logo
#

Latest news with #DelhiHighCourt

Why waste our time: Supreme Court refuses to pause Udaipur Files release
Why waste our time: Supreme Court refuses to pause Udaipur Files release

India Today

time4 hours ago

  • Politics
  • India Today

Why waste our time: Supreme Court refuses to pause Udaipur Files release

The Supreme Court on Friday refused to extend its earlier stay on the release of the film Udaipur Files: Kanhaiya Lal Tailor Murder and directed those objecting to it to approach the Delhi High Court to challenge the Centre's revisional order, which had allowed the movie to be screened with six edits."First go to High Court and pursue and then come here. Now other side says he [movie producer] is satisfied with central government order and he does not want to pursue the case here. So you go to High Court now. Why waste our time," the Court scheduled for release on July 11, 2025, 'Udaipur Files' faced many delays due to censorship and legal troubles. The movie is based on Kanhaiya Lal, a tailor from Udaipur who was murdered by Mohammad Riyaz and Mohammad Ghous for allegedly sharing a post supporting former BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma's controversial on-air remarks on Prophet Muhammad in 2022.A division bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi asked the counsel representing those opposing the movie's release — Kapil Sibal, appearing for Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind president Maulana Arshad Madani, and Menaka Guruswamy, appearing for one of the accused in the murder case — to approach the Delhi High Court if they sought relief from the Information and Broadcasting Ministry's committee, which reviewed the movie and suggested minor edits and changes to it, was set up by the Information Ministry after an order of the Delhi High Court."We had moved a writ thought that matter would also come before it has not come we seek permission to withdraw and go before the High Court," Sibal told the top bench refused to intervene in the movie's release even after the counsel for the petitioners argued, "Please issue a stay on the release until the High Court takes up the matter?""Whatever arguments you have to make, go to High Court,' the top court the other hand, counsel representing the filmmakers said that the "social fabric of the country was not harmed even after Kashmir Files or Kerala Story or even Pahalgam or 26/11 attacks," adding, "They are making a mountain out of a molehill.""Do they have any evidence that any social fabric was affected, or any incident happened after Kerala Story or Kashmir Files?," he response, Sibal pointed out that all the films mentioned by the filmmakers are a different case all together "for the simple reason that this movie has been seen while others were not seen.""Therefore I am challenging the content which could not be done in those cases," Sibal Supreme Court, however, declined to go into the merits of the objections, also refusing to address the argument made by the filmmaker about the "effect" of the film. advertisement"These arguments are provoking dialogue.. we have no doubt that in appropriate proceedings these questions may need to be answered. But that's not here.." observed the bench.- Ends

Working Hours Of Indian Pilots, Leaves Rules And Health Issues
Working Hours Of Indian Pilots, Leaves Rules And Health Issues

