain, on scale, and on ecosystem. "We have begun well, but we are far from done. The government must continue supporting the adoption of electric vehicles," she added. She further noted the resistance from traditional internal combustion engine (ICE) players who have vested interests in maintaining the status quo. "There is a large counterforce from existing ICE manufacturers who naturally want to protect their investments and may not wish to see EVs succeed. However, it's encouraging that the government remains focused. Schemes like EMPS and the PM-eBus Sewa, lower GST rates, ecosystem support, and a strong Make-in-India push should continue to drive demand and adoption," Kinetic Green founder asserted.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 hours ago
- First Post
Ex-Australian PM Scott Morrison to testify before US House panel on China after Albanese's Beijing visit
Former Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison will be testifying at the US House panel next week at a hearing about countering China's 'economic coercion against Democracies' read more The former Prime Minister of Australia, Scott Morrison, will be testifying at the US House panel next week at a hearing about countering China's 'economic coercion against Democracies'. The committee confirmed the news on Friday and mentioned that Rahm Emanuel, the former US ambassador to Japan, will also testify before the committee on China. Relations between China and Australia have been rocky after Canberra banned Huawei from its 5G broadband network in 2018. However, things went further downhill in 2020 after the Morrison government called for an independent investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 virus. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In response to this, China imposed high tariffs on Australian commodities, including wine and barley. They also imposed heavy duties on limited imports of Australian beef, coal and grapes, moves described by the United States as 'economic coercion'. Things changed after Morrison exited the office Eventually, the former Australian premier lost the re-election bid in 2022, paving the way for the country's current Prime Minister, Anthony Albanese. After the Labour government came to power in the country, there have been signs of warming ties between the two nations. It is pertinent to note that Albanese spent this week touring China with stops in Beijing, Shanghai and Chengdu. The Australian premier's visit is also coming amid a period of geopolitical instability and escalating trade hostilities between the US and its trading partners. While responding to his critics, who questioned Albanese's six-day visit to China, the Australian PM pointed out that the former coalition government failed to hold a single phone call with the country's largest trading partner for years. This week, Reuters reported that Canberra is closing in on an agreement with Beijing that would allow Australian suppliers to ship five trial canola cargoes to China. Sources close to the matter said that the deal would end a year-long freeze in the trade, given how China has imposed 100 per cent tariffs on Canadian canola meal and oil this year amid strained diplomatic ties. American envoy Emanuel, who told a Chicago news outlet last month he is considering a run for president in 2028, has been a harsh critic of China. Last year, he said that Beijing has been constantly using coercion and pressure on other nations like Japan and the Philippines. 'Economic coercion by China is their most persistent and pernicious tool in their toolbox,' Emanuel said in a separate speech in 2023. Meanwhile, the Chinese embassy in Washington is yet to comment on the matter. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from Reuters.
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Trump wants to cut deficits. Powell-bashing, stablecoins, and T-bills could help.
President Trump has been waging a campaign to oust Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. What do President Donald Trump's campaign to oust Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, legislation to regulate digital stablecoins, and the Treasury's debt-management practices have to do with one another? All relate to holding down the rise of the interest cost on federal government debt, a major factor boosting the budget deficit from the recently passed Big Beautiful Bill. Trump recently posted on Truth Social that if the Federal Reserve would slash its key federal-funds policy rate, now set in a range of 4.25% to 4.5%, by multiple percentage points, it could save the government billions in interest costs. The yield on Treasury debt has turned higher as notes from the near-zero-interest-rate eras following the 2008-09 financial crisis and the Covid pandemic mature. They will be replaced with notes yielding nearly 4% or higher. It's true, T-bills could be sold at lower rates if Powell & Co. would acquiesce to Trump's wishes. Meanwhile, BNP Paribas rate strategists Guneet Dhingra, Sebastian Mauleon, and Timothy High wrote recently that the Treasury should take a 'T-bill and chill" tack. That would produce a 'significant cost saving" for the Treasury. It wouldn't reduce the deficit, but it would reduce the government's interest expense, which is already running at over a $1 trillion annual rate and exceeding the U.S. military budget, as I've noted previously. The Treasury has kept T-bills to about 15% to 20% of its total issuance, but the BNP strategists argue that the department should think about upping that to 20% to 25%. Demand from money-market funds and overseas investors (buyers of some $336 billion of bills in the latest 12 months) should absorb the increased supply. Fewer notes and bonds, they note, should tend to reduce intermediate- and long-term yields. Former Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen was criticized for tilting the government's securities sales toward shorter maturities starting in late 2022. One of those critics was Scott Bessent, her successor, who hasn't changed the Treasury's financing mix since taking over this year. However, Powell has said that the Treasury's financing costs don't enter into the Fed's interest-rate decisions. This past week, Kevin Warsh, widely viewed as a candidate to replace Powell, posited that the Treasury and Fed should coordinate their debt-management policies. 'We need a new Treasury-Fed accord, like we did in 1951 after another period where we built up our nation's debt and we were stuck with a central bank that was working at cross-purposes with the Treasury," he told CNBC. Tilting Treasury borrowing to the short end is 'stealth QE," according to Dario Perkins, managing director for Global Macro. Quantitative easing describes central bank buying of securities to inject liquidity into the financial system. The idea behind QE is to reduce the supply of long-term government paper available to investors and force them to buy corporate and mortgage debt to stimulate the economy, as former Fed Chair Ben Bernanke explained back in 2010. QE has mainly served to boost financial markets, Warsh said, as the S&P 500 index and Nasdaq Composite hit records again last week, corporate credit spreads historically narrowed, and initial public offerings picked up. On Main Street, however, credit is tight, owing to the level of short-term rates. (Small businesses borrowing from banks typically pay some spread over the posted prime rate, currently 7.5%.) Now comes the crypto connection to all of this. The passage this week of the so-called Genius bill sets standards for stablecoins, which are digital currencies pegged to the dollar or another actual currency. Stablecoins would have to be fully collateralized by safe assets, notably U.S. government debt. That would boost demand for Treasury bills, Torsten Sløk, Apollo Global Management's chief economist, wrote recently. He cites a recent Bank for International Settlements paper that estimates that an aggregate $3.5 billion flowing in stablecoins lowers the three-month T-bill rate by 2.5 basis points in 10 days and five basis points in 20 days. (A basis point is a hundredth of a percentage point.) Circle July 30 on your calendars to see how these disparate forces come together. The Treasury is due to announce its quarterly financing plans that morning, while the Federal Open Market Committee will announce its rate decision that afternoon, followed by Powell's news conference. The fed-funds futures market on Friday puts a 95% probability of no interest rate change then, according to the CME FedWatch tool, but Fed Gov. Christopher Waller late on Thursday argued for a quarter-point cut then. That may make him the new front-runner in the race to replace Powell, says Washington watcher Greg Valliere, chief U.S. policy strategist for AGF Investments, although he trails Warsh, Bessent, and Kevin Hassett, head of the National Economic Council, in the Polymarket betting. Speaking for the likely majority, Fed Gov. Adriana Kugler this past week said no rate reduction is appropriate now, given that the economy is near full employment, inflation remains above the Fed's 2% goal, and tariffs are exerting upward price pressures. Kugler's term runs out in January; her replacement is certain to echo Trump's call for rate cuts. Write to Randall W. Forsyth at
