Need For Speed 'shelved' by EA as Forza Horizon 5 PS5 sales hit 2 million
Arcade racing series Need For Speed was once a juggernaut franchise for EA, with its best-selling entry, 2005's Need For Speed: Most Wanted, selling over 16 million copies worldwide.
The popularity of the Fast & Furious films, at around the same time, no doubt contributed to some degree, as the Need For Speed games pivoted from Hot Pursuit to street racing, with 2003's Need For Speed Underground debuting two years after the first film came out.
However, while the Fast & Furious films continue to be box office juggernauts, Need For Speed's popularity has nosedived over the past decade. The last game was 2022's Need For Speed Unbound, developed by Criterion, which was a financial failure.
There have been rumbles of another Need For Speed being in development at Criterion, most recently in February last year, but it seems EA has put those plans on hold.
According to photojournalist Matthew Everingham, who was a contributor to an EA-backed car culture website called Speedhunters, the developer has pulled its funding for the site because it has 'shelved' Need For Speed.
'Speedhunters is on ice,' an Instagram post from Everingham reads. 'EA shelved Need For Speed, and that means no more funding for the site. Grateful for everything – the trips, the stories, the lifelong mates. I'm still shooting, just shifting gears into more video.'
Sign up to the GameCentral newsletter for a unique take on the week in gaming, alongside the latest reviews and more. Delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning. https://www.instagram.com/p/DL8zRnrTSwl/?img_index=1
The Need For Speed IP is listed as an 'entertainment partner' on the Speedhunters website, which is described as an 'international collective of photographers, writers, and drivers with a shared passion for uncovering the world's most exciting car culture stories'.
GameCentral has reached out to EA for comment.
If Need For Speed has been shelved, this might be due to Criterion's commitments on the next Battlefield. Criterion is one of four studios working on EA's plans for a 'connected Battlefield universe', alongside DICE, Ripple Effect, and EA Motive.
EA announced it had moved the 'majority' of Criterion staff onto Battlefield in 2023, but a blog post at the time claimed 'work will also continue on what's next for Need For Speed' at the developer. Earlier this year, EA laid off up to 400 staff across various studios, so it's possible Need For Speed has been caught in the crossfire as it prioritises Battlefield.
It seems racing games in general have been knocked down EA's priority list, after the company ended its partnership with the World Rally Championship in May this year. 'For now, we are pausing development plans on future rally titles,' EA said at the time.
Presumably EA feels racing games no longer attract the audience they once did, but there's no obvious reason why they shouldn't, as Microsoft has proven with the Forza Horizon franchise. More Trending
Open world arcade racer Forza Horizon 5 has sold two million copies in one month on PlayStation 5, according to the LinkedIn profile of a former game designer at Turn 10 Studios (as spotted on ResetEra).
This is particularly impressive considering the original game came out on Xbox Series X/S and PC almost four years ago, in November 2021.
At the same time though, the more serious Forza Motorsport was a sales disappointment for Microsoft and developer Turn 10 was badly hit by company wide layoffs earlier this month.
But Need For Speed has rarely been a serious racing game, so the problem here seems to be with EA, not changing consumer tastes. EA even has a back-up franchise to fall back on, in Criterion's Burnout series, but there seems even less chance of that returning in the short term.
Email gamecentral@metro.co.uk, leave a comment below, follow us on Twitter.
To submit Inbox letters and Reader's Features more easily, without the need to send an email, just use our Submit Stuff page here.
For more stories like this, check our Gaming page.
MORE: Xbox handheld prices accidentally leaked by Asus and they're super expensive
MORE: Games Inbox: What is the hardest game on PS5?
