Latest news with #Pro-Palestine
Sydney Morning Herald
a day ago
- Politics
- Sydney Morning Herald
Aid to Gaza has been co-opted and weaponised
Sean Kelly says the 'unsayable' — the Israeli government is starving Gazans (' The moral test for Labor has shifted on Gaza: Words are not enough', July 28.). In March 2025, Israel prohibited the delivery of aid to Gazans by independent organisations such as the UN, replacing it with the Israeli-appointed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) which provides aid sporadically. Netanyahu insists that Hamas was looting independent deliveries. No evidence of this has ever been revealed. On the contrary, facts indicate that, until March, enough aid was getting through to prevent starvation. Since then, the GHF has failed to provide adequately for Gazans. Even the American head of GHF, Jake Wood, has resigned because the aid plan failed to uphold the principles of humanity, neutrality and impartiality. He acknowledged that he witnessed innocent Gazans being fired upon while seeking aid. Netanyahu argues that Hamas must be defeated before aid can flow freely. He also vowed to 'defeat' Hamas in 2014. How much longer must starving Gazans wait? Nell Knight, Avoca Beach I think Premier Chris Minns needs to read the room better (' Pro-Palestine demonstration across Sydney Harbour Bridge to be blocked ', July 28). The Sydney Harbour Bridge carrying tens of thousands protesting against the starvation in Gaza would send a powerful image about Australians' attitudes about the current situation to the world. It would have far more impact than the words of politicians. What's the point of having such iconic locations that are immediately identifiable without being able to leverage them? Dale Bailey, St Leonards It was with some distress that I saw reports of the opposition's Dan Tehan pulling the 'where are the facts?' card on Gaza. Is this the blood-stained hill the Liberal Party wish to take a stand on? Politics so often sweeps real human choices under the rug, saying 'that's politics', or 'someone needs to make the tough decisions', divesting themselves of any real choice in the matter. The tough decision would have been to support the government to do anything it can to find a solution whereby civilians do not get slaughtered, and preventing the creation of a new generation of vengeance-fuelled agents of change. A moral party should be helping disclose the facts together with the government. You want the facts? Then go looking for them together. Stop treating politics like a two-team football league. Be a team player for the country and a better world instead. James Cottam, Enmore The opposition's insistence that criticism of the Israeli government be muted because it's all Hamas' fault sounds a lot like support for the infamous domestic violence excuse: 'Look what you made me do.' Tom Mangan, Woy Woy Please allow me to make the point that Hamas is not forcing Israel to use the tactics being employed – it is Israel's policy. Israel has never in reality 'targeted' Hamas. Witness the fact the 'war' is still going after 21 months, which may well be the intention. John Christie, Oatley Cost of addiction Addicted to smoking, many pensioners who don't have access to illicit tobacco actually do put their addiction before their need for food (' Jail time and evictions: Labor announces crackdown on illegal tobacco ', July 28). This isn't of any concern apparently to state and federal governments, whose focus is on the criminal syndicates and 'dealers″ in this strong drug and the revenue taxed on its hooked users, which for a moderate habit, a pack a day, is more than $300 a week and for a heavy smoker as I used to be, 60 plus daily, now attracts $50,000 per annum. Nicotine is acknowledged to be as or more addictive than heroin. These crises are totally the predictable results of policies which have backfired and now appear to be soon to cause more misery as the crime enforcement is ramped up to try to redirect revenue away from criminals who exploit millions of addicts. Andrew Cohen, Glebe The government and the anti-tobacco and vaping lobby groups are wasting their time. Draconian taxation and prohibition does not work. I can understand that they have the best of intentions, and have been chuffed that their jackbooted approach was considered the toughest in the world, but we live in a free country and a more mature, respectful approach to those who choose to smoke and vape is recommended. With a cut in taxes and the legalisation of vaping (including applying a lower level of taxation) the illicit trade would crumble and products would again be properly regulated. This is what every other developed, free country has done. Peter Barrett, Woonona Calming cannabis Cannabis is effectively legal. I have neither bought nor consumed it, but many people I know do it regularly (' The cannabis factory: How one doctor wrote 72,000 scripts in two years ', July 28). It is cheaper than alcohol and nicotine-derived products. It calms the user down and so reduces the level of violence and anxiety that are symptomatic of other drugs. True, it stays in the system longer and can still have long-term negative side-effects. But properly taxed and regulated, cannabis would be a better companion than Jack Daniels and Peter Stuyvesant. David Neilson, Araluen (NT) Joyce wide of target As part of his mission to demolish the net-zero emissions