Latest news with #GCSEs
Western Telegraph
10 hours ago
- General
- Western Telegraph
New learning centre to open in Haverfordwest in September
Cherry Grove Learning Centre is an innovative learning environment for children and young people aged three to 18. Its principal, Saj Madni, said: 'Cherry Grove is a centre of excellence, where young people rediscover a love of learning, rebuild confidence, and develop a strong sense of identity and purpose.' And this coming weekend, families are invited to attend an open day at the centre at 1 Cherry Grove, Haverfordwest SA61 2NZ on Saturday July 26, from 11am to 3pm. The learning centre will open its doors on September 8. (Image: Cherry Grove Learning Centre) Ms Madni, who was the deputy head of an independent secondary school and also a Head of Sixth Form for eight years, added: 'Every child deserves to feel seen, valued, and inspired – and that's what we aim to provide.' Ms Madni outlined the ethos of Cherry Grove. She explained: 'Cherry Grove offers a personalised, child-centred approach to learning. 'With small group teaching, bespoke education plans, and a focus on academic achievement, wellbeing and leadership, the centre supports learners from a wide range of backgrounds – including those who are ambitious, anxious, neurodivergent, previously home-educated, or simply looking for a fresh start. Out-of-classroom experiences will also be important for learners at the centre. (Image: Cherry Grove Learning Centre) 'Learners follow tailored pathways to GCSEs, A-levels, and vocational qualifications, supported by Cherry Grove's in-house examinations centre." Ms Madni emphasised that academic success is just one part of the experience. She said: "The centre also offers outdoor learning, creative subjects, sports partnerships, and a unique programme of community organising, where learners build confidence through real-world projects." The centre is officially launching on September 8, 2025 and more information ahead of that date can be found by going along to the open day; by contacting info@ or visiting Learners from the age of three to 18 are welcome to attend the centre. (Image: Cherry Grove Learning Centre) Families whose children are set to start at Cherry Grove in September have already shared their experiences after visiting the centre: Said one parent: 'My daughter is aiming for a top university, but she needed somewhere that could challenge her and support her as a person. Cherry Grove offers both – and after a few visits, she felt right at home.' Another told how her son had always found mainstream school 'overwhelming. They commented: 'At Cherry Grove, the calm setting and welcoming staff gave us real reassurance. He's actually excited about learning again.' Another parent of a 'very anxious' child praised the 'brilliant' Cherry Grove staff. They explained: 'They let him visit a few times, meet the team, and explore the space slowly. He loved it. Knowing he feels comfortable there has given us real peace of mind.' The open day will give families the chance to tour the site and meet staff; learn about the curriculum and learner support and ask questions about the admissions process and next steps. For more information, contact the centre, linked above.
North Wales Chronicle
6 days ago
- General
- North Wales Chronicle
Ofqual data ‘significantly overstated' number of pupils given extra exam time
Ofqual has announced it is withdrawing a decade's worth of statistics on pupils being granted special access arrangements in their GCSEs, AS and A-level exams after identifying issues with the data. It comes after data from the exams regulator last year suggested that nearly a third (30.1%) of pupils in England were given 25% extra time to complete their GCSEs, AS and A-level exams in 2023/24. The original figures, published by Ofqual in November, suggested that 41.8% of all candidates in independent centres – of which the majority are private schools – were granted 25% extra time in their exams in 2023/24, compared with 26.5% in non-selective state schools. But with just weeks to go until A-level results day, Ofqual has admitted that its published figures led to a 'significant overstatement' of access arrangements. A new analysis from Ofqual suggests that the proportion of students receiving access arrangements is 'much more closely aligned' with the proportion of students with special educational needs (Sen) in the school population. Department for Education (DfE) figures published last month suggest that nearly a fifth (19.5%) of pupils in England had Sen support or an education, health and care (EHC) plan in 2024/25. Ofqual said the 'problem' has been with the way the data was recorded and reported rather than how the access arrangements system has been used. For example it included arrangements for students who did not sit exams that year, and duplicate applications for the same