MORE: Patapon 1+2 Replay review – a PSP classic comes to Nintendo Switch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
3 hours ago
- Metro
The biggest problem with the Nintendo Switch 2 is that it's too big
A reader is happy with the games on the Switch 2 but wishes that it, and other modern portables like the PlayStation Portal, were a bit smaller. The first console I ever got was the Game Boy Color, in about 1998. Even then it was obvious to me that it was old tech, but the games were great, so it didn't matter and there started a life of loving video games. I like to think I'm not too biased in terms of companies and formats, but I have to admit I have a soft spot for Nintendo and portables so, as you can imagine, I've loved the Switch and immediately got a Switch 2. I've not played a lot of Donkey Kong Bananza so far, but I like what I have played and Mario Kart World is great. I certainly wouldn't have complained if there were more game announcements at this point, but I think, knowing games take longer nowadays, it's a good launch. I also don't regret getting the Switch 2 but I do have a big problem with it, and it's something I knew was going to be an issue before I got it: it's too big. The Switch 2 has a 7.9 inch screen and is 27.2 cm × 11.6 cm. That is, in short, massive. The smallest portable I own is the Game Boy Micro, which is 10.1 cm by 5 cm. That's one extreme to another but even the clunky big original DS was only 14.9 cm x 8.5 cm when it was closed. These are actual portable consoles that you can put in your pocket and carry around with you. There is no way that I can comfortably put a Switch 2 in the pocket of any coat or trousers I own. I tried to talk my girlfriend into putting it in her handbag, but it didn't fit. Especially as you have to put it in its own carry case first or risk getting it bashed up and scratched. I get the Switch 2 is very powerful and the screen is huge and all that. It's definitely a decision, not a mistake, but I don't like it. I especially don't like it because it's part of the modern trend where all portables are not actually portable. Sign up to the GameCentral newsletter for a unique take on the week in gaming, alongside the latest reviews and more. Delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning. I've got a PlayStation 5 and a PlayStation Portal, and while the Portal is useful its size is really awkward, even though you only use it in the house. I don't own a PC portable or an Xbox but that Xbox Ally looks massive and clunky too. I think we've really lost sight of the benefits of what a portable console should be. The ability to, you know… port it around to you. If I want to take the Switch 2 with me anywhere I basically have to take a bag with me, whether I was going to or not. It's bigger than the Switch 1 but not by that much, so this isn't a new problem, but I would like to see a proper alternative. The Switch Lite was smaller but it was still pretty massive compared to any previous handheld console. And now we hear rumours that the PlayStation 6 and next gen Xbox are going to be portables, or have portable versions? I'm going to take a wild guess and imagine they're going to be the size of a house too. Because if there's one thing the PlayStation 5 has taught me, it's that Sony does not value the idea of making consoles a convenient size. I'm not angry and I'm not going to start a petition, but I do think it's a shame and I wish things like the Switch Lite offered a real alternative in terms of the size, because it really makes a different to how, and how often, you use them. Since I don't expect any change with the inevitable Switch 2 Lite, what I will ask for instead is some kind of mini-console portable from Nintendo. Something that can play games from all their pre-Switch portable consoles, that has the same design as the 3DS but is as small as they can make it. More Trending I think a lot of people would be interested in that, not just weirdos like me, and it might even help people to appreciate the idea of a handheld that can actually fit in the palm of your hand. By reader Gorby The reader's features do not necessarily represent the views of GameCentral or Metro. You can submit your own 500 to 600-word reader feature at any time, which if used will be published in the next appropriate weekend slot. Just contact us at gamecentral@ or use our Submit Stuff page and you won't need to send an email. MORE: Donkey Kong Bananza is Nintendo and gaming at its best - Reader's Feature MORE: The best thing the PS6 can do is be less powerful than PS5 – Reader's Feature MORE: The standards for video game reviews need to be higher - Reader's Feature
Metro
9 hours ago
- Metro
Donkey Kong Bananza is Nintendo and gaming at its best - Reader's Feature
A reader is very impressed by Donkey Kong Bananza on the Nintendo Switch 2 and praises it for focusing on being a video game above all else. From the moment the game boots up, Donkey Kong Bananza feels like a celebration of everything Nintendo stands for: bold creativity, joyful chaos, and a deep respect for its own legacy. It's not just another platformer, it's a vibrant love letter to the spirit of play. The game doesn't try to reinvent the wheel; instead, it polishes it to a gleam and sends it rolling down a jungle hill with barrels flying and bongo beats thumping. It's Nintendo in full swing, embracing its roots while swinging forward with confidence. The character of Donkey Kong himself is emblematic of Nintendo's genius. He's not sleek or edgy, he's a big-hearted brute with a goofy grin and a penchant for bananas. And yet, he's iconic. In Bananza, his personality bursts through every animation, every sound effect, every triumphant chest pound. There's a tactile joy to his movement, a weight and rhythm that makes every jump and roll feel satisfying. Nintendo's mastery of feel is on full display here, and it's something few other developers can replicate. What makes Bananza shine is its level design. Each stage is a playground of surprises, packed with secrets, alternate paths, and clever environmental puzzles. The game trusts the player to explore, to experiment, to fail and try again. It's challenging without being punishing, whimsical without being shallow. There's a sense of craftsmanship in every vine swing and barrel blast, a deliberate layering of mechanics that rewards curiosity and skill. It's the kind of design that makes you smile not just because you succeeded, but because the journey was so much fun. The music is pure Nintendo magic. Infectious jungle rhythms, cheeky melodies, and atmospheric flourishes create a soundscape that's both nostalgic and fresh. It's the kind of soundtrack that sticks with you, that you hum while making toast or walking to the bus. It elevates the game's energy and reinforces its identity – playful, adventurous, and unmistakably Nintendo. Sign up to the GameCentral newsletter for a unique take on the week in gaming, alongside the latest reviews and more. Delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning. Multiplayer