Dodgers owners, Dodgers Foundation pledge $100M to wildfire recovery initiative
With hope the foremost theme of Newsom's message, as he called on both civic leaders and leaders in the private sector to come together to help rebuild fire ravaged areas of L.A., Johnson announced that Dodger's owner Mike Walter, the Walter Family Foundation and the Dodgers Foundation will contribute $100 million to wildfire recovery and rebuilding efforts.
'My focus is Altadena because those people may be left behind and I want to make sure that doesn't happen,' Johnson said at the podium.
While news of the recovery initiative and funds pledged sounds encouraging, some Altadena residents, like Samera Arkel, hope some of that money does in fact make it into the once tight-knit, multi-generational community of Altadena.
'Not only have we just lost our house, but we also lost a lot of our work,' Arkel explained. 'There's a lot of jobs that were lost and that part is hard.'
Arkel, like many other families in the community, has lived there for generations and says it's important that victims of the wildfires receive financial help.
'It would be nice,' she said. 'I would like to see a lot of that come to our area too. We'll know when we start seeing people getting help. It's a waiting game. It is tiring. The unknown is what's so scary.'
As for Gov. Newsom, he believes the L.A. Rises initiative can be a step toward those impacted by the wildfire feeling less helpless.
'I know people feel helpless at the loss of community, the loss of identity, self, place, traditions, lifestyles – all of that. We cannot give way to hopelessness,' he said.
For many homeowners, however, they say the reality is that there is a lot of red tape to deal with, a lot of standing in long lines and while they are hopeful, they are also frustrated.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
a few seconds ago
- Newsweek
The 1600: Dems Want a Fighter. Is Newsom It?
The Insider's Track Good morning, We've got a late entry for The Craziest $#*! I Read This Week. It's a local story here in the Big Apple, but it's a good one and comes courtesy of the great journalists over at The City: A close advisor to Eric Adams, our illustrious mayor, has been suspended from his re-election campaign after she gave a reporter a wad of cash tucked inside a bag of Sour Cream & Onion potato chips. The failed payoff, which she brushed off as a cultural misunderstanding, comes as even more of Adams' associates are expected to be indicted on corruption charges in the coming days. If you enjoy a good trainwreck election, I really recommend following the New York City mayoral race. It's got everything. A cartoonishly corrupt incumbent polling in the single digits. A disgraced former governor attempting and failing the world's most half-hearted political comeback. A charismatic rich-kid socialist with no experience whose first real job will be running a $2T economy. And on the GOP side, a beret-wearing perennial also-ran most famous for staging vigilante subway rescues in the 80's, who now lives in a studio apartment with six cats. Greatest city in the world, baby! On the topic of elections, there have been some notable developments this week while we've spent our time together focused on geopolitics. Today, the Texas Senate will likely pass the state's new mid-cycle congressional map, after the House rammed it through yesterday. This kicks off a new redistricting war that California Gov. Gavin Newsom has vowed to answer with his own redrawn map. The move got the blessing from Barack Obama, who weighed in from his perch in Martha's Vineyard that Newsom was taking a "smart and measured" approach ahead of the midterms. If you haven't been following, Newsom is the toast of the town at the moment—at least among liberals—for the aggressive posture he's adopted, both in policy and style. On social media, the governor has crafted this new persona as a Trump-esque troll, posting in ALL CAPS and in Trump's signature style, generating AI memes at Trump's expense, excoriating MAGA as a bunch of lemmings and essentially playing POTUS' own game against him. And it's working. He has rocketed to the top of the (very early and still meaningless) 2028 polls with this strategy, which tells you that Democratic voters badly want a fighter. I can see why Newsom is an attractive choice to go up against what will likely be JD Vance in '28. He is one of the few Dems who is able to play in the mud with Trump and come out clean. Michelle Obama was famous for that saying, "When they go low, we go high" even though it was precisely the wrong political advice for the Trump era. Newsom understands that it should actually be, "When they go low, we go lower." But he has two big problems. One is that he runs what is arguably the most dysfunctional state in the country, and that comes with a lot of baggage. The other is that he comes across as just a little too slick for his own good. As a buddy of mine put it, "Newsom looks like he'd lay off your dad and then post on LinkedIn about how difficult it was." Maybe I'm wrong. If Vance is the nominee, maybe Newsom is the perfect candidate to run against him. Both of them seem like they're willing to say or do anything to get elected, with no deep or apparent convictions. Remember, Vance called Trump "America's Hitler" not all that long ago, and now he's his VP! That's still crazy to me. Newsom is also a very good fundraiser, and there are reports this week that Elon Musk has already pumped the brakes on his brief attempt at building a third party and is