Latest news with #Real-WorldTestingProgram
The Advertiser
an hour ago
- Automotive
- The Advertiser
Electric cars pull up short in road test of range claim
Some of Australia's best-selling electric vehicles fail to meet their advertised range and consume significantly more power than manufacturers promise, on-road tests reveal. One popular SUV performed particularly poorly, stopping short of its advertised range by more than 100km. The Australian Automobile Association released the results on Thursday after testing five electric vehicles as part of its $14 million Real-World Testing Program. The findings come one week after the program revealed 25 out of 30 petrol and hybrid vehicles tested had consumed more fuel than their lab results showed and more than three in every four vehicles examined had failed to meet expectations. The motoring body road-tested five electric vehicles in its first trial of the technology, using a 93km circuit around Geelong in Victoria in damp and dry conditions, and measuring the vehicles' energy consumption. BYD's Atto 3 SUV produced the worst result of the models tested, falling short of its promised range by 111km or 23 per cent, and using 21 per cent more power than advertised. Tesla's entry-level electric car, the Model 3, also failed to meet its promised range by 14 per cent, or 72km, and used six per cent more electricity than lab results showed. The Tesla Model Y and Kia EV6 SUVs also failed to meet their range by eight per cent, or just over 40km, while the Smart #3 electric car came the closest to its lab test results, falling within five per cent or 23km of the advertised range. The results could help families and fleet managers make choices about their next vehicle purchases, association managing director Michael Bradley said, as research showed range anxiety remained a significant concern for buyers. "As more EVs enter our market, our testing will help consumers understand which new market entrants measure up on battery range," he said. An electric car's range could be affected by a number of factors, Australian Electric Vehicle Association national president Chris Jones said. These include high or low temperatures, headwinds, steep terrain, and the use of air conditioning and heating features. Car makers should seek to "under-promise and over-deliver" when it comes to vehicle range, he said, to allow buyers to make informed choices about the models that will suit their needs. "It is frustrating that manufacturers are inflating the values when they really ought to be a bit more conservative," Mr Jones said. "I would have thought a 10 per cent difference was reasonable but 20 per cent is pretty bad." Electric vehicle range is typically tested in Australia using the older New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) laboratory test, but this will be replaced by the more accurate Worldwide Harmonised Light Vehicle Test Procedure (WLTP) from December. The Australian Automobile Association's vehicle-testing program, funded by the federal government, has examined 114 fuel-powered vehicles since it began in 2023 and found 88 models, or 77 per cent, failed to meet their advertised energy consumption. Some of Australia's best-selling electric vehicles fail to meet their advertised range and consume significantly more power than manufacturers promise, on-road tests reveal. One popular SUV performed particularly poorly, stopping short of its advertised range by more than 100km. The Australian Automobile Association released the results on Thursday after testing five electric vehicles as part of its $14 million Real-World Testing Program. The findings come one week after the program revealed 25 out of 30 petrol and hybrid vehicles tested had consumed more fuel than their lab results showed and more than three in every four vehicles examined had failed to meet expectations. The motoring body road-tested five electric vehicles in its first trial of the technology, using a 93km circuit around Geelong in Victoria in damp and dry conditions, and measuring the vehicles' energy consumption. BYD's Atto 3 SUV produced the worst result of the models tested, falling short of its promised range by 111km or 23 per cent, and using 21 per cent more power than advertised. Tesla's entry-level electric car, the Model 3, also failed to meet its promised range by 14 per cent, or 72km, and used six per cent more electricity than lab results showed. The Tesla Model Y and Kia EV6 SUVs also failed to meet their range by eight per cent, or just over 40km, while the Smart #3 electric car came the closest to its lab test results, falling within five per cent or 23km of the advertised range. The results could help families and fleet managers make choices about their next vehicle purchases, association managing director Michael Bradley said, as research showed range anxiety remained a significant concern for buyers. "As more EVs enter our market, our testing will help consumers understand which new market entrants measure up on battery range," he said. An electric car's range could be affected by a number of factors, Australian Electric Vehicle Association national president Chris Jones said. These include high or low temperatures, headwinds, steep terrain, and the use of air conditioning and heating features. Car makers should seek to "under-promise and over-deliver" when it comes to vehicle range, he said, to allow buyers to make informed choices about the models that will suit their needs. "It is frustrating that manufacturers are inflating the values when they really ought to be a bit more conservative," Mr Jones said. "I would have thought a 10 per cent difference was reasonable but 20 per cent is pretty bad." Electric vehicle range is typically tested in Australia using the older