
It's official - The Project has been axed
Channel 10 has made it official. Staff at The Project have been told the show is coming to an end on June 27.
Until today, staff had been kept in the dark, left to read headlines and stories from outsiders who knew more about the future of the show than they did.
Despite staff on the show being kept in the dark until now, TV Blackbox released details over the weekend about its replacement show, including the show name.
The new program will be called: Behind the Lines – A 10 News First Investigation.
Wow, that's a mouthful.
The outlet (of which I am a co-founder) has already revealed the show will air four nights per week at 6.30pm with a 'best of' or repeat episode on the typically low-rating Friday nights.
This backs up everything I reported in my column last week when many still believed 10's new 'Investigations Unit' would only be making specials or a once-a-week show along the lines of 7NEWS Spotlight and 60 Minutes.
Author Kyle Laidlaw reports that he has seen the logo and included these marketing materials in his report:
'Go behind the headlines with 10 News First as our reporters dig deep to uncover the facts, follow every lead, and expose stories that others try to keep hidden.'
'Hosted by Denham Hitchcock, this investigation series shines a light on issues that matter to Australians – holding the powerful to account with fearless journalism.'
'Real stories. Real impact. The truth, told straight.'
Today The Australian is reporting the launch date for the new show will be Monday July 14.
DINKLAGE BACKLASH
The fallout from Disney's failed 'woke' version of Snow White isn't just being felt by lead actress Rachel Zegler, who will be lucky to secure any future roles in Hollywood.
Zegler was an outspoken critic of the 1937 animated film, particularly its depiction of women and the 'stalkerish' nature of Snow White's relationship with the Prince.
The backlash against her has been well documented.
Now, actor Peter Dinklage is facing a backlash from his own community as little people take issue with his demand little people not depict the dwarfs.
'I was a little taken aback when they were very proud to cast a Latina actress as Snow White — but you're still telling the story of Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs ' he told Marc Maron on the WTF podcast.
'Take a step back and look at what you're doing there. It makes no sense to me. You're progressive in one way, but then you're still making that f**king backward story about seven dwarfs living in a cave together? What the f**k are you doing, man? Have I done nothing to advance the cause from my soapbox? I guess I'm not loud enough.'
His comments in January 2022 made headlines around the world and Disney ended up using CGI characters to depict the dwarfs.
So, at the end of the day, he was loud enough.
But that's the problem.
His 'privileged activism' had more power than those who would have been given jobs and made an income from the production if it had used little people to play the dwarfs.
It's money Peter Dinklage doesn't need, but other working little people do. In fact, many in the community were angry at Disney for using CGI characters and angry at Dinklage for pushing his agenda.
Former WWE Superstar Hornswoggle, and little person, summed it up best this past fortnight during an interview with Chris Van Vliet.
'F**k you Peter Dinklage piece of sh*t' he told Van Vilet.
'It still makes me mad. Like, he costed so many people jobs, so many people'.
'I think he wanted to make a statement and he thought he was making some cool hip thing, but it wasn't, when he did Elf that cheque cashed just fine. Tyrion Lannister was a role for a little person. He cashed that cheque for all those years. Like, I am okay, not going out for Brad Pitts roll, give me grumpy or happy or sleepy and major Disney remake'.
But then Hornswoggle made his most important point.
'And then you're gonna have seven dwarves. Then there's extras, then there's stunt doubles that are all gonna get paid'.
And when CGI was used, no-one in the little people community were paid.
So, a win for Dinklage but a big loss for workers in the little people community who would have been happy for the work.
Peter Dinklage can take the moral high ground because it doesn't affect him. He's not going to accept a role as Happy or Grumpy because he doesn't need that kind of money. He can be an artist. He can do the roles that he wants to do.
That is what I'm calling 'privileged activism'. It's when someone can demand changes that won't affect them.
Dinklage is not living week-to-week like many working actors in the little people community. Dinklage has his choice of roles and the financial clout to be able to turn roles down.
Others aren't so lucky.
It's one thing for Dinklage to demand change, it's another when he's taking money out of other people's pockets.
THE BEST SHOW TO WATCH THIS WEEK
The most compelling drama series this week isn't on television or a streaming service, it's happening inside Norfolk Superior Court in Dedham, Massachusetts – and it's all being beamed live.
I'm talking about the trial of Karen Read – a woman accused of fatally striking Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe and leaving him to die in the snow outside another officer's home after a night of drinking in January 2022.
This trial has so many twists and turns it makes any fictional court drama seem tame.
Watching the clips come into my feed though, I wonder if I am getting a one-sided view of the case or whether I'm seeing a true representation of what is happening.
From what I'm seeing the prosecution is struggling, witnesses have changed their testimony and it certainly seems like a cover-up.
But is that because it is people who believe Karen Read is innocent who are posting the majority of videos?
While I'm loving the influx of moments from the trial, it reminds me of the importance of credible news – news that I can rely on to give me a complete overview of what is happening in a story, not just a one-sided view.
We are lucky in this country to have news services on every channel that deliver a quality bulletin every night. No matter which one you watch, you can have faith you are getting all the facts.
