‘Expect to see 15pc on your bill as standard – US-style tipping is here'
US-style tipping culture has crept into establishments where tips were never historically paid, such as cafes and pubs, while restaurants now routinely ask for tips of 20pc on top of a cover charge.
The recent crackdown on employers pocketing staff tips and higher rates of employers' National Insurance payments come against the backdrop of rising costs, the exodus of workers after Brexit and fewer customers with disposable income for going out.
Staff are paying the price. Contracted hours are being trimmed, workers get sent home without pay if they aren't busy and small perks such as the after-work beer have been retracted.
'My job now and the one I took a year ago are very different,' says Maya*, a commis chef who works in an historic London restaurant. 'The way my colleagues and I describe it is that we're frogs in boiling water.'
Policies designed to help hospitality staff have backfired. The Employment (Allocation of Tips) Act – commonly known as the 'Tips Bill' – came into force in October. It mandates that businesses must pass on 100pc of tips and service charge to staff, prohibiting employers from retaining any portion of these gratuities.
Although it aims to ensure fairness and transparency, the effects have been negative.
'Before the legislation, the service charge was pooled and often used as an emergency buffer for restaurants,' explains Kitty Slydell-Cooper, of Countertalk, a hospitality community.
'But from October, the buffer disappeared and restaurants put many more of their staff down to minimum wage, and topped up the wages of a greater number of people with the service charge – which is being spread more thinly.'
Ryan's* team in a luxury bar in Mayfair dropped from 13 people to just four in a matter of months. Those who were kept on get fewer hours and have to make do with less.
'One of my bartenders got paid £1,600 in January,' he said. 'I just don't know how some are surviving.'
The 3.5 million people employed in the UK's hospitality sector are in crisis – and they make up about 10pc of the UK's entire workforce.
Money is their biggest concern, according to a study by Wagestream, a financial platform. Almost a quarter have nothing in savings.
'We've been tracking this for eight years, and this year's results feel much more emotive. Workers had the pandemic and the cost of living crisis, which everyone assumed was a blip,' says Peter Briffett, head of Wagestream.
'But with the National Insurance increases, 2025 is only going to get worse.'
Despite the fact that the sector is being pummelled from all sides, it is growing at 5.9pc – almost double the rate of the UK economy, according to UK Hospitality. Restaurants, pubs and clubs are the driving force.
But the Government is not helping. 'The exact opposite has happened with their policies, which is that people are forced out of work, or forced to move jobs,' says Briffet. The Chancellor's increase to employers' National Insurance will hit hospitality hard. 'They're high volume businesses with low margins, yet now have to pay millions of pounds extra in tax. They need that money to operate their businesses,' he adds.
Employers' contributions rose from 13.8pc to 15pc, and the weekly earnings at which employers start paying National Insurance was lowered from £175 to £96.
This is being passed on to customers. Stealthy cover charges have been added to bookings, and there's also been widespread adoption of a 15pc service charge – up from 12.5pc. At The Wolseley, for example, the 'standard discretionary service charge' is 15pc, on top of a £2.50 cover charge.
Experts suggest in some restaurants this could creep up to the American-style 20pc soon. This has particularly been the case in high-end establishments, where international clientele are more used to paying higher tips. It's also more tax-efficient to raise service charge to pay staff, rather than raising menu prices.
'Expect to see 15pc on your bill as standard, and don't be horrified when the card machine is asking you to add an additional gratuity,' says Slydell-Cooper. 'It will be propping up a totally beleaguered industry, so it's best to view it as a tax loophole that allows for the restaurants you love to survive.'
Although it is technically optional, many diners feel obliged to pay service charge.
A survey by the Hospitality Professionals Association found 53pc felt anxious about requesting to remove it. But imposing a US-style 20pc tip may be a step too far for British people. Payment provider Dojo found that only 3pc of people would tip that high in the UK.
'Eating out, of course, is already very expensive, and there's a sense that diners want to tip their server, but not be paying their wages,' adds Maya. 'My restaurant is falling into the US system.'
For workers in the industry, the relentless instability and financial struggles of working are taking a toll.
