Call for paddleboarders to act ‘responsibly' around marine mammals
Dr Emily Hague, from Heriot-Watt University, explained that a third of all observed disturbances were caused by 'non-motorised craft like kayaks, paddleboards and rowboats'.
She explained: 'In one case, seals resting on a beach became visibly agitated as kayaks passed by, beginning to move around and then many left the haul-out site and slid into the water, a clear disruption of their resting behaviour.
'Signs of stress aren't always dramatic or obvious; it can be more subtle, such as a change in breathing rate, swimming direction or their diving behaviour.'
A paddleboarder heads for the sea during the morning sunshine (Image: Gareth Fuller) Another third of the disturbances were caused by small motorboats, with the researchers saying that in one case they saw a speedboat 'repeatedly pursue' bottlenose dolphins, which changed direction and lengthened their dives, regrouping only after the boat left.
The scientists added that many small motorboats do not carry automatic identification system tracking, meaning their presence and behaviour are 'effectively invisible' to regulators and conservation authorities.
Disturbances caused by kayaks and paddleboards were recorded in the Clyde, Forth and Tay and Moray Firth areas, while powered vessel disturbances, including those from speedboats and RIBs (rigid inflatable boats), occurred in all five areas.
Dr Hague explained that the land-based sightings were 'opportunistic', reflecting 'what happened to be observed, not necessarily how often disturbances occur'.
She added: 'Just because no incidents involving kayaks were recorded in Orkney or Shetland doesn't mean they don't happen.'
READ MORE:
The scientist appealed to all water users to follow the Scottish Marine Wildlife Watching Code in order to minimise their impact on marine mammals.
'The truth is that all of Scotland's coastline is important habitat for marine mammals,' she said.
'Whether you're paddling off the coast of Fife or sailing around Skye, you're likely sharing the water with sensitive species.
'We want people to enjoy Scotland's waters, but to do so responsibly by keeping up to date on how best to respond should you spot marine wildlife.
'Kayakers, paddleboarders, surfers, recreational boaters and everyone else in the water should follow the Scottish Marine Wildlife Watching Code, which offers clear advice on how to minimise your impact on marine mammals.
'With a little more awareness and a few small changes, we can all help ensure that sharing the sea doesn't come at a cost to the animals that call it home.'
A third of marine mammal disturbances observed in a study were found to be caused by unmotorised craft (Image: PA) The research, which was conducted with the support of the Whale and Dolphin Conservation, forms part of the Scottish Vessel Project, led by Heriot-Watt University.
The project aims to capture marine vessel data around Scotland's coastline to better understand the amount of exposure to boats that whales, dolphins and seals experience at different locations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
17 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Major new assessment recognises four separate giraffe species for the first time
Historically, giraffes have been classified as a single species with nine subspecies, but there has long been uncertainty over their taxonomy – the way in which plants, animals and microorganisms are named, described and classified. Reticulated giraffe (Giraffa reticulata) is one of the new species classified in the assessment, seen here in Kenya's Laikipia Plateau (Michael Brown/PA) There is also an urgent need for better conservation planning for giraffes, which are assessed as 'vulnerable' to extinction on the IUCN's Red List of Threatened Species amid declining numbers, with several of the existing subspecies classified as endangered or even critically endangered. A taxonomic review by an IUCN task force assessed genetic data, which showed DNA with large differences between several giraffe lineages, supporting the recognition of different species, the experts said. The review also looked at notable differences such as skull structure and bone shape across regions and natural features such as a major rivers, rift valleys and desert areas in Africa that could have cut off giraffe populations from each other so they evolved into different species. Masai giraffe (Giraffa tippelskirchi) in Tanzania's Lake Manyara National Park (Michael Brown/PA) As a result of the assessment, four distinct giraffe species have been officially recognised, with several recognised subspecies. Experts said it would lead to a more nuanced understanding of the conservation threats and opportunities they face in the diverse regions of Africa in which they live. Southern giraffe (Giraffa giraffa) seen in the deserts of Namibia (Michael Brown/PA) The IUCN's Michael Brown, one of the co-authors of the assessment, said: 'This landmark taxonomic revision by the IUCN giraffe and okapi specialist group reflects the best available science and provides a globally standardised framework to inform conservation. 'Recognising these four species is vital not only for accurate IUCN Red List assessments, targeted conservation action and co-ordinated management across national borders. 'The more precisely we understand giraffe taxonomy, the better equipped we are to assess their status and implement effective conservation strategies.' Northern giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis) in Uganda's Kidepo Valley National Park (Michael Brown/PA) The four species are: Northern giraffe, with the subspecies West African giraffe, Kordofan giraffe and Nubian giraffe; the Reticulated giraffe; the Masai giraffe, with the subspecies Masai giraffe and Luangwa/Thornicroft's giraffe; and the Southern giraffe, with the subspecies South African giraffe and Angolan giraffe.
