Latest news with #Primetime


Irish Examiner
20 hours ago
- Politics
- Irish Examiner
Paul Kearns: It's not as simple as Bob Geldof thinks for Israelis to 'snap out of it'
'What has happened to the Israeli people?'. Bob Geldof last week made an impassioned plea to Miriam O'Callaghan on RTÉ's Primetime for 'Israelis to snap out of it' and 'to rise up against their government'. In the context of the daily horrific images from Gaza and more than 20 months of onslaught on the Palestinian civilian population, Geldof asks an important and, I would argue, very profound question: 'What has happened to the Israeli people?'. But here is a startling fact. In no other country in the world over the past two and a half years have there been larger and more consistent political demonstrations against the current far-right Israeli messianic government than in Israel itself. Within weeks of assuming power, hundreds of thousands of Israelis began protesting weekly against the anti-human rights agenda of their government. The coalition of five right-wing, religious, and Jewish supremacist parties that make up the government received a minority of the popular vote (48.4%) in the election that brought them to power. Political parties to the left — admittedly a broad spectrum from centre-right to progressive left — won more than 50% of the vote in that fateful election. Sometimes the vagaries of the electoral system tip victory to the loser. Those demonstrations have at times reached more than a quarter of a million on a single Saturday night in Tel Aviv alone. Since the October 7 Hamas terror attack, and despite an inevitable rallying around the flag effect, tens of thousands of Israelis opposed to Netanyahu have continued to take to the streets. Demonstrations only ceased when rockets rained down from Hamas at the start of the war, and more recently, over the 12-day war with incoming ballistic missiles from Iran. Yet despite two years of weekly protests and plunging political popularity, this government remains in power. Most Israelis feel exhausted. Most feel powerless. If families of the remaining hostages have been unable to pressure their government to prioritise Israeli lives, the lives of their children held in underground tunnels for two years, does Geldof think that they can pressurise the government to consider the fate of Palestinian children? Mainstream, secular, and centrist Israelis feel under assault. First, they came under attack from their government, then came the trauma of October 7 and the murder of over 1,200 Israelis by Hamas in a short few hours. Within 48 hours of those terror attacks, anti-Israeli demonstrations had erupted around the world, and then came months of rocket attacks, including cruise missiles from Iran. Despite the war, or perhaps because of it, the government continues to assault its civil liberties by advancing authoritarian legislation. In addition, the exponential growth of global anti-Semitism is undeniable. A protest outside the US embassy demanding the end of the war and immediate release of hostages held by Hamas in the Gaza Strip, and against prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government in Tel Aviv earlier this month. Picture: AP/Maya Alleruzzo Most Israelis are vehemently opposed to their messianic revolutionary government. They are revolted by the images of marauding settlers on the West Bank, and also sickened by the words of many far-right ministers that ricochet around the world in minutes. Some of those same far-right ministers have mocked and belittled the families of hostages. Today, 70% want the war to stop, irrespective of so-called concessions to Hamas. International revulsion at the dystopian images coming from Gaza is understandable. With that, revulsion has come an undeniable visceral hatred of all Israelis. I think hate is not too strong a word. Visceral hatred of Israelis is now not just politically acceptable; it is widely socially championed — and let's be clear, we are talking about Israeli Jews. One in five Israeli citizens is a Palestinian or an Israeli Arab. The dehumanisation of all Palestinians by too many Israelis is now arguably matched by the demonisation of Israeli Jews by non-Israelis. There is a similar groupthink, and an 'othering' that lumps all Israelis together. This demonisation can have, has had, chilling outcomes. Geldof says Israelis are subject to 'heavily censored news'. There is, however, no government censorship of the news in Israel, at least not in the general understanding of the word. The mainstream commercial TV news channels indeed refuse to show what the rest of the world sees nightly. Ironically, it is the public service broadcaster, Kan, which recently shows the most graphic footage. News editors have told me Kan's two commercial rivals are more concerned about a TV ratings war than revealing the truth of the war in Gaza. In fact, many journalists of the left-leaning Haaretz newspaper, the Israeli paper of record, are fearless in their criticism and condemnation of both the government and the war on Gaza. Some of the most powerful investigative journalism exposing Israel's war crimes in Gaza has come from Israeli Haaretz investigative journalists. This includes a recent damning revelation of a shoot-to-kill policy of Israeli soldiers at food distribution points in Gaza. Haaretz is on sale in every town and city in Israel. Perhaps the very fact Haaretz is readily available makes the seeming indifference of too many Israelis more inexcusable. Geldof argues there are no excuses for the seeming Israeli difference to genocide 70km from Tel Aviv. He is right, there aren't. I have written many times in this newspaper about the moral failures of Israeli society, particularly its universities, trade unions, and television media stars, to speak out more loudly about the undeniable Israeli war crimes. There is, of course, no context to acts of genocide. There is, however, a context to the simple assertion that Israelis 'snap out of it' and 'rise up against their government'. If the fate of governments were determined by the scale and duration of street power alone, this unpopular far-right regime would have long since been consigned to the dustbin of political history by Israelis themselves. And perhaps, just perhaps, tens of thousands of dead Palestinians would be alive today. Paul Kearns is an Irish journalist living in Israel