now leaning toward backing Vance instead. That is going to be formidable: an incumbent veep, with Trump's blessing and Musk's unlimited cash. But I think Democrats have a way to win in such a scenario. We'll get into that tomorrow. The Rundown Thirty minutes into conversing with Ohio College Republican Federation President Spencer Mandzak, I was compelled to ask why he was a Republican instead of a Democrat. After nearly three years in Washington, D.C., I found the answer to that question generally materialized within five minutes of meeting a politico. Mandzak was different, however. He introduced himself by sharing an op-ed he'd written on the importance of curating bipartisanship online. He said that economics and foreign policy were his top political issues, and he offered no charged opinions on topics like religion or sexuality. "You're not going to get a lot of probably interesting viewpoints from me, just because I try to stay in my lane," he responded. "But I can tell you why I'm not a Democrat." Read more from Newsweek's Alex J. Rouhandeh. Also happening: Election 2028: Elon Musk is considering backing Vice President JD Vance in the 2028 presidential election, according to reports on the billionaire's political movements. The tech CEO formed a new party and pledged to contest both Republicans and Democrats at the 2026 midterms, but his relationship with Vance, who considers Musk a personal friend, may not be as damaged as it seems. Read more . Elon Musk is considering backing Vice President JD Vance in the 2028 presidential election, according to reports on the billionaire's political movements. The tech CEO formed a new party and pledged to contest both Republicans and Democrats at the 2026 midterms, but his relationship with Vance, who considers Musk a personal friend, may not be as damaged as it seems. . Immigration: A federal appeals court on Wednesday sided with the Trump administration in its bid to end humanitarian protections for tens of thousands of immigrants from Central America and Nepal. The ruling puts on hold a lower court's order that had temporarily preserved Temporary Protected Status for nearly 60,000 migrants. Read more. This is a preview of The 1600—Tap here to get this newsletter delivered straight to your inbox.
The Hill
31 minutes ago
- The Hill
Democrats across US rip Texas House passage of new congressional lines
Democratic leaders from coast-to-coast ripped Texas Republicans on Wednesday for approving a new Congressional map that gives the GOP an opportunity to gain five additional House seats in next year's midterm elections. The map passed along party lines in an 88-52 vote. State senators are expected to consider the measure on Thursday for final approval before it heads to Gov. Greg Abbott's (R) desk. 'Tonight, Texas Republicans delivered Donald Trump the rigged map he demanded,' New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) said, after the measure passed. 'Trump, Greg Abbott and their allies know they can't win on their record of stripping health care, tanking the economy and making families pay more with less.' 'This is a last gasp of a desperate party clinging to power,' she added. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) echoed her disdain, saying the mid-decade redistricting effort signaled a sign of weakness for Republicans and an attempt to regain strength ahead of the midterms. 'You only try changing the rules if you think you're losing — and that's exactly what Texas Republicans are attempting to do,' Newsom shared in a post on social platform X. 'We want to give Californians the power this November to counter redistricting power grabs and stand for independently drawn maps in every state,' he added. In a subsequent video message, Newsom offered the Texas GOP an 'off-ramp.' 'If they don't move. If Republicans stand back — they have an off ramp — this initiative, our efforts, don't go forward. We're doing this only in response to what he's doing,' he said. 'So if he doesn't want us to move forward, he has some capacity to influence that.' The governor added later, 'we should let voters choose their representatives.' The criticism comes after Texas Democrats, who fled the state to delay the vote, returned home following threats of arrest or involvement by the FBI, and as the state lawmakers racked up fines. Newsom and Hochul have both vowed to fight Texas's effort with similar proposals to restructure district lines in their respective states. Democrats in California released a proposed new map last week to offset the five seats the Lone Star State is poised to gain and has called for a special session in November to vote on the measure. Golden State Republicans pushed back on the effort, filing a petition to the state Supreme Court to halt the move, though their petition was rejected. Newsom has pressed his Democratic counterparts in New York and Illinois to move quickly on their redistricting efforts. 'In New York, we'll confront Trump's legal insurrection head on,' Hochul said Wednesday. 'We'll meet him on the same field and beat him at his own game.' Georgia Sen. Jon Ossoff (D) also weighed in on the effort, lauding his counterparts for creating plans to ensure what he called an equal balance of power. 'Democrats need to strike back,' Ossoff said during an appearance on MSNBC's 'The Weeknight.' 'We have no time or luxury for high-minded hesitation, because Trump and MAGA are going to do everything within their power to hold on and to lock in one party rule in America,' he continued. 'That's the reality that we face.'