And that's important.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Perth Now
9 hours ago
- Perth Now
Gal Gadot blames 'pressure' for stars to speak about Israel for Snow White flopping
Gal Gadot believes the 'pressure on celebrities to speak out against Israel' caused Snow White to flop. The 40-year-old actress - who served in the Israeli Defense Forces for two years as part of her mandatory conscription - played the Evil Queen in Disney's live-action fairytale and she expected the film to be a "huge success", only for it to perform poorly at the global box office, generating a loss of more than $115 million. And Gal has now suggested one reasons audiences were put off the film - which featured Rachel Zegler, a vocal supporter of Palestine and Gaza - because of the current political climate. Speaking on Israeli TV show The A Talks, the Jerusalem Post reports she said in Hebrew: 'First of all, I have to say that I really enjoyed filming this movie. 'I even enjoyed working with Rachel Zegler. We laughed, we talked and it was fun. I was sure that this movie was going to be a huge success. 'And then October 7 happened, and what's happening in all kinds of industries, and also in Hollywood, is that there's a lot of pressure on celebrities to speak out against Israel. "I can always explain and try to give people in the world context about what's happening and what the reality is here, but in the end, people decide for themselves. I was disappointed that the movie was greatly affected by that and didn't do well at the box office.' The former Miss Israel previously admitted she had found playing the Evil Queen "delicious" because she doesn't often get asked to play the villain. She told Variety: "It was different than anything that I've ever done because I was playing the villain. She's so theatrical and so grand and bigger than life … it was a delicious role to play." Gal - who is best known for playing the lead in the Wonder Woman film franchise - loved the experience of getting to grips with a new character. The Hollywood star shared: "That's the fun part about what we do. To dig in to create all the history for the character and to understand how they operate - what triggers them, what they love, what scares them - it's something that takes you through a journey when you play a character. And I love it."

News.com.au
10 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Stand up': Star's proposal to boyfriend divides
Former Disney Star Bella Thorne has sparked debate by proposing to her British boyfriend, producer Mark Emms... who she is already engaged to. The 27-year-old, who rose to prominence as a child actor on the Disney television show Shake It Up and in movies like Adam Sandler and Drew Barrymore's Blended, has just gotten down on one knee and asked her boyfriend to marry her. The romantic gesture isn't just surprising in the fact that she's forgone the tradition of the man proposing and popped the question herself, but it is also slightly random, because the pair are already engaged - and have been since 2024. Ms Thorne didn't offer much explanation but posted a clip of her proposing on social media to her millions of followers. '3 years ago we met, 1 year later he proposed, now year 1 later, so did I,' she wrote. There is some music over the top of the video, so you can't hear Mr Emms' response, but he clearly said yes. The 45-year-old even covered his mouth with his hand in shock before dropping to his knees and joining the former Disney star on the ground. It was quite the romantic scene but the proposal really baffled people online. While some commented on how 'sweet' it was and gushed over the couple, many didn't like the idea of a woman proposing to a man. 'Girl stand up. I'm saying this with love,' one advised. 'If he had already proposed. Why did you do it? I'm confused,' another said. 'Okay ladies. Let's not normalise this okay?' One wrote. 'Girl you cannot be serious,' someone else said 'Get up,' someone instructed. One social media user commented that you 'don't ever propose to a man,' another countered, that argument saying everyone should leave Ms Thorne alone and 'let her cook' and propose to her boyfriend. The lovebirds originally got engaged after just nine months of dating. Emms, 45, works behind the scenes as a producer, and owns a bar in New York City and the pair met at model Cara Delevingne's birthday party. Ms Thorne has previously shared on social media that the two have been 'through every emotion together and I love them all equally' and she has told People that the pair have even seen a therapist before marriage. 'We're still really learning each other's traits, and trying to get them right before we get married,' she said. She added that the wedding planning is 'going great' and said it has been a 'wow' experience to find her partner. 'Every day we kind of draw closer. It's really like, 'Oh wow, we're really, and you're my partner.' Let's do this together,' she said. 'So that kind of becomes more real every day and kind of solidifies our partnership more and more every day.'

Sydney Morning Herald
21 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Helicopter parent? Yep. Hypocrite? For sure. Why more and more of us are tracking our kids
I slipped into the Apple Store furtively, not quite sure what I was doing was right. My child would soon be walking to school on her own, I said. And I wanted to track her. The shop assistant met my query with total approval. As though what I was seeking – to digitally surveille my own kid – was perfectly normal. So I bought the AirTag, which would nestle into her school backpack and assure me that she had arrived at school safely. Electronic stalking of children by their parents is increasingly common. And it's a controversial topic. Is it a valid and respectful way to ensure our children's safety? Or is it an invasion of privacy which is contributing to the anxiety epidemic among kids who have only ever known a world dominated by the smartphone? The phenomenon brings to mind comedian Tina Fey's quip about using Photoshop to digitally alter images: 'it is appalling and a tragic reflection on the moral decay of our society … unless I need it, in which case, everybody be cool'. Whether it's right or wrong, a bias towards surveillance is clearly the prevailing parental sentiment – this week the California-based family tracking app Life360 reported its half-yearly earnings, which showed record revenue growth. The business is worth $9.5 billion, and is expanding into the tracking of ageing relatives and family pets. In Australia, use of Life360 has surged from 1.9 million monthly active users in 2023 to 2.7 million in 2024. 'We're seeing the rise of what we call the anxiety economy – a shift where families are making more values-based decisions and prioritising peace of mind in how they spend,' said the company's newly announced chief executive, Lauren Antonoff. 'I think of us as the antidote for the anxiety. We're not telling people that there's danger around every corner, but we know that people think about this stuff.' The company recently released an advertisement that went viral, which satirised the very parental anxiety it monetises. The ad featured a mother singing a Disney-style song to her teenage daughter called I think of you (dying) in which the mother voices her catastrophic thoughts about the fatal disasters that could befall her child while she's out of sight. They include getting stuck in a mine, being kidnapped by bandits and bleeding out on the street.