target, Barnaby Joyce declares that he wants people to have the cheapest forms of power generation, which he says are coal and nuclear (' Why Barnaby's war on net zero's already sunk ', July 26). If Barnaby were to have a look at the Open Electricity (National Electricity Market) website, he would soon see that renewables consistently come into the market at a cheaper price than coal. And given that most of our coal-fired power stations are reaching the end of their lives, it is even clearer that the price of coal-fired power will be way more expensive once the costs of building new power stations are factored in. Catherine Rossiter, Fadden (ACT) Amid his ramblings on climate change, Barnaby Joyce did make a valid point. Even if Australia's domestic energy consumption involved 100 per cent zero emissions, this would have negligible effect on global warming. For Australia to achieve any significant effect, we would need to cease exports of our coal and gas. But the annual revenue from these sources is respectively about $55 billion and $90 billion dollars. Are we as a nation prepared to forego this money, and how would it affect our economy? Regarding net zero emissions, there may be times when the sun doesn't shine and the wind doesn't blow, meaning that we would occasionally need to fall back on gas temporarily to generate instant power. Perhaps total net zero is an illusion. Bruce Johnson, Lakewood The writers to this letters page are constantly questioning why the voters of New England consistently elect Barnaby Joyce as an MP (Letters, July 28). The simple reason is that most people in New England electorate enjoy a standard of living that is better than the average Australian and, as such, vote conservatively, the way their parents and grandparents voted. Barnaby is simply the beneficiary of that tradition. John Maunder, Quirindi Correspondent Neil Ormerod doesn't seem to understand the way the world works (Letters, July 27), and his analogy of coal being like heroin is taking it too far. At this point, the world needs fossil fuel. Countries around the world realise this. Has Neil heard of supply and demand? If we don't supply it, somebody else will. That is a fact. So Australia stopping exports will make absolutely zero difference, as will net zero make zero difference to the weather. Peter Phizacklea, Sydney Modern myths Ross Gittins tells us that the economics profession 'has never worried too much about ethics' (' When they say 'modelling', grab your bulldust detector ', July 28). This, surely, is a bit harsh. Really, the problem with the economics profession is that it has bought into two modern mythologies. These are that eternal growth is possible – it isn't – and that any benefits of improved productivity will flow through to working people – it won't. Until these myths are recognised and refuted, we will remain in this seemingly endless cycle of hand wringing. Greg Baker, Fitzroy Falls Strip-search violations Kate's story illustrates the dangers of this invasive, intimidating violation of personal safety (' No drugs found in 70,000-plus strip-searches ', July 28). In my view, strip-searches of adults, if deemed to be both absolutely necessary and completely lawful, should not as far as possible be carried out by police but by trained medical and trauma-informed care personnel. Moreover, police strip-searching of minors anywhere anytime is tantamount to institutionally sanctioned child abuse and should be totally banned. Meredith Williams, Baulkham Hills History shows that prohibition doesn't work. Even the financial pseudo-prohibition of cigarettes is failing. Meanwhile, in Portugal, where drug possession has been decriminalised, drug use has not increased, but there has been a significant increase in people entering rehabilitation. Overdoses, deaths and drug-related offences have been dramatically reduced. Decriminalisation of drug possession/usage, drug-testing facilities and increased funding for rehabilitation does work, with further evidence in Oregon and Washington state trials in America. Our politicians need to stop worrying about how strong they appear and focus on what works. The carrot always beats the stick, especially with the young. Rowan Godwin, Rozelle Could it be that the harms caused by police in using sniffer dogs and strip-searching young people are greater than those purportedly caused by the drugs themselves? Either way, I'd like to see the police searching people of all ages at the restaurant at the NSW Parliament. It would only take that to occur once and the practice would cease overnight. Well, Mr Minns? Shaun Davies, St Peters The push to eliminate strip-searches is both wrong and dangerous. The number of people found with drugs is small because of the fear of being nabbed. The message that the use of illegal drugs is criminal is a good one. Roger Cedergreen, Kirrawee Marina madness It's great to see residents fighting to stop the extension of the Woolwich marina (' Outrage at bid to expand marina ' July 28). We lost the battle in Blackwattle Bay. The new fish market is being built in the bay instead of on the existing site. New marinas and extensions are appearing and recreational activities such as rowing and dragon boat racing are increasingly problematic. The bay is fast becoming a pond like Darling Harbour, surrounded by commercial interests. Keep up the good fight to stop it happening on your side of the harbour. Richard