Latest news with #Murley
Yahoo
03-06-2025
- Entertainment
- Yahoo
Carnival Cruise Line bans TikTok influencer after booze scam
Carnival Cruise Line bans TikTok influencer after booze scam originally appeared on Come Cruise With Me. Carnival Cruise Line takes its cruise rules very seriously — so seriously that it even has a team of people who monitor social media for posts about passengers doing things they shouldn't on board its ship. The cruise line is well aware that some social media influencers like to brag about 'cruise hacks' for breaking cruise rules in an effort to get views on social media platforms like one influencer thought it would be clever to wait until after her cruise to post a video about how she (allegedly) broke a crucial cruise rule during a Bahamas getaway aboard Carnival Conquest. What she didn't realize was that Carnival could still take disciplinary action against her after she disembarked from the ship. Now, the TikTok influencer is changing her tune after her social media stunt landed her on Carnival's "Do Not Sail" list for her cruise on Carnival Conquest, Courtney Murley posted a video on TikTok that showed her travel companion checking their suitcase to see if the alcohol they (allegedly) hid in feminine product packaging and shampoo bottles made it on the cruise. 'Def waited until after I got home to post this…but it worked,' Murley wrote in the video caption, 'Forget a drink package…okay we ended up drinking probably what we would of paid for a drink package anyways but still was fun to try and see if the rum runners would work.'Although Murley succeeded in her alleged cruise alcohol smuggling endeavor and racked up more than 300,000 views on TikTok, she's now dealing with the consequences of her actions. Carnival Cruise Line didn't think her video, which she claims was created solely for entertainment value, was entertaining at all. 'This letter is to inform you that you will not be able to sail onboard any Carnival Cruise Line vessel in the future due to the smuggling of alcohol onboard the Carnival Conquest on March 31st, 2025, and subsequently posting about it on social media platforms,' Carnival wrote in a letter to Murley that she also posted in a TikTok video. 'Your attempt to book a future cruise will result in cancellation and a possible loss of deposit monies.'After receiving the letter and sharing it on TikTok, Murley is now claiming that she's being accused of something she didn't do. In a more recent video, she defended herself saying that she did not smuggle alcohol on board, but faked it with juice to create a video that would drive engagement on TikTok. She's even suggested that Carnival owes her an apology. 'Can I get an apology, Carnival? Like can somebody reach out to me? Is there a good lawyer you guys know that I can talk to about this?' she asked her followers. 'Because we did not break a rule.' More Carnival cruise news:'I didn't smuggle alcohol. All I did was make a video,' she insisted. 'You guys saw an edited video.' Murley says that she'll accept the ban, but asserts that she has integrity and will defend herself because she won't accept being accused of something she didn't do. If you're a loyal Carnival cruiser who wants to post cruise content on social media, let this be a lesson to you. If you're going to post about 'cruise hacks," stick with helpful tips and entertaining posts that don't encourage others to break cruise line rules. This story was originally reported by Come Cruise With Me on May 30, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
23-03-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
How Natural England became a green dictatorship
When Natural England disregarded nearly 200 objections to designate Penwith Moors a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), Eric Murley was not happy. The environmental regulator's 2023 decision means farmers in the Cornish idyll have to apply for consent for a raft of activities, including ploughing. The confrontation has left 78-year-old Murley, who runs a 350-acre family dairy farm, hoping that the quango will one day reap what it sows. So, imagine his surprise when he found out last week that the Government is about to give Natural England the power to slap a compulsory purchase on his land. The reason? It's because the quango lies at the centre of the Government's ambitious plans to spark a housing revolution designed to build 1.5 million homes. Developers themselves will no longer be obliged to offset the environmental damage in the area of the building, with the inevitable delays. Instead, they'll pay into a national nature restoration fund. It will be Natural England's job to offset the environmental damage of the new large-scale developments by setting up nature reserves and rewilding land on a national as opposed to local basis. To this end, the draft of the new Planning and Infrastructure Bill, unveiled by Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner earlier this month, gives Natural England powers to seize farmland, allotments and other green spaces for this environmental offsetting, which will free up sites for developers. But critics fear this conceals a breathtaking power grab by Natural England. When it comes into force, the bill will give local authorities in England, alongside Natural England, the power to seize farmland at 'bargain' rates. The backlash is hardly surprising: farmers have denounced the bill as a 'landgrab', 'Marxism', and the 'death of property rights', as well as another nail in the coffin of farming. 'Natural England? I wouldn't trust them with a barge pole to be perfectly honest,' says Murley. 