News18

time5 hours ago

  • Business
  • News18

Working Hours Of Indian Pilots, Leaves Rules And Health Issues

DGCA caps pilot flying time at 8 hrs at night, limits night landings to 2, and boosts weekly leave from 36 to 48 hrs to reduce fatigue and ensure better crew rest laIndia's aviation regulator, the DGCA, has issued a strict warning to Air India over serious lapses in crew fatigue management and training. The warning follows the airline's own reports highlighting safety violations submitted last month and in 2023, prompting the DGCA to consider strong regulatory action. The warning comes just days after a tragic incident in Ahmedabad, where one of its Boeing 787 Dreamliner aircraft crashed, claiming 260 lives. Pilots in India often express concerns about their demanding duties and insufficient rest periods, leading to various health issues, including mental health and fatigue. These concerns have recently come to the forefront. In four government notices issued on July 23, Air India was reprimanded for repeated non-compliance with safety regulations. The notices cite 29 violations, including inadequate rest for pilots, non-adherence to simulator training requirements, insufficient training for high-altitude airports, and flying international routes with inadequate cabin crew. Violations of weekly rest rules were found in two pilots in June 2024 and one pilot in June 2025, although the exact number of extra hours flown was not disclosed. Air India Under Scrutiny DGCA Regulations DGCA has set specific working hours for pilots, including a maximum flying time of 8 hours during the night (12 midnight to 6 am) and a maximum duty period of 10 hours. Night landings are limited to two instead of six, and weekly leave for pilots has been increased from 36 hours to 48 hours to reduce fatigue. Although these regulations were scheduled for implementation from June 1, 2024, airlines opposed them, leading pilots to seek intervention from the Delhi High Court. Following the court's decision, most rules are set to take effect from July 1, 2025. Court's Intervention The Delhi High Court ruled that duty and rest norms for pilots would be effective from July 1, 2025. Pilots will receive two days off per week, and night shift hours have been extended from 12 midnight to 6 am. Pilots cannot be rostered for consecutive night shifts and are limited to two flights during night duty, with a maximum flight time of 8 hours and duty time of 10 hours. Special exemptions for unforeseen circumstances now allow an additional period of use reduced from three hours to two hours. Pilot Leave Policies Pilots receive six casual leaves, 12 medical leaves (sick leaves), and 30 privilege leaves (PL) in Air India, with applications for PL required a year in advance. Indigo provides 42 PL to pilots and 22 PL to first officers. Challenges For Pilots Over the past decade, low-cost airlines have significantly expanded short-haul international flights, leading to a sharp rise in night operations. At the same time, many carriers have stopped providing hotel rest facilities at destinations. Pilots also complain that duty rosters are not prepared a week in advance as required, and sudden last-minute changes are frequently made. Stressful Cockpit Environment Cockpits offer limited space, minimal movement, and constant exposure to air congestion, low lighting, background noise, and vibration. Frequent changes in oxygen pressure force the body to continuously adapt, contributing to heightened fatigue among pilots. According to a report in The Hindu, an airline spokesperson said they are committed to ensuring the safety and well-being of crew members and have implemented robust fatigue management protocols. However, pilot availability varies across airlines, with some operating with adequate crew and others facing shortages. Pilot Statistics As of November 2024, there were 11,775 pilots across the country, operating about 800 aircraft. Air India and Indigo have placed orders for 1,000 aircraft to be delivered by 2035. Air India claims to have over 3,500 pilots, meeting current fleet requirements and DGCA norms on pilot rest and duty hours. Mental Health Concerns Pilots face extreme stress and depression due to irregular hours, long shifts, jet lag, and heavy responsibilities. Recent incidents like the Ahmedabad crash have led to an increase in pilots taking sick leave, highlighting mental health concerns. DGCA has recommended special programmes (such as peer support programmes) to assess and support the mental health of flight crew and air traffic controllers. Excessive work pressure and lack of rest can lead to burnout, physical and mental exhaustion, frustration, and reduced performance. Fatigue and Sleep Issues Frequent travel across time zones leads to severe jet lag in pilots, disrupting their sleep cycles and causing fatigue. Some may also suffer from obstructive sleep apnea, a condition in which breathing repeatedly stops during sleep, resulting in excessive daytime drowsiness and a heightened risk of accidents. The DGCA closely monitors such health issues due to their potential impact on flight safety. Irregular and frequently changing duty hours further disturb pilots' internal body clocks, preventing adequate rest. To address these concerns, the DGCA has recently proposed revised norms for pilot duty and rest hours to ensure better fatigue management. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : Ahmedabad Plane Crash Air India Air Safety crew members DGCA fatigue leave pilots working view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: July 25, 2025, 19:07 IST News india Working Hours Of Indian Pilots, Leaves Rules And Health Issues | Explained Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Udaipur Files Director Announces Film's New Release Date After Supreme Court Ruling, Says "Truth Always Wins"
Udaipur Files Director Announces Film's New Release Date After Supreme Court Ruling, Says "Truth Always Wins"

NDTV

time5 hours ago

  • Entertainment
  • NDTV

Udaipur Files Director Announces Film's New Release Date After Supreme Court Ruling, Says "Truth Always Wins"