Spencer, Glebe Higher ground In July 2022, at the height of the devastating rains and floods that followed the Black Summer bushfires, there was a call for Warragamba Dam's wall to be raised by 14 metres. Perhaps, with what we have learned now, the call should have been for developers to raise houses built on the floodplains by 14 metres (Letters, July 28). My cottage on a tributary of the Hawkesbury River was built in 1953 as a family fishing retreat by someone who knew about water and how it behaves. Yes, the water rose alarmingly three years ago, but the older houses here were safe because they had been built well back from the river many years ago by people who knew their trade. Alexandra Szalay, Coba Point All about size It's hardly surprising that Springwood residents value convenience, choice and apparent competition (' Woolies plan splits suburb' ', July 28). However, closer reading of the DA exposes the following serious shortcomings: extra pedestrian crossings, a roundabout fenced against pedestrians, an extra two customer carparks and an underground truck loading bay. All this in a tiny section of road a mere 150 metres long which is also the only access road to two childcare centres and the community's cultural precinct (theatre, community hub, library, gallery). There is ample evidence that a development of such magnitude cannot fail to damage the businesses and prosperity of any community. Residents are not necessarily opposed to this proposal, but to the sheer scale of it. We just want the best outcome for Springwood. Only the Blue Mountains residents know how to cut off their nose to spite their amenity. As a former resident of Leura for four years and then Springwood in the 80s and 90s, I remember fondly all the campaigns to keep development out of the Blue Mountains – Kmart in Katoomba, Fairmont Resort in Leura, Macca's in Blaxland. We lived in Springwood for eight of those years and how I would have loved a new Woolworths to walk up to, instead of having to drive to Winmalee, Katoomba or even Penrith Plaza to do more detailed shopping. There are many things I would have preferred not to have ever changed, but fortunately the splendid Blue Mountains themselves always knows how to outshine any crass developments. Reina French, Oak Flats Local control best I support Joanna Mendelssohn's support for council owned and operated childcare centres (Letters, July 27). This seems to be a field where good profits are assured – three large new centres have recently been built in my surrounding suburbs. This is a sector where council-owned and other non-profit agencies could have been encouraged. The federal Liberals had a fondness for small businesses and struck out in the profit-driven direction. Sadly, the cat is now out of the bag. David Rose, Nollamara (WA)
Perth Now
a day ago
- Politics
- Perth Now
Pro-Palestine protesters plan first-ever march across Sydney Harbour Bridge
Pro-Palestine protesters will march across Sydney Harbour Bridge for the first time in nearly two years of rallies, setting the stage for a potential confrontation with police. In a statement, the Palestine Action Group said on Sunday it had filed a Form 1 notifying NSW Police of the 'March for Humanity' set to take place at 1pm on August 3. The group called on NSW authorities to 'facilitate' the march, which is in response to the 'extraordinary situation' in Gaza, including mass civilian starvation. 'As Australia's most iconic symbol, a mass march across the Harbour Bridge will send a powerful message to the world,' the Palestine Action Group said. That message, the group said, would be to 'Gaza, to Israel, and to our own government, that we are determined to stand up for humanity'. Camera Icon Pro-Palestine protestors have rallied almost weekly since October 7, 2023. NewsWire / Flavio Brancaleone Credit: News Corp Australia The protest is likely to face stiff opposition, with then-NSW Police Commissioner Karen Webb previously applying to the Supreme Court to stop a pro-Palestine event. The vigil, held on the one-year anniversary of the October 7 attacks, was ultimately given the green light after a court hearing and 11th-hour discussions with protesters. In NSW, protesters do not need formal approval from police to hold a legal rally following the filing of a Form 1 – but police can oppose it through the court system. The Harbour Bridge is a major thoroughfare in Sydney, but has been closed several times in recent years, including for the filming of the movie Fall Guy. The bridge was also shuttered in 2023 for a World Pride Month march attended by Anthony Albanese. Camera Icon Sydney Harbour Bridge has been the site of several protests. NewsWire / Damian Shaw Credit: News Corp Australia In 2000, the bridge was the site of the Walk For Reconciliation, a rally showing support for Indigenous and non-Indigenous reconciliation attended by 250,000 people. 'It can certainly be closed to stop a genocide,'organisers said. The Palestine Action Group said protesters planned on meeting at Lang Park, near Wynyard station, at 1pm before marching to the bridge. The event marks almost two years of protests following Hamas' October 7 attack on Israel and the subsequent war on Gaza. Last week, the Prime Minister accused Israel of 'clearly' breaching international law, but fell short of joining ally France in recognising a Palestinian state. NSW Police has been contacted for comment.
