logo
After OPEC's Oil Supply Cuts, What Now?

After OPEC's Oil Supply Cuts, What Now?

Yahoo2 days ago
OPEC+ will complete the unwinding of its largest production cut next month after agreeing this weekend to boost output by 547,000 barrels per day (bpd) in September in a move that was widely expected by the market and oil industry analysts.
What's next for the OPEC+ oil production policy and the last remaining layer of production cuts of 1.66 million bpd is anyone's guess. The group of OPEC and non-OPEC producers, led by Saudi Arabia and Russia, left the door wide open to any further production adjustment – in either direction – and to all sorts of forecasts and analyses by market watchers and investment banks.
The group of eight major OPEC+ producers agreed on Sunday, as expected, to continue with the rollback of the 2.2 million bpd cuts. This will see the alliance roll back all these cuts, and the UAE adding 300,000 bpd by the end of next month.
The short-term strategy is clear. The strategy for after September—anything but.
'The big question now remains whether prices can be sustained into the autumn months as global demand slows and Trump's tariffs impact global trade,' analysts at Saxo Bank said in a note on Monday.The OPEC+ producers cited 'current healthy oil market fundamentals and steady global economic outlook' to justify the continued rollback of the output cuts, as they have been doing since early spring.
The group is betting on peak summer fuel demand, but this will come to an end in September. Near-term fundamentals may be strong, but the market is bracing for a major surplus once the peak demand season ends.Current demand in the key crude-importing region, Asia, appears to be not as strong as OPEC+ suggests with every press release on its production policy.
Crude oil imports into Asia fell in July to 25 million bpd, down from 27.88 million bpd in June, per data by LSEG Oil Research cited by Reuters columnist Clyde Russell.
Asia's July crude imports slumped to the lowest monthly level in exactly a year, according to the data.
China is boosting imports, but it's likely that these have been opportunistic purchases at lower oil prices when June and July-loading cargoes were arranged. Chinese refiners have been building up stockpiles in recent months, as it's estimated that China has been adding just over 1 million bpd to its stockpiles so far this year.
The volatile prices and the spikes in oil in June during the Israel-Iran war may have influenced buying for cargoes set to arrive in China in August and September, and these could be lower, due to the price hikes.
Looking at fundamentals, the market appears to be headed to a glut in the fourth quarter of the year, analysts concur.
'While OPEC+ policy remains flexible, we assume OPEC+ will keep its production quota unchanged after September as we expect the pace of builds in OECD commercial stocks to accelerate and seasonal demand tailwinds to fade away,' Goldman Sachs said earlier this week.
The investment bank kept its oil price forecast for Brent crude, seeing the international benchmark averaging $64 over the fourth quarter of the year despite recent developments that have pushed both Brent and West Texas Intermediate higher than Goldman's Q4 target.
'We believe the group is finished with its supply hikes, as we move out of the stronger summer demand period and inventories start to rise,' ING commodities strategists Warren Patterson and Ewa Manthey said on Monday.The group hasn't signaled any direction for after September, but the producers warned that the rollback of the cuts could be subject to change.
'The phase-out of the additional voluntary production adjustments may be paused or reversed subject to evolving market conditions,' OPEC said.
This leaves the market hanging and guessing which geopolitical or trade event could overshadow fundamentals and warrant a new OPEC+ intervention sooner than thought.
The messaging from the latest meeting is 'all options remain on the table — including bringing those barrels back, pausing increases for now, or even reversing the recent policy action,' Helima Croft, head of commodity strategy at RBC Capital Markets, told Bloomberg.
The most immediate material change in market balances could be the U.S. seeking to choke off Russian supply to India and Turkey, if Putin lets the August 8 deadline to seek peace in Ukraine lapse without any action.
Analysts assume that Russia and China will find a way to keep crude trade flowing after a short period of adjustment or deeper price discounts for Russia's crude.
India and Turkey are more vulnerable, and if they stop buying Russian oil, OPEC+ will have to tap into the last layer of 1.66 million bpd production cuts and return them to the market sooner than planned, which is by late 2026.
President Trump is threatening he would be 'substantially raising' the tariff on India as 'They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine.'
'India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits,' President Trump wrote on Truth Social on Monday.
The Trump Administration's potential move to severely restrict Russian oil shipments could reduce and even erase the expected surplus on the market in late 2025.
But it is uncertain how long President Trump's campaign pledge 'I'll end the war in Ukraine on day one in office' will take and whether the U.S. will move to impose secondary tariffs on buyers of Russian oil. The Trump Administration wants low oil and energy prices, which would be inconsistent with hiking the barriers to Russian oil exports.
Amidst all these geopolitical frictions and power plays, OPEC+ is watching and waiting for the right time to unwind the last remaining production cuts and reclaim market share lost to U.S. shale.
By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com
More Top Reads From Oilprice.comRead this article on OilPrice.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nvidia, chip stocks jump after Trump says some chipmakers exempt from 100% semiconductor tariff
Nvidia, chip stocks jump after Trump says some chipmakers exempt from 100% semiconductor tariff