The charity Hospitality Action provided financial and emotional support to more hospitality households facing hardship than ever before. Its 2024 Impact Report found that the number of hospitality workers reporting mental health struggles at some point in their careers reached 76pc – an increase of 12pc since 2020.
Maya's base rate of pay is now under the London Living Wage of £12.21, and when her hours are cut, she gets less of the already-stretched service charge.
Living on this is only feasible because the 25-year-old lives at home with her parents. And working six days out of seven, at unsociable hours, she rarely has time to spend her earnings.
'There's a passion associated with cheffing and cooking which means they can get away with pay being as low as it is,' says Maya. 'Unfortunately, we still love what we do, and feel lucky to have that kind of work.'
Paul*, a 32-year-old manager at a high street chain restaurant in St Albans, has been the sharp end of the changes.
There have been several rounds of redundancies, and he's being pushed to increase sales and profitability with a skeleton team.
'It's a 100-cover restaurant, and often just me and another person on the floor,' says Paul. Contracted to work 46 hours a week, Paul is often pushed to do overtime that amounts to 60 hours a week – all of which is unpaid.
He is also constantly having to cut the hours of his staff. 'Cutting someone from a Friday night isn't just a reduction in hourly wage, they could lose the £100 they might get through tips,' he says. 'Many have second jobs, because that's the only way to survive.'
The longest-tenured member of staff has been at the restaurant just nine weeks, which makes a busy service even more stressful. However, he notes that 'unless you want a restaurant staffed by school kids,' it's becoming impossible to get good staff to stay in the industry.
According to the CIPD, the hospitality industry has the highest employee turnover rate among all sectors, with an average turnover rate of 52pc.
Experts believe far more must be done to support this vibrant industry and the millions of workers employed in it. Slydell-Cooper says: 'A lower VAT for hospitality businesses, like in Holland where it's 9pc, would make an enormous difference.
'In the UK, it was dropped during the pandemic, but went back up to 20pc – it feels brutal.'
Ryan, Paul and Maya all have an eye on the door. Ryan plans to be out of hospitality completely by the autumn, in the hopes of finding a 'normal 30-year career' – even if he has to go back to university to study for it. Paul is in the final stages for an operations manager role at a takeaway chain. He believes the dine-in market, as a whole, is doomed.
'Lots of managers working for my current employer have left already, and switched to retail, because it seems like a holiday compared to what we're going through,' says Paul.
'The amount of stress we're under, and what we're being asked to do just isn't worth it any more, and I have to go before it has adverse effects on me personally.'
Maya, who attended culinary school, still wants to work in food, but more on the education side. She's looking forward to being on the same time schedule as her friends, although will miss the company and camaraderie of her colleagues.
'If everyone in the kitchen left, the whole place would crumble. Yet management is not making any allowances for that,' she says.
'I am proud to be part of the restaurant, but I feel like we're being taken for mugs.'