West Australian
a day ago
- Politics
- West Australian
Pro-Palestine protesters plan first-ever march across Sydney Harbour Bridge
Pro-Palestine protesters will march across Sydney Harbour Bridge for the first time in nearly two years of rallies, setting the stage for a potential confrontation with police. In a statement, the Palestine Action Group said on Sunday it had filed a Form 1 notifying NSW Police of the 'March for Humanity' set to take place at 1pm on August 3. The group called on NSW authorities to 'facilitate' the march, which is in response to the 'extraordinary situation' in Gaza, including mass civilian starvation. 'As Australia's most iconic symbol, a mass march across the Harbour Bridge will send a powerful message to the world,' the Palestine Action Group said. That message, the group said, would be to 'Gaza, to Israel, and to our own government, that we are determined to stand up for humanity'. The protest is likely to face stiff opposition, with then-NSW Police Commissioner Karen Webb previously applying to the Supreme Court to stop a pro-Palestine event. The vigil, held on the one-year anniversary of the October 7 attacks, was ultimately given the green light after a court hearing and 11th-hour discussions with protesters. In NSW, protesters do not need formal approval from police to hold a legal rally following the filing of a Form 1 – but police can oppose it through the court system. The Harbour Bridge is a major thoroughfare in Sydney, but has been closed several times in recent years, including for the filming of the movie Fall Guy. The bridge was also shuttered in 2023 for a World Pride Month march attended by Anthony Albanese. In 2000, the bridge was the site of the Walk For Reconciliation, a rally showing support for Indigenous and non-Indigenous reconciliation attended by 250,000 people. 'It can certainly be closed to stop a genocide,'organisers said. The Palestine Action Group said protesters planned on meeting at Lang Park, near Wynyard station, at 1pm before marching to the bridge. The event marks almost two years of protests following Hamas' October 7 attack on Israel and the subsequent war on Gaza. Last week, the Prime Minister accused Israel of 'clearly' breaching international law, but fell short of joining ally France in recognising a Palestinian state. NSW Police has been contacted for comment.
7NEWS
2 days ago
- Politics
- 7NEWS
Two Australians among civilians on Gaza-bound aid ship Handala intercepted by Israel
Two Australians were among a group of civilisations detained by Israeli forces after the vessel they were travelling on, which was carrying humanitarian aid to Gaza, was intercepted. The Handala, operated by members of the Pro-Palestine group, was intercepted by Israel in international waters about forty nautical miles from Gaza on Saturday night. Of the 21 civilians on board were Australians Robert Martin, a human rights activist, and journalist Tania 'Tan' Safi. In a video posted to social media before the vessel was intercepted, Martin said the boat was too close to Gaza for the Israeli military to allow it to continue any further. 'We've also heard through Al Jazeera and a few other news agencies that they've actually been told that if we do not stop and go back they will have to act and deal with us,' he said. 'We're not sure what that means. But to the world if something happens, we were trying to shine the light on what's going on in Palestine and particularly Gaza. If something happens, it shows what Israel's all about.' The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade told it was aware of two Australians on board the intercepted ship. 'Our officials in Tel Aviv are liaising with authorities, and consular officers stand ready to offer assistance to affected Australians,' a spokesperson said. According to the Freedom Flotilla Coalition (FFC) Israel intercepted the boat in international waters outside Palestinian territorial waters off Gaza, a violation of international maritime law. It said those on board were 'abducted' and its cargo was seized. The ship was carrying aid such as baby formula, diapers, food and medicine for Palestinians in Gaza who have been unable to access supplies due to Israel's blockade. Ann Wright, a member of FFC's steering committee, said Israel had no authority to detain international civilians on the boat. 'This is not a matter of internal Israeli jurisdiction,' she said. 'These are foreign nationals operating under international law in international waters. Their detention is arbitrary, unlawful, and must end.' A YouTube livestream on board the ship showed armed personnel boarding the vessel, while the activists on the deck, all wearing life jackets, held their hands in the air in surrender. One of the helmeted personnel appears to manipulate the camera streaming on the deck, turning it around. The stream ended soon after that. Israel's foreign ministry confirmed in a statement on X that the 'Israeli navy has stopped the vessel Navarn from illegally entering the maritime zone of the coast of Gaza,' using the Handala's original name. 'The vessel is safely making its way to the shores of Israel. All passengers are safe,' the statement continued. 'Unauthorised attempts to breach the blockade are dangerous, unlawful, and undermine ongoing humanitarian efforts.' The Handala, named for a famous Palestinian cartoon character, is part of the FFC, which has attempted numerous times to break Israel's blockade on Gaza via sea and deliver aid to Palestinians there. Last month, another FFC Gaza-bound aid ship carrying Greta Thunberg was intercepted by Israeli forces.