student were not filtered out. Schools and colleges apply to exam boards for access arrangements to ensure that those students can sit their exams without being unfairly disadvantaged. Education leaders have suggested that more pupils are seeking support due to a rise in young people with special educational needs and disabilities (Send) and mental health issues since the pandemic. Requests for 25% extra time in exams is the most common exam board-approved access arrangement for pupils. Tom Bramley, executive director of research and analysis at Ofqual, said there are no issues with the access arrangements system itself and no student should be affected. In a blog on Thursday, he said: 'The approach to access arrangements remains unchanged.' Ofqual is withdrawing its official statistics on access arrangements for GCSE, AS and A-levels from 2014 to 2024. Revised statistics will be published later this year, covering the academic years from 2020/21 onwards, and they will be 'official statistics in development'. A detailed analysis of the data is expected to include updated figures on exam access arrangements for state and private school pupils. Mr Bramley said: 'In 2023 we started considering trends in access arrangements data and began research into how the arrangements were used and perceived in the education sector. 'As part of this work we requested more detailed data from exam boards, which we received at the end of 2024. 'We have always recognised that there are limitations to these figures. 'Our analysis has now revealed that they have led to a significant overstatement of approved access arrangements in place for the exam cohort in each year.' Earlier this year, Ofqual said it would 'take action' if it found that the higher proportion of private school pupils being given extra time in exams was due to unfairness. In February, Sir Ian Bauckham, chief regulator at Ofqual, told Tes magazine that the regulator was doing 'extra work' as he was 'concerned' by the gap between private school and state school candidates being granted special exam access arrangements. It came after the Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson called on the exams regulator last year to investigate why private school pupils were more likely to receive extra exam time than state school pupils. Julie Robinson, chief executive of the Independent Schools Council (ISC), said: 'Ofqual is supposed to be the trusted source for exam statistics and as a result of these significant errors, independent schools have wrongly seen their results undermined and their integrity questioned. 'We are pleased that the investigation instigated by the DfE will lead to a correction of the record and we hope an apology will be forthcoming.' Tom Middlehurst, deputy director of policy at the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), said: 'We're pleased that Ofqual has conducted a thorough review of this data to understand why there have been very significant increases in access arrangements. 'Clearly, having identified issues which indicate that this is in fact overstated in the statistics it is the right thing to do to withdraw and correct the data. 'This will lead to a more accurate understanding of trends around access arrangements. 'It is, however, frustrating that the data was apparently incorrect in the first place.' Paul Whiteman, general secretary at school leaders' union NAHT, said: 'While it is regrettable that problems have been identified with these statistics, Ofqual has done the right thing in withdrawing them and working to correct and republish them. 'Having correct datasets on access arrangements is vital to identify trends and changes across the system. 'School leaders have certainly seen more requests for access arrangements in recent years in the aftermath of Covid, increased reports of anxiety and mental ill-health, and significant rises in numbers of children with additional needs.' A DfE spokeswoman said: 'Ofqual has acted appropriately in firstly reviewing the data and then identifying and addressing the issue as quickly and transparently as possible. 'We welcome Ofqual's commitment to improving data quality and transparency, and we will continue to work closely with them to ensure high standards across the system.' A Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ) spokeswoman said: 'Ofqual is responsible for quality assuring and publishing official statistics about access arrangements. 'For the majority of cases, data about access arrangements, such as extra time, is uploaded to a centralised JCQ system used by schools, colleges and other exam centres. 'Individual exam boards provide additional data for a proportion of more complicated cases. 'We will continue to work with Ofqual to make sure that its statistics accurately reflect the number of students who benefit from access arrangements, such as extra time in exams.'
