Bucking trends, Topsham approves a smaller budget for next year
Voters backed a municipal budget totaling $14.13 million during the meeting at the Mt. Ararat High School Forum. The budget reflects a 2% decrease in municipal spending from the current fiscal year, which was kept low by cutting paving projects and contributions to reserve funds.
The municipal budget plus the county tax and Topsham's contribution to Maine School Administrative District 75 make up the total town budget. The SAD 75 budget, which totals $57.88 million with contributions from four towns, will go to referendum vote on June 10.
Within the proposed municipal budget, police is the highest-spending department at $2.55 million, followed by EMS and fire, public works, and capital programs. The town plans on funding a community paramedic position in the fire department this year, a post that has existed for two years but was previously funded by a grant.
The Climate Action Plan, developed by the town Energy Committee with input from residents, is an outline for town projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and increase resilience to climate change.
"Any project that looks promising will be presented to the Select Board for the intention of creating better preparedness, a healthier environment as well as monetary savings," Energy Committee Vice Chairperson Nick Whatley said during Wednesday's meeting.
The plan calls for Topsham to adopt state goals on climate change, including decreasing greenhouse gas emissions below 1990 levels by 45% by 2030 and 80% by 2050, and achieving carbon neutrality by 2045. It also proposes several actions that town government can adopt to reach these goals, from investing in sustainable transportation and renewable energy to updating town properties with climate-friendly heat pumps, appliances and lighting.
Copy the Story Link
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
2 days ago
- New York Post
Insane energy policies are set to burn Democrats in New Jersey, New York
New York's state Public Service Commission just OK'd big National Grid rate increases that'll hike many upstate utility bills by $600 a year — fueling outrage Democrats will soon feel. Downstate, Con Edison is seeking an 11.4% hike to electric bills and 13.3% gas hike — largely thanks to green-energy mandates that Gov. Kathy Hochul embraced along with the rest of the party. The 'climate agenda' is delivering pain we've long warned of, in New York and New Jersey. Advertisement Con Edison is seeking an 11.4% hike to electric bills and 13.3% gas hike — largely thanks to green-energy mandates that Gov. Kathy Hochul embraced along with the rest of the party. Jack Forbes / NY Post Design Across the Hudson, electric bills as much as tripled this summer — and could cost Democrats the Jersey governor's race. 'Once they realize that Democrats' bungled energy policies are to blame for their exploding utility bills as well, it could blow November's race wide open,' warned Bethany Mandel last week. Yes, GOP Gov. Chris Christie shares in the blame for the Garden State's madness, but it started with the Democrats before him and accelerated under Dem Gov. Phil Murphy, who let the Oyster Creek nuclear power plant close in 2018 and aggressively shut down fossil fuel-powered electricity sources. Advertisement New York's worst-in-the-nation Climate Action Plan began under Gov. Andrew Cuomo but then Hochul doubled down on closing reliable natural-gas power plants and pretending expensive — and less reliable — solar and offshore wind installations could not only replace them, but make up for growing electric demand. Both states are using more electricity than ever — even as 'decarbonization' prevented supply from growing to match. Even without soaring power demands for data centers and AI, green policies that push ever-more consumers to need electricity for cooking, home heating and vehicles put added strain on the grid. Advertisement Hochul's belated push for new nuclear reactors upstate comes too late to stop the crunch; even 'clean power' advocates admit the high risk will cause chaos for New York's power grid. Democrats who locked both states into this idiocy certainly should pay the political price. Murphy barely won re-election in 2021; Hochul came shocking close to losing in 2022 — and all the issues that boosted Republicans then remain. Now Democratic policies are delivering soaring utility bills in both states — and voters will know who to blame.
