Latest news with #Afghan
Scottish Sun
34 minutes ago
- Sport
- Scottish Sun
Former Scotland striker named first-ever manager of Afghan women's refugee team
They previously played Celtic, Hibs and Kilmarnock - and once coached at Rangers Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A FORMER Scotland striker has been appointed head coach of the newly-formed Afghan women's refugee football team. Afghan women have been banned from playing sport in the country since the Taliban came to power in 2021. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Girls of the Afghan National Development Squad - all of whom are refugees Credit: The Times 2 Pauline Hamill during her days as a Scotland international Credit: Les Gallagher - The Sun Glasgow Back in May, Fifa gave the green light to set up a new team for female players of Afghan nationality who had obtained refugee status abroad, allowing them to play in official matches. Fifa president Gianni Infantino has been leading the process, which will now see players gather for three "talent identification camps" in order to populate a squad. These training camps will not only decide who makes the team but they will offer players psychological care, safeguarding and better access to nutrition and physical preparation. Ex-Scotland, Hibs and Celtic striker Pauline Hamill has been chosen by Fifa to be the first-ever manager of the team. Hamill, 53, earned 141 caps for the Scotland women's national team and scored 29 goals during an illustrious international career. She played for Kilmarnock, Hibernian, Doncaster Rovers ad Celtic among others at club level before retiring in 2011. An experienced coach, she worked with the Scotland women's under-17s between 2010 and 2017 before moving up to the under-19s for six years. In 2023 she was named head coach of the Saudi Arabia women's under-20s (a first for the country). Hamill holds a Uefa Pro Licence and headed up the SFA Women's National Academy at the University of Stirling before moving to the Middle East. She made history way back in 2003 too, when she was still a player, when she became the first ever female coach at Rangers, being appointed to a youth development role at the Ibrox club. Nicolas Kuhn poses for selfies with Celtic fans as he greets team-mates and Brendan Rodgers at Como Cup Hamill described the job as a "no-brainer" and a "privilege" and that she hopes the initiative will have a long-lasting impact. She said: "I was super excited, honestly, as soon as I was offered the role. "From the very start, something about the job was really pulling me in. "So, when I had the opportunity to lead the team, for me it was an absolute no-brainer. It's a privilege to be invited into this project. "This is going to be something really special, and I think it's something that they'll remember forever. "It's more than just a football journey. This is something that will have a lasting effect on people." Infantino said upon announcing Hamill's new role: "We're proud to have Pauline Hamill guiding this team on such a meaningful journey. "Her experience, empathy and dedication will be a powerful source of strength and inspiration for these courageous players. "Fifa stands firmly with Afghan women - at home and in exile - and remains committed to creating safe, inclusive spaces where they can pursue their football dreams and be seen, heard and supported on the international stage." Keep up to date with ALL the latest news and transfers at the Scottish Sun football page
L'Orient-Le Jour
an hour ago
- Business
- L'Orient-Le Jour
Iran plays populist card with campaign to expel Afghan migrants
Iran is banking on the idea that expelling Afghan migrants will boost its national economy. On Tuesday, Iranian government spokesperson Fatemeh Mohajerani reaffirmed the clerical regime's goal: "to reduce the pressure on state subsidies, particularly in the areas of energy and bread." According to the United Nations refugee agency (UNHCR), over 1.4 million Afghan nationals have been forced out of Iran since last January, as part of a massive deportation campaign launched by Iranian authorities. In May, Tehran announced July 6 as the deadline for all unregistered foreign nationals to leave the country. Read more Iran and Europeans begin nuclear talks with questions over future UN sanctions Although the campaign has faced widespread criticism from international human rights groups and civil society members, the Islamic...
