Latest news with #KSCA
The Hindu
a day ago
- Sport
- The Hindu
From the archives: When Zaheer Abbas-led Pakistan walked off the field in Bengaluru as Gavaskar neared his 28th Test ton
England captain Ben Stokes, seeing the fourth Test at Manchester heading to a sure draw, decided to extend an invitation to draw the match to give his bowlers some added rest. India had Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar on strike, both inching closer to their individual centuries. The Indian management decided to hold off on accepting the draw to allow the duo to register their hundreds, which sparked a wave of displeasure and chatter from the England players. The incident has sparked off a raging 'spirit of cricket' debate. As history shows, this wasn't the first time a game headed for a draw featured a player eyeing a milestone and an unhappy opponent as a consequence. In 1983, during the first Test between India and Pakistan in Bangalore, skipper Zaheer Abbas walked off with his players before the scheduled end when 20 overs of play were still left. Here's the story by R. Mohan as published in Sportstar in 1983: The spirit takes a hard dent Was the spirit of the game forsaken by Zaheer Abbas and company when they walked out of the first Test? Could the spirit of the law been a better guide than the cold letter of the law proved to be? Were the umpires totally right in forcing the extension of play? Was a batsman's personal landmark more important than the need to look at the state of the match as a whole when deciding on cessation of play? These and many other questions can be asked. The answers will be unclear even on a thorough reading of the rules governing cricket. Since there was no provision in the playing conditions regarding the mandatory overs period, the umpires had no option but to rely on the laws of cricket alone. The first class game is run on this principle in India. Never has a match been called off before the scheduled close on the final day even if both captains wished not to carry on till close in matches in which the possibility of carrying the game to its final conclusion did not exist. Gavaskar and Gaekwad waiting for play to resume after their opponents, Pakistan, walking off the pitch en mass. | Photo Credit: SPORTSTAR ARCHIVES Sunil Gavaskar once declared against England in Kanpur so that there was no need to play the last three overs. Stalemate: Based on the broad principle, the umpires ran the game till 4 p.m. - on the final day of the Bangalore Test. If there was a mutual agreement on abandoning play at that point, the stumps would have been drawn and all the drama enacted would not have come about. Gavaskar insisted on his right to play on to a possible century. Zaheer was unwilling to oblige. The resumption of play was made possible by a plea from C. Nagaraj, Secretary, KSCA, to Zaheer Abbas. It was pointed out that a 'law and order' problem would crop up if the Pakistanis refused to come on to the field. In view of good relations existing between the teams, Abbas relented though he remained unconvinced about the need to go through all the 20 overs. The Test came to a close on Gavaskar completing a century and on what is presumed to be a mutual agreement on cessation. How else could the umpires have drawn the stumps with five ball still left to be bowled? That again raises a valid point. Should a Test match go on until the team batting in the mandatory overs period is satisfied? Is the spirit of the law served if that is allowed to happen? A close look at the letter of the law — Law 17 cessation of play — should .prove most interesting. Note 6 governing 'last hour of match — number of overs reads: The umpires shall indicate when one hour of playing time of the match remains according to the agreed hours of play. The next over after that moment shall be the first of a minimum of 20 six-ball overs, provided a result is not reached earlier or there is no interval or interruption of play. Where they erred: Everyone is aware that an interval for drinks was taken during the last hour. The law further reads 'if there is a later interval or interruption, a further deduction shall be made from the minimum number of overs which should have been bowled following the last resumption of play.' So the law was not fully complied with on the one clear count of the water break. To say the umpires were entirely right would, in fact, be wrong. However, a walkout, whatever the provocation whether Illingworth does not agree with the umpires' interpretation of intimidatory bowling or Gavaskar does not see eye to eye with an umpiring decision or Zaheer Abbas chooses to question the rules, is totally unjustified. The report was published in The Hindu on September 20, 1983 High drama marks Gavaskar's 28th Test century Sunil Gavaskar's 28th century in Test cricket came in controversial circumstances. What transpired on the final day of an otherwise inconsequential and indecisive Test was not quite cricket. Especially the fact that the Pakistanis walked off the field, refusing to continue beyond the scheduled close, though a fair bit of the 20 mandatory overs remained. The curtain came down on the Test, 46 minutes beyond the scheduled hour of 4p.m.. giving way to the feeling that all is well