Latest news with #Non-CooperationMovement
The Hindu
4 days ago
- General
- The Hindu
R.P.G.V. Govindan Chettiyar, the unsung freedom fighter from Erode
Tamil Nadu's contribution to the freedom struggle is a captivating chapter in the history of India's fight for independence. Many unsung heroes, who devoted their lives to the nation, remain largely unknown. One such hero is R.P.G.V. Govindan Chettiyar, born on July 27,1910 to Venkatachalam Chettiyar and Guruvayammal, at Chithode, a village in Erode Taluk, which was then part of the composite Coimbatore district. From an early age, he was deeply influenced by Gandhian principles. A passionate freedom fighter and dedicated Congressman, he played a crucial role in India's struggle for independence. Even as a school student, he participated in the Non-Cooperation Movement of 1920–21. On February 28, 1941, as a member of the erstwhile Coimbatore Zilla Congress Committee, he led a Satyagraha near the Chithode Mariamman Temple, demonstrating his unwavering commitment to the nation's freedom. Govindan Chettiyar was an ardent advocate of Gandhian principles. He strongly promoted the use of Khadi, believing that self-reliance in clothing would weaken the economic grip of the British. He also championed the cause of prohibition, considering liquor a social evil that hindered national progress. A staunch opponent of untouchability, he worked tirelessly for social harmony and uplift of the downtrodden. His efforts extended to promoting cottage industries, particularly in rural areas, to enhance self-sufficiency and economic independence among the poor. Govindan Chettiyar's patriotism was not confined to mere ideology; he took to the streets, mobilising people against British colonial rule. Between February 2, 1941 and March 9, 1941, he undertook a padayatra (march on foot) alongside K. S. Ramasamy of Gobichettipalayam (who later became the Deputy Minister for Home Affairs in the Union Cabinet), traveling through several towns and villages, including Perundurai, Kanchikoil, Chennimalai, Kunnathur, Thingalur, and Chithode, accompanied by Congress volunteers. These processions were not just demonstrations but platforms for public discourse, where he and his associates delivered powerful speeches on anti-war propaganda and the pressing need for Indian independence. His activism reached its peak in 1941 when he actively took part in the Individual Satyagraha movement, launched in then Madras under Mahatma Gandhi's guidance. As a result, he was arrested and sentenced to six months of imprisonment in the Madras prison. Even after his release, his spirit remained unbroken. During the Quit India Movement of 1942, when the British intensified their crackdown on nationalists, he went underground to continue his efforts against colonial rule. After independence, he served as a member of the advisory committee for the Erode National Expansion Scheme. He organised a team of volunteers to assist those affected by the devastating Bhavani flood. In his later years, he was compelled to sell his six acres of land due to financial family, consisting of nine members, including his wife Renganayaki, four sons, and three daughters, faced hardships due to a low income. Suffering from eye problems, he was unable to afford the necessary medical treatment. He had repeatedly requested the government to honor its earlier promise of providing 10 acres of free land (for freedom fighters). Additionally, he appealed to the government to retain the revolver that had been confiscated from his father under the National Security Act in 1932 due to his involvement in the Civil Disobedience Movement. Govindan maintained close political ties with prominent leaders and Congress stalwarts C. Subramaniam and K. Kamaraj. This association was evident from the letters preserved by his descendants, which highlight his active involvement in the political landscape of his time. Despite his contributions, he faced numerous personal and financial hardships in his later years. On August 2, 1993, Govindan passed, leaving behind a legacy of dedication and service. His sacrifices and relentless efforts serve as a testament to the courage and determination of Tamil Nadu's unsung heroes in the freedom struggle. Though his name may not feature prominently in mainstream history, his contributions remain invaluable in shaping India's journey to independence. Even after 78 years of independence, we are still to include in mainstream history several heroes of the freedom movement like Govindan. (The author is Head, Department of History, Chikkaiah Government Arts and Science College, Erode)
Indian Express
25-05-2025
- General
- Indian Express
Difficult CSAT, lengthy and tricky GS: 10 key takeaways from this year's prelims paper