Los Angeles Times
31 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Letters to the Editor: Maybe Newsom's redistricting effort is for his own political gain. So what?
To the editor: I'm sure that I could not be a more generic or less important voice or voter. And count me in for being uninformed in many ways, but I can't help but say something. Mark Z. Barabak's column struck me as a know-it-all-type criticism ('Power grab may energize Newsom and Democrats. But it won't fix their bigger problem,' Aug. 20). I own a real estate company in Washington, D.C. Many of the liberal voices here are my clients or friends. I care. And living here at the moment is extremely challenging for all the reasons you already know about. In my little lane, I can't help but see that we are all struggling for anything we can do. Gov. Gavin Newsom at least brought something to the table, an action that might matter. Something we can support that might make a difference. And Barabak paints Newsom's efforts as purely for his own political gain. So what if it is? Does Barabak have another suggestion? What is it? If all we can do is snivel at one another about political philosophy while our democracy is being undone, then we're cooked. Judy Cranford, Washington, D.C. .. To the editor: If anyone thinks Newsom's redistricting effort is anything but a boost for another presidential campaign, I have a bridge to sell you. We don't need more Democratic districts in this state — we need balance. I'm not a MAGA believer or voter. I just know when one party dominates, it's not good. It boggles my brain to think about what Newsom is going to talk about if/when he hits the national stage. He and his buddies in Sacramento have caused so many problems that if I named them all, you would have to give me the whole page. Residents of states that have their act together would laugh him off the stage. Jan Slater, Irvine .. To the editor: It may be true, as Babarak opines, that Newsom is motivated by political ambitions in proposing the special November 'gerrymandering' election. But there is much more at stake here and Barabak's ire points in the wrong direction. Voters in other states who see our democracy slipping away don't care about motivation. Republican shenanigans in Ohio show this. Although we have overwhelmingly passed anti-gerrymandering constitutional amendments, Ohio remains one of the most gerrymandered states. Our Republican legislative supermajority has simply thumbed their noses at the voters' will. For our democracy to survive, no one can be so provincial as to ignore what is happening in other states. The way to confront President Trump's anti-democratic plan is to fight fire with fire. Texas voters have no opportunity to voice their will on gerrymandering. Under Newsom's proposal, California voters will. The message you all send may be one that helps preserve our democracy. Stephen Gladstone, Shaker Heights, Ohio .. To the editor: So, Barabak doesn't want to use the 'fight fire with fire' analogy? How about 'if we get punched in the face, we punch back'? Barabak fails to recognize that we need to be thinking of the short term, because that is when the fight for our democracy is. We cannot afford to wait and play by the rules when all the norms are being thrown out by fascists. Fighting back might hurt at times, but if we don't engage in this fistfight, it's lights out. I don't support Newsom for president (Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez would be a better candidate), but he hasn't decided to lay down and get knocked out. Let's punch back. Chase Brown, Rancho Santa Margarita