that ends well. Had there been an appeal for awarding the match when the visitors kept away for 27 minutes, the umpires would have had no choice but to go by the rule book and the ramifications could well be imagined. Still, there is no escaping the conclusion that there was no justification tor a walkout as staged by Pakistan led by Zaheer Abbas Zaheer Abbas' arguments were based on his county experience as well as the special regulations relating to Tests in most other countries by which play can be called off (by mutual consent between the captains only) after 10 overs in the last hour if there is no possibility of there being a result. It may be recalled that Mohinder Amamath and Kapil Dev completed their centuries in Pakistan and in the West Indies after insisting that play be carried on. However, the circumstances were different then in the sense that time remained before the scheduled close. Zaheer's men stand condemned on this count. The matter could easily have been resolved on the field, though finally the authority of the umpires would have to be accepted. Finally, it was accepted but the whole episode left a bad taste. Save for minor injuries to ground staff from chairs hurled on the ground and the minor embarrassment of Zaheer Abbas tossing a soft drink bottle back towards the crowd and seeing it smash harmlessly on the floor of the pavilion stand, the end was better than could have been expected. Especially for Gavaskar. The solution: The only way out is to arm umpires with greater powers regarding the last hour of the match. Either the teams should be given the option of leaving the field on mutual agreement after ten overs or the umpires should be left as the sole judges of whether a match needs to be taken to its final conclusion by extending play beyond the first 10 overs or beyond the scheduled close. There should be a clause inserted in the playing conditions for future series, specifying in detail the course of action umpires should take and the options left to the teams. Ideally, the umpires should be the sole judges of the state of the match and the need or otherwise of extending the match. The possibility of a decision being reached should be given precedence over such things as a batsman's century.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
3 days ago
- Sport
- First Post
RCB's home M. Chinnaswamy stadium declared 'unsafe' for large-scale events
Justice John Michael D'Cumha commission, which was appointed by the Karnataka government has deemed M. Chinnaswamy stadium 'unsafe' for large-scale events read more A still of capacity crowd at the M. Chinnaswamy stadium. AFP As per a finding made by Justice John Michael D'Cumha commission, the iconic M. Chinnaswamy Stadium in Bengaluru is incapable of hosting large-scale events safely. The commission was appointed by the Karnataka government to investigate the stampede that caused the death of 11 individuals and injured more than 50 during RCB's victory celebrations. The commission's report deemed the stadium's 'design and structure' inherently 'unsuitable and unsafe' for large crowds, warning that hosting high-attendance events there would pose 'unacceptable risks' to public safety, traffic, and emergency response. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Citing 'systematic limitations', the commission has also 'strongly recommended' that large-scale events be relocated to venues that are 'better suited' to handle significant crowds. 'Any future venue should adhere to international standards,' the report stated. More from First Cricket India vs England LIVE Score, 4th Test Day 4: Will Gill and Rahul hold their nerve and see out the day unbeaten? The commission strongly advised relocating large-scale events to more suitable venues, emphasising that future venues should meet international standards to handle crowds safely. The venue's future events are now uncertain, particularly with high-profile matches like the Women's ODI World Cup scheduled. As a temporary solution, the KSCA has decided to hold the upcoming Maharaja Trophy behind closed doors. Also Read | 'Bumrah may quit Test cricket': Kaif makes bold claim about pacer's future after struggle at Old Trafford Justice John Michael D'Cumha commission's findings The report outlined several key requirements that the Chinnaswamy Stadium lack. The stadium can be improved to provide, 'purpose-built queuing and circulation areas separated from public roads, sufficient entry and exit gates to manage mass ingress and egress, integrated access to public transport and nearby tourist hubs, comprehensive emergency evacuation plans in line with global safety norms and adequate parking and drop-off facilities to accommodate large volumes of attendees'. Also Read | 'It was a no-brainer': Ashwin slams Shubman Gill and Gautam Gambhir as India stare at another loss Brief about M. Chinnaswamy stadium Initially called the Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA), the M. Chinnaswamy stadium was established in 1969. It is named after M. Chinnaswamy, a prominent figure in Karnataka cricket. Having hosted its first Test match in 1974 and becoming the home ground for the Karnataka cricket team and IPL outfit Royal Challengers Bengaluru, the venue holds historic importance.
