Edu dept to get lion share of 26k new jobs: CM
The announcement came a day after Union home minister Amit Shah's public address at Dadiya village, Jaipur, where he spoke about employment generation and recruitment reforms.
Sharma said, "The govt is committed to creating maximum employment opportunities for youth in a transparent and time-bound manner. We are ensuring that every deserving candidate gets a fair chance."
Recruitment notifications for more than 26,000 posts were issued in a single day Thursday, covering a wide range of departments.
The education department leads the drive with recruitment for 3,225 lecturer posts and 6,500 senior teacher positions in secondary education.
The Sanskrit education department will recruit 2,759 teachers for Level-1 and Level-2, while the primary education department has advertised 5,000 Level-1 teacher posts.
In the home department, recruitment was announced for 1,015 sub-inspector posts, including 896 sub-inspector (AP), four for the Sahariya community, 25 for Scheduled Areas, 26 Sub-Inspector (IB), and 64 Platoon Commander posts. The Home Guard Department has also issued notifications for 84 Platoon Commander positions.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025
Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List
Undo
Other key departments have announced large-scale recruitments as well. The agriculture department will appoint 281 assistant engineers and 1,100 agriculture supervisors. The animal husbandry department will recruit 1,100 veterinary officers, while the forest department will fill 785 positions including forest guards, foresters, and surveyors.
The energy department has advertised 2,163 vacancies, and the public health engineering department (PHED) has notified 1,050 posts. In addition, the Ayurveda department has issued recruitment notifications for 1,535 contractual AYUSH officer posts.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Wire
29 minutes ago
- The Wire
Rights Group Writes to Vatican Over Rise in Violence Against Christians in India
New Delhi: Civil society group United Christian Forum has submitted a memorandum highlighting targeted attacks against the Christian community in India to the Vatican, the Hindu reported. The letter was given to Vatican foreign minister Archbishop Paul Richard Gallagher, who is on a week-long visit to India to meet with church officials in the country. The letter urged the Vatican minister to bring up rising crimes against the minority community during his talks with Indian officials. Gallagher held a meeting with Union external affairs minister S. Jaishankar last week. The Indian minister took to social media after the meeting on Thursday and said that he was pleased to meet the archbishop, adding that they had 'good conversation about the importance of faith, and the need for dialogue and diplomacy to address conflicts'. In January, UCF had released a report which stated that 2024 witnessed 834 hate crimes against Christians, up from 734 such incidents in 2023. In the Modi decade, such crimes had increased from 127 in 2014, the report further said. 'The alarming frequency of attacks translates to more than two Christians being targeted every day in India simply for practising their faith,' UCF had said. In their submission to Gallagher, UCF said that the 'primary reason for these attacks has been false allegations of fraudulent conversions'. According to the report, the highest number of incidents in 2024 were reported from Uttar Pradesh (209), followed by Chhattisgarh (165). In many of these cases, rights activists have pointed out, no First Information Report is filed – sometimes despite there being a police complaint on the matter. In other situations, victims are afraid to approach the police because they believe that the police will try to turn the matter around, and side with the perpetrators while filing false charges against the victims.
The Wire
29 minutes ago
- The Wire
Day Ahead of Monsoon Session, Opposition Raises Pahalgam, Trump's Claims and Bihar SIR in All-Party Meet
Parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju said that the government is 'ready for discussions with an open heart' but did not provide any clear answers to whether the demands will be heeded to. Union Ministers J.P. Nadda and Kiren Rijiju, along with others arrive to attend the all-party meeting ahead of the Monsoon session of Parliament. Photo: PTI New Delhi: The monsoon session of parliament is set for a stormy start as opposition parties on Sunday (July 20) at the customary all-party meeting convened by the Union government demanded a discussion on the Pahalgam terror attack, US president Donald Trump's continuing claims of ceasefire mediation between India and Pakistan and the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in poll-bound Bihar. The monsoon session of the parliament will begin on Monday, July 21. Following the all-party meeting which was attended by 54 MPs, Union parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju said that the government is 'ready for discussions' but did not provide any clear answers to whether the opposition's demands will be heeded to and said that the Business Advisory Committee (BAC) will take a final decision. He also said that whether it is the US President or anyone else, responses can only be given in parliament when a discussion or statement is being given. 'All parties put forth their positions. From the government we noted down all their points. We have said that to ensure that the House functions properly, the government and opposition should work together with good coordination. We might be political parties of different ideologies but it is everyone's responsibility to ensure that Parliament functions properly – opposition's as well as the government's,' said Rijiju to reporters after the meeting. 'Several important issues have been raised by the members asking for a discussion in parliament. We are ready for a discussion with an open heart. We follow rules and parliamentary traditions,' he added. As the opposition raised Trump's claims of mediating the ceasefire – he claimed it 24 times by some accounts – in the all-party meeting, along with his latest statement that 'five jets ' having been shot down, Rijiju said that whether it is the US president's statement or anyone else, an answer can only be given when a discussion is held in the parliament. 