Fox News
4 days ago
- Entertainment
- Fox News
Expert answers whether sharks would make good security guards for Trump's Alcatraz reboot
'Saving the Blue' shark expert Dr. Tristan Guttridge gives 'Jesse Watters Primetime' a shark week lesson.


Fox News
6 days ago
- Politics
- Fox News
I was the only one that opposed ex-CIA director John Brennan's nomination: Sen. Rand Paul
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., discusses the newly released documents allegedly pointing to former President Obama's administration's involvement in Trump-Russia 'hoax' on 'Jesse Watters Primetime.'


Fox News
6 days ago
- Politics
- Fox News
Tulsi Gabbard warns of 'deep state actors' who don't want this info to 'see the light of day'
National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard describes the alleged cover-up of 'Russiagate' on 'Jesse Watters Primetime.'
Yahoo
18-07-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Fox News' Jesse Watters forced into embarrassing walkback over Gavin Newsom claims
Fox News host Jesse Watters reluctantly apologized to California Governor Gavin Newsom amid their escalating legal battle during Thursday's episode of his show. The host walked back accusations that the governor lied about a phone call with President Donald Trump during the anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles. 'He didn't deceive anybody on purpose, so I'm sorry, he wasn't lying. He was just confusing and unclear. Next time, governor, why don't you say what you mean?' the MAGA-favorite said. Last month, the governor filed a $787 million defamation lawsuit against Watters and Fox News, accusing Primetime of misleadingly editing a video of Trump to support the claim. Jesse Watters reluctantly apologized for the claim he made about California Governor Gavin Newsom (Jesse Watters Primetime/X) Newsom's attorneys said Watters aired a deceptively edited clip of Trump suggesting he spoke with the governor just before the president mobilized the U.S. Marines on June 9, when, in fact, records show the call occurred days earlier. Newsom's lawyers argued in the complaint that by making the call appear more recent, Trump could falsely imply he and the governor discussed the troop deployment to LA. The governor, however, had already said publicly that he spoke to Trump after midnight on June 7, and the military was not discussed. Trump sent Fox News anchor John Roberts a screenshot showing the June 7 date of the phone call, but the image used on the show omitted the timestamp. 'Gavin lied about Trump's call,' the Fox News banner blared. Gavin Newsom (left) and Donald Trump spoke on the phone on June 7 about the immigration protests erupting in Los Angeles (AP) Newsom said they did not speak after June 7 and refuted the claim in a post on X. 'There was no call,' Newsom tweeted on June 10. 'Not even a voicemail. Americans should be alarmed that a President deploying Marines onto our streets doesn't even know who he's talking to.' After filing the lawsuit on June 28 in a Delaware court, Newsom's lawyers said they would drop the case if the governor received a retraction and a formal on-air apology. During his grudging apology Thursday, Watters told viewers he believed Newsom's X post asserted that the two had not spoken at all. 'We thought the dispute was about whether there was a phone call at all when he said without qualification that there was no call,' he said. 'Now Newsom's telling us what was in his head when he wrote the tweet.' After Watters's concession, Newsom showed little sign of remorse or backing down. 'Discovery will be fun,' he said in a statement to the Los Angeles Times. 'See you in court, buddy.'