Latest news with #CoreCivic
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- General
- Yahoo
CoreCivic inmate sues Trousdale Turner prison staff over alleged extortion
An inmate at CoreCivic's Trousdale Turner prison in Tennessee is suing prison administrators for allowing gang members to assault him. (Photo: Kansas Reflector) A Trousdale Turner Correction Center inmate serving time at a privately-run prison in Tennessee is suing the warden and staff for allowing gang members to assault him and extort money from his mother. Filed in May in U.S. District Court in Nashville, the lawsuit claims gang members at the CoreCivic prison in Trousdale County threatened to assault inmate Charles Anderson if his mother and two family friends didn't send them money, then beat and sexually assaulted him anyway after he complained to prison staff. Trousdale Turner already faces a federal civil rights investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice for gang violence and murders. The lawsuit names prison warden Vince Vantell, assistant warden Keith Huggins, investigator Robert Fohrd and a sergeant at the facility, which is run by the Brentwood-based prison operator under contract with the state of Tennessee. U.S. Department of Justice opens investigation into CoreCivic Trousdale County prison The filing says almost as soon as Anderson was transferred to Trousdale Turner in October 2023, he became the repeated victim of violence, with gang members stealing his property and threatening and inflicting violence on him. Gang members ordered him to buy back the stolen items in a well-known prison extortion scheme, according to the filing. Anderson then instructed his elderly mother to pay gang members' affiliates outside the prison through mobile methods or a 'green dot' card or else he would be severely harmed or killed. Gang members armed with shanks forced him to call his mother and ordered him to tell her to make payments between $40 and $150. 'These calls were placed from (Trousdale Turner Correctional Center) lines and presumably monitored by staff at TTCC,' the filing says. When the inmate's mother couldn't afford to make the payments, he asked two family friends for 'protection' payments to 'preserve his life.' The family friends told Fohrd about the extortion and threats, yet the staff member did 'nothing' meaningful to intervene or put Anderson in protective custody, the filing says. In May 2024, the family friend sent multiple emails to the warden's office about the 'incessant' extortion, and at one point a prison official told the friend they were 'committed' to placing him in protective custody. Yet in June 2024, Anderson was assaulted again, and in October 2024, he was sexually assaulted by at least four gang members with a broom handle. They claimed he owed them $1,000 for 'debt.' No staff members intervened, the filing says. The victim received treatment at Nashville General Hospital in October, but when he returned to the prison, gang members attacked him again and poured 'scalding hot water' on his face as he slept. Despite receiving medical treatment, he wasn't placed in protective custody and was attacked again and threatened if he didn't perform sexual favors for the gang members, which he refused to do, according to the filing. A corrections officer recommended he be put in protective custody, and staff reviewed the request. After repeated complaints and a request to file a Prison Rape Elimination Act complaint, Anderson met with prison officials when Vantell told him it was 'okay if he was gay.' Anderson replied that he wasn't. 'This interaction was an attempt to cover-up the rape as a consensual act and escape liability for the defendants' acts and omissions,' the filing says. The defendants denied his requests for protective custody, alleging he 'was not honest about why he needed protective custody' and 'became argumentative with the board' of prison officials. In December 2024, Fohrd spoke with the inmate's mother and told her to pay the gang members 'one more time' to buy back his property and he would be put into protective custody. The filing says the phone call was made in the presence of Anderson and gang members. 'Because the defendants failed to stop gang violence and extortion directed towards Mr. Anderson and his family, the violence and extortion continues, without reprieve, even to present,' the filing says. Since last October, the victim has received multiple disciplinary write-ups for refusing his cell assignment, because he believes 'segregation' is the only way to be protected from 'constant gang violence,' according to the filing. Yet he remains in the general population. Vantell resigned as warden in April after being placed on involuntary administrative leave amid the Department of Justice investigation into inmate physical and sexual violence, as well as understaffing at Trousdale Turner. The plaintiffs are represented by Moseley & Moseley Attorneys in Murfreesboro and Leanne Thorne in Lexington, Tennessee. A CoreCivic spokesman said the company doesn't comment on pending litigation but added that 'the safety and well-being of every person in our care is a top priority for our leadership and the staff at our Trousdale Turner Correctional Center.' CoreCivic 5-22-25 SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
3 days ago
- General
- Yahoo
Data breach at Missouri Department of Conservation exposed employees' personal information
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — The Missouri Department of Conservation (MDC) said Friday that its employees' personal information was leaked in a data breach earlier this year. In February of this year, the MDC said its cybersecurity team notified it of unauthorized access to one of its servers. City of Leavenworth files new lawsuit against CoreCivic after judge throws out previous suit At first, the department said no personal information had been compromised in the data breach. However, in April, the MDC determined that some files had been impacted by the breach. Specifically, the department has determined that current and former beneficiaries of the MDC's health benefits plan may have been impacted. However, the MDC cannot confirm exactly what data has been affected for each of the impacted individuals. The information involved may have included contact information (i.e., name, address, date of birth, phone number and email) and one or more of the following: Health benefits plan enrollment information Other personal information, such as Social Security numbers, driver's license numbers or state ID numbers. The department said it's continuing to investigate with the help of law enforcement. In the meantime, the MDC said individuals can take the following steps to protect themselves: Monitor any benefits statements received from health care providers, as well as bank and credit card statements, credit reports and other similar documents for any unfamiliar activity. Contact your medical provider or health plan if you identify health care services that you did not receive on your benefits statement. Contact your financial institution, credit card company or other applicable agency if you notice any suspicious activity on bank or credit card statements or on tax returns. Contact local law enforcement authorities if you believe that you are a victim of a crime. The department said it has implemented additional safeguards in addition to the IT security policies and procedures already in effect. Missouri counties denied state aid for tornado damage The MDC said it's in the process of providing direct, written notification to potentially impacted individuals. The department said it has also provided substitute notification on its website for potentially impacted individuals who may not have sufficient address information on file with the department. 'MDC regrets the inconvenience and concern that this incident may have caused to our team, retirees, and current or former beneficiaries of our health benefits plan,' the department said in a news release. The MDC said it will provide complimentary credit monitoring services to impacted individuals who are concerned their information may have been compromised. More information about complimentary credit monitoring services will be provided in the coming weeks, the department said. Those who believe they have been affected by this data breach can contact the MDC toll-free at 800-392-3111 or PrivacySupport@ Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Business