'If they think they have a chance of getting it done, they'll come and jump in, regardless of the farmer. They aren't going to bother about us. They just push us aside. 'I have got no time for Natural England as a body at all. At all,' he adds. 'We have had several ministers down here over the last two and half years and every time I say to them 'Have you got any authority over Natural England?' And they say no. 'They are unanswerable. Look, can it be right in a democracy that a quango can effectively put a farm out of business?' Murley is not alone in looking at Natural England's burgeoning powers with alarm. 'Natural England was originally meant to be the advisor to the Government, but over the years it has been handed a series of executive powers that have turned it into judge, jury and executioner,' says Victoria Vyvyan, the president of the Country Land and Business Association (CLA). 'Now no one can really challenge them.' The bill reflects both Sir Keir Starmer, and Rayner's, determination to clear the planning logjam for a largescale housing and infrastructure programme. The move to hand Natural England its extended powers is designed to help avoid delays and often protracted and expensive mitigation projects. These have included the infamous bat tunnel on the HS2 route with European rules on protecting habitat and wildlife still in place. The bill ballooned to £100 million. But what has particularly outraged farmers and landowners is that local authorities and Natural England will be able to buy the land at its agricultural value, which critics believe will impair the value of farms. The bill effectively removes 'hope value', or the potential development value of land. 'Housing and nature are not competing interests,' says Oliver Harmar, the chief strategy officer at Natural England. 'Sustainable development and nature recovery must go hand in hand, but the current planning system needs to change. 'We are working with the Government to deliver their ambition to grow nature and grow the economy for the benefit of everybody. This includes ensuring guidance is fit for purpose and moving toward better strategic planning to secure environmental improvements and enabling development. Natural England is fully accountable to the Secretary of State and Parliament.' Experts have told The Telegraph that the exact mechanisms by which Natural England would exercise their powers under the bill has yet to be spelt out. But Murley worries that he, along with any other landowner, would be rendered helpless in the face of a compulsory purchase order from Natural England. For Natural England's 'activist' chairman Tony Juniper, the decision to hand his quango such sweeping powers represents an extraordinary turnaround. In 2022, only three years after Juniper was appointed, the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs floated the idea of closing it down. Tory critics had become increasingly concerned with what they viewed as Natural England's 'activist' agenda. Last year a group of Conservative MPs wrote to the then Defra secretary, Steve Barclay, urging him to strip Natural England of its SSSI powers. 'Natural England is completely independent and can make decisions without ministerial sign off, says Greg Smith, Tory MP for Mid Buckinghamshire. 'On the one hand we have Rachel Reeves attacking quangos and on the other they have given a quango with no democratic oversight the power to take land. 'At the end of the day this all points in the direction of less food security, loss of natural beauty and loss of rural areas.' A former minister, who did not want to be named, says: 'The main issue I had with Natural England was the gold plating of the powers they had, which, along with other quangos is becoming quite a threat to democracy.' He adds that he has come across 'farmers who were unhappy with Natural England' but when he went to Natural England 'Tony Juniper said, 'We have got the act… if you don't like it, ministers can change legislation'.' A life-long environmentalist and former Friends of the Earth director, Juniper has a long history of attacking governments on environmental issues. In 2011, before he joined Natural England, he was signatory to a letter that accused the Government of being 'on a path to become the most environmentally destructive government to hold power… since the environmental movement was born.' Since joining Natural England in 2019 Juniper has repeatedly promoted 'net zero' on social media despite Natural England's code of conduct's requirement for political neutrality. Juniper has also attacked Brexit and in a Tweet last month appeared to issue a coded dig at Kemi Badenoch's scepticism around net zero when reposted a tweet by Badenoch, marking Margaret Thatcher's election as Tory leader 50 years earlier. 'Baroness Thatcher was the first Prime Minister to take a political lead on climate change, & Teresa [sic] May when she was PM enacted the net zero goal for 2050,' he said. 'These distinguished climate leaders hopefully provide inspiration for their successors.' In 2023 it emerged that Natural England was accused of stalling plans to build up to 145,000 homes thanks to concerns about potential pollution of rivers. Natural England has a 'nutrient neutrality' policy, which derives from the European Court of Justice. These block development in designated areas unless it can be shown they would not increase levels of nitrogen or phosphorous in the rivers. Yet construction companies have long claimed that the bulk of waste flowing into rivers comes from farms, not housing and infrastructure projects. In the same year, Juniper was accused of failing to declare his membership of the National Trust, Wildlife Trusts and the RSPB before a key vote. The vote saw Natural England designate a large swathe of Penwith Moors an SSSI despite widespread objections. At the time Natural England said it 'strongly rejected' claims of conflicts of interests and that all board members had observed the relevant rules. Because of the SSSI designation, farmers, including Murley, said they were told that they would no longer be able to spread lime on the land to neutralise soil acidity and allow farming. 