Latest news with #CCTVfootage
Independent Singapore
a day ago
- Independent Singapore
Employer discovers maid threw household items out the window, asks if incident can be reported to police
SINGAPORE: An employer was shocked after discovering through CCTV footage that her domestic helper had thrown household items out of a window. She shared the incident in the 'MDW in Singapore' Facebook group on Sunday (Jul 27), explaining that she had been trying to locate several items that had mysteriously gone missing from her home. Although the items were not particularly expensive, she emphasised that they were essential to her family's daily routine and that replacing them had been both inconvenient and frustrating. She said she had questioned the helper multiple times about the missing items, hoping for an explanation or even a clue as to where they might have gone. However, each time, the helper insisted she had no knowledge of them. Suspecting something was amiss, the employer reviewed the CCTV recordings and was disturbed by what she saw. 'I was shocked to see that she threw it away at the window. She did it in a careful manner…to appear like she was just staring out of the window…but CCTV still captured everything when she touched it and pushed it out of the window,' the employer explained. She added that the incident was especially unexpected, as the helper had always come across as 'respectful, frail-looking, mild-mannered, and cheerful.' 'We really need to be vigilant and not let looks deceive us,' she wrote. The employer also shared that the incident occurred shortly after the family had attempted to make peace with the helper following a prior disagreement. 'There was a misunderstanding with her a few days ago… But we even took the first step to make it right with her even if it's not entirely our fault. We even prayed for her and shared something about God with her, and this incident (throwing away the things) happened like 30 mins after the prayer… Which is so odd…' Seeking advice from the community, she asked whether the incident could be reported to the police. 'Can this be reported to police? So far, I have not decided to take action, and it is unlikely for me to do so… However, it's good to know my options in case this happens again…. because the item thrown is not expensive (quite cheap), but money is still money,' she said. 'If I report to police…I don't even know if this is too simple to be reported…and maybe they will find me a nuisance…' 'Please take action and don't give a chance.' Other employers who responded to the post shared similar experiences with their own domestic helpers and encouraged her to consider finding a replacement. One wrote, 'I had some previous helpers who did similar. Throw wanted good things away purposely. It's like their way of being vindictive. I've learnt over the years that such behaviour is a huge red flag. Crime usually only escalates. Believe that they are the person that they show you.' Another commented, 'Please take action and don't give a chance. If you let her off, she'll just do it again, if not to you, then her next employer.' A third added, 'Throwing things out like that is spiteful, not innocent. Some people hide behind a sweet face, but actions don't lie. You have every right to protect your home. Don't second-guess that.' On the other hand, some others suggested that if the employer still wished to continue the working relationship, she should have an open and honest conversation with the helper. One said, 'If you like her and still want her around, you must sit her down to chat with the CCTV evidence. Explain to her that this will be the first and last conversation you'll have with her about it, and if it happens again, she will be fired.' How to handle a dispute with your domestic helper The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) recommends that employers take the following steps when dealing with a dispute or misunderstanding: Communicate your issues. Instead of reacting out of anger or ignoring the problem, take the time to sit down with your helper in a quiet setting. Have an open and honest conversation. Allow her to share her side of the story without interruption, and try to listen with an open mind. At the same time, explain your concerns clearly and respectfully so she understands where you are coming from. Reach out for help. If having an honest conversation doesn't help settle things, you can reach out to your employment agency (EA) for support. If the issue still isn't resolved, groups like the Association of Employment Agencies (Singapore) or the Centre for Domestic Employees are also there to offer guidance. Report the incident. If you suspect your helper has committed a criminal offence, report the matter to the authorities. Employers are advised not to take matters into their own hands. Read also: 'I never even thought of running away' — Maid upset after employer refuses to give her a two-month salary advance of S$1.2k
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Five Taiping Prison officers given access to classified CCTV footage before testifying at Suhakam inquiry