'Whether it is the US President or anyone else, I cannot give an answer here as this is not the proper forum. The correct forum for an answer or a statement is when a discussion will be held in parliament and at that time all answers will be given,' said Rijiju. 'I cannot make any announcement at the moment because the demands and issues raised today by both opposition parties and the ruling alliance will now be taken up in the Business Advisory Committee (BAC). A meeting will then be held under the chairmanship of the Rajya Sabha Chairman and Lok Sabha Speaker, where a final decision will be made,' he said. 'As for notices submitted by members, we cannot deny them. Requesting a discussion is every member's right, and we cannot refuse that,' he added. The monsoon session will be the first parliament session since the Pahalgam terror attack, and the four-day long military conflict with Pakistan following Operation Sindoor. The opposition had made continued demands for a special session of parliament, but the government had not heeded to the demands. 'We have demanded that several important issues are raised in this session, due to which we hope that Prime Minister Narendra Modi addresses the nation through the parliament. Those important issues are Pahalgam – the lapses that led to the attack and the statements made by the Lieutenant Governor. A lot of time has passed and the government will have to speak. The statements coming from the US President today (Saturday), raise questions on the dignity of India, the bravery of the Indian armed forces. Only the Prime Minister can respond to the statements made by the US President,' said Congress' deputy leader in the Lok Sabha Gaurav Gogoi. Gogoi further said that the prime minister must also address concerns arising from the ongoing SIR in Bihar, as well as the two-front axis being built by China and Pakistan that have implications for Indian foreign policy. 'It will be very important for Prime Minister Modi to come to this House and put forth his views on these three subjects,' he said. These issues were decided upon by the INDIA bloc in its virtual meeting on Saturday, July 19, attended by 24 parties. The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) stayed away and said that the alliance was only for the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. However, AAP MP Sanjay Singh, who attended the all-party meeting on Sunday, raised some of the same issues that were highlighted by the INDIA bloc. 'The issue I have raised on behalf of my party is that the US President is repeatedly saying that he got the ceasefire done in the name of a trade deal, the government should give clarification on this," said AAP MP Sanjay Singh. Singh added that the government must also address the slum demolitions in Delhi, the SIR exercise in Bihar, as well as the Air India plane crash last month. Communist Party of India MP Sandosh Kumar P. said that the 'Prime Minister must come to the House and address the Pahalgam terror attack and its subsequent developments. The government did not say anything clearly.' Biju Janata Dal MP Sasmit Patra said that he had raised the 'alarming breakdown of law and order in Odisha under the BJP government.' 'There has been a disturbing rise in heinous crimes against women and children. The tragic self-immolation of a student in Balasore; who had reached out to a BJP MP, the administration and even tweeted to the Odisha's chief minister, Union ministers, and several BJP leaders; has shaken the conscience of the nation. She was an ABVP member, yet her pleas were ignored. Just yesterday, a 15-year-old girl in Puri was set ablaze. Around 20 days ago, the Additional Commissioner of BMC was assaulted by five local BJP leaders. The recent chaos during the Puri Rath Yatra stampede is another example of this lawlessness. These issues will be strongly raised during the session,' Patra said. During the meeting some opposition members also raised the issue of communal remarks made by Justice Shekhar Yadav and demanded that the impeachment notice against him should be taken up. Meanwhile, Rijiju said that the government is in the process of gathering signatures from MPs against Justice Yashwant Varma – at whose house charred currency notes were discovered – and who has filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court challenging the in-house inquiry committee's report indicting him in the case. "I cannot comment on any business in terms of priority because until or unless the matter is passed by the BAC (Business Advisory Committee) with approval by the Chair, it is difficult for me to make an announcement outside… The signature is underway and it has crossed 100 already,' said Rijiju. A total of 100 signatures from MPs are required to move a motion for impeaching a judge. A huge sum of currency notes were discovered at an outhouse of Justice Varma, when he was a Delhi high court judge, during an accidental fire at his residence in the national capital. A committee appointed by then Chief Justice of India Sanjeev Khanna had indicted him following which he had moved the Supreme Court. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Smriti Irani interview: ‘My 10 years as minister so stamped on people's minds, they can't envision me as anyone else'