Dear UPSC Aspirants, It's time to address the big question on everyone's mind: How was the UPSC CSE Prelims 2025? While the buzz in study circles suggests that this year's paper was anything but easy—especially after the CSAT paper—was it really manageable enough to push you above the cut-off line? Did UPSC finally play fair, or did it once again live up to its legendary unpredictability? In this piece, we break down the 2025 Prelims into 10 key takeaways—to help you reflect, recalibrate, and most importantly, plan your comeback (or your next move). This year's UPSC Prelims saw a significant shift in trend, with 16 questions emerging from the History and Art & Culture section. Marking a notable reversal from last year, Modern Indian History dominated the segment, contributing as many as 9 questions, many of which focused on the Independence Struggle, marching around Mahatma Gandhi and the Non-Cooperation Movement. In a nod to variety (or perhaps a gentle prank), UPSC threw in a question linking fruits in India to their Portuguese origins—a definite departure from the usual canon of archaeological sites, monuments, and Buddha's life. And speaking of Buddhism, no, UPSC's favourite topic didn't show up this year. Shocking, we know. Instead, candidates were greeted with a rather easy question on Fa-Hein, probably to keep the peace. Meanwhile, Raja Ram Mohan Roy and Vishnu Digambar Paluskar made an appearance, keeping the modern section populated with historical personalities. On a more celebratory note, the 100-year anniversary of the discovery of the Indus Valley Civilization was acknowledged—albeit gently—with a straightforward question on the famous 'Dancing Girl'. No complicated seals or town planning here—just a graceful nod to history. A creative twist appeared in a question blending Ancient Indian history and geography, which asked candidates to match rivers with their corresponding territorial regions. Other questions revolved around rulers of ancient India. A throwback to the 2016 paper came in the form of Araghatta—yes, that ancient Indian water wheel UPSC can't seem to get enough of. Maybe it's time for them to order a fresh glossary? Civil services mentor Shikhar Sachan told The Indian Express that 'the History section was arguably the easiest in the last five years.' But here's your friendly reminder: in UPSC, 'easy' is just a polite way of saying 'don't mess this up.' Because if you mess it up, you miss the train. There wasn't much novelty in this year's Polity section, with UPSC largely sticking to its traditional playbook—though not without its trademark mind games. The number of questions dipped to around 12, down from 15 last year. The topics? All textbook staples: House of the People, the President, the Governor, Constitutional Provisions, Councils, Panchayati Raj, Ordinances, Centre–State relations—all comfortably nestled in basic reference books, making the section appear deceptively conventional. But if there's one thing aspirants have learned over the years, it's this: in UPSC, 'easy-looking' often hides a sting. Mudit Gupta, UPSC mentor, explained: 'In the Polity section, the previous year's trend continued. Like last year, many questions came from the legislative and executive branches. Some were very easy and could be answered using basic books.' However, he added a crucial caveat: 'When it came to statement-based questions, UPSC made at least one statement in each question complex, making the entire question challenging for aspirants.' And that's where the real twist lay. UPSC chose to maintain its toughest exam tag with its statement-based formats, by basing polity questions mainly on 'How many of the above statements are correct?' variety. Every straightforward topic had at least one cleverly crafted statement. And that was enough to confuse even the best-prepared candidates. The result? A section that wasn't just tricky, but also time-consuming, adding to the overall length and pressure of the paper. And if you're feeling confident about those 'definitely correct' answers—hold that thought. The official answer key won't show up until next year, and when it does, it may have a surprise or two in store. In short, while the Polity section looked familiar, it wore a cleverly disguised UPSC mask—smiling on the surface, but not here to make things easy. Ever imagined UPSC would hand you a calculator in the Economy section? Well, the Unpredictable Public Service Commission lived up to its reputation this year by adding a dash of arithmetic to its usual conceptual fare. Yes, this time they wanted to know if future bureaucrats could actually calculate deficits—because who says civil servants can't be economists too? The Economy section featured around 17 questions, retaining its strong conceptual core while throwing in a few numerical surprises. True to tradition, the RBI remained UPSC's favorite muse, with two questions focusing on its sources of income and regulatory powers. Banke Bihar, a noted UPSC mentor for Economy, told The Indian Express: 'There was a strong focus on energy and minerals critical to the green economy, such as lithium and other strategic resources, including their geographical locations. Daily-life economic topics were also covered, with questions on RTGS, NEFT, and the international acceptance of UPI. Investment-related concepts appeared prominently, including stock market performance, the difference between bonds and stocks, and Alternative Investment Funds. The recurring issue of agricultural income and taxation, especially the exemption enjoyed by wealthy farmers and its connection to recent farmers' movements, was also touched upon. The theme of energy and the green economy was clearly visible across multiple questions, reflecting its growing relevance in the global and national context.' In short, the paper demanded a jack-of-all-trades approach—from