Latest news with #OceanicandAtmosphericResearch
San Francisco Chronicle
29-07-2025
- Science
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump's budget takes aim at gold standard measurement of atmospheric carbon dioxide
In its latest assault on science, the Trump administration has proposed eliminating funding for the Mauna Loa Observatory on Hawaii's Big Island, the place that has helped us understand how the rise in greenhouse gases is causing climate change. Measurements made at remote sites around the world, located away from industrial activities, provide the most direct evidence of this global increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide. The Mauna Loa Observatory, where the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Oceanic and Atmospheric Research makes carbon measurements, is the most famous of these. Located on the barren slopes of a volcano 11,135 feet above sea level, it's the site of the longest continuous CO2 measurement in the world. In 1958, American scientist Charles David Keeling began measuring atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide at Mauna Loa and by 1961 had compiled enough data to establish that they were steadily rising. When Keeling's measurements began, the scientific community lacked a comprehensive understanding of the global carbon cycle. Deciding to go to Hawaii to do this, away from local contamination and vegetation, was a stroke of genius. The continuous record of this increase came to be known as ' the Keeling Curve, ' and it showed that if humans keep burning fossil fuels, atmospheric carbon will rise. This, in turn, increases global temperatures. Think of the measurements recorded at Mauna Loa as a health indicator for the planet — similar to human cholesterol levels being monitored by a doctor. Our view of the world changed the moment when these measurements began. They showed us that humanity can pull the levers of the planetary machine in a way that matters for us all. By making these measurements, the U.S. government has helped monitor the vital signs of our planet, providing us with an understanding of how serious the problem is. The Keeling Curve is valuable to science, but it is also a treasure that belongs to humanity as the most poignant indication of our impact on the environment and as a testament to our ability to document it. The Mauna Loa Observatory deserves the same respect as a UNESCO World Heritage site. But President Donald Trump, a renowned climate change denier, has shown repeatedly that he has no use for scientific data that disproves his preconceived assumptions. Since his second inauguration, he has proposed drastic cuts to science agencies like National Institutes of Health, National Science Foundation, NASA and the NOAA, so the proposed elimination of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research at Mauna Loa is no great surprise. While the Senate and House Appropriations Committees have both decided on budgets for NOAA that are only slight reductions from last year, the fate of the agency's Oceanic and Atmospheric Research, which accounts for roughly 10% of the total NOAA budget, remains uncertain because the two budgets still have to be reconciled and voted on by Congress. Although other nations track atmospheric carbon dioxide in specific regions, none offer global coverage comparable to NOAA's, and none extend as far back as the Mauna Loa data. Today, NOAA operates a network of four global measurement stations in Alaska, Hawaii, American Samoa and the South Pole, as well as 84 sampling sites in 37 countries worldwide. These sites collect samples, which are then sent to the laboratory in Boulder, Colo., for analysis. The NOAA stations are part of the World Meteorological Organization's Global Atmosphere Watch Programme, and NOAA also calibrates measurements taken by other countries. These sustained observations enable scientists and policymakers to understand our impact on the environment and make informed decisions. Seeing the data also reveals to the general public the consequences of our actions and the inadequacy of our response to date — atmospheric carbon dioxide continues to increase at an alarming rate. Interrupting the Mauna Loa time series, the most iconic measurement in use, would be catastrophic. It would be like interrupting the Dow Jones Industrial Average or a graph tracking the rise of the human population. We will never be able to go back and remake those measurements. The observatory provides essential information for the future, and humanity would be impoverished without it. The U.S. has been an essential partner in an international cooperative endeavor to understand our planet's carbon cycle. Science is a collaborative enterprise, and even the U.S. cannot do it all alone. The Global Carbon Budget utilizes data from NOAA and other sources for its annual reports on the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide, allowing us to understand how the atmosphere, ocean and land respond to our input of emissions. Academic science funding in the U.S. and elsewhere typically favors hypothesis-based research — specific questions that can be answered by a targeted data set. Routine observations, such as the Mauna Loa carbon record, are not typically funded by National Science Foundation, even though they are fundamental to making discoveries. This is where government agencies like NOAA come in, because it is their mandate to make these observations. NOAA has always funded these measurements because it is part of its mission — to share important knowledge and information with others. If the Trump administration is successful in the senseless destruction of NOAA's Oceanic and Atmospheric Research, other countries will need to step up and assume the responsibility of making atmospheric carbon observations and be in charge of calibrations. The Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego is making parallel measurements of carbon dioxide at Mauna Loa, but these are supported by philanthropy and are vulnerable to the whims of funders. For now, philanthropic funding is essential to ensure these measurements continue, but it can only be a stopgap measure. The Keeling Curve is a significant and symbolic achievement for an advanced nation, and the measurements should continue until humanity has no reason to monitor atmospheric carbon in such an intensive way. We, as a society, should be proud to fund it collectively. David Ho is a professor in the Department of Oceanography at the University of Hawaii at Manoa. Find him on Bluesky at @
CBS News
12-04-2025
- Politics
- CBS News
NOAA could face 25% budget cut, slashing climate research, under draft proposal
An internal government document proposes significant changes for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration along with a 25% cut to its 2026 budget, according to a draft obtained by CBS News from three sources. The cuts hit the agency's research functions hardest. Under the proposal, Oceanic and Atmospheric Research would be eliminated as an office, as well as all funding for climate, weather and ocean laboratories, cooperative institutes and several other programs, according to the document obtained by CBS News. The memo is labeled "pre-decisional," considered an initial proposal by the Office of Budget and Management, during the so-called "passback" process. During "passback," agencies can appeal decisions to OMB, according to the Congressional Research Service. The draft document proposes a $1.672 billion reduction from 2025 funding levels for NOAA , saying "passback levels support a leaner NOAA that focuses on core operational needs, eliminates unnecessary levels of bureaucracy, terminates nonessential grant programs, and ends activities that do not warrant a Federal role." Current and former NOAA officials describe the memo's objective as "devastating," saying research is the backbone to improving services to the public. "When you cut the research, you cut the ability to improve the forecasts and the predictions," Former NOAA Administrator Rick Spinrad told CBS News Friday. "It's not just hurricanes or tornadoes. The climate side of things includes seasonal outlook. So if precipitation which are used obviously by the agricultural community, the insurance and reinsurance industry wants information about," Spinrad said. One current NOAA employee, speaking to CBS News anonymously out of fear of retaliation, said they are most concerned about the memo's "complete disregard for how important Earth systems research is for human survival." National Weather Service funding would remain the same, but the draft proposes to move the Space Weather Prediction Center, which monitors conditions like solar flares and geomagnetic storms , from NOAA to the Department of Homeland Security. Within the Office of Space Commerce, viewed as a growing priority within NOAA , the passback proposes to terminate the Traffic Coordination System for Space, tasked with helping to coordinate space traffic and guard against collisions. It proposes potentially transferring "useful elements of TraCSS effort to a non-government entity." Congressional Democrats are also sounding the alarm over the proposal. "Trump's budget plan for NOAA is both outrageous and dangerous. They're wholly destroying critical offices, like NOAA's Oceanic and Atmospheric Research line office, which is foundational to the agency's mission to protect life and property," said Rep. Zoe Lofgren, a Democrat from California and the ranking member of the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology. While sources at NOAA say they have been successful in the past of objecting to the Office of Management and Budget during the "passback" period, they worry it will be much more difficult to appeal under the current administration. "No final funding decisions have been made," OMB spokeswoman Alexandra McCandless said. The White House has not responded to a request for comment.