'So, in effect, they were stopping us from farming,' says Murley. 'They can effectively put a firm out of business with no compensation, because there is no compensation with SSSI.' The Cornishman is convinced that Natural England's management was determined to drive through the SSSI as a flagship development. 'We are going to make a big splash in West Cornwall,' says Murley. 'It was going to be a big deal for them, and they were going to force it through come what may.' 'I run this business with my wife and three sons,' he says. 'My sons now say to me... do we really need to be bothering with farming, and I've never heard this before. Talking about this still upsets me now.' Natural England says that Penwith SSSI was chosen on scientific evidence and reflected its statutory duty to protect areas of special environmental interest. The quango also says it always seeks to work with farmers and landowners and that it will provide consent for the majority of established farming activities. Murley says that Natural England had recently written to farmers in the SSSI to say they could now use lime, but he says that the damage had been done. Still, the Cornishman has some sage advice for any farmers should Natural England come rattling their front doors with their new expanded powers. 'My advice would be to politely tell them to get stuffed.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Telegraph
23-03-2025
- Politics
- Telegraph
How Natural England became a green dictatorship
When Natural England disregarded nearly 200 objections to designate Penwith Moors a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), Eric Murley was not happy. The environmental regulator's 2023 decision means farmers in the Cornish idyll have to apply for consent for a raft of activities, including ploughing. The confrontation has left 78-year-old Murley, who runs a 350-acre family dairy farm, hoping that the quango will one day reap what it sows. So, imagine his surprise when he found out last week that the Government is about to give Natural England the power to slap a compulsory purchase on his land. The reason? It's because the quango lies at the centre of the Government's ambitious plans to spark a housing revolution designed to build 1.5 million homes. Developers themselves will no longer be obliged to offset the environmental damage in the area of the building, with the inevitable delays. Instead, they'll pay into a national nature restoration fund. It will be Natural England's job to offset the environmental damage of the new large-scale developments by setting up nature reserves and rewilding land on a national as opposed to local basis. To this end, the draft of the new Planning and Infrastructure Bill, unveiled by Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner earlier this month, gives Natural England powers to seize farmland, allotments and other green spaces for this environmental offsetting, which will free up sites for developers. But critics fear this conceals a breathtaking power grab by Natural England. When it comes into force, the bill will give local authorities in England, alongside Natural England, the power to seize farmland at 'bargain' rates. The backlash is hardly surprising: farmers have denounced the bill as a 'landgrab', 'Marxism', and the 'death of property rights', as well as another nail in the coffin of farming. 'Natural England? I wouldn't trust them with a barge pole to be perfectly honest,' says Murley. 'If they think they have a chance of getting it done, they'll come and jump in, regardless of the farmer. They aren't going to bother about us. They just push us aside. 'I have got no time for Natural England as a body at all. At all,' he adds. 'We have had several ministers down here over the last two and half years and every time I say to them 'Have you got any authority over Natural England?' And they say no. 'They are unanswerable. Look, can it be right in a democracy that a quango can effectively put a farm out of business?' Murley is not alone in looking at Natural England's burgeoning powers with alarm. 'Natural England was originally meant to be the advisor to the Government, but over the years it has been handed a series of executive powers that have turned it into judge, jury and executioner,' says Victoria Vyvyan, the president of the Country Land and Business Association (CLA). 'Now no one can really challenge them.' The bill reflects both Sir Keir Starmer, and Rayner's, determination to clear the planning logjam for a largescale housing and infrastructure programme. The move to hand Natural England its extended powers is designed to help avoid delays and often protracted and expensive mitigation projects. These have included the infamous bat tunnel on the HS2 route with European rules on protecting habitat and wildlife still in place. The bill ballooned to £100 million. But what has particularly outraged farmers and landowners is that local authorities and Natural England will be able to buy the land at its agricultural value, which critics believe will impair the value of farms. The bill effectively removes 'hope value', or the potential development value of land. 'Housing and nature are not competing interests,' says Oliver Harmar, the chief strategy officer at Natural England. 