Leader Live
6 days ago
- General
- Leader Live
Ofqual data ‘significantly overstated' number of pupils given extra exam time
Ofqual has announced it is withdrawing a decade's worth of statistics on pupils being granted special access arrangements in their GCSEs, AS and A-level exams after identifying issues with the data. It comes after data from the exams regulator last year suggested that nearly a third (30.1%) of pupils in England were given 25% extra time to complete their GCSEs, AS and A-level exams in 2023/24. The original figures, published by Ofqual in November, suggested that 41.8% of all candidates in independent centres – of which the majority are private schools – were granted 25% extra time in their exams in 2023/24, compared with 26.5% in non-selective state schools. But with just weeks to go until A-level results day, Ofqual has admitted that its published figures led to a 'significant overstatement' of access arrangements. A new analysis from Ofqual suggests that the proportion of students receiving access arrangements is 'much more closely aligned' with the proportion of students with special educational needs (Sen) in the school population. Department for Education (DfE) figures published last month suggest that nearly a fifth (19.5%) of pupils in England had Sen support or an education, health and care (EHC) plan in 2024/25. Ofqual said the 'problem' has been with the way the data was recorded and reported rather than how the access arrangements system has been used. For example it included arrangements for students who did not sit exams that year, and duplicate applications for the same student were not filtered out. Schools and colleges apply to exam boards for access arrangements to ensure that those students can sit their exams without being unfairly disadvantaged. Education leaders have suggested that more pupils are seeking support due to a rise in young people with special educational needs and disabilities (Send) and mental health issues since the pandemic. Requests for 25% extra time in exams is the most common exam board-approved access arrangement for pupils. Tom Bramley, executive director of research and analysis at Ofqual, said there are no issues with the access arrangements system itself and no student should be affected. In a blog on Thursday, he said: 'The approach to access arrangements remains unchanged.' Ofqual is withdrawing its official statistics on access arrangements for GCSE, AS and A-levels from 2014 to 2024. Revised statistics will be published later this year, covering the academic years from 2020/21 onwards, and they will be 'official statistics in development'. A detailed analysis of the data is expected to include updated figures on exam access arrangements for state and private school pupils. Mr Bramley said: 'In 2023 we started considering trends in access arrangements data and began research into how the arrangements were used and perceived in the education sector. 'As part of this work we requested more detailed data from exam boards, which we received at the end of 2024. 'We have always recognised that there are limitations to these figures. 'Our analysis has now revealed that they have led to a significant overstatement of approved access arrangements in place for the exam cohort in each year.' Earlier this year, Ofqual said it would 'take action' if it found that the higher proportion of private school pupils being given extra time in exams was due to unfairness. In February, Sir Ian Bauckham, chief regulator at Ofqual, told Tes magazine that the regulator was doing 'extra work' as he was 'concerned' by the gap between private school and state school candidates being granted special exam access arrangements. It came after the Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson called on the exams regulator last year to investigate why private school pupils were more likely to receive extra exam time than state school pupils. Julie Robinson, chief executive of the Independent Schools Council (ISC), said: 'Ofqual is supposed to be the trusted source for exam statistics and as a result of these significant errors, independent schools have wrongly seen their results undermined and their integrity questioned. 'We are pleased that the investigation instigated by the DfE will lead to a correction of the record and we hope an apology will be forthcoming.' Tom Middlehurst, deputy director of policy at the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), said: 'We're pleased that Ofqual has conducted a thorough review of this data to understand why there have been very significant increases in access arrangements. 'Clearly, having identified issues which indicate that this is in fact overstated in the statistics it is the right thing to do to withdraw and correct the data. 'This will lead to a more accurate understanding of trends around access arrangements. 'It is, however, frustrating that the data was apparently incorrect in the first place.' Paul Whiteman, general secretary at school leaders' union NAHT, said: 'While it is regrettable that problems have been identified with these statistics, Ofqual has done the right thing in withdrawing them and working to correct and republish them. 'Having correct datasets on access arrangements is vital to identify trends and changes across the system. 'School leaders have certainly seen more requests for access arrangements in recent years in the aftermath of Covid, increased reports of anxiety and mental ill-health, and significant rises in numbers of children with additional needs.' A DfE spokeswoman said: 'Ofqual has acted appropriately in firstly reviewing the data and then identifying and addressing the issue as quickly and transparently as possible. 'We welcome Ofqual's commitment to improving data quality and transparency, and we will continue to work closely with them to ensure high standards across the system.' A Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ) spokeswoman said: 'Ofqual is responsible for quality assuring and publishing official statistics about access arrangements. 'For the majority of cases, data about access arrangements, such as extra time, is uploaded to a centralised JCQ system used by schools, colleges and other exam centres. 'Individual exam boards provide additional data for a proportion of more complicated cases. 'We will continue to work with Ofqual to make sure that its statistics accurately reflect the number of students who benefit from access arrangements, such as extra time in exams.'