A prison inspector at Taiping Prison admitted that he and four other witnesses had access to classified closed-circuit television (CCTV) footage ahead of the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia's (Suhakam) public inquiry into alleged human rights violations that occurred on Jan 17, 2025. Muhamad Mustakhim Abdul Rahim said he and the next four witnesses scheduled to testify at Suhakam's headquarters in Kuala Lumpur had requested to be shown the CCTV footage, which the Prison Department had earlier said was classified. Suhakam's assisting inquiry officer, Simon Karunagaram, was shocked to hear Muhamad Mustakhim admit that he had been given access to the CCTV footage. Simon: Did you watch the footage? Muhamad Mustakhim: Yes. Simon: Where did you watch it? Muhamad Mustakhim: At Taiping Prison. Simon: You asked to see it, or were you directed to watch it? Muhamad Mustakhim: I asked to see it. Simon: Why? Muhamad Mustakhim: Because it was six months ago, and I wanted to refresh my memory. Simon started this line of questioning after examining Muhamad Mustakhim's notes, which outlined details of the events on Jan 17, following a 'discussion' with witnesses who gave testimony at the second session earlier this month. Muhamad Mustakhim admitted he wrote the notes a few days ago – long after the incident, and after watching the CCTV footage. Simon then requested the panel's chairman, Datuk Seri Mohd Hishamudin Md Yunus, to direct the Prison Department to instruct Taiping Prison not to show the footage to the other witnesses. Mohd Hishamudin duly did so, but towards the end of the day, under questioning by T. Shashi Devan – who is representing some 99 detainees allegedly assaulted on Jan 17 – Muhamad Mustakhim admitted that all five witnesses scheduled to give testimony over the next three days had viewed the classified footage. Shashi: Did you submit a written or oral request to view the footage? Muhamad Mustakhim: Oral. Shashi: Who did you ask permission from? Muhamad Mustakhim: The prison's deputy director (Shahrul Izzat Hamid). He granted us permission to watch the footage. Shashi: How many of you watched the footage? Muhamad Mustakhim: Five of us. Shashi: Who are the five? Muhamad Mustakhim: The five called to give testimony this week. Mohd Hishamudin then asked why the five wanted to watch the footage, and Muhamad Mustakhim repeated his earlier answer – to refresh their memory, as it had been six months since the incident. On Jan 25, Twentytwo13 reported that Gan had died from abdominal injuries caused by blunt trauma during the Jan 17 incident. He was among 104 detainees who were transferred from the Batu Gajah Correctional Facility to the Taiping Prison on Jan 16. Looks like me, but maybe it isn't me Muhamad Mustakhim, who was caught on CCTV kicking inmates, hitting them with a slipper and a bath ladle, admitted to losing control and letting emotions get the better of him as he heard the inmates saying 'I kill you' and 'I will rape your wife and children'. However, he had trouble identifying himself when shown footage of more serious acts of aggression when questioned by Suhakam's assisting inquiry officer, Mohd Faiz Abdul Rahman. His standard reply was 'I can't be certain', 'the images are blurry', or 'the images are unclear.' He repeated these answers more than 10 times. Mohd Hishamudin had to step in several times to remind Muhamad Mustakhim that he needed to tell the truth. He was also warned he could face a three-year jail term and a fine for providing false testimony. Later, Simon showed Muhamad Mustakhim a screenshot of a close-up and asked if that was him. Simon: This is quite a bright and clear image. Can you identify the person? Muhamad Mustakhim: It's unclear. Simon: If I were to say it's you, would you agree? Muhamad Mustakhim: No. Simon: Are you being honest when you say it's not you? Muhamad Mustakhim: My answer is that it's not me. Mohd Hishamudin: Why do you say it is not you? It has your features. Muhamad Mustakhim: It may look like me, but it is not clear. Simon then asked the representatives from the Prison Department if the image matched the witness, and they replied that it was a match. Simon: Can I ask the lawyer for the inmates' families if the image looks like the witness? Shashi: Yes, it looks like the witness. Simon: Mr Chairman, I'm also of the opinion that the image is of the witness, and suggest it is him. When asked if he agreed that he wasn't telling the truth – as other witnesses had placed him at the scene and those in the inquiry room had identified him as the person in the footage and screenshot – Muhamad Mustakhim replied: 'Not from my eyes. I see differently from other people's eyes. I have taken an oath to tell the truth. I deny being dishonest. It doesn't look like me.' Simon: Do you wear spectacles? Muhamad Mustakhim: No. Simon: Do you wear contact lenses? Muhamad Mustakhim: No. Simon: Are you colour-blind? Muhamad Mustakhim: No, but sometimes I have problems with glare. So while the person may have my features, I can't say for certain it's me. Showing another footage, Simon asked: Look at the uniform, the beret and the watch. Isn't that you? Muhamad Mustakhim: It isn't me. There is a ring. Simon: Just now, you said the footage and pictures are not clear, but suddenly you notice a ring? I put it to you that you are choosing to answer questions that help your interests. I suggest the images are of (Muhamad) Mustakhim unless he can prove otherwise. Suhakam's assisting inquiry officer, Mohd Faiz Abdul Rahman then resumed the questioning and once again asked Muhamad Mustakhim about him kicking and beating the inmates. He repeated the allegation that the prisoners were passive-aggressive, a phrase he said he recently learnt from Google. 'You can't hear it as there is no sound on the CCTV, but they were cursing, insulting and threatening us,' he said. 'That's how I lost control.' When asked by Mohd Hishamudin how trained officers could fail to control their emotions, Muhamad Mustakhim replied: 'Different people have different triggers. Sometimes it's words; other times, it's physical. I remember the words.' The inquiry at Suhakam's headquarters in Kuala Lumpur resumes tomorrow. Main image: Datuk Seri Mohd Hishamudin Md Yunus (right) and fellow inquiry panel member Dr Farah Nini Dusuki.