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Nvidia, chip stocks jump after Trump says some chipmakers exempt from 100% semiconductor tariff

Chip stocks climbed on Thursday after President Trump said he'll exempt companies from his planned semiconductor tariffs if they have committed to making their chips in the US. 'We'll be putting a tariff of approximately 100% on chips and semiconductors,' Trump said during a press conference at the Oval Office Wednesday afternoon. 'But if you're building in the United States of America, there's no charge.' 'If you've made a commitment to build or if you're in the process of building, as many are, there is no tariff.' Leading AI chipmaker Nvidia (NVDA) stock rose as much as 2.5% Thursday to a fresh intraday high of $183.88 before paring gains midday. Shares of rival Advanced Micro Devices rose more than 6%, while Broadcom (AVGO) and Micron (MU) stocks rose 1% and 2%, respectively. Most of the world's advanced chips are produced by leading contract chip manufacturer TSMC (TSM) in Taiwan, but the company has been building out its capacity in Arizona with a $165 billion investment, exempting it from Trump's tariffs. The company's US-listed shares jumped more than 4% Thursday. Tech companies have rushed to announce investments in their US manufacturing footprint in the hopes of avoiding Trump's trade war wrath. So far, Nvidia has committed to producing $500 billion of AI infrastructure in the US. Micron made a similar $200 billion commitment. Texas Instruments (TXN) has said it's spending $60 billion to bolster its manufacturing capacity in the US. Citi (C) analyst Christopher Danley said the exemptions mean the semiconductor tariff will have 'minimal impact…as US-based semiconductor companies with in-house fabs have operations in the US and fabless companies can commit to using TSMC, Samsung ( GFS (GFS) which have operations in the US.' 'Fabs' refer to factories where chips are produced, and 'fabless' companies outsource production of their chips to contract manufacturers such as TSMC, Samsung, and GFS. Companies with 'in-house fabs' include Intel (INTC), Micron, and Texas Instruments. Nvidia, AMD, Broadcom, and Qualcomm (QCOM) are 'fabless.' Morgan Stanley (MS) analyst Joseph Moore echoed Danley's sentiment, writing in a note to clients Thursday, 'To some degree this outcome would be something of a relief.' 'Yes, 100% tariffs are unpalatable but if companies are given time to restore them, the real tax is just the higher cost of building chips in the United States," he wrote. "The biggest fear was that such a tariff would be implemented immediately.' Still, Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon noted that there are questions surrounding how the tariffs would be applied, making it hard to determine its impact. He explained that most semiconductors are imported once they're already inside other products, and the US 'does not import a ton of raw chips" — $45 billion in 2024 — and it's unclear whether duties would just apply to raw semiconductors or also to products containing them. The US Department of Commerce did not immediately respond to Yahoo Finance's request for comment. Further details about the tariffs will be revealed when the agency publishes its findings from an investigation into US semiconductor imports it launched in April under Section 232 of The Trade Expansion Act, which empowers the president to restrict imports of products related to national security. "Trump's public statements often lack detail and nuance, so at this point we do not know exactly how the new rules will be implemented once they go into effect," Rasgon wrote. "We should know more once the actual 232 investigation results are published." Laura Bratton is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on Bluesky @ Email her at Sign in to access your portfolio

Trump's planned 100% computer chip tariff sparks confusion among businesses and trading partners
Trump's planned 100% computer chip tariff sparks confusion among businesses and trading partners