'Sustainable development and nature recovery must go hand in hand, but the current planning system needs to change. 'We are working with the Government to deliver their ambition to grow nature and grow the economy for the benefit of everybody. This includes ensuring guidance is fit for purpose and moving toward better strategic planning to secure environmental improvements and enabling development. Natural England is fully accountable to the Secretary of State and Parliament.' Experts have told The Telegraph that the exact mechanisms by which Natural England would exercise their powers under the bill has yet to be spelt out. But Murley worries that he, along with any other landowner, would be rendered helpless in the face of a compulsory purchase order from Natural England. For Natural England's 'activist' chairman Tony Juniper, the decision to hand his quango such sweeping powers represents an extraordinary turnaround. In 2022, only three years after Juniper was appointed, the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs floated the idea of closing it down. Tory critics had become increasingly concerned with what they viewed as Natural England's 'activist' agenda. Last year a group of Conservative MPs wrote to the then Defra secretary, Steve Barclay, urging him to strip Natural England of its SSSI powers. 'Natural England is completely independent and can make decisions without ministerial sign off, says Greg Smith, Tory MP for Mid Buckinghamshire. 'On the one hand we have Rachel Reeves attacking quangos and on the other they have given a quango with no democratic oversight the power to take land. 'At the end of the day this all points in the direction of less food security, loss of natural beauty and loss of rural areas.' A former minister, who did not want to be named, says: 'The main issue I had with Natural England was the gold plating of the powers they had, which, along with other quangos is becoming quite a threat to democracy.' He adds that he has come across 'farmers who were unhappy with Natural England' but when he went to Natural England 'Tony Juniper said, 'We have got the act… if you don't like it, ministers can change legislation'.' 'Environmentally destructive' A life-long environmentalist and former Friends of the Earth director, Juniper has a long history of attacking governments on environmental issues. In 2011, before he joined Natural England, he was signatory to a letter that accused the Government of being 'on a path to become the most environmentally destructive government to hold power… since the environmental movement was born.' Since joining Natural England in 2019 Juniper has repeatedly promoted 'net zero' on social media despite Natural England's code of conduct's requirement for political neutrality. Juniper has also attacked Brexit and in a Tweet last month appeared to issue a coded dig at Kemi Badenoch's scepticism around net zero when reposted a tweet by Badenoch, marking Margaret Thatcher's election as Tory leader 50 years earlier. 'Baroness Thatcher was the first Prime Minister to take a political lead on climate change, & Teresa [sic] May when she was PM enacted the net zero goal for 2050,' he said. 'These distinguished climate leaders hopefully provide inspiration for their successors.' In 2023 it emerged that Natural England was accused of stalling plans to build up to 145,000 homes thanks to concerns about potential pollution of rivers. Natural England has a 'nutrient neutrality' policy, which derives from the European Court of Justice. These block development in designated areas unless it can be shown they would not increase levels of nitrogen or phosphorous in the rivers. Yet construction companies have long claimed that the bulk of waste flowing into rivers comes from farms, not housing and infrastructure projects. In the same year, Juniper was accused of failing to declare his membership of the National Trust, Wildlife Trusts and the RSPB before a key vote. The vote saw Natural England designate a large swathe of Penwith Moors an SSSI despite widespread objections. At the time Natural England said it 'strongly rejected' claims of conflicts of interests and that all board members had observed the relevant rules. Because of the SSSI designation, farmers, including Murley, said they were told that they would no longer be able to spread lime on the land to neutralise soil acidity and allow farming. 'So, in effect, they were stopping us from farming,' says Murley. 'They can effectively put a firm out of business with no compensation, because there is no compensation with SSSI.' The Cornishman is convinced that Natural England's management was determined to drive through the SSSI as a flagship development. 'We are going to make a big splash in West Cornwall,' says Murley. 'It was going to be a big deal for them, and they were going to force it through come what may.' 'I run this business with my wife and three sons,' he says. 'My sons now say to me... do we really need to be bothering with farming, and I've never heard this before. Talking about this still upsets me now.' Natural England says that Penwith SSSI was chosen on scientific evidence and reflected its statutory duty to protect areas of special environmental interest. The quango also says it always seeks to work with farmers and landowners and that it will provide consent for the majority of established farming activities. Murley says that Natural England had recently written to farmers in the SSSI to say they could now use lime, but he says that the damage had been done. Still, the Cornishman has some sage advice for any farmers should Natural England come rattling their front doors with their new expanded powers. 'My advice would be to politely tell them to get stuffed.'