Former Union Minister Smriti Irani surprised many when she announced she was reprising her role as Tulsi Virani in the limited series reboot of popular TV drama Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi — a character that made her a household name. Speaking to The Indian Express, Irani discusses her return to acting, how the entertainment industry has changed, balancing her life — and reiterates that she is not out of politics. Excerpts: * Why did you decide to return to acting? It is a limited series. I was keen to have a partnership with a cohort led by Uday (JioHotstar vice chairman Uday Shankar), who has a background in news and has seen Delhi from up close, and of course, Ekta (Kapoor). She has undergone a huge creative journey… (I wanted to ) see how she would perceive things from today's perspective, issues that are relevant to today's youth, to today's times. Knowing that it is a limited series, how can you not work and enjoy the benefit of this combination coming together? I have never done OTT before. I am more in an observation mode with an expectation to act. * When you stepped onto the set, how did people respond? Was it any different from a decade ago? I was told that I had to sit with the younger generation to do a reading so that they get comfortable. I sat with them for one-and-a-half hours. A decade ago, when I used to do acting, there was never any preparation. Now, there is a lot of it. When I sat with them, they wanted to know the political discourse, state politics, how Parliament functions, how legislation is done, etc. Not just actors, but the writers, creative directors, too. I felt it became less of a media workshop, more of a political workshop. They are kids from different states, speaking different languages, with different ideologies. All of us come together, sit, and talk politics. That was surreal. I managed to keep both my lives separate. My political and acting life were far from each other. Those in the sets tell me we did not know that you knew how to legislate or administer. So, a lot of my old colleagues ask me how come we didn't know all these. Those people in politics with me for the last few decades had not seen the other side of me for a decade. I just went to Bijnor to visit a bereaved colleague. Suddenly, a karyakarta came up and said, 'Didi, my mother wanted me to get a picture with you'. They all came to know that the show was coming up. Now both worlds are coming together, which never happened earlier. * How will you balance these two roles? I always did. I had a break only when I became a Cabinet minister. But I am so glad that as a Cabinet minister, I became so prominent that people never envisioned me as anything but a minister. I had organisational responsibility even in 2003. When I was national secretary twice and national president of the (BJP) Mahila Morcha, I was in the media even then. But my role as a Cabinet minister became so prominent that people have forgotten my other roles. I may be the only one who has had a role in the multimedia age of politics, done legislation across five ministries, and created political history in Amethi. A whole generation has grown up in the last 10 years. They see me only as a politician, but before that too I played a fictional character. * There was speculation that you may be sent to the Rajya Sabha as a nominated MP… Why would I be? I am still an active politician. I am just 49 years old. There are people older than me who have done much for society and much for the organisation. If there is one person who can say that age is on my side, I am that person. I am a very patient human being who has served three terms as MP and has handled five ministries. The fact that I was the youngest minister in the first and second Modi governments is not lost on anyone. I am very proud of the fact that the 10 years as a minister are so stamped on people's minds that they cannot envision me as anyone else. * Do you feel you are missing out on anything since, at the moment, you are neither in the government nor in Parliament? I became an MP in 2011. I was not in Parliament before that. I do not miss anything, I make sure that I am missed. Everyone is in touch with me. Politics is not an easy field. I have seen the best people in politics because they come to serve. For most of my colleagues in the BJP, it was never about the pursuit of power. It was about creating something for the country. It was about being happy when your colleague becomes something. I was elated when Rekha (Gupta) became CM (of Delhi), when Devendra (Fadnavis) became (Maharashtra) CM, or the achievements of Bhupendra (Yadav) bhai and Dharmendra (Pradhan) bhai as a minister. We celebrate each other's achievements. That's a quintessential core BJP karyakarta behaviour. * Will the Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi reboot have any social or political message? It is an unreal, surreal, made-up story that can create an indication towards certain realities of our lives. There has to be relevance to today's generation, issues that are topical to them, which require reflection. It is very easy to do reality, but very difficult to convey realities through a made-up, fictional act. You need to create a balance. I am mindful of the channel itself, the platform itself. If you look at the first promo, it is not about the character but about Smriti Irani. It has never happened in the history of GEC (general entertainment channel) that you speak about an individual who has played a fictional character. There is a recognition that the crossroads are meeting. When they wrote the character, they were mindful that it had to be relevant to families today… Tulsi talks about the times that have changed, but the value system is consistent. * The serial is about a Gujarati family. How much has it helped in promoting Gujarati culture? If you watch this time, the new part you will see is an amalgamation of cultures. I don't want to give spoilers. I am married into a Parsi family, but for me to be quintessentially recognised as a Gujarati showcases the impact of what was written. * Will you ever play a negative role? I do not have the capacity to play one. Some may presume me to be one in politics, but I do not have it in me. I don't restrict myself in my political and media choices. I do not don the hat presuming what I can and what I cannot. But I am mindful that I am a responsible politician. I cannot afford to be irresponsible. It's a fine act of balancing because you are a part of a larger storytelling group. Whether what you say is of consequence or not should be a part of your decision. Let's say somebody's propagating a superstition. What should your character say? Your character should not propagate superstition. * Will you be following the Monsoon Session of Parliament while on set? Yes, I always follow the developments. I am not, and never was, out of politics.