Glasgow Times
3 days ago
- Glasgow Times
Citizen science water tests reveal ‘really concerning' pollution in Windermere
Following the results, which showed levels of harmful bacteria and phosphorus that fail water quality standards and identified 'hotspots' for pollution, campaigners have called for 'decisive action' to improve the lake for people and the environment. Surveying saw 350 volunteers collecting more than 1,000 samples of water from Windermere, in the Lake District, during 10 sessions that took place over two and a half years at more than 100 locations – many of which had never previously been tested for water quality. The findings from the Big Windermere Survey show much of the lake's shoreline failed bathing water quality standards for illness-causing bacteria in the summer, when it is popular for activities such as swimming and water sports. And tests for phosphorus, a pollutant that causes algal blooms and damage to aquatic wildlife and comes from sources such as wastewater and fertiliser run-off from agriculture, revealed levels of the chemical that exceed expected standards. The Freshwater Biological Association, which co-ordinated the citizen science project with the University of Lancaster, warned that rare and threatened freshwater species in the lake such as Arctic char would face a 'steady and devastating decline' without action to improve water quality. In the light of the findings, the charity's executive director Simon Johnson said: 'The evidence is clear and must lead to decisive action to improve water quality'. He said Windermere was one of the world's most famous lakes, and if the issues could not be solved on this 'totemic' lake, it did not bode well for the future of other equally important but less famous sites such as Coniston Water. He told the PA news agency: 'Its scientific, ecological, cultural importance, whether you are an artist, a poet, wild swimmer, motorboat owner, it's just intertwined in the whole kind of social and ecological fabric of the Lake District. 'If we can't get this right on Windermere, where are we going to do it?' He added: 'When you see a place you love so much, that is so important, when the water quality of that place is below what I think society expects and demands, then that's really concerning. 'I hope that these results will spur people on into better and faster action to rejuvenate this incredible place.' Windermere, part of the Lake District National Park Unesco World Heritage Site, is home to more than 14,000 people, and its scenery, rare species and cultural heritage attract seven million visitors a year, generating £750 million for the local economy. Bacteria levels rose in the summer months when the lake is popular for water sports, the report found (Danny Lawson/PA) But it has been the focus of concerns over pollution, from sources including wastewater from United Utilities and private sewage treatment and rural and urban land use, with the Government pledging to 'clean up Windermere' from the high levels of pollutants it faces. The citizen science testing which took place from June 2022 to November 2024 aimed to address concerns about water quality and fill in gaps in traditional monitoring. The Environment Agency currently monitors water quality through the summer months at four sites around the lake as part of its bathing water assessments, with all receiving 'excellent' ratings in the last annual classification. But the Big Windermere Survey used data from 71 sample sites around the lake's shoreline, to assess the prevalence of two types of bacteria that can cause illness, with tests taken throughout the year. The data show that overall Windermere's levels of bacteria give it a 'good' water quality rating, but pollution gets worse in the summer, with the north-east, north-west, and south-west areas of the lake having bacteria levels that would lead to a 'poor' or failing rating for bathing water quality. Only the south-east lake basin has concentrations of these bacteria – which are found in faeces and can come from treated wastewater, untreated sewage, livestock and wildlife – consistent with excellent bathing water quality in the summer, a report on the surveying found. Both the north and south basins of Windermere were classified as having 'good' levels of phosphorus in the latest official assessment, as part of standards that should see all water bodies reach good ecological status by 2027. Waterhead on Windermere was one of the hotspots for pollution (Yui Mok/PA) But the report shows that all areas of the lake – when sampled around the shoreline – had 'moderate' levels of phosphorus, which mean they are higher than what is needed to ensure a 'good' rating. The report also reveals that some sample sites had consistently demonstrated high concentrations of both phosphorus and at least one of the bacteria. These include Waterhead, Millerground, Bowness Bay, Belle Isle, Mitchell Wyke Bay, south-west shore sites and near the River Leven outflow on the lake, and river locations on the Rothay, Stock Ghyll, Black Beck, Mill Beck, and Wilfin Beck. The Freshwater Biological Association is calling for the pollution hotspots identified by the testing to be investigated and resolved urgently, and for the Environment Agency to increase the number of bathing water sites and monitor them through the year. The charity also wants to see investment to ensure wastewater facilities are fit for purpose and adequately monitored and regulators are able to tackle pollution risks, and it wants funding to allow the Big Windermere Survey to continue. An Environment Department (Defra) spokesperson said: 'This Government shares the nation's fury at unacceptable levels of pollution pumped into this national treasure. 'We have committed to ending sewage pollution into Windermere entirely, boosted monitoring of sewage spills nationwide and are increasing enforcement to hold polluting companies to account. 'We know that there is a lot of damage to undo, but we are getting on with the work to ensure that the British people will be able to see genuine results.'
