Latest news with #CX70
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Automotive
- Yahoo
Leaked: 2026 Mazda CX-5 Shows Off Grown-Up Look
Leaked: 2026 Mazda CX-5 Shows Off Grown-Up Look originally appeared on Autoblog. Despite the arrival of the newer Mazda CX-50, the CX-5 continues to be the best-selling Mazda in the United States. Last month, over 9,500 of them found new homes across the country, well over 2,000 units more than the CX-50. A new CX-5 has been spied several times in recent months, but now we have our clearest look yet at the new compact crossover, thanks to a leaked image of what appears to be a production model. The picture was shared on the Cochespias forum. Recent spy shots of the CX-5 were spotted by various publications, and the leaked image doesn't deviate from those. The headlights flow down more deeply alongside the grille, which actually appears smaller than it does on the current CX-5. Whereas the current CX-5 appears quite rounded in profile, this new one appears to have slightly more masculine lines, with an upright body. Black cladding around the wheel arches add another rugged touch. The spy shot doesn't show the CX-5 from any other angle, but based on this first look, we'd say it's more or less in line with Mazda's current design language. As for whether it's a noticeable improvement over the current CX-5, well, that's up for debate, since the existing CX-5 is still one of the most stylish compact crossovers around. Previous spy shots show lengthened taillights that mirror those on the larger CX-70 and CX-90. While powertrains haven't been confirmed, we expect both gas and hybrid versions of the new CX-5, with outputs at least matching the CX-50. In the latter, the range is topped by a 256-horsepower turbocharged engine, while the hybrid CX-50 has a 219-hp powertrain shared with the RAV4 Hybrid. However, the new CX-5 may use an in-house-developed hybrid system. Mazda would absolutely need to offer a hybrid CX-5 to stay competitive in this segment. The upcoming 2026 RAV4 is now a hybrid-exclusive model, while the Hyundai Tucson offers both hybrid and plug-in hybrids, too. However, the new CX-5 is unlikely to set new standards for performance in this class. What it is expected to focus on is more spirited driving dynamics and a more premium look and feel than rivals. These are aspects that have kept the current CX-5 in contention, despite its age. We hope to see the new CX-5's full reveal before the end of the year. Leaked: 2026 Mazda CX-5 Shows Off Grown-Up Look first appeared on Autoblog on Jun 17, 2025 This story was originally reported by Autoblog on Jun 17, 2025, where it first appeared.
Auto Blog
2 days ago
- Automotive
- Auto Blog
Mazda CX-70 vs. CX-90 Dilemma: Making Sense of Mazda's New Strategy
Two models, same idea The Mazda CX-70 is essentially a five-passenger version of the three-row CX-90. All of the powertrains and a majority of the CX-90's design go right into the Mazda CX-70. The automaker does offer some variations in styling, features, and trim levels, but writers across the internet have been confused as to why Mazda is marketing a larger version of the same SUV as an entirely different model. 0:05 / 0:09 Nissan's revolutionary self-driving tech hits Japan's streets Watch More To understand the genesis of the CX-70 and why it was spun off of the CX-90, I wanted to look at an example from an automaker that I consider successful in this endeavor: the Honda and its five-passenger Passport, which is based on the same platform and many of the same mechanical bits as the three-row Honda Pilot. Despite sharing several components, they maintain different personalities, with unique identities both inside and out. I've just finished my time driving the CX-70 PHEV, and I must say that it has me scratching my head. Just like the CX-70 Turbo S I played with earlier, it's essentially the same as its slightly larger brother, with reduced passenger capacity and details that raise questions. With this in mind, I wanted to place the CX-70 and CX-90 side-by-side to see what I'm missing. The Mazda CX-90 The Mazda CX-90 was recently introduced, replacing the well-liked CX-9. This is a completely different vehicle with mechanicals that mirror those of BMW, in terms of its turbocharged inline 6-cylinder engine and rear-drive-biased architecture. All CX-90s come with all-wheel drive (AWD), and Mazda created a world-class people mover that's extremely well balanced, fun to drive, and luxurious. There are some glitches, which I'll cover in a moment, but for the most part, the Mazda CX-90 is a fantastic effort. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. There are several trims available, including the Select Turbo ($38,045), Preferred Turbo ($41,145), Premium Sport Turbo ($46,600), Turbo Premium Plus ($49,600), Turbo S Premium ($53,150), and Turbo S Premium Plus ($56,650). Then there's the PHEV models, the PHEV Preferred ($49,945), PHEV Premium Sport ($54,900), and the PHEV Premium Plus ($57,950). Yes, that's pricy for a Mazda, but the vehicle you're getting for the money truly competes head-to-head with much more expensive offerings from Europe and Asia. The CX-90 offers three powertrain choices, including two powerful six-cylinder options. The base 3.3-liter Inline-6 Turbo with a 48-volt hybrid system delivers 280 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque, while the Turbo S boosts output to 340 hp and 369 lb-ft of torque. For efficiency, a PHEV combines a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine, an electric motor, and a 17.8-kWh battery for 323 hp and 369 lb-ft of torque, plus 26 miles of all-electric range. All engines are paired with an 8-speed automatic transmission. Yes, the PHEV is more powerful and efficient, yet it's the one powertrain I would not recommend. It is jerky, less refined, heavier, and the premium you're paying for the PHEV doesn't justify the performance in my book. Additionally, the fuel mileage benefits don't jive for me, as the base model Turbos get 24 mpg city and 28 mpg highway, and the Turbo S gets 23 mpg city and 28 mpg highway. The PHEV is rated at 56 MPGe, but without the electric motor, it's rated at 25 mpg. That translates to a maximum range of 490 miles per tank. The Turbo and Turbo S are about 30 miles less in range. The Mazda CX-70 Mazda CX-70 — Source: Dave McQuilling/AutoBlog Remember how I mentioned the Honda Passport is unique compared to its platform mate, the Honda Pilot? Well, the CX-70 is remarkably similar to the CX-90. So much so that only the profile and interior design give you clues that it's different. It's still a great driving vehicle, especially the Turbo S, but it feels contrived when you match it against the CX-90. Right off the bat, the CX-70 comes with fewer trim options: the Turbo Preferred ($40,445), Turbo Premium ($45,900), Turbo Premium Plus ($48,900), Turbo S Premium ($52.450), and the Turbo S Premium Plus ($55,950). Then there are the PHEV models: the PHEV Premium ($54,400) and the PHEV Premium Plus ($57,450). There is no Select Turbo option, which is the entry level for the CX-90, meaning that the CX-70's base model is more expensive than the CX-90's base model. The powertrain is the same as the Mazda CX-90, as is the 75 cubic feet of cargo space. The difference here is that, with no third-row storage section, the CX-70 features a unique cubby storage section located aft of the second row. Otherwise, the interior layout, design, and feel are pretty much the same as the Mazda CX-90. Oh, and Mazda kept the third-row cupholders in the two-row CX-70. In terms of having its own personality like the aforementioned Honda Passport, it's not there. Mazda simply added some black trim and made the rear bumper look different. From almost every angle, they look remarkably similar. Other than badges, you'll be hard-pressed to tell them apart. Driving the Mazda CX-70 vs the CX-90 The base Mazda CX-70 has a curb weight of 4,863 pounds, while the CX-70 PHEV has a curb weight of 5,198 pounds. On the other hand, the base Mazda CX-90 3.3 Turbo has a curb weight of 4,735 pounds, while the 3.3 Turbo S model weighs 4,901 pounds. The PHEV has a curb weight of 5,267 pounds. That's not much of a difference, and their wheelbase are even the same, which means their overall performance numbers are very close. This all boils down to how they behave on the road. All models benefit from a performance-friendly AWD system and good balance. The weight of the PHEV is noticeable when you're pushing hard around a corner, but it's still better than most. The Turbo S is downright athletic. Noise and harshness, which were old issues for Mazda, are well isolated, and passenger comfort is top-notch. This goes for both vehicles, as I struggle to feel a difference between the two. My choice? If I had to pick one, I would opt for the Mazda CX-90 Turbo or Turbo S. It's a great all-around family hauler that's engaging to drive and extremely well-engineered. It holds its own against much more expensive vehicles, while providing a decent amount of economy to boot. Mazda still has to refine its PHEVs, at least to make them more enjoyable to drive. Even the base Select Turbo CX-90 has a nice-looking interior, with a standard 10.3-inch infotainment screen on the base CX-90s and a 12.3-inch one on the higher trims and all CX-70s. They all share the same UX, complemented by plenty of buttons and dials, and the odd design choice of having only the bigger screen be touch-capable. The system looks good, but it's slow, especially when using XM Satellite. Final thoughts I'm not here to bash Mazda about the CX-70. It's a good vehicle, but it makes little sense to me. Even if you don't need the third row of the CX-90, you can simply keep it folded flat. One day, you might need to haul more than five people. That's the only thing that makes these two vehicles different, and the logic boggles my mind. Maybe I'm missing something here, but I have to say that the Mazda CX-90 Turbo and Turbo S are outstanding. The CX-70, on the other hand, is a little confusing.