in Bananza is another triumph. The game fosters laughter and camaraderie and makes use of Game Chat in the most perfect way. It's chaotic in the best way, with moments of unexpected hilarity and clutch teamwork. Nintendo has always understood that games are better when shared and Bananza leans into that philosophy with gusto. It's a game that brings people together, whether they're seasoned gamers or just picking up a controller for the first time. But perhaps what makes Donkey Kong Bananza truly special is its heart. There's no cynicism here, no gritty realism or forced drama. It's pure joy, distilled into pixels and sound. It reminds us why we fell in love with games in the first place – not for high scores or achievements, but for the thrill of discovery, the delight of movement, the laughter of shared moments. Nintendo at its best doesn't just entertain, it uplifts. It creates worlds we want to live in, characters we want to root for, and experiences we want to revisit again and again. More Trending Bananza is a triumph not because it's perfect, but because it's unmistakably Nintendo. It's bold, it's silly, it's brilliant. And in every vine swing and banana hoard, it reminds us that play is a beautiful thing. By reader BaldB3lper The reader's features do not necessarily represent the views of GameCentral or Metro. You can submit your own 500 to 600-word reader feature at any time, which if used will be published in the next appropriate weekend slot. Just contact us at gamecentral@ or use our Submit Stuff page and you won't need to send an email. MORE: The best thing the PS6 can do is be less powerful than PS5 – Reader's Feature MORE: The standards for video game reviews need to be higher - Reader's Feature MORE: Zelda: The Wind Waker is still an amazing game that can inspire future sequels – Reader's Feature
Metro
a day ago
- Metro
The best thing the PS6 can do is be less powerful than PS5 - Reader's Feature
A reader argues that rising costs in the games industry means Sony would be wise to make the PS6 less powerful than current gen consoles. In two years' time we're going to be drowning in news, rumours and leaks about the PlayStation 6. Everything seems to point towards it coming out in 2027 and I have not met a single person that's excited about it. Everybody thinks it's too soon, everyone thinks the PlayStation 5 has barely started, and everyone thinks Sony has dropped the ball in terms of games. Or maybe everyone doesn't think that. Maybe I'm just living in a bubble with my video game savvy friends, but it doesn't matter because dread it, run from it, the PlayStation 6 will arrive all the same. We haven't got any details yet, that I'm aware of, but the few hints we've had are of a new console (and a portable) that is even more powerful than the last one and no doubt even more expensive. Considering the PS5 Pro is already the most expensive console I don't even want to think about how much the PlayStation 6 is going to cost. As we all know by now, more powerful means it'll take even longer to make games and need more money and people. This will mean less games, less often, and absolutely no risks of any kind – including probably any new IP at all. We've already seen this in this generation, where everything's slowed to a crawl, but a new console is only going to make things worse. What makes the whole situation all the sadder is that there is no way on Earth the extra power is going to make any difference. There's barely any difference between PlayStation 4 and 5 games as it is, so the difference between 5 and 6 is going to be miniscule and certainly nothing a normal person will ever notice. Remember that PlayStation 5 tech demo that looked a bit like Tomb Raider? We haven't seen anything like that so far in an actual game, so that was all just a lie. They always are, I know, but whatever excuse they try to give for the PlayStation 6 needing to exist is going to be a con. Sign up to the GameCentral newsletter for a unique take on the week in gaming, alongside the latest reviews and more. Delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning. Considering everything going on in gaming at the moment the only decision that makes any sense to me is making the PlayStation 6 less powerful than the PlayStation 5. If that sounds silly to you, I guarantee the vast majority of people wouldn't even notice. If you told them it was more powerful (which I'm not suggesting Sony do) they'd probably believe it, just because nothing in terms of graphics has looked any different in years. Sony should explain that in order for the portable and console machines to be running the same games they had to lower the overall power, since a portable can never be as powerful as a home console. There are better reasons to decrease the power though and not just because it'll make the console cheaper. We've known about the problem that games cost too much to make for years now and nobody has done a thing about it. Not Sony and not anyone else. If the PlayStation 6 is more powerful – if it is just another box under the TV- then the problem is only going to continue to get worse until something snaps and suddenly video games just aren't viable anymore. I don't want to see a future where the only video games are indies, mobile games, and free to play, but that is where we're headed, and very quickly. The future should be AA games like Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 and Eriksholm: The Stolen Dream (which I haven't played yet but was fascinated to hear about this week). But none of the big publishers care about that, they think it's small beans and not worth bothering with. If they carry on their current course, games will end up costing £100+ (there's already rumours of that for GTA 6), they'll take 10 years to make, and they'll only be the safest of safe franchises and ideas. It's not just publishers I worry aren't doing anything about this ticking time bomb, it's gamers who just hope the problem is going to magically go away. If games become unprofitable publishers will simply stop making them. They won't start making cheaper games because then their graphs won't go up, they'll just find something else to make money from. More Trending Something has to change. It's not enough even to draw the line here, they have to go back to before the PlayStation 5, when companies could still afford to make games and we could still afford to pay for them. By reader Captone The reader's features do not necessarily represent the views of GameCentral or Metro. You can submit your own 500 to 600-word reader feature at any time, which if used will be published in the next appropriate weekend slot. Just contact us at gamecentral@ or use our Submit Stuff page and you won't need to send an email. MORE: The standards for video game reviews need to be higher - Reader's Feature MORE: Zelda: The Wind Waker is still an amazing game that can inspire future sequels – Reader's Feature MORE: I wish Bethesda didn't make Fallout and The Elder Scrolls - Reader's Feature