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
CCTV captures alleged hit-and-run horror
Chilling CCTV that allegedly shows a car being driven by a mother striking and killing a woman in a hit-and-run crash has surfaced, as the accused faces court six months on from the incident. Zakia Bashi Qamber fronted Adelaide Magistrates Court on Thursday, charged with causing the death of the 40-year-old woman in the early morning crash in January. Grainy CCTV footage shows a vehicle, allegedly driven by Ms Qamber, approaching the woman with headlights piercing the darkness. The woman suffered serious injuries in the hit on Kinkaid Rd in Elizabeth East and died at the scene. Ms Qamber is charged with causing death by the careless use of a vehicle and leaving the scene of an accident after causing death. She was due to enter pleas to the charges on Thursday but Michael Woods, appearing for Ms Qamber, asked for an eight-week adjournment as he needed more time to consume material. Mr Woods said he was still waiting on body-worn camera footage from the scene of the crash, the confirmation of biological material on the undercarriage of the vehicle and a post-mortem toxicological report. He told the court he might consider a no case to answer application after reviewing the material. 'It appears there is a large amount of disclosure outstanding,' Magistrate Lynette Duncan said. She listed September 18 for the next answer charge hearing, where Ms Qamber is expected to enter her pleas. An interpreter stood with Ms Qamber in the dock and spoke softly to her throughout proceedings. Ms Qamber has been granted bail and left the court with a supporter. She has no prior criminal history.
News.com.au
6 days ago
- News.com.au
Zakia Bashi Qamber fronts Adelaide court in alleged hit-and-run case
Chilling CCTV that allegedly shows a car being driven by a mother striking and killing a woman in a hit-and-run crash has surfaced, as the accused faces court six months on from the incident. Zakia Bashi Qamber fronted Adelaide Magistrates Court on Thursday, charged with causing the death of the 40-year-old woman in the early morning crash in January. Grainy CCTV footage shows a vehicle, allegedly driven by Ms Qamber, approaching the woman with headlights piercing the darkness. The woman suffered serious injuries in the hit on Kinkaid Rd in Elizabeth East and died at the scene. Ms Qamber is charged with causing death by the careless use of a vehicle and leaving the scene of an accident after causing death. She was due to enter pleas to the charges on Thursday but Michael Woods, appearing for Ms Qamber, asked for an eight-week adjournment as he needed more time to consume material. Mr Woods said he was still waiting on body-worn camera footage from the scene of the crash, the confirmation of biological material on the undercarriage of the vehicle and a post-mortem toxicological report. He told the court he might consider a no case to answer application after reviewing the material. 'It appears there is a large amount of disclosure outstanding,' Magistrate Lynette Duncan said. She listed September 18 for the next answer charge hearing, where Ms Qamber is expected to enter her pleas. An interpreter stood with Ms Qamber in the dock and spoke softly to her throughout proceedings. Ms Qamber has been granted bail and left the court with a supporter. She has no prior criminal history.
The Independent
17-07-2025
- The Independent
Influencer's bag stolen from between her feet as she dines with sister
CCTV footage captured a suspected thief stealing a vintage Chanel bag from TikTok influencer Grace Beverley. The incident occurred while Ms Beverley, 28, was dining outside at Zephyr restaurant in Notting Hill. The individual, already carrying several bags, sat behind Ms Beverley before reaching over to take her bag, which was placed between her feet. Ms Beverley shared the video on TikTok on Tuesday (15 July), expressing her shock at the theft. Watch the video in full above.