Udaipur Files director Bharat Shrinate on Friday said the film will be released in theatres on August 8, 2025, soon after the Supreme Court directed the Delhi High Court to hear on the pleas challenging the Centre's nod to release the movie on July 28, 2025 in theatres around the globe. The film, based on tailor Kanhaiya Lal's murder in Udaipur, Rajasthan, in 2022, has been in the news due to controversy. The director previously told NDTV that the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) has made 150 cuts to the film. Due to censor and legal troubles, Udaipur Files missed its July 11, 2025 release date. The film, starring Vijay Raaz in the role of Kanhaiya Lal and produced by Amit Jani, is expected to be released on August 8, 2025. Udaipur Files director Bharat Shrinate told NDTV, "We respect the Supreme Court's order and are ready to release the film on August 8. Jani Firefox Films is going to start promotions and release Udaipur Files worldwide on August 8. Truth always wins." According to a PTI report, a Supreme Court bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi on Friday said the filmmakers appeal against the Delhi High Court order staying the release was infructuous as they accepted the July 21 order of the Centre clearing the release of the film subject to six cuts in its scenes and modifications in the disclaimer. The bench said it has not expressed any opinion on merit and the high court can adjudicate the issue of stay of release of film. Recently, a petition was before the Delhi High Court seeking to stay the release of the film, claiming that the movie has potential to inflame communal tensions and disrupt public order in the country. Kanhaiya Lal was hacked to death at his tailoring shop in the busy Hathipole area of Udaipur in June 2022 by two cleaver-wielding men for allegedly supporting a social media post against Islam, an incident that sent shockwaves across the country.

Udaipur Files to release on August 8 after Supreme Court clears legal hurdles
Udaipur Files to release on August 8 after Supreme Court clears legal hurdles

India Today

time6 hours ago

  • Entertainment
  • India Today

Udaipur Files to release on August 8 after Supreme Court clears legal hurdles

'Udaipur Files', which was ealier titled 'Gyanvapi Files: A Tailor's Murder Story', will finally release in theatres on August 8, 2025. This comes after a Supreme Court ruling directed the Delhi High Court to address challenges against the government's approval of the film's slated for release on July 11, 2025, 'Udaipur Files' faced many delays due to censorship and legal troubles. The film, featuring Vijay Raaz as Kanhaiya Lal, is produced by Amit Jani and has generated considerable interest among audiences and critics Bharat Shrinate announced the new release date after the Supreme Court's decision, signalling the end of the legal journey for the film's distribution. The legal issues surrounding the film emerged when the Centre's approval for its release was challenged, causing the film's release to be postponed. The Supreme Court's direction to the Delhi High Court has now paved the way for its global Shrinate reacted to the court's decision told NDTV, "We respect the Supreme Court's order and are ready to release the film on August 8. Jani Firefox Films is going to start promotions and release Udaipur Files worldwide on August 8. Truth always wins."BJP leader Amit Malviya celebrated Supreme Court's verdict on X. He wrote, "Supreme Court refuses to stay Udaipur Files. A historic victory. Cinema will not be silenced – it will speak! (sic)."Production challenges have not deterred the filmmakers from pursuing the film's tailor Kanhaiya Lal was murdered in June 2022 allegedly by Mohammad Riyaz and Mohammad assailants later released a video claiming that the murder was in reaction to the tailor allegedly sharing a social media post in support of former BJP member Nupur Sharma following her controversial comments on Prophet case was probed by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) and the accused were booked under the stringent Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, besides provisions under trial is pending before the special NIA court in Jaipur.- EndsMust Watch

‘Udaipur Files': SC declines to extend stay on release, says those against it can approach Delhi HC
‘Udaipur Files': SC declines to extend stay on release, says those against it can approach Delhi HC

Indian Express

time7 hours ago

  • Entertainment
  • Indian Express

‘Udaipur Files': SC declines to extend stay on release, says those against it can approach Delhi HC

