Latest news with #Court
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Business
- Yahoo
Google says to appeal online search antitrust ruling
Google said Saturday it will appeal a ruling against it for anti-competitive practices in online search, a day after urging a US judge to reject the suggestion it spin off its Chrome browser. "We will wait for the Court's opinion. And we still strongly believe the Court's original decision was wrong, and look forward to our eventual appeal," the tech giant wrote on X. Google was found guilty in the summer of 2024 of illegal practices to establish and maintain its monopoly in online search by a federal judge in Washington. The Justice Department is now demanding remedies that could transform the digital landscape: Google's divestiture from its Chrome browser and a ban on entering exclusivity agreements with smartphone manufacturers to install the search engine by default. It is also asking that the California-based company be forced to share the data used to produce search results on Chrome. The department's proposal "reserves the right for the government to decide who gets Google users' data. Not the Court," Google said Saturday. "While we heard a lot about how the remedies would help various well-funded competitors (w/ repeated references to Bing), we heard very little about how all this helps consumers," Google added, referring to the Microsoft-owned search engine. The firm has proposed much more limited measures, including giving phone manufacturers the possibility to pre-install its Google Play app store but not Chrome or the search engine. The Friday hearing devoted to arguments marked the end of the trial to determine Google's penalty. The judge's decision is expected by August. juj/vla/bjt/mlm
France 24
an hour ago
- Business
- France 24
Google says to appeal online search antitrust ruling
"We will wait for the Court's opinion. And we still strongly believe the Court's original decision was wrong, and look forward to our eventual appeal," the tech giant wrote on X. Google was found guilty in the summer of 2024 of illegal practices to establish and maintain its monopoly in online search by a federal judge in Washington. The Justice Department is now demanding remedies that could transform the digital landscape: Google's divestiture from its Chrome browser and a ban on entering exclusivity agreements with smartphone manufacturers to install the search engine by default. It is also asking that the California-based company be forced to share the data used to produce search results on Chrome. The department's proposal "reserves the right for the government to decide who gets Google users' data. Not the Court," Google said Saturday. "While we heard a lot about how the remedies would help various well-funded competitors (w/ repeated references to Bing), we heard very little about how all this helps consumers," Google added, referring to the Microsoft-owned search engine. The firm has proposed much more limited measures, including giving phone manufacturers the possibility to pre-install its Google Play app store but not Chrome or the search engine. The Friday hearing devoted to arguments marked the end of the trial to determine Google's penalty. The judge's decision is expected by August.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Business
- Time of India
Google says it will appeal court's decision in Search case: Read company's 6-point response to remedies proposed by justice department
Google has announced that t plans to appeal a US antitrust ruling after a federal judge proposed milder remedies than those sought by antitrust regulators to address the company's dominance in online search. The update follows a Friday (May 30) hearing in Washington, where US District Judge Amit Mehta heard closing arguments on how to remedy Google's illegal monopoly in search and related advertising. What remedies DOJ has demanded and what the judge said The Department of Justice (DOJ) and a group of state attorneys general are seeking strong corrective measures, including forcing Google to share search data and stop paying billions to Apple and other smartphone makers to remain the default search engine on their devices. Judge Mehta, however, has suggested less aggressive options than the DOJ's proposal for a 10-year regulatory regime. The DOJ has expressed concern that Google's dominance in search also boosts its competitive edge in emerging technologies like artificial intelligence (AI), particularly through products such as Gemini. The DOJ's proposed remedies go miles beyond...: Google by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Homeowners can claim a free boiler upgrade if they live in these postcodes Eco Green Tips Apply Now Undo Google, in a statement posted on X (formerly Twitter), said that it will wait for the decision and believes "the Court's original decision was wrong". Yesterday, we made closing arguments in the DOJ search remedies trial. The DOJ's proposed remedies go miles beyond the Court's decision & would harm consumers, businesses and America's tech leadership. Here are a few key points from our arguments. ⬇️ 1/ DOJ waved off very real privacy issues, saying they'd be resolved later on. In fact, one DOJ lawyer said 'the only thing we can do is give [rivals] more data.' 