monetary policy and financial instruments to the green economy and tax quirks. And while the level ranged from moderate to difficult, one thing is clear: the paper setter for India's toughest exam knows how to keep aspirants on their toes. With a mix of real-world relevance and tricky calculations, this year's Economy section was a masterclass in smart question design. Let's just hope none of these brilliant questions vanish mysteriously from the final answer key—a phenomenon not unheard of in the sacred halls of India's most revered exam-conducting body. With 17 questions from Science and Technology, this section had all the potential to send shivers down your spine—especially if you got them right at the start (looking at you, Set B). But if you've been keeping up with current affairs, you might've had a fighting chance—and maybe even cracked a few with smart guessing. Electric Vehicles (EVs), always in the headlines, popped up not once but twice. Familiar buzzwords like GAGAN, deep learning, Majorana 1, chemical substances in the news, and UAVs made their expected appearance—basically, if it's been trending in the science section of your daily current affairs digest, UPSC probably picked it up. But before you start thinking this was just a news-based section, hold that thought. True to form, UPSC also tested your conceptual clarity—because future bureaucrats, apparently, need to know a little bit of everything. So, alongside the headline topics, came questions on viruses, battery cathodes, activated carbon, cement manufacturing, and even coal gasification. A well-crafted blend of static knowledge and current affairs—or as aspirants would call it, a 'mixed bag of hope and horror.' But was it easy? Of course not. This is UPSC. Even when you know the topic, the challenge lies in how the question is asked. With confusingly worded statements and options designed to make you second-guess your own notes, the section was less about what you know and more about how calmly you can handle mind games under pressure. In the end, it was classic UPSC: informative, unpredictable, and just confusing enough to keep everyone humble. Why is it that when a section feels easier, it also has fewer questions? The International Relations segment this year was relatively smooth sailing—at least for half of the five questions that made it five questions focused on well-known international organizations—BIMSTEC, BRICS, INSTC, and NATO—the usual suspects for any well-read aspirant. If you'd been following global affairs (or at least your current affairs notes), these should have been within reach. But just when you start to relax, UPSC's option traps are there to remind you: Nothing is ever truly easy here. The only real curveball? A question on the EU's Nature Restoration Law, which could have stumped those not tracking climate diplomacy closely. Still, if you nailed it with a smart guess—or better yet, actual knowledge—kudos! You deserve a celebratory chai. But back to the question that haunts every hopeful candidate: Why does the easier section get fewer questions? Well, don't ask UPSC. Seriously—don't. They might just respond next year with more questions, and twice the trickery. So, for now, smile, stay silent, and move on. You survived this round. Who says UPSC is boring? Certainly not sports fans, who were pleasantly surprised to find two questions on Chess and Kho Kho in this year's paper. Yes, the Commission showed it's not all policy and polity—it can toss in a bit of play too. The Miscellaneous section, often overlooked during revision, delivered questions that were surprisingly basic—if only you'd taken them seriously while revising. Topics like the Gandhi Peace Prize, AI Action Summit, and Critical Minerals were all over the news this year. If you were tuned into current affairs, these should've been easy pickings. Questions on various Boards and North Eastern States of India tested how far in advance your prep went. As for the International Year-themed question—for aspirants of State PCS exams, that was practically a gift-wrapped point. And here's the real wisdom nugget: Not every question is meant to be attempted. Some are booby-trapped brain teasers, and the smartest candidates know exactly when to skip. After all, success in UPSC is often about knowing what not to do. While most of us prefer to keep Geography and Environment/Ecology in separate corners of our prep strategy, this article unapologetically puts them under one roof. Why? While many questions maintain their exclusivity, frankly, some questions blurred the line between the two anyway. Now, remember when your teachers told you to stick to basics and NCERTs? Turns out, they weren't just repeating it for fun. The core geography questions—especially the map-based ones—proved just how important fundamentals still are. From world geography to conceptual Environment questions, and a good dose of current affairs (because why not?), this section had something for everyone—provided you studied everything. And here's the fun part: if Environment, Geography, and Science & Tech were your strong zones, congratulations! You might be boarding the train to UPSC Mains! Wait a second—did we just skip talking about CSAT? That lovable paper sitting quietly between you and Mains. So before you start writing answers in your