Memri
4 hours ago
- Politics
- Memri
Hezb-e-Islami Leader Gulbuddin Hekmatyar Discusses Russia's Recognition Of Afghan Taliban, Advocates 'National And Religious Unity Within The Framework Of A Just And Lawful System' In Afghanistan
On July 9, 2025, Daily Shahadat published a Dari-language article by former mujahideen commander and the leader of Hezb-e-Islami Afghanistan Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, who is also the publisher of the daily, addressing Russia's recognition of the Afghan Taliban government and its acceptance of the Taliban-appointed ambassador to Moscow. Hekmatyar also publishes Daily Shahadat. In the article – titled "Acceptance Of The Islamic Emirate's Ambassador In Moscow – Political Maneuver Or Political Gamble?" – Gulbuddin Hekmatyar describes Russia's move to recognize the Taliban government variously as a political and diplomatic maneuver, a gamble, and a reaction to developments in Syria and Iran, suggesting it may also be part of a broader deal between Russia and the United States. The article is informative and offers insight into the past half-century of Afghanistan's history and its unique geographical location, which draws global powers to seek to control it in a strategic game. However, the Hezb-e-Islami leader thinks that foreign powers' meddling in Afghanistan can be ended. "If Afghanistan succeeds in realizing its national and religious unity within the framework of a just and lawful system, it will overcome the most dangerous conspiracies and pressure circles of foreign actors," he says. Following are excerpts from the article: "The Coup Against Najib [Dr. Mohammad Najibullah Ahmadzai, President Of Afghanistan Executed By The Taliban In 1996] Was A Joint Plan Of Russian And American Intelligence, And Iranian And Saudi Intelligence Were Also Involved In It" "Acceptance Of The Islamic Emirate's Ambassador In Moscow – Political Maneuver Or Political Gamble? "A Reaction To The Events In Syria And Iran Or A Give-And-Take Deal With America? "In The Light Of Moscow's Policies On Afghanistan From The Founding Of The Soviet Union To Today "Moscow, since the time of Peter the Great – when it emerged as a regional power – has always pursued the expansion of Russian influence toward the south and access to warm waters. "In this regard, Afghanistan, due to its sensitive geopolitical position, was considered one of the areas of interest to Russia. The expansionist policies of Peter the Great laid the groundwork for the (rivalry between Russia and Britain) in Afghanistan. This rivalry later turned into the Great Game in the 19th century, and Afghanistan was accepted as a (buffer) between Russia and Britain. "After the establishment of the Soviet Union and when it occupied the regions of Central Asia and the Caucasus and reached the borders of Afghanistan, this country gained greater importance. Until today, throughout all this time, it has had an active presence in the affairs of our country. As the Soviet Union, at one time, it competed with Great Britain over the occupation of Afghanistan, and at another time with the United States of America. "At one point, against the first Taliban government, it, together with India, Iran, Israel, France, Britain, and America – supported the [anti-Taliban] Northern Alliance, which included the Parcham Party, militias from the Soviet occupation era, Shura-e-Nazar, Jamiat, and Shia parties under Iran's influence. It provided them with weapons and printed Afghani [currency] for them. "There was also a time when Russia and Iran helped America in the occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq. From 2001 to 2014, a major part of the logistics for NATO and American forces in Afghanistan was carried out through Russian land and airspace, and another part of America's logistics was delivered through Pakistan's land and airspace. Groups affiliated with Moscow and under Tehran's influence, during the 20 years of occupation, were at the service of America. "This coalition was formed when Moscow, due to continuous failures and the financial and human losses in the war in Afghanistan, and the problems that this situation created for it within the Soviet Union, had no choice but to withdraw its forces from our country. It considered the establishment of an Islamic government in Afghanistan a serious threat to its dominance over Central Asia. America and Iran had similar concerns. They jointly decided to unify their positions regarding Afghanistan and to prevent the establishment of a Mujahideen government... "The coup against Najib [Dr. Mohammad Najibullah Ahmadzai, former president of Afghanistan executed by the Taliban in 1996] was a joint plan of Russian and American intelligence, and Iranian and Saudi intelligence were also involved in it..." "Saudi Support Was Cut Off When The Taliban Refused To Hand Over [Saudi National] Osama Bin Laden To Them"; "Saudi Intelligence Chief Turki Al-Faisal Traveled On His Private Jet... To Kabul [But Osama Was Too Powerful For The Taliban To Hand Him Over]" "[During 1996-2001] The first era of the [Islamic] Emirate, from beginning to end, was spent in war against the Northern Alliance. The Hezb-e-Islami did not want to fight the Taliban; it considered such a war neither useful nor in accordance with its military policies. The Alliance benefited from financial, military, and political support from Russia, the United States, India, Iran, France, Britain, and Israel, while the Taliban were supported by Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, who also recognized their government. "Saudi support was cut off when the Taliban refused to hand over [Saudi national] Osama bin Laden to them. This was despite the fact that a gathering of the Emirate's religious scholars in Kabul asked Osama to leave Afghanistan. The Emirate's foreign minister traveled to Saudi Arabia with the message that they were willing to hand over Osama to the Saudis. "Saudi intelligence chief Turki al-Faisal traveled on his private jet, together with the Taliban foreign minister [Wakil Ahmad] Muttawakil, to Kabul and then Kandahar to take Osama and bring him to Saudi Arabia. But the Taliban were not able to do so, because Osama was so powerful that the Taliban simply were unable to arrest and hand him over to Turki al-Faisal. In fact, in the war against the Alliance, the Taliban were largely indebted to the active role of Osama's loyal fighters, who fought on the front lines in all Taliban battles. "The 9/11 attacks and the refusal to hand over Osama to Saudi Arabia and the United States led America to strike Afghanistan from land and sky – first targeting it with cruise missiles and then bombarding the Taliban centers and strongholds with terrifying B-52 bombers. The Taliban offered no resistance whatsoever; from the day the first American missile was launched toward Afghanistan to the day the Taliban evacuated Kandahar and, through a press conference, surrendered to America and Karzai, a total of five weeks (35 days) passed!" After 9/11 "The U.S. Decision Changed – A Large-Scale Aerial And Ground Assault, With The Participation Of Hired Afghan Fighters Belonging To The Northern Front And Groups Under Iranian Influence, Replaced The Limited And Covert Operation Planned With Russia And Iran [To Replace The Taliban Government]" "Before the United States began its operation to occupy Afghanistan, it had a plan for a joint operation with Russia, in such a way that 17,000 Russian soldiers would participate in the operation, capture Mazar and Takhar, and hand them over to the Northern Alliance. The expenses of this operation were to be paid by the United States. "Akhdar Ibrahimi [aka Lakhdar Brahimi], the special representative of the United Nations Secretary-General for Afghanistan, told a group of Afghans in a meeting in Switzerland: Moscow and Washington have a plan for a joint operation; it is better that you get on this train! "Before September 11, 2001, the United States and some Western countries including Russia, Iran, and India were providing intelligence, weapons, and financial support to the United Northern Front [aka Northern Alliance] against the Taliban. In the years 2000–2001, secret meetings were held in Moscow, Dushanbe (Tajikistan), Tehran, and Delhi to coordinate this support. "After the Al-Qaeda attack on America, the U.S. decision changed. A large-scale aerial and ground assault, with the participation of hired Afghan fighters belonging to the Northern Front and groups under Iranian influence, replaced the limited and covert operation planned with Russia and Iran. And the United States was able to launch its operations under the flag of 'the international counter-terrorism coalition' (ISAF)." "Although Pakistan's Role... In Assisting The U.S. In The Occupation Of Afghanistan Was No Less Than That Of Russia And Iran, Due To Its Support For The Taliban, It Was Deprived Of An Active And Significant Presence In The Bonn Negotiations [That Led To Formation Of Post-Taliban Government Headed By Hamid Karzai]" "The United States first overthrew the Taliban government and captured major cities, including Kabul and Kandahar. Then, it convened a meeting in Bonn with the participation of representatives from the United States, Britain, Germany, Iran, and Russia, so that with their consultation and agreement, the future government during the occupation period could be formed. "The share of Russia and Iran in the governments during the occupation period was greater than other countries due to their extensive cooperation in the U.S. occupation of Afghanistan. Although Pakistan's role and contribution in assisting the United States in the occupation of Afghanistan was no less than that of Russia and Iran, due to its support for the Taliban, it was deprived of an active and significant presence in the Bonn negotiations. Former mujahideen commander Gulbuddin Hekmatyar "Britain insisted on the restoration of [former king of Afghanistan Mohammad] Zahir Shah as king, but Iran was sensitive to this, because the restoration of monarchy in Afghanistan would pave the way for the return of Reza Shah Pahlavi in Iran. The replacement of [Burhanuddin] Rabbani, a Tajik, with [Hamid] Karzai, a Pashtun, was also not pleasing to Iran; they preferred Satar Sirat, who was the representative of the deposed king, but did not succeed. The United States considered Karzai suitable to its own liking, and in the Bonn meeting, the final word had to be spoken by the actual victor of Afghanistan – the United States. "Karzai used to refer to Zahir Shah as 'Baba' [father or grandfather] and would bow to kiss his hand. However, in his first presidential term, in the face of the Northern Alliance – and especially [Mohammad Qasim] Fahim, who was his defense minister and later his deputy – he resembled a sparrow in a cage beside a hawk. Even his protection in Arg [the Presidential Palace] was provided by the gunmen of Shura-e Nazar [created by Ahmad Shah Massoud]. "Russia and Iran formed the Jabal Al-Siraj Alliance led by Rabbani against Hezb-e-Islami [led by Gulbuddin Hekmatyar] and supported it for four years with financial, military, intelligence, and propaganda assistance, and supported the fight against the Taliban for five years. Both of them helped the United States in the occupation of Afghanistan and the overthrow of the Taliban government with all their capabilities..." "Russia Abandoned Its Important And Strategic Friend In The Region (Iran) During The Hardest Days And The Dangerous U.S.