Time of India
4 days ago
- Sport
- Time of India
Bengaluru's Chinnaswamy Stadium declared 'unsafe' for big events; Women's WC 2025, IPL 2026 & other matches in doubt
The M Chinnaswamy Stadium in Bengaluru has been declared "unsuitable and unsafe" for large-scale events by the Justice John Michael Cunha Commission, which was appointed by the Karnataka government to investigate the stampede that took place on 4 July. The stampede happened during the victory celebrations of Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) after the team won their first-ever IPL title, ending an 18-year wait. The incident left 11 people dead and over 50 injured. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Degree Data Science Management Healthcare Artificial Intelligence others Data Analytics Public Policy Others healthcare MCA Technology MBA Leadership Cybersecurity CXO Finance Digital Marketing Data Science Design Thinking Product Management Operations Management Project Management PGDM Skills you'll gain: Data-Driven Decision-Making Strategic Leadership and Transformation Global Business Acumen Comprehensive Business Expertise Duration: 2 Years University of Western Australia UWA Global MBA Starts on Jun 28, 2024 Get Details According to ESPNCricinfo, the commission's report says the stadium's design and structure are not suitable for hosting large gatherings. The panel warned that holding such events there could cause serious risks to public safety, traffic, and emergency response. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo The report blamed RCB, its event partners DNA Entertainment, and the Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA) for their roles in the poorly planned event. The panel called for future large-scale events to be moved to better-equipped venues that meet international safety standards. Upcoming Matches in Doubt This finding puts doubt over the upcoming matches scheduled at Chinnaswamy Stadium, including the opening match and a semifinal of the ICC Women's ODI Cricket World Cup, set to be held between 30 September and 2 November. Live Events The KSCA has also decided that its upcoming Maharaja Trophy T20 League, starting 11 August, will be held behind closed doors (without spectators). Stadium Lacks Basic Safety Features Built in 1974, the stadium does not meet several modern safety requirements, including: Proper queuing and crowd control areas Enough entry and exit gates Easy access to public transport Emergency evacuation plans that follow global standards Adequate parking and drop-off areas The report noted that these shortcomings made the venue unsafe for large events. Officials Named in the Report The panel has recommended action against several people, including: KSCA president Raghuram Bhat Former secretary A Shankar and former treasurer ES Jairam, who have already resigned RCB vice-president Rajesh Menon DNA Entertainment MD T Venkat Vardhan and VP Sunil Mathur Several police officers were also held responsible, including B Dayananda, Vikash Kumar, Shekhar HT, C Balakrishna, and AK Girish, all of whom were removed from their posts after the tragedy by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah. The Karnataka government, which had also held a public celebration with RCB players at Vidhana Soudha, is expected to discuss the commission's recommendations at its next cabinet meeting, according to ESPNCricinfo. Inputs from ANI
Hindustan Times
4 days ago
- Politics
- Hindustan Times
Stampede report recommendations to be implemented in phased manner, says home minister
The government will implement the recommendations of the one-man judicial commission report on the June 4 stampede at Chinnaswamy Stadium in a phased manner, home minister G Parameshwara said on Friday. The tragedy, which occurred during Royal Challengers Bangalore's (RCB) IPL victory celebrations, claimed 11 lives and left over 70 injured. Stampede report recommendations to be implemented in phased manner, says home minister The government's decision comes a day after the cabinet formally accepted the findings of the report submitted by retired high court judge John Michael D'Cunha. The cabinet has now decided to initiate legal and departmental proceedings against several individuals and private organisations, including the Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA), DNA Entertainment Networks, and RCB. 'The government has primarily accepted the report by justice John Michael D'Cunha on the stampede tragedy. We will try to implement the recommendations one after the other. The ongoing cases against RCB and DNA will continue. The officers involved have already been suspended and subjected to one form of punishment. Now, the government has decided to conduct a departmental inquiry,' Parameshwara said, speaking to reporters in Bengaluru. He added that the inquiry would be administrative in nature and handled internally by the state. 