Western Telegraph
3 days ago
- Western Telegraph
Citizen science water tests reveal ‘really concerning' pollution in Windermere
Following the results, which showed levels of harmful bacteria and phosphorus that fail water quality standards and identified 'hotspots' for pollution, campaigners have called for 'decisive action' to improve the lake for people and the environment. Surveying saw 350 volunteers collecting more than 1,000 samples of water from Windermere, in the Lake District, during 10 sessions that took place over two and a half years at more than 100 locations – many of which had never previously been tested for water quality. The findings from the Big Windermere Survey show much of the lake's shoreline failed bathing water quality standards for illness-causing bacteria in the summer, when it is popular for activities such as swimming and water sports. And tests for phosphorus, a pollutant that causes algal blooms and damage to aquatic wildlife and comes from sources such as wastewater and fertiliser run-off from agriculture, revealed levels of the chemical that exceed expected standards. The Freshwater Biological Association, which co-ordinated the citizen science project with the University of Lancaster, warned that rare and threatened freshwater species in the lake such as Arctic char would face a 'steady and devastating decline' without action to improve water quality. In the light of the findings, the charity's executive director Simon Johnson said: 'The evidence is clear and must lead to decisive action to improve water quality'. He said Windermere was one of the world's most famous lakes, and if the issues could not be solved on this 'totemic' lake, it did not bode well for the future of other equally important but less famous sites such as Coniston Water. He told the PA news agency: 'Its scientific, ecological, cultural importance, whether you are an artist, a poet, wild swimmer, motorboat owner, it's just intertwined in the whole kind of social and ecological fabric of the Lake District. 'If we can't get this right on Windermere, where are we going to do it?' He added: 'When you see a place you love so much, that is so important, when the water quality of that place is below what I think society expects and demands, then that's really concerning. 'I hope that these results will spur people on into better and faster action to rejuvenate this incredible place.' Windermere, part of the Lake District National Park Unesco World Heritage Site, is home to more than 14,000 people, and its scenery, rare species and cultural heritage attract seven million visitors a year, generating £750 million for the local economy. Bacteria levels rose in the summer months when the lake is popular for water sports, the report found (Danny Lawson/PA) But it has been the focus of concerns over pollution, from sources including wastewater from United Utilities and private sewage treatment and rural and urban land use, with the Government pledging to 'clean up Windermere' from the high levels of pollutants it faces. The citizen science testing which took place from June 2022 to November 2024 aimed to address concerns about water quality and fill in gaps in traditional monitoring. The Environment Agency currently monitors water quality through the summer months at four sites around the lake as part of its bathing water assessments, with all receiving 'excellent' ratings in the last annual classification. But the Big Windermere Survey used data from 71 sample sites around the lake's shoreline, to assess the prevalence of two types of bacteria that can cause illness, with tests taken throughout the year. The data show that overall Windermere's levels of bacteria give it a 'good' water quality rating, but pollution gets worse in the summer, with the north-east, north-west, and south-west areas of the lake having bacteria levels that would lead to a 'poor' or failing rating for bathing water quality. Only the south-east lake basin has concentrations of these bacteria – which are found in faeces and can come from treated wastewater, untreated sewage, livestock and wildlife – consistent with excellent bathing water quality in the summer, a report on the surveying found. Both the north and south basins of Windermere were classified as having 'good' levels of phosphorus in the latest official assessment, as part of standards that should see all water bodies reach good ecological status by 2027. Waterhead on Windermere was one of the hotspots for pollution (Yui Mok/PA) But the report shows that all areas of the lake – when sampled around the shoreline – had 'moderate' levels of phosphorus, which mean they are higher than what is needed to ensure a 'good' rating. The report also reveals that some sample sites had consistently demonstrated high concentrations of both phosphorus and at least one of the bacteria. These include Waterhead, Millerground, Bowness Bay, Belle Isle, Mitchell Wyke Bay, south-west shore sites and near the River Leven outflow on the lake, and river locations on the Rothay, Stock Ghyll, Black Beck, Mill Beck, and Wilfin Beck. The Freshwater Biological Association is calling for the pollution hotspots identified by the testing to be investigated and resolved urgently, and for the Environment Agency to increase the number of bathing water sites and monitor them through the year. The charity also wants to see investment to ensure wastewater facilities are fit for purpose and adequately monitored and regulators are able to tackle pollution risks, and it wants funding to allow the Big Windermere Survey to continue.