-Israel Attack, And Aside From Empty Rhetoric, Gave Iran No Help – Neither Did It Provide The S-400 Air Defense System, Nor The SU-35 And SU-57 Fighter Jets – Iran Was Forced To Purchase 40 Chinese J-10 Aircraft" "However, the United States, in its negotiations with the Taliban [in Doha, 2020] and in handing over Kabul to them, did not inform Moscow and Tehran and made a unilateral decision. The reason was its differences with its two former partners on one hand, and their efforts to establish an anti-American front – BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization [SCO] and its expansion – on the other. The founders of this organization are Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, and these five countries constitute more than 40 percent of the world's population and about 25 percent of the global gross domestic product. "Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Iran, Ethiopia, and the United Arab Emirates have also joined [BRICS subsequently]. So far, more than 30 countries have expressed their desire to join or cooperate with BRICS. All of these countries want to reduce their dependence on the dollar and the Western financial system. The United States considers any effort to strengthen this organization or join it as hostility toward itself and finds it intolerable. "However, regarding the lack of official recognition of the Taliban government [since it assumed power in August 2021] and how to engage with it, they had a joint position. The events in Syria and later the massive and joint attack by the United States and Israel on Iran [in June 2025] deepened the rift in their relations, and Moscow decided to be the first country to accept the Taliban's ambassador in Moscow and allow the white Taliban flag to replace the previous tricolor flag [of Afghanistan] – perhaps in this way they could lessen the pain that had reached Russia. "It is clear that this is a political game and nothing else – Russia has not changed, nor has its policies and positions regarding Afghanistan. Official recognition or non-recognition of any government has had no effect on its policies in the past, nor will it in the future. "Russia abandoned its important and strategic friend in the region (Iran) during the hardest days and the dangerous U.S.-Israel attack, and aside from empty rhetoric, gave Iran no help – neither did it provide the S-400 air defense system, nor the SU-35 and SU-57 fighter jets. Iran was forced to purchase 40 Chinese J-10 aircraft. Russia's position regarding the U.S. attack on Iran was so passive and vague that some observers and analysts thought perhaps a deal had been made between Moscow and Washington over Iran." "Basically, Russia Has Always Pursued Policies Regarding Afghanistan That Are Based On Its Strategic Goals"; "This Was Part Of An Agreement Between Moscow And Washington During The Dissolution Of The Soviet Union: That Russia Would Withdraw From Eastern Europe But Would Continue Its Active Presence In Central Asia" "Moscow's move [to recognize the Taliban government] led to the issuance of a warrant by the Hague International Court [ICC] for the arrest of the Taliban leader [Mullah Hibbatullah Akhundzada] and Chief Justice [Abdul Hakim Haqqani]. "The United Nations also called it a unilateral decision [by Russia]. The White House, the U.S. State Department, and Congress also reacted, emphasizing their firm rejection of recognizing the Taliban, maintaining sanctions, imposing additional sanctions, and continuing the freeze on Afghanistan's assets in American banks. And [U.S. President Donald] Trump once again said: We handed over the world's most powerful base (Bagram) to China! "Basically, Russia has always pursued policies regarding Afghanistan that are based on its strategic goals. Central Asia was under the complete control of the Soviet Union, and after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the region remained under Moscow's influence. In some countries, such as Tajikistan, power remains to this day in the hands of former KGB members, and in others, they hold the largest share and role in governments. "This was part of an agreement between Moscow and Washington during the dissolution of the Soviet Union: that Russia would withdraw from Eastern Europe but would continue its active presence in Central Asia. At that time, we repeatedly heard from Washington statements such as: Central Asia is the soft underbelly of the Soviet Union; it is facing threats from radical Islamic groups in Afghanistan; the mujahideen government destabilizes the region's stability and security; the withdrawal of Soviet forces from this region is harmful and will have dire consequences! Meaning, America agreed to the continued dominance of Moscow over this region, despite the complete collapse of the Soviet Union! "Likewise, Moscow does not allow Central Asia to connect to the South through Afghanistan, nor for its gas and oil to be transported via this route to the South – thus freeing itself from dependence and reliance