Glasgow Times
6 days ago
- General
- Glasgow Times
Ofqual data ‘significantly overstated' number of pupils given extra exam time
Ofqual has announced it is withdrawing a decade's worth of statistics on pupils being granted special access arrangements in their GCSEs, AS and A-level exams after identifying issues with the data. It comes after data from the exams regulator last year suggested that nearly a third (30.1%) of pupils in England were given 25% extra time to complete their GCSEs, AS and A-level exams in 2023/24. The original figures, published by Ofqual in November, suggested that 41.8% of all candidates in independent centres – of which the majority are private schools – were granted 25% extra time in their exams in 2023/24, compared with 26.5% in non-selective state schools. But with just weeks to go until A-level results day, Ofqual has admitted that its published figures led to a 'significant overstatement' of access arrangements. A new analysis from Ofqual suggests that the proportion of students receiving access arrangements is 'much more closely aligned' with the proportion of students with special educational needs (Sen) in the school population. Department for Education (DfE) figures published last month suggest that nearly a fifth (19.5%) of pupils in England had Sen support or an education, health and care (EHC) plan in 2024/25. Ofqual said the 'problem' has been with the way the data was recorded and reported rather than how the access arrangements system has been used. For example it included arrangements for students who did not sit exams that year, and duplicate applications for the same student were not filtered out. Schools and colleges apply to exam boards for access arrangements to ensure that those students can sit their exams without being unfairly disadvantaged. Education leaders have suggested that more pupils are seeking support due to a rise in young people with special educational needs and disabilities (Send) and mental health issues since the pandemic. Requests for 25% extra time in exams is the most common exam board-approved access arrangement for pupils. Tom Bramley, executive director of research and analysis at Ofqual, said there are no issues with the access arrangements system itself and no student should be affected. In a blog on Thursday, he said: 'The approach to access arrangements remains unchanged.' Ofqual is withdrawing its official statistics on access arrangements for GCSE, AS and A-levels from 2014 to 2024. Revised statistics will be published later this year, covering the academic years from 2020/21 onwards, and they will be 'official statistics in development'. A detailed analysis of the data is expected to include updated figures on exam access arrangements for state and private school pupils. Mr Bramley said: 'In 2023 we started considering trends in access arrangements data and began research into how the arrangements were used and perceived in the education sector. 'As part of this work we requested more detailed data from exam boards, which we received at the end of 2024. 'We have always recognised that there are limitations to these figures. 'Our analysis has now revealed that they have led to a significant overstatement of approved access arrangements in place for the exam cohort in each year.' Earlier this year, Ofqual said it would 'take action' if it found that the higher proportion of private school pupils being given extra time in exams was due to unfairness. In February, Sir Ian Bauckham, chief regulator at Ofqual, told Tes magazine that the regulator was doing 'extra work' as he was 'concerned' by the gap between private school and state school candidates being granted special exam access arrangements. It came after the Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson called on the exams regulator last year to investigate why private school pupils were more likely to receive extra exam time than state school pupils. Julie Robinson, chief executive of the Independent Schools Council (ISC), said: 'Ofqual is supposed to be the trusted source for exam statistics and as a result of these significant errors, independent schools have wrongly seen their results undermined and their integrity questioned. 'We are pleased that the investigation instigated by the DfE will lead to a correction of the record and we hope an apology will be forthcoming.' Tom Middlehurst, deputy director of policy at the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), said: 'We're pleased that Ofqual has conducted a thorough review of this data to understand why there have been very significant increases in access arrangements. 'Clearly, having identified issues which indicate that this is in fact overstated in the statistics it is the right thing to do to withdraw and correct the data. 'This will lead to a more accurate understanding of trends around access arrangements. 'It is, however, frustrating that the data was apparently incorrect in the first place.' Paul Whiteman, general secretary at school leaders' union NAHT, said: 'While it is regrettable that problems have been identified with these statistics, Ofqual has done the right thing in withdrawing them and working to correct and republish them. 'Having correct datasets on access arrangements is vital to identify trends and changes across the system. 'School leaders have certainly seen more requests for access arrangements in recent years in the aftermath of Covid, increased reports of anxiety and mental ill-health, and significant rises in numbers of children with additional needs.' A DfE spokeswoman said: 'Ofqual has acted appropriately in firstly reviewing the data and then identifying and addressing the issue as quickly and transparently as possible. 'We welcome Ofqual's commitment to improving data quality and transparency, and we will continue to work closely with them to ensure high standards across the system.' A Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ) spokeswoman said: 'Ofqual is responsible for quality assuring and publishing official statistics about access arrangements. 'For the majority of cases, data about access arrangements, such as extra time, is uploaded to a centralised JCQ system used by schools, colleges and other exam centres. 'Individual exam boards provide additional data for a proportion of more complicated cases. 'We will continue to work with Ofqual to make sure that its statistics accurately reflect the number of students who benefit from access arrangements, such as extra time in exams.'