The Hill

time29 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump's planned 100% computer chip tariff sparks confusion among businesses and trading partners

President Donald Trump's plans for 100% tariffs on computer chips that aren't made in the U.S. are stoking confusion among businesses and trading partners — boosting stocks for leading semiconductor companies while leaving smaller producers scrambling to understand the implications. The U.S. imports a relatively small number of chips because most of the foreign-made chips in a device — from an iPhone to a car — were already assembled into a product, or part of a product, before it landed in the country. 'The real question everybody in the industry is asking is whether there will be a component tariff, where the chips in a device would require some sort of separate tariff calculation,' said Martin Chorzempa, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. Trump said Wednesday that companies that 'made a commitment to build' in the U.S. would be spared the import tax, even if they are not yet producing those chips in American factories. 'We'll be putting a tariff of approximately 100% on chips and semiconductors,' Trump said in the Oval Office while meeting with Apple CEO Tim Cook. 'But if you're building in the United States of America, there's no charge.' Wall Street investors interpreted that as good news not just for U.S. companies like AMD, Intel and Nvidia, but also for the biggest Asian chipmakers like Samsung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company that have been working to build U.S. factories. But it left greater uncertainty for smaller chipmakers in Europe and Asia that have little exposure to the AI boom but still make semiconductors inserted into essential products like cars or washing machines. These producers 'probably aren't large enough to get on the map for an exemption and quite probably wouldn't have the kind of excess capital and margins to be able to add investment at a large scale into the United States,' Chorzempa said. The announcement came more than three months after Trump temporarily exempted most electronics from his administration's most onerous tariffs. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a shortage of computer chips increased the price of autos and contributed to higher inflation. Chorzempa said chip tariffs could again raise prices by hundreds of dollars per vehicle if the semiconductors inside a car are not exempt. 'There's a chip that allows you to open and close the window,' Chorzempa said. 'There's a chip that is running the entertainment system. There is a chip that's kind of running all the electronics. There are chips, especially in EVs, that are doing power management, all that kind of stuff.' Much of the investment into building U.S. chip factories began with the bipartisan CHIPS and Science Act that President Joe Biden signed into law in 2022, providing more than $50 billion to support new computer chip plants, fund research and train workers for the industry. Trump has vocally opposed those financial incentives and taken a different approach, betting that the threat of dramatically higher chip costs would force most companies to open factories domestically, despite the risk that tariffs could squeeze corporate profits and push up prices for electronics.

Trump administration, TSA propose new rule expanding drone usage
Trump administration, TSA propose new rule expanding drone usage

Miami Herald

time29 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Trump administration, TSA propose new rule expanding drone usage

The U.S. Transportation Secretary and the TSA have unveiled a new proposed rule for drones that would make it easier for companies to use drones for farming, deliveries, manufacturing and more, called Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS). Touted by Secretary Sean P. Duffy as "unleashing American drone dominance," the new BVLOS rule does away with individual waivers or exemptions for drone operators to use their drones without a visual line of sight. Traditionally, they were approved by the FAA on a case-by-case basis. "From drones delivering medicine to unmanned aircraft surveying crops, this technology will fundamentally change the way we interact with the world," said Duffy. "Our new rule will reform outdated regulations that were holding innovators back while also enhancing safety in our skies. Thanks to President Trump, America – not China – will lead the way in this exciting new technology." The new rule requires drone traffic-management services and exempts drones from operating within airspace of places like airports, space ports and other similar locations. Operations, according to the new rule, would take place at or below 400 feet, and would be allowed to occur above people. Drones would not need traditional FAA airworthiness certificates; instead of the FAA creating the standards for drone safety and security, the industry standards would become the FAA's standards for allowing drone operations. According to the release, the FAA is welcoming the public to comment on the rule for the next sixty days in the Federal Register. However, the Federal Register only shows Trump's executive order on the issue, not the proposal. Detractors will surely point to worries over personal safety, surveillance and the potential for drones to reduce the American workforce by automating some jobs. The Federal Register also shows the work of the Biden Administration in researching and working with industry partners to create the BVLOS rule, as far back as 2022 and 2023. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store