Yahoo
18-02-2025
- Entertainment
- Yahoo
BBC Wins Legal Fight With Fired Presenter, But Case Details Claims He Faced 'Anti-Wokeism' Homophobia
EXCLUSIVE: The BBC has won the first round of a legal fight with a fired radio presenter, but was unsuccessful in efforts to stop the publication of an internal review detailing allegations of homophobia at one of the broadcaster's regional outposts. BBC Radio Cornwall presenter Jack Murley took legal action against his employer for wrongful dismissal last year. In the first part of his employment tribunal, Murley argued that the BBC discriminated against him for being gay and a representative of the National Union of Journalists (NUJ). More from Deadline 'Bridgerton's Queen Charlotte Boards BBC's 'The Dream Lands' BBC Cuts Some Donald Trump Jokes From David Tennant's Opening BAFTA Remarks 'Derry Girls' Star Louisa Harland & Debi Mazar Cast In TV Adaptation Of Marian Keyes' 'The Walsh Sisters' The BBC argued that Murley broke social media rules with tweets that failed to be impartial about local radio job cuts and that fell below standards of taste and decency. The BBC also argued that Murley breached editorial rules by discussing job cuts on-air and making sexualized jokes during a segment on his Sunday afternoon show, titled 'Loosest Goose.' Employment Judge Smail was not persuaded by Murley's arguments and the first round of his case was dismissed. A second part of the tribunal, scheduled to take place in October, will deal with the events surrounding his ousting. In his ruling, Judge Smail concluded that the BBC 'did not seek to prevent' Murley from participating in trade union activities and agreed that the presenter broke social media rules by campaigning against local radio job cuts. Judge Smail also concluded that the disciplinary proceedings brought by the BBC against Murley were 'not related to his sexuality.' In a statement, the BBC said: 'We do not comment on individuals. We welcome the judgment of the tribunal and won't be commenting further.' Murley told Deadline: 'As the tribunal's judgment makes clear, the second part of my claim against the BBC is set to be considered later this year. As such, it would not be right to comment further at this stage. I'd like to thank the NUJ and my legal team for their continued support and hard work, and the public for their kind words and best wishes. They mean an awful lot.' Homophobia Whistleblowing Report As part of the legal proceedings, the BBC failed in its efforts to stop the publication of an internal investigation into allegations of homophobia at BBC Radio Cornwall. Murley filed a whistleblowing report accusing colleagues of homophobic abuse and claiming that management failed to protect him. The July 2024 report was disclosed despite the BBC arguing it was not relevant. The investigation partially upheld an allegation that 'failings at a managerial and institutional level in BBC Radio Cornwall created and sustained an environment in which homophobic abuse was implicitly or explicitly tolerated.' In its closing submission to the tribunal, the BBC admitted that the report detailed the 'regrettable treatment' of Murley, but argued that it was not evidence that managers treated him 'less favourably' because of his sexuality. Judge Smail's ruling contained more details about the report, which comprised 12 allegations made by Murley. BBC investigators concluded that there was a 'case to answer' on eight of Murley's 12 claims. One of the claims with a case to answer detailed how a BBC Radio Cornwall employee pinned to the office kitchen wall a Spectator article that was considered homophobic by managers and later removed. The 'anti-wokeism' op-ed in the right-wing magazine was headlined: 'Has Soviet self-censorship come to Britain?' Written by an Estonian who moved to the UK after living through the fall of Soviet rule, it claimed LGBTQ+ rights advocates have restricted free speech in the same way that the USSR strangled human liberties. It concluded with the line: 'So I find myself facing a dilemma: whether to pack up all of our belongings and move, perhaps back to Eastern Europe – to the Free East, where I don't have to sing to the red rainbow flags. Or correct my speech to avoid being detected by the KGB Trans Allies.' Other allegations considered to have merit by BBC investigators included Murley's claims a presenter made a 'homophobic joke' in the office and a camera operator made 'homophobic' remarks about an LGBT