on Moscow and its transit path. At any cost, this must be prevented. It would be the height of folly for anyone to think that Russia would easily abandon its strategic objectives merely by accepting the ambassador of the Kabul government in Moscow." "When Hezb-e-Islami Forces Entered Kabul, [Hashemi] Rafsanjani, The Former President Of Iran, Said In His Friday Prayer Sermon: We Will Never Allow Hezb-E-Islami To Rule Over Kabul"; "Pakistan Also Does Not Favor The Establishment Of An Islamic Government Led By A Pashtun And Considers It A Cause For Provoking And Encouraging The Pashtuns Of Pakistan To Separate From Pakistan" "In this regard, Iran also holds a position identical to that of Russia: the transfer of Central Asian gas and oil through Afghanistan to Pakistan and India – two important markets for Iran – is in no way acceptable to it. Iran's opposition to the project for transporting Turkmenistan's gas to Afghanistan, Pakistan, and India (TAPI), and the creation of obstacles against it, stems from this very point. Iran has spared no effort to prevent the implementation of this project, and one of the main reasons behind its massive investments in the continuation of insecurity and war in Afghanistan has been exactly this. "Furthermore, a majority Pashtun and Sunni government in Afghanistan is intolerable for Iran. When Hezb-e-Islami forces entered Kabul, [Hashemi] Rafsanjani, the former president of Iran, said in his Friday prayer sermon: We will never allow Hezb-e-Islami to rule over Kabul. Iran opposes U.S.-backed TAPI gas pipeline, while U.S. opposes Iran-Pakistan-India pipeline "Pakistan also does not favor the establishment of an Islamic government led by a Pashtun and considers it a cause for provoking and encouraging the Pashtuns of Pakistan to separate from Pakistan and join Afghanistan. For this very reason, it preferred non-Pashtuns belonging to ethnic minorities, such as Mojaddedi [Sibghatullah Mojaddedi, former President of Afghanistan] and [Burhanuddin] Rabbani, for the presidency. "One of the heads of Pakistan's ISI [Inter-Services Intelligence of Pakistani military], who was known for being propagandistic, wrote in his analytical report to Pakistan's decision-making authorities: A government led by a Pashtun in Kabul is not in Pakistan's interest. When the forces of Hezb-e-Islami entered Kabul, this same general, in a meeting with the leaders of the Peshawar-based factions [of the Taliban], said: Pakistan will never allow Hekmatyar to rule Kabul. One of them said to him: Please, General Sahib, do it." "As Long As Afghanistan Lacks A Government Based On The Will Of The Majority Of The People And A Strong Consultative System, It Will Remain A Toy For External Competition – Neither Accepting Political Representatives From This Side Nor From That Side, Nor Financial Aid, Nor Diplomatic Maneuvers, Will Replace True Legitimacy" "The truth is this: As long as Afghanistan lacks a government based on the will of the majority of the people and a strong consultative system, it will remain a toy for external competition – neither accepting political representatives from this side nor from that side, nor financial aid, nor diplomatic maneuvers, will replace true legitimacy. If Afghanistan succeeds in realizing its national and religious unity within the framework of a just and lawful system, it will overcome the most dangerous conspiracies and pressure circles of foreign actors. "We also believe that as long as diplomatic and political relations among the countries of the world are not based on sound principles and genuine justice, and as long as unhealthy rivalries, reprehensible hypocrisy, and malicious intent are not set aside, the existing problems between countries will not be resolved, and trust and confidence will not be established. "Some of these sound and justice-based principles are as follows: "i) Non-interference by large and powerful countries in the internal affairs of small and underdeveloped countries. "ii) Non-support for imposed, non-national, non-popular, coup-installed, puppet, autocratic governments that lack internal legitimacy. "iii) Severing relations with ethnocentric and racist regimes. "These fundamental conditions must be strictly observed in dealing with any government and system: "1) The country's political and social system must be lawful and supported by the majority of the nation. "2) It must have a shura [council] that genuinely represents the will of the people, as the highest and most authoritative body for all major national decisions. "3) It must possess a constitution accepted by the nation, as a national covenant and guarantor of the individual human rights of every member of society. "However, diplomatic relations and political engagements between countries are currently, in general, based on reprehensible motives and unhealthy political, economic, and military rivalries. No attention is paid to who the counterpart is and what background and characteristics they have – whether they represent their nation and people or a forcibly imposed minority, whether they respect and submit to the will of their people or not. "If it were not so, and if these standards were observed in political relations, we would not witness authoritarian, coup-installed, and individual-centered governments in any country in the world. Such regimes would face severe global isolation, and the space for their survival and continuation would be significantly restricted. "Hekmatyar" Source: (Afghanistan), July 9, 2025.