Fox News
29-06-2025
- Fox News
Mike Lee preemptively drops 'big beautiful bill' provision to sell federal lands that riled GOP colleagues
Utah Republican Sen. Mike Lee preemptively withdrew a provision in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act on Saturday evening that would have allowed for the sale of federal lands for development after widespread outrage among his conservative colleagues. "Over the past several weeks, I've spent a lot of time listening to members of the community, local leaders, and stakeholders across the country. While there has been a tremendous amount of misinformation – and in some cases, outright lies – about my bill, many people brought forward sincere concerns," Lee said in a message posted to his X account on Saturday evening. Lee, who chairs the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, said he pulled the provision after he failed to secure "safeguards to guarantee that these lands would be sold only to American families," and not to China or corporations. The Senate parliamentarian ruled on Monday that the provision's original language did not comply with strict rules related to what could be included in reconciliation legislation, with Lee's office resubmitting the provision with new language before pulling it altogether on Saturday evening. Lee said he maintains his long-held position that the U.S. government owns too much land that is often mismanaged and leaves Americans, most notably in Western states, with higher tax burdens. "I continue to believe the federal government owns far too much land – land it is mismanaging and in many cases ruining for the next generation," Lee wrote in his post. "Under Democratic presidents, massive swaths of the West are being locked away from the people who live there, with no meaningful recourse." Lee had included a mandate for sales of millions of acres of federal lands in a draft provision of the tax cut package earlier this month. He preemptively pulled the provision on Saturday ahead of a procedural vote, as a handful of Republican lawmakers in both chambers publicly denounced the provision and said they would vote against the bill if it was included. "We've got the votes to strike it," Montana Sen. Steve Daines said Thursday of Lee's provision. "We're ready." "I agree with my colleagues that the federal government has mismanaged federal lands for decades. But I don't agree with their solution. The solution is not to sell public lands. The solution is better management. Let's send legislation to POTUS desk to improve management and access. I remain a no on the senate reconciliation bill," Montana Rep. Ryan Zinke posted to X last week ahead of Lee pulling the provision. Zinke served as President Donald Trump's secretary of the Department of the Interior during his first administration. "The people of Idaho have been clear – we do NOT support the sale of our public lands to the highest bidder. I am proud to help lead the effort to remove this provision from the One Big Beautiful Bill," Idaho Republican Sen. Jim Risch posted to X after Lee said he would pull the provision. Lawmakers are on a tight 4th of July deadline to get the legislation, which will advance Trump's agenda on taxes, immigration, energy, defense and the national debt, to the president's desk. Senate Republicans successfully carried the legislation over a procedural hurdle late on Saturday after hours of negotiations.
New York Post
27-06-2025
- New York Post
Hochul admits New York needs nuclear power — but getting it won't be easy
Good news: Gov. Kathy Hochul has tapped the New York State Power Authority to build the first major new US nuclear power plant in over 15 years. Bad news: New York's history of politicians pandering to anti-nuke hysteria will scare off a lot of potential private 'partners' on building the one-gigawatt plant. After all, it's just four years since then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo forced the early closure of Indian Point — and four decades since then-Gov. Mario Cuomo killed the $6 billion Shoreham nuke plant before it even opened. Hochul has belatedly recognized reality: New York has no hope of coming near meeting any of its clean-energy goals without nuclear power — and indeed is already hard-pressed for enough generating capacity to meet the natural growth in electric demands. For example, Micron's New York semiconductor plant will require massive amounts of reliable electricity, potentially 1.85 gigawatts at full capacity — enough to power half a million homes. The windmills and solar power plants pushed by the state Climate Action Plan can never meet that need. Yet nuke plants take a long time to build, and getting the state-of-the-art modular reactor Hochul envisions is a lot harder than calling for it. The Cuomos' anti-nuke actions — Long Islanders are still paying for Shoreham, while Indian Point had supplied 25% of the electricity needed for the city and Westchester — ensure that any company will demand a huge risk premium before investing a dime in building a nuke plant in the Empire State. Which is why Hochul left the door open to the Power Authority footing the bills itself — without mentioning this means taxpayer support and/or stiff new fees on utility bills. She also didn't mention that, since any new nuclear plant is 15 or so years off, the state's going to need new carbon-fueled power plants in the meantime, pushing the Climate Act's goals even further out of reach. Consider it all just a few more reasons we all have the Cuomo clan to thank for a huge chunk of New York's deep 'affordability' problems.