podcast and blood donation. While publishing these details, Judge Smail ultimately determined that the report was only of 'background interest' and was not relevant to the first part of the employment tribunal. Deadline has asked the BBC a series of questions about the whistleblowing report, including whether those accused of wrongdoing have faced disciplinary action. A spokesperson declined to comment. The corporation's diversity and inclusion policy states: 'The BBC is committed to diversity and inclusion in all aspects of recruitment and employment and will not tolerate unlawful discrimination or harassment in any form.' Disclosure of the report comes at a time when the BBC is undertaking a workplace culture review and employees are being questioned about their experiences of wrongdoing or abuses of power. The work is being led by management consultancy Change Associates and is expected to conclude this year. Best of Deadline 2025 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Oscars, Spirits, Tonys, Guilds & More How To Watch Sunday's 'SNL50: The Anniversary Special' Online & On TV Everything We Know About Christopher Nolan's Next Film – 'The Odyssey': Release Date, Cast And More
BBC News
31-01-2025
- Sport
- BBC News
Losing is not what I'm about
Men's Six Nations: Ireland v EnglandVenue: Aviva Stadium, Dublin Date: Saturday, 1 February Kick-off: 16:45 GMTCoverage: Listen live on BBC Radio 5 Live & BBC Sounds; text commentary and highlights on BBC Sport website and app; watch on ITV1. New England captain Maro Itoje says losing is not what he is about as his side prepare to open their Six Nations campaign against Ireland on replaced Jamie George as skipper earlier this month after England only won five of their 12 Tests in Borthwick's side beat Ireland, who are seeking a historic third championship in a row, at Twickenham's Allianz Stadium last year and will be hoping to start positively in Dublin to help their bid for a first Six Nations title since 2020."I don't want to lose and losing is not what I am about," Itoje told the BBC's Rugby Union Weekly."There is no greater honour than winning with England. You win with your club and that is special, but winning with England is a different kettle of fish."I want this team to feel that and achieve that and I think we can."Itoje led England to the Under-20 world title in 2014 but only stepped up to lead Saracens this season in the wake of previous captain Owen Farrell's departure to 30-year-old lock made his debut in England's 2016 Grand Slam-winning campaign and enjoyed a successful start to his international career under Eddie Jones, reaching the Rugby World Cup in a 2021 book, Jones questioned whether Itoje was suited to captaincy, writing that the second row was "very inward-looking" and did not "usually influence people off the field" - a view Itoje later Lawes, who captained England during their Australia tour in 2022, said Itoje is not a loud talker, external when it comes to pre-game team talks, but the new England captain is happy to hand over those duties to louder squad members."If there are swearing obligations I will hand that over to the 14 members of the team!" Itoje added."Everyone has things to work on. I like to think I am a reasonably self-aware person and I think I am humble enough to acknowledge where I need support from others." I want to bring a different edge - Murley Harlequins wing Cadan Murley, who scored two tries for England A against Australia A in November, will make his England debut on up, Murley played the majority of his rugby as a flanker - like his father and former Harlequin Jon - before switching to the backs as a nine England camps since his first call-up in 2023, the 25-year-old finally has the chance to show that he punches above his size, taking inspiration from fellow 5ft 11in wing Jack Nowell who had a successful England career with a similarly stocky build."I have different traits to a life-long wing and want to bring a different edge like Jack Nowell did to the English team," Murley told BBC's Rugby Union Weekly."I was quick for a flanker, but did not have standout pace, and you obviously work with the best speed coaches to get as quick as you can."There are some absolutely rapid wings in the world, so it's definitely something I have tried to add to my game. There are not many line breaks in Tests and you have to take those opportunities."I am going to try and stay in this shirt, I am desperate to play from my country."