South Wales Guardian
7 days ago
- General
- South Wales Guardian
Ofqual data ‘significantly overstated' number of pupils given extra exam time
Ofqual has announced it is withdrawing a decade's worth of statistics on pupils being granted special access arrangements in their GCSEs, AS and A-level exams after identifying issues with the data. It comes after data from the exams regulator last year suggested that nearly a third (30.1%) of pupils in England were given 25% extra time to complete their GCSEs, AS and A-level exams in 2023/24. The original figures, published by Ofqual in November, suggested that 41.8% of all candidates in independent centres – of which the majority are private schools – were granted 25% extra time in their exams in 2023/24, compared with 26.5% in non-selective state schools. But with just weeks to go until A-level results day, Ofqual has admitted that its published figures led to a 'significant overstatement' of access arrangements. A new analysis from Ofqual suggests that the proportion of students receiving access arrangements is 'much more closely aligned' with the proportion of students with special educational needs (Sen) in the school population. Department for Education (DfE) figures published last month suggest that nearly a fifth (19.5%) of pupils in England had Sen support or an education, health and care (EHC) plan in 2024/25. Ofqual said the 'problem' has been with the way the data was recorded and reported rather than how the access arrangements system has been used. For example it included arrangements for students who did not sit exams that year, and duplicate applications for the same student were not filtered out. Schools and colleges apply to exam boards for access arrangements to ensure that those students can sit their exams without being unfairly disadvantaged. Education leaders have suggested that more pupils are seeking support due to a rise in young people with special educational needs and disabilities (Send) and mental health issues since the pandemic. Requests for 25% extra time in exams is the most common exam board-approved access arrangement for pupils. Tom Bramley, executive director of research and analysis at Ofqual, said there are no issues with the access arrangements system itself and no student should be affected. In a blog on Thursday, he said: 'The approach to access arrangements remains unchanged.' Ofqual is withdrawing its official statistics on access arrangements for GCSE, AS and A-levels from 2014 to 2024. Revised statistics will be published later this year, covering the academic years from 2020/21 onwards, and they will be 'official statistics in development'. A detailed analysis of the data is expected to include updated figures on exam access arrangements for state and private school pupils. Mr Bramley said: 'In 2023 we started considering trends in access arrangements data and began research into how the arrangements were used and perceived in the education sector. 'As part of this work we requested more detailed data from exam boards, which we received at the end of 2024. 'We have always recognised that there are limitations to these figures. 'Our analysis has now revealed that they have led to a significant overstatement of approved access arrangements in place for the exam cohort in each year.' Earlier this year, Ofqual said it would 'take action' if it found that the higher proportion of private school pupils being given extra time in exams was due to unfairness. In February, Sir Ian Bauckham, chief regulator at Ofqual, told Tes magazine that the regulator was doing 'extra work' as he was 'concerned' by the gap between private school and state school candidates being granted special exam access arrangements. It came after the Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson called on the exams regulator last year to investigate why private school pupils were more likely to receive extra exam time than state school pupils. Julie Robinson, chief executive of the Independent Schools Council (ISC), said: 'Ofqual is supposed to be the trusted source for exam statistics and as a result of these significant errors, independent schools have wrongly seen their results undermined and their integrity questioned. 'We are pleased that the investigation instigated by the DfE will lead to a correction of the record and we hope an apology will be forthcoming.' Tom Middlehurst, deputy director of policy at the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), said: 'We're pleased that Ofqual has conducted a thorough review of this data to understand why there have been very significant increases in access arrangements. 'Clearly, having identified issues which indicate that this is in fact overstated in the statistics it is the right thing to do to withdraw and correct the data. 'This will lead to a more accurate understanding of trends around access arrangements. 'It is, however, frustrating that the data was apparently incorrect in the first place.' Paul Whiteman, general secretary at school leaders' union NAHT, said: 'While it is regrettable that problems have been identified with these statistics, Ofqual has done the right thing in withdrawing them and working to correct and republish them. 'Having correct datasets on access arrangements is vital to identify trends and changes across the system. 'School leaders have certainly seen more requests for access arrangements in recent years in the aftermath of Covid, increased reports of anxiety and mental ill-health, and significant rises in numbers of children with additional needs.' A DfE spokeswoman said: 'Ofqual has acted appropriately in firstly reviewing the data and then identifying and addressing the issue as quickly and transparently as possible. 'We welcome Ofqual's commitment to improving data quality and transparency, and we will continue to work closely with them to ensure high standards across the system.' A Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ) spokeswoman said: 'Ofqual is responsible for quality assuring and publishing official statistics about access arrangements. 'For the majority of cases, data about access arrangements, such as extra time, is uploaded to a centralised JCQ system used by schools, colleges and other exam centres. 'Individual exam boards provide additional data for a proportion of more complicated cases. 'We will continue to work with Ofqual to make sure that its statistics accurately reflect the number of students who benefit from access arrangements, such as extra time in exams.'
