French town cuts funding for music festival over booking of pro-Palestinian band Kneecap
The Belfast-based Kneecap, which raps in Irish and English, has drawn criticism because it has displayed pro-Palestine messages during gigs. It is scheduled to play on the final day of the Rock-en-Seine festival, which takes place from August 21 to August 24.
In a statement late on Wednesday, the Saint-Cloud city hall said the money had been agreed before the final line-up of the festival was announced and that it had decided to withdraw the funding on July 3.
The Saint-Cloud city said it respects the festival's programming freedom, and had not sought 'to enter into any negotiations with a view to influencing the programming.'
'On the other hand it does not finance political action, nor demands, and even less calls to violence, such as calls to kill lawmakers, whatever their nationality,' the statement said.
Rock-en-Seine could not be immediately reached for comment.
Kneecap member Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh, who is known by his stage name Mo Chara, was charged in May with a terrorism offence for allegedly displaying a flag of Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed militant group that is proscribed as a terrorist organization in Britain.
He denies the offence and the band says its members do not support Hamas or Hezbollah.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
14 hours ago
- Arab News
Argentines commemorate Jewish center bombing, demand justice
BUENOS AIRES, Argentina: Hundreds of Argentines gathered Friday to commemorate the 1994 bombing of a Jewish cultural center that killed dozens, demanding justice for a crime for which there has not yet been a trial. In the worst such attack in Argentina's history, a car bomb on July 18, 1994, killed 85 people and injured more than 300 at the seven-story Argentine Israelite Mutual Association (AMIA) building in Buenos Aires. Two years earlier, an explosion at the Israeli embassy killed 29 and wounded 200. 'Impunity persists, terrorism too' was the slogan for Friday's 31st commemoration of the AMIA attack — the second such event attended by President Javier Milei, a staunch defender of Israel. Survivors and victims' relatives hope there will be movement under Catholic-born Milei, who has already visited Israel twice since taking office in December 2023, and has professed a deep interest in Judaism. In April 2024, an Argentine court found Iran and Hezbollah were responsible for what it called a crime against humanity. It ruled the likely motive for the attacks was the cancelation by the Argentine government under then-president Carlos Menem of three contracts with Iran for the supply of nuclear equipment and technology. In June, a judge authorized a trial in absentia against ten Iranian and Lebanese defendants — former ministers and diplomats. No date has been set. Iran has always denied any involvement and has refused to hand over any suspects. The Memoria Activa organization, which represents victims' families, rejects a trial in absentia as it believes it 'essential for the accused to participate' for the whole truth to come out. The AMIA itself is in favor, but has cautioned that 'holding a trial only for it to end... in some sort of nullity or a declaration of unconstitutionality would once again be very painful for everyone.' Both organizations have been highly critical of the Argentine state's handling of the case. Last year, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in San Jose, Costa Rica, found the state responsible for not preventing, or properly investigating, the AMIA attack. It also blamed the state for efforts to 'cover up and obstruct the investigation.' Prosecutor Alberto Nisman, investigating accusations of a cover-up against former president Cristina Kirchner, was later found murdered. No one was ever charged over his death. Argentina is host to the largest Jewish community in Latin America, with nearly 300,000 people living mostly in Buenos Aires.
Arab News
18 hours ago
- Arab News
UK police drop Kneecap probe after Glastonbury performance
LONDON: UK police said on Friday they had dropped a criminal investigation into on-stage comments by Irish rappers Kneecap at the Glastonbury festival. Avon and Somerset Police in southwest England said last month it had launched an enquiry after reviewing 'video footage and audio' of both Kneecap and London-based duo Bob Vylan, whose frontman led a chant against the Israeli army at the festival. The Kneecap probe was focused on remarks made about a forthcoming court case in which one band member Liam O'Hanna, known by his stage name Mo Chara, is charged with a 'terror' offense over alleged support for banned organizations Hamas and Hezbollah. But in an update the force said it would take no further action against Kneecap, whose members had been informed of the decision. 'Detectives sought advice from the Crown Prosecution Service during their enquiries and after that advice, we have made the decision to take no further action on the grounds there is insufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction for any offense,' it said. Inquiries into the separate allegations against Bob Vylan, however, would continue, it added. Chara appeared in court in June accused of having displayed a Hezbollah flag while saying 'Up Hamas, Up Hezbollah' at a London concert last year. The Iran-backed Lebanese group Hezbollah and the Palestinian militants Hamas are banned in the UK, where it is an offense to express support for them. Kneecap deny the terrorism charge and say the video featuring the Hezbollah flag has been taken out of context.
Arab News
20 hours ago
- Arab News
Will UK-France ‘one in, one out' deal solve migration dilemma?