- Yahoo
City of Leavenworth files new lawsuit against CoreCivic after judge throws out previous suit
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — The City of Leavenworth, Kansas, is once again suing CoreCivic – the corporation that's trying to turn a vacant facility into an ICE detention center. This comes after the city previously sued CoreCivic in March, claiming the company was trying to reopen the facility without acquiring the necessary permit from the city. Former Leavenworth Detention Center worker recounts brutal attack An agreement was reached in mid-April – in which CoreCivic said it would not house immigration detainees in the facility until at least a month-and-a-half (June). However, on May 23, a judge threw out the lawsuit. This new lawsuit argues again that CoreCivic is trying to bypass Leavenworth law and reopen the facility without first obtaining the necessary city permit. CoreCivic has owned the now-vacant property since 1992. Until 2021, it operated a detention facility at the property. 'During this time, CoreCivic became embroiled in multiple widely publicized scandals resulting from its gross mismanagement of the facility and the ensuing rampant abuse, violence, and violations of the constitutional rights of its detainees and staff,' the lawsuit states. You can read more about that here. The city says in the lawsuit that CoreCivic's mismanagement impacted the city in countless ways, including: By imposing unexpected maintenance costs on its taxpayers Increasing the burden on the city's police and law enforcement Impeding the city's investigation of sexual assaults and other violent crimes against detainees and staff After CoreCivic initially applied for the city permit, the lawsuit says it then withdrew its application less than a month later. 'It (CoreCivic) has now taken the position that it need not seek or obtain a special use permit and that it plans to start housing detainees at the facility at some point in the immediate future, all in violation of the city's lawfully enacted ordinances,' the lawsuit reads. CoreCivic claims that its contract with ICE allows it to bypass Leavenworth law. 'In other words, CoreCivic refuses to comply with the city's permitting process because, it contends, it will take too long to do so,' the city argues in the lawsuit. For more background information on CoreCivic and the 'scandals' it was involved in, click here. The city is also suing Misty Lynn Mackey, the warden of the Midwest Regional Reception Center – as well as the employees, contractors and/or agents of CoreCivic – for 'aiding, abetting, and conspiring with CoreCivic to violate the city's development regulations.' The city is asking the court to enter a temporary restraining order or injunction to stop CoreCivic from housing any detainees in the facility without applying for and obtaining a special use permit from the city. This lawsuit was filed in the District Court of Leavenworth County, Kansas, on May 23, 2025 (case no. LV-2025-CV-000180).City of Leavenworth files lawsuit against CoreCivic for attempting to open ICE facility without permit Former Leavenworth Detention Center worker recounts brutal attack City of Leavenworth and CoreCivic come to agreement on ICE facility Judge throws out suit against CoreCivic's proposed ICE detention center Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Business
- Yahoo
With 81% ownership of the shares, CoreCivic, Inc. (NYSE:CXW) is heavily dominated by institutional owners
Institutions' substantial holdings in CoreCivic implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price The top 7 shareholders own 51% of the company Recent sales by insiders This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. To get a sense of who is truly in control of CoreCivic, Inc. (NYSE:CXW), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 81% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn). Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute. In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of CoreCivic. View our latest analysis for CoreCivic Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index. We can see that CoreCivic does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of CoreCivic, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too. Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. It would appear that 6.3% of CoreCivic shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 17% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 11% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 8.0% by the third-largest shareholder. Furthermore, CEO Damon Hininger is the owner of 0.7% of the company's shares. On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones. While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too. While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO. Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances. We can see that insiders own shares in CoreCivic, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$55m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling. The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run. It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand CoreCivic better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with CoreCivic (at least 1 which is significant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process. If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Business
- Yahoo
With 81% ownership of the shares, CoreCivic, Inc. (NYSE:CXW) is heavily dominated by institutional owners
Institutions' substantial holdings in CoreCivic implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price The top 7 shareholders own 51% of the company Recent sales by insiders This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. To get a sense of who is truly in control of CoreCivic, Inc. (NYSE:CXW), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 81% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn). Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute. In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of CoreCivic. View our latest analysis for CoreCivic Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index. We can see that CoreCivic does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of CoreCivic, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too. Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. It would appear that 6.3% of CoreCivic shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 17% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 11% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 8.0% by the third-largest shareholder. Furthermore, CEO Damon Hininger is the owner of 0.7% of the company's shares. On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones. While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too. While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO. Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances. We can see that insiders own shares in CoreCivic, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$55m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling. The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run. It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand CoreCivic better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with CoreCivic (at least 1 which is significant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process. If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