*Names and details have been changed.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
17 minutes ago
- New York Post
Commerce chief Lutnick insists Aug. 1 is ‘hard deadline' for EU and tariffs: ‘They're going to start paying'
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick was adamant Sunday that the Aug. 1 date President Trump gave Europe to negotiate new trade arrangements is a 'hard deadline.'' 'So on Aug. 1, the new tariff rates will come in. But nothing stops countries from talking to us after Aug. 1, but they're going to start paying the tariffs on Aug. 1,' Lutnick told CBS News' 'Face the Nation' when asked the European Union, whose representatives he was on the phone with before the interview. 'That's a hard deadline,' the Trump official said. Advertisement The president has shifted his deadline several times. On April 2, 'Liberation Day,' he debuted his customized rates, which were supposed to go into effect April 9. They it got pushed 90 days and then to Aug. 1. Trump has threatened to slap a 30% tariff rate against the EU and a flurry of customized tariff rates on other countries that fail to cut a new deal with him. Those tariffs come on top of the 10% baseline tax against virtually all countries. 3 President Trump moved his tariff deadline several times, but Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick stressed Aug. 1 is now a firm cut-off. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement 3 Trump has made recalibrating US trade policy a top priority of his second term. AP Despite the fast-approaching deadline, Lutnick conveyed confidence that the US and EU will come to some sort of arrangement. 'There's plenty of room. Look, the president and the European Union, these are the two biggest trading partners in the world talking to each other. We'll get a deal done. I am confident we'll get a deal done,' the commerce secretary said. 'You are going to see the best set of trade deals you've ever seen for America and for the American people.' Advertisement Lutnick also stressed that the 10% baseline tariff rate is 'definitely going to stay' amid negotiations. So far, the Trump administration has announced tariff deals with the United Kingdom and Vietnam as well as a tariff truce with China, which Trump claims is subject to a 55% rate. 'The next two weeks are going to be weeks for the record books. President Trump is going to deliver for the American people,' he said. In addition to the baseline tariffs and levies on imports from China, the Trump administration has imposed 25% tariffs on automobiles, aluminum, steel and imports from Canada and Mexico that don't comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. Advertisement 3 Lutnick urged US trading partners to finish negotiating deals with the Trump administration by the deadline. REUTERS Trump has threatened to raise that to 35% against Canada and 30% for Mexico. This month, he has been blasting out letters to smaller US trading partners urging them to get a deal done or face the 'Liberation Day' tariffs. But Lutnick indicated that many of the smaller countries may simply face the 10% baseline rate while the Trump administration focuses on retooling trade with larger nations. 'I think what you've got is you should assume that the small countries, you know, the Latin American countries, the Caribbean countries, many countries in Africa, they will have a baseline tariff of 10%,' Lutnick said. 'Then the bigger economies will either open themselves up or they'll pay a fair tariff to America for not opening themselves up and [for] treating America unfairly.'


The Hill
17 minutes ago
- The Hill
Himes: White House warning of ‘massive market reaction' if Trump fires Powell
Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.) said Sunday that a White House insider is warning President Trump of a 'massive market reaction' if he fires Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. 'I mean, what happens if there's a tweet that says the Fed chair is gone?' CBS's Margaret Brennan asked Himes on 'Face the Nation.' 'Well, interestingly, inside the White House — and I don't know who it is — my guess is, it's maybe the Treasury secretary — is saying — and this is a very difficult thing to say to a person like Donald Trump — that, if you fire the Fed chair, either illegally, which they're happy to do, or because you trump up some baloney-like charge associated with a renovation of the headquarters, there is going to be a massive market reaction, because you cannot lie to the capital markets,' Himes responded. Trump has recently grasped on to the Federal Reserve's multibillion-dollar makeover as a possible way to finally oust Powell. The president has for months criticized Powell over the Fed's decision not to cut interest rates, a move partly based on uncertainty surrounding Trump's tariffs. Trump has stated his desire to remove Powell, whom he appointed during his last term in the White House. Senate Republicans have recently warned Trump that it would be a large mistake to go forward on his threat to fire Powell, saying it would probably send a 'shock wave' through the financial markets and rattle the larger economy. Republican senators, including those who are strong supporters of the president, have warned that any action to oust Powell would jeopardize the Fed's independence, which could erode investors' confidence in American monetary policy and creditworthiness. 'I do not believe a president, any president, has the authority to fire the Federal Reserve chair,' Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) said previously.


Bloomberg
18 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
India's Millions of Jobseekers Are Short on Skills
India's destiny for centuries to come will be determined by the young people joining its workforce today. A few years ago — in 2019, by some calculations — the country entered the most favorable stage of its demographic transition. There are more working-age people than those over 65 or under 16. This will be true for another three or so decades; if India doesn't grow rich in that period, then the chances are it will stay poor forever. That's a great responsibility for this generation — and one it can only fulfill if it the right jobs are available, allowing them to increase their productivity and grow incomes. But those don't seem to exist. India's growth numbers may appear comfortable, but that isn't being accompanied by an expansion of employment. There are no reliable statistics on joblessness rates — and these are deceptive in poorer countries anyway. But scenes like those in 2022, when 12.5 million candidates applied for 35,000 junior positions in Indian Railways and then rioted over the selection process illustrate the scale of the challenge.