Forget the rebranding of the UK-France 'entente cordial' as the 'entente amicale,' as expressed by King Charles when he toasted the relations between the old neighbors when he received Emmanuel Macron during last week's first state visit for a French president since 2008. Forget also the joint nuclear deterrent agreement reached between London and Paris. Forget Macron's mantra of standing together to 'save' European democracy. Forget the need to unhook Europe's excessive dependencies 'on both the US and China.' Forget the need to save a democratic model that is under threat from 'foreign interference, information manipulation, domination of minds by negative emotions and addictions to social media,' as Macron told Parliament. Forget the commitment to save and defend Ukraine, used repeatedly by British and French leaders at every official meeting. Lastly, forget the commitment to finding a solution to the Gaza conflict or a means to lessen the humanitarian blockade starving the Palestinians, as well as the threat to unilaterally recognize Palestine. Forget all these important issues that were evoked during Macron's three-day state visit. Instead, most of the attention focused on the vexing issue of cross-Channel migration, which has become a major headache for UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's one-year-old Labour government — just like it has been for all prime ministers, without exception, since the mid-1990s. But it is becoming increasingly problematic because the failure to manage UK migration policy has become the ladder climbed by right-wing populist parties like Reform UK. The 'one in, one out' policy that London and Paris last week unveiled as a pilot program — meaning some of the migrants arriving in the UK on small boats will be returned to France — may not be the silver bullet needed to save Starmer's premiership. Though Starmer described the deal as 'groundbreaking' and capable of stemming the record numbers of people who have embarked on the perilous journey so far this year, it will need time to prove its effectiveness. The failure to manage UK migration policy has become the ladder climbed by right-wing populist parties Mohamed Chebaro Starmer hopes that the deportation of those who cross the English Channel from France will break the model that has been used for the past few years. And he hopes that it will signal to migrants that, if they cross in a small boat, they will ultimately end up back where they started. In exchange for every return, a different individual will be allowed to come to the UK in a legal and safe manner, as part of a scheme for reuniting families or for those who already have a link with the country. The pilot program is understood to start with 50 returns a week and is likely to be ready to commence in the coming weeks. More than 21,000 migrants have crossed the Channel in rudimentary vessels so far this year, 55 percent more than in the same period last year. While the new measures are yet to be tested, some other new powers recently demonstrated by French police could yield different results. Police officers were seen slashing the small rubber boats with knives as they tried to pick up migrants in shallow waters. This dangerous new practice is yet to be contested in court by human right defenders, while it might also not be easy to apply along the entire coastline. Data gathered from both the British and French sides is alarming. Just since May 2024, when the Home Office began publishing this data, the French authorities have prevented more than 33,000 migrants from crossing the Channel to the UK. This includes 21,317 individuals who were prevented from crossing in May to December last year and 12,321 so far in 2025. France has also engaged in 1,158 'events' in that same period, referring to small boats not being allowed to leave or the arrest of smugglers. That means only about four out of every 10 migrants are being stopped from crossing — a figure that Starmer will want to see rise, as he is under pressure from those using migration failures to turn public opinion against the government. At the same time, they are sowing discontent in some communities that could lead to violent acts, threatening the peace and civil cohesion. The truth came in a statement made by Macron, as he blamed Brexit for the sharp increase in migrant arrivals Mohamed Chebaro The truth that neither the government nor the people of the UK wanted to hear came in a statement made by Macron during his visit, when he blamed Brexit for the sharp increase in migrant arrivals. He claimed that Britain's 2020 departure from the EU had worsened the situation in the Channel, cutting off legal migration routes and London's access to the bloc's returns agreements. It appears that those who so hastily engineered and enforced Brexit did not consider the legal parameters that needed to be in place to send people back. That void has become the pull factor and, as a result, the bitter truth is that leaving the EU has had the opposite effect on migration to what the Brexiteers promised. However, Brexit may not be solely to blame, as other factors have left the immigration processing system exposed, such as the policy of austerity during the 14 years of Conservative government up to last July and the slow and ineffective visa schemes that brought much-needed workers to the country. Many of those workers ended up playing the system and becoming a burden on the welfare state, which was already suffering after years of underinvestment. Last week's UK-France summit yielded a lot in terms of upgrading the cooperation between these two neighbors and strategic allies. But its success or failure hinges entirely on the ability of both countries to curb cross-Channel migration, the rise of which was a clear result of Brexit. The one in, one out plan looks good on paper, but its implementation relies on many variables that neither Macron nor Starmer control. It is worth mentioning that, when accounting for population, the UK receives fewer asylum applications than France and the EU average. The French Interior Ministry recorded 157,947 asylum applications in 2024, compared to 108,138 applicants in the UK. Across the EU, there were just under a million applications for the same period. The UK will have to prepare to receive some of these if its new deal with France is going to work.