Saudi Gazette
7 hours ago
- Politics
- Saudi Gazette
Muslim World League chief meets Afghan ministers to discuss Islamic unity and extremism
Saudi Gazette report KABUL — Sheikh Dr. Mohammed Al-Issa, Secretary-General of the Muslim World League and President of the Association of Muslim Scholars, held high-level meetings with Afghan ministers in Kabul this week, focusing on strengthening Islamic solidarity, confronting extremism, and promoting the true image of Islam. During a meeting at the Presidential Palace with Afghan Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi, both sides discussed the importance of clarifying the values of Islam based on the Quran and Sunnah, and the impact of these values on individual and communal behavior among Muslims. The discussions highlighted the significance of promoting tolerance, wisdom, and constructive dialogue. The talks also referenced the key messages of the Makkah Declaration and the Document on Building Bridges Between Islamic Schools of Thought, both initiatives led by the Muslim World League. These documents underline the importance of intra-faith unity and mutual understanding. The role of the Islamic Fiqh Council, one of the oldest and most prominent scholarly institutions affiliated with the League, was also praised for bringing together senior Islamic scholars and muftis from across the Muslim meeting further addressed the growing challenge posed by entrenched cultural customs that contradict Islamic teachings in some communities, emphasizing the need to raise awareness using wisdom and respectful Al-Issa also met Afghan Interior Minister Sirajuddin Haqqani at Shaharsinar Palace, where they reviewed Afghanistan's ongoing efforts to combat terrorist parties affirmed the grave consequences of division and discord within the Muslim world, and stressed the importance of unity and cohesion in preserving the reputation and strength of Islam.
Euractiv
8 hours ago
- Politics
- Euractiv
Germany halts voluntary visa programmes for refugees
BERLIN – Germany suspended its voluntary humanitarian visa programmes for refugees, the interior ministry announced on its website on Thursday. Previously, the country occasionally granted a fixed number of humanitarian visas – usually including safe passage – to individuals in dangerous circumstances, such as dissidents in Russia and Syrian refugees in Turkey. All such procedures have now been suspended, and will be permanently terminated as soon as possible in line with the government's coalition agreement, a spokesperson of the interior ministry said, according to The suspension comes after a controversy over an admissions programme for Afghans facing a particular threat from the Taliban regime, which toppled the Western-backed government in 2021. The programme has relocated over 45,000 Afghans to Germany, including former local staff of Germany's armed forces. Earlier this year, reports emerged that arrivals had purportedly been insufficiently screened for security risks, with doubts being raised over the identity of some Afghan arrivals. The then-government, led by Olaf Scholz, stated that all arrivals had been screened. As part of its wider crackdown on migration, the new conservative-led government suspended previous visa commitments, leaving some 2,300 people stranded in Pakistan, who had been preparing for passage to Germany. The decision, however, has been dogged by legal difficulties. Earlier this month, an administrative court in Berlin ruled that Germany has to allow for safe passage if a previous legal commitment was made, referring specifically to the case of an Afghan family. Over the last four years, most of Germany's humanitarian visas were granted to Afghans, ahead of Syrians and Russians, according to , which cites data from the German foreign office. Overall admissions numbers have fallen consistently since then, from 23,000 in 2022 to 10,500 last year. (mm)