Middle East Eye
4 days ago
- Politics
- Middle East Eye
Charity Commission launches investigation into UK Lawyers for Israel's charitable trust
The UK's charity regulator is investigating the UK Lawyers for Israel Charitable Trust following complaints about the organisation's conduct. A spokesperson for the Charity Commission confirmed to Middle East Eye that it is investigating the Trust's relationship with UK Lawyers for Israel, a separate non-profit organisation. 'We can confirm that we already have an active case open into UKLFI Charitable Trust,' the spokesperson told MEE. 'Further concerns have been raised with us about the charity, which we will assess as part of the case to determine what, if any, role there is for us as regulator.' The spokesperson clarified that the ongoing case centres on the relationship between the UKLFI Charitable Trust, a registered charity, and UK Lawyers for Israel, which is not a charity and therefore falls outside the commission's regulatory remit. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The commission did not specify how long the investigation will take or what findings, if any, have been produced so far. UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI) is a legal advocacy organisation that supports Israel by using legal and regulatory tools to challenge activities and campaigns it views as anti-Israel or unlawful. UKLFI Charitable Trust is the charitable arm of UKLFI, supporting educational and legal initiatives related to Israel and international law. The charity says it focuses on promoting public understanding of legal issues concerning Israel and combating antisemitism through lawful means. The commission's decision to investigate UKLFI Charitable Trust comes amid growing calls to examine the group's charitable status and assess whether it is fulfilling its charitable objectives. UKLFI did not respond to Middle East Eye's request for comment at the time of writing. Pro-Palestine groups have accused UKLFI's advocacy arm of using the law to stifle and silence critics of Israel. Last week, Led by Donkeys, a British political campaign group, projected a video outside the Charity Commission's office calling for an investigation into UK Lawyers for Israel Charitable Trust. The group accused UKLFI of violating charity regulations by engaging in political lobbying and endorsing far-right Israeli politicians, rather than remaining educational or neutral as required by law. Earlier this year, Cage International submitted a complaint to the Charity Commission against UKLFI and the Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) over their support for Israel and its war on Gaza. The CAA did not respond to MEE's request for comment at the time of writing. The complaint followed the publication of a report by Cage titled "Britain's Apartheid Apologists", which accused UKLFI and CAA of abusing 'regulatory authorities in Britain to attack and harass' pro-Palestinian voices in the UK. 'UKLFI and CAA are Britain's leading enablers of the livestreamed genocide. They aid regulators like the Charity Commission to stifle free speech and pro-Palestinian activism in the UK," said Anas Mustapha, Head of Public Advocacy at Cage. 'The Charity Commission must end its charity cover used to provide an advocacy infrastructure in support of genocide.' In January, the Charity's Commission said "it is not lawful" for British charities to raise funds or send money to soldiers fighting for the Israeli army. This statement comes after the Commission issued a warning against Chabad Lubavitch Centres North East London and Essex Limited after the charity received 180 complaints for raising money for a soldier fighting for the Israeli army in northern Israel. Since October 2023, the Charity Commission has opened more than 200 regulatory cases related to the war on Gaza. The commission said the investigations involved charities with different positions on the war.