head, maybe flip back to those CSAT pages and do a quick reality check. There is a clear distinction between qualifying and eliminating. But when it comes to UPSC's CSAT paper, that line gets blurred. Meant to be a mere formality for most, the CSAT once again turned into a nightmare. leaving many aspirants scratching their heads and questioning how much preparation for a qualifying is enough. Definitely not a Class 10th satndard questions, as one would expect after looking at the syllabus. Mudit Gupta, UPSC mentor and CSAT expert, told The Indian Express: 'This year's CSAT was one of the most difficult papers ever. The paper which UPSC says is qualifying in nature is actually 'eliminating' in nature.' Let's be honest—when was the last time anyone walked out of a UPSC Prelims exam and said, 'That was easy'? Exactly. It's only after hours of analysis, frantic WhatsApp group debates, and excessive Googling that most aspirants downgrade their verdict to a humble 'moderate'—and even that's a stretch. This year's paper? Let's call it what it was: difficult. Sure, a few questions may have seemed direct. But anyone who's been in this game long enough knows that a paper's difficulty isn't just about how many facts you can recall—it's the length, the time pressure, and the options crafted to mess with your head. This year, UPSC took its love for confusion up a notch by embracing its favorite format: 'How many statements are correct?' in every possible flavor. Yes, some topics were familiar, and a few sections might've felt manageable. But in totality, this GS Paper was a test of not just knowledge, but clarity, composure, and quick decoding under pressure. So, dear future bureaucrats, it's time to up your game. Not to scare you—but to prepare you. Because if UPSC is anything, it's consistently unpredictable. When the GS paper is tough and the CSAT feels anything but 'qualifying', predicting the cut-off becomes less of a science and more of a gamble. To make things more thrilling, UPSC will generously release the official answer key… sometime next year, after everyone has moved on or aged slightly. By then, questions might be dropped and the timing would be so close to next year's prelims that the cut-off numbers will look good only on the score cards who have finally cleared the Civil Services Examination. Experts and students alike are betting on lower cut-offs, thanks to the curveball CSAT. But how low? Nobody really knows. And by the time we do, it might be too late to complain—or care. So, what should aspirants do? Simple: take a breather, stretch your legs, eat something that isn't instant noodles—then get back to prep mode. Because if there's one thing UPSC loves more than surprises, it's keeping everyone guessing. Best Wishes, Manas (With inputs from Nitendra Pal Singh, Khushboo Kumari, Roshni Yadav, UPSC candidates for Prelims 2025, mentors and educators) For your answers, queries and suggestions write at Manas Srivastava is currently working as Senior Copy Editor with The Indian Express (digital) and leads a unique initiative of IE - UPSC Essentials. He majorly writes on UPSC, other competitive exams and education-related projects. In the past, Manas has represented India at the G-20 Youth Summit in Mexico. He is a former member of the Youth Council, GOI. A two-time topper/gold medallist in History (both in graduation and post-graduation) from Delhi University, he has mentored and taught UPSC aspirants for more than four years. His diverse role in The Indian Express consists of writing, editing, anchoring/ hosting, interviewing experts, and curating and simplifying news for the benefit of students. He hosts the YouTube talk show called 'Art and Culture with Devdutt Pattanaik' and a LIVE series on Instagram and YouTube called 'You Ask We Answer'.His talks on 'How to read a newspaper' focus on newspaper reading as an essential habit for students. His articles and videos aim at finding solutions to the general queries of students and hence he believes in being students' editor, preparing them not just for any exam but helping them to become informed citizens. This is where he makes his teaching profession meet journalism. He is also the editor of UPSC Essentials' monthly magazine for the aspirants. He is a recipient of the Dip Chand Memorial Award, the Lala Ram Mohan Prize and Prof. Papiya Ghosh Memorial Prize for academic excellence. He was also awarded the University's Post-Graduate Scholarship for pursuing M.A. in History where he chose to specialise in Ancient India due to his keen interest in Archaeology. He has also successfully completed a Certificate course on Women's Studies by the Women's Studies Development Centre, DU. As a part of N.S.S in the past, Manas has worked with national and international organisations and has shown keen interest and active participation in Social Service. He has led and been a part of projects involving areas such as gender sensitisation, persons with disability, helping slum dwellers, environment, adopting our heritage programme. He has also presented a case study on 'Psychological stress among students' at ICSQCC- Sri Lanka. As a compere for seminars and other events he likes to keep his orating hobby alive. His interests also lie in International Relations, Governance, Social issues, Essays and poetry. ... Read More