🤔 2/ When confronted with significant questions left open by their proposals (i.e. how much data should Google be forced to share?), DOJ just said it could all be worked out by a 'Technical Committee' of mostly govt-appointed experts. 3/ The DOJ's proposal reserves the right for the government to decide who gets Google users' data. Not the Court. 4/ The DOJ spent many hours trying to convince the Court to remake the tech sector. Meanwhile it's very clear the AI space is highly competitive today: Countless rivals in the AI space are growing fast & gaining users & distribution without government intervention. 5/ While we heard a lot about how the remedies would help various well-funded competitors (w/ repeated references to Bing), we heard very little about how all this helps consumers. 6/ We will wait for the Court's opinion. And we still strongly believe the Court's original decision was wrong, and look forward to our eventual appeal. Previously in a separate case, the DOJ sought Google's divestment of parts of its ad tech business, specifically Google Ad Manager , which includes its publisher ad server and ad exchange platform. A federal judge ruled that Google unlawfully controlled key parts of the digital advertising market. Powerbeats Pro 2 – Apple's Most Powerful Workout Buds Yet! AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
CNBC
5 hours ago
- Business
- CNBC
Google says it will appeal online search antitrust decision
Alphabet's Google on Saturday said it will appeal an antitrust decision under which a federal judge proposed less aggressive ways to restore online search competition than the 10-year regime suggested by antitrust enforcers. "We will wait for the Court's opinion. And we still strongly believe the Court's original decision was wrong, and look forward to our eventual appeal," Google said in a post on X. U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta in Washington heard closing arguments on Friday at a trial on proposals to address Google's illegal monopoly in online search and related advertising. In April, a federal judge said that Google illegally dominated two markets for online advertising technology, with the U.S. Department of Justice saying that Google should sell off at least its Google Ad Manager, which includes the company's publisher ad server and its ad exchange. The DOJ and a coalition of states want Google to share search data and cease multibillion-dollar payments to Apple and other smartphone makers to be the default search engine on new devices. Antitrust enforcers are concerned about how Google's search monopoly gives it an advantage in artificial intelligence products like Gemini and vice versa. John Schmidtlein, an attorney for Google, said at the hearing that while generative AI is influencing how search looks, Google has addressed any concerns about competition in AI by no longer entering exclusive agreements with wireless carriers and smartphone makers including Samsung Electronics, leaving them free to load rival search and AI apps on new devices.
Economic Times
5 hours ago
- Business
- Economic Times
Google says it will appeal online search antitrust decision
Alphabet's Google on Saturday said it will appeal an antitrust decision under which a federal judge proposed less aggressive ways to restore online search competition than the 10-year regime suggested by antitrust enforcers "We will wait for the Court's opinion. And we still strongly believe the Court's original decision was wrong, and look forward to our eventual appeal," Google said in a post on X. — NewsFromGoogle (@NewsFromGoogle) US District Judge Amit Mehta in Washington heard closing arguments on Friday at a trial on proposals to address Google's illegal monopoly in online search and related advertising. In April, a federal judge said that Google illegally dominated two markets for online advertising technology, with the US Department of Justice saying that Google should sell off at least its Google Ad Manager, which includes the company's publisher ad server and its ad exchange. The DOJ and a coalition of states want Google to share search data and cease multibillion-dollar payments to Apple and other smartphone makers to be the default search engine on new devices. Antitrust enforcers are concerned about how Google's search monopoly gives it an advantage in artificial intelligence products like Gemini and vice versa. John Schmidtlein, an attorney for Google, said at the hearing that while generative AI is influencing how search looks, Google has addressed any concerns about competition in AI by no longer entering exclusive agreements with wireless carriers and smartphone makers including Samsung Electronics, leaving them free to load rival search and AI apps on new devices.