'The decision has been made after internal discussions,' he said. The cabinet note names KSCA president Raghuram Bhat, former KSCA president A Shankar, former treasurer Jayaram ES, RCB vice president Rajesh Menon, and DNA managing director Venkatavardhan as people against whom legal action will be initiated. While the cabinet did not outline specific legal steps, officials confirmed that action would follow based on the findings. The report has recommended a series of measures to improve crowd safety at large public events. These include introducing conditions that must be fulfilled before granting permissions and issuing guidelines for crowd management. The state government has agreed to consider these suggestions seriously in its phased implementation plan. Parameshwara clarified that the report does not name any political leaders, including Congress MLC K Govindaraju, who was removed as the political advisor to chief minister Siddaramaiah shortly after the incident. 'The report specifically mentions RCB, DNA, KSCA, and certain police officers,' he said. The government's announcement comes amid growing political friction, with the Opposition BJP rejecting the findings of the commission. BJP leaders have accused the Congress-led government of attempting to sidestep accountability and using the report to shift the blame. Leader of the Opposition R Ashoka said, 'The state government should hand over this case to a judicial inquiry led by a sitting judge and deliver justice to those who lost their lives.' Responding to the BJP's criticism, Parameshwara said the government has always encouraged the Opposition to offer constructive feedback. 'The BJP is in the opposition. We have always asked them to offer constructive criticism and submit suggestions, which we are willing to consider in the interest of the state and its people. They continue to criticise us, and we can't help it. It is natural for the opposition to criticise the ruling party. We did the same when we were in opposition. I cannot ask them not to criticise,' he said.
NDTV
4 days ago
- Politics
- NDTV
"Unsuitable And Unsafe": Probe Provides New Details In IPL Stampede Controversy
The Justice John Michael D'Cunha Commission, appointed by the Karnataka Government, has deemed the Chinnaswamy Stadium "unsuitable and unsafe for mass gathering", casting a shadow over some big-ticket matches, including the Women's World Cup games scheduled at the venue later this year. The state government constituted the one-man commission after a stampede killed 11 fans and injured scores of others, who had thronged the areas near the stadium to take part in Royal Challengers Bengaluru's maiden IPL title celebration. "The design and structure of the stadium was unsuitable and unsafe for mass gathering," the commission deemed in its report which was recently tabled before the state cabinet, which the PTI has accessed. The Chinnaswamy Stadium is scheduled to host the opening game and the final of the ICC Women's WC later this year, and this observation and its acceptance by the state government could have a wider impact on those matches. It may be recalled that the KSCA has already decided to host this year's Maharaja Trophy T20 tournament, scheduled for next month, behind the doors. Further, the commission noted that the authorities should consider "relocating" large sporting events to venues that have the capacity to hold large gatherings. "Given these systematic limitations the commission strongly recommends that stadium authorities consider relocating events that are expected to attract large crowds to venues that are better suited for such large gatherings," the commission stated. The commission also proposed some remedial measures to avoid such tragic events in future such as "adequate entry-exit gates for mass entry and exit (ingress and egress), and emergency evacuation plans compliant with international safety norms." The commission then deemed that holding "mass events" until these preventive measures are met could cause more damages. "Until such infrastructural changes are made, continuing to host high attendance events at the current location poses unacceptable risks to public safety, urban mobility and emergency preparedness," it said. The commission also suggested initiating legal proceedings KSCA president Raghuram Bhat, now-resigned secretary A Shankar and treasurer ES Jairam, RCB vice-president Rajesh Menon, DNA Entertainment Networks MD T Venkat Vardhan and VP Sunil Mathur. Meanwhile, the DNA has approached the Karnataka High Court against the constitution of the commission and its findings.