The Supreme Court on Friday declined to extend the stay on release of the film Udaipur Files: Kanhaiya Lal Tailor Murder and told those objecting to it to approach the Delhi High Court for any further relief. A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi told senior advocates Kapil Sibal and Menaka Guruswamy, who appeared for those opposing its release, that they can approach the high court if they want to challenge the order by the expert committee set up by the Information and Broadcasting Ministry to review the certificate granted to the movie by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC). The committee, set up following an order of the Delhi High Court, had recommended allowing the release subject to certain changes, including a new disclaimer. While Sibal was appearing for Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind president Maulana Arshad Madani, Guruswamy was appearing for Mohammed Javed, one of the accused in the Kanhaiya Lal murder case. 'We have not touched the merits…We will pass an order asking the high court to take it up on Monday…Whatever arguments you have to make, go to high court,' the bench said. As the counsel for those objecting to the release sought a stay in the meanwhile, Justice Kant said, 'meanwhile nothing.' Appearing for the filmmakers, senior advocate Gaurav Bhatia opposed the request for extending the stay ordered by the high court. 'What is happening is very peculiar. This is my SLP [special leave petition] challenging the stay. Can they ask for stay in my SLP when they have a legal remedy before the HC?' Bhatia asked. The court pointed out that it had not granted any stay. Sibal said, 'I am not disputing that. In any case he can't screen the movie after tomorrow. You have to get 1,800 cinema halls.' Another counsel urged the bench, 'Your Lordships need only say HC will hear it on Monday. Meanwhile, the movie will not be screened, that is all.' The bench, however, did not agree. Bhatia referred to the objections raised in the past to the release of the film, Kerala Story, and the Supreme Court subsequently allowing its release. 'Every time the SC has allowed release. Let them go to HC. The HC will give them a detailed hearing. If there is a case made out for a stay, the HC will grant them. Why should this court, where I am the aggrieved party, pass an interim order stopping the release of the movie?' he said. Bhatia added, 'All preparations at my end are being done. I have lost 12 days already. I have abided by every instruction…Now today they couldn't make out a case. The revisional authority has passed an order. It would not be appropriate for Your Lordships to grant relief to them at this juncture.' Pointing out that around 1,200 screens had been blocked to screen the film, Bhatia said, 'And what are we encouraging Your Lordship? Is that question not relevant? Any person…comes forward, says I am aggrieved, my feelings are hurt. Can there be a …movie which will not hurt the sentiments of anyone? And then there are orders passed by the HC. A special screening was done for them. 55 plus 6 plus disclaimer edited by them…Now any further stay would be unfair.' The CBFC had ordered 55 cuts and the committee constituted by the Centre had recommended six further changes in addition to a new disclaimer. A counsel backing demands for its release said that no one was vilified even when films like Kashmir Files were released. 'The argument is this film will vilify the community and jeopardise the social fabric of the country. Earlier also similar arguments were made…Did any incident happen after the Kashmir Files? Was any Muslim targeted? Was the community vilified? Were even Kashmiri Muslims targeted?' he submitted. 'Madani should understand that the social fabric of the country was not harmed even after Pahalgam. It was not harmed after 26/11, or after the actual incident of Udaipur, or after Kashmir Files, or after Kerala Story. If it was harmed, it should be part of their petition. It is not. Their vilification theory and hate story is a figment of imagination. They are making a mountain out of a molehill….They want us to believe Udaipur Files is more profound than Pahalgam, Pulwama…,' he added. Bhatia questioned Madani's credentials saying he has three FIRs registered against him for provocative speech. 'They want to act as super censor. Can this be allowed in a country like ours?' he asked. Justice Kant said, 'Today, only short question here is once you withdraw your petition, should there be a condition from this court (to not screen) for 2 days, 3 days…?' Sibal said that all cases cited by the film makers are different from this 'for the simple reason that this movie has been seen while others were not seen. Therefore I am challenging the content which could not be done in those cases.' The high court had allowed a special screening and asked those objecting to watch it before it decided their plea for stay of release. Sibal argued that his case is also covered by the Supreme Court judgment in the Amish Devgan case. But Justice Bagchi said, 'In that respect, we will apply the Wednesbury principle. Whenever an expert body takes a decision, courts are generally deferential. It is not that judicial review is completely obviated. If the finding is perverse or completely contrary to the established principles, fundamental principles, courts will interfere. But nonetheless, we won't put the test of proportionality vis a vis the hands of the expert body.' Sibal said 'They have a CBFC certificate. The presumption is in their favour. But I have a right to challenge it.' 'You have (already) challenged it,' said Justice Bagchi. Sibal said, 'If they make a statement that it is not being released till Monday, Your Lordships may fix it for Monday (before the HC).' Justice Kant, however, said, 'No, how can we compel them to make a statement!' Ananthakrishnan G. is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express. He has been in the field for over 23 years, kicking off his journalism career as a freelancer in the late nineties with bylines in The Hindu. A graduate in law, he practised in the District judiciary in Kerala for about two years before switching to journalism. His first permanent assignment was with The Press Trust of India in Delhi where he was assigned to cover the lower courts and various commissions of inquiry. He reported from the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court of India during his first stint with The Indian Express in 2005-2006. Currently, in his second stint with The Indian Express, he reports from the Supreme Court and writes on topics related to law and the administration of justice. Legal reporting is his forte though he has extensive experience in political and community reporting too, having spent a decade as Kerala state correspondent, The Times of India and The Telegraph. He is a stickler for facts and has several impactful stories to his credit. ... Read More

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store