New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) laboratory test, but this will be replaced by the more accurate Worldwide Harmonised Light Vehicle Test Procedure (WLTP) from December. The Australian Automobile Association's vehicle-testing program, funded by the federal government, has examined 114 fuel-powered vehicles since it began in 2023 and found 88 models, or 77 per cent, failed to meet their advertised energy consumption. Some of Australia's best-selling electric vehicles fail to meet their advertised range and consume significantly more power than manufacturers promise, on-road tests reveal. One popular SUV performed particularly poorly, stopping short of its advertised range by more than 100km. The Australian Automobile Association released the results on Thursday after testing five electric vehicles as part of its $14 million Real-World Testing Program. The findings come one week after the program revealed 25 out of 30 petrol and hybrid vehicles tested had consumed more fuel than their lab results showed and more than three in every four vehicles examined had failed to meet expectations. The motoring body road-tested five electric vehicles in its first trial of the technology, using a 93km circuit around Geelong in Victoria in damp and dry conditions, and measuring the vehicles' energy consumption. BYD's Atto 3 SUV produced the worst result of the models tested, falling short of its promised range by 111km or 23 per cent, and using 21 per cent more power than advertised. Tesla's entry-level electric car, the Model 3, also failed to meet its promised range by 14 per cent, or 72km, and used six per cent more electricity than lab results showed. The Tesla Model Y and Kia EV6 SUVs also failed to meet their range by eight per cent, or just over 40km, while the Smart #3 electric car came the closest to its lab test results, falling within five per cent or 23km of the advertised range. The results could help families and fleet managers make choices about their next vehicle purchases, association managing director Michael Bradley said, as research showed range anxiety remained a significant concern for buyers. "As more EVs enter our market, our testing will help consumers understand which new market entrants measure up on battery range," he said. An electric car's range could be affected by a number of factors, Australian Electric Vehicle Association national president Chris Jones said. These include high or low temperatures, headwinds, steep terrain, and the use of air conditioning and heating features. Car makers should seek to "under-promise and over-deliver" when it comes to vehicle range, he said, to allow buyers to make informed choices about the models that will suit their needs. "It is frustrating that manufacturers are inflating the values when they really ought to be a bit more conservative," Mr Jones said. "I would have thought a 10 per cent difference was reasonable but 20 per cent is pretty bad." Electric vehicle range is typically tested in Australia using the older New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) laboratory test, but this will be replaced by the more accurate Worldwide Harmonised Light Vehicle Test Procedure (WLTP) from December. The Australian Automobile Association's vehicle-testing program, funded by the federal government, has examined 114 fuel-powered vehicles since it began in 2023 and found 88 models, or 77 per cent, failed to meet their advertised energy consumption. Some of Australia's best-selling electric vehicles fail to meet their advertised range and consume significantly more power than manufacturers promise, on-road tests reveal. One popular SUV performed particularly poorly, stopping short of its advertised range by more than 100km. The Australian Automobile Association released the results on Thursday after testing five electric vehicles as part of its $14 million Real-World Testing Program. The findings come one week after the program revealed 25 out of 30 petrol and hybrid vehicles tested had consumed more fuel than their lab results showed and more than three in every four vehicles examined had failed to meet expectations. The motoring body road-tested five electric vehicles in its first trial of the technology, using a 93km circuit around Geelong in Victoria in damp and dry conditions, and measuring the vehicles' energy consumption. BYD's Atto 3 SUV produced the worst result of the models tested, falling short of its promised range by 111km or 23 per cent, and using 21 per cent more power than advertised. Tesla's entry-level electric car, the Model 3, also failed to meet its promised range by 14 per cent, or 72km, and used six per cent more electricity than lab results showed. The Tesla Model Y and Kia EV6 SUVs also failed to meet their range by eight per cent, or just over 40km, while the Smart #3 electric car came the closest to its lab test results, falling within five per cent or 23km of the advertised range. The results could help families and fleet managers make choices about their next vehicle purchases, association managing director Michael Bradley said, as research showed range anxiety remained a significant concern for buyers. "As more EVs enter our market, our testing will help consumers understand which new market entrants measure up on battery range," he said. An electric car's range could be affected by a number of factors, Australian Electric Vehicle Association national president Chris Jones said. These include high or low temperatures, headwinds, steep terrain, and the use of air conditioning and heating features. Car makers should seek to "under-promise and over-deliver" when it comes to vehicle range, he said, to allow buyers to make informed choices about the models that will suit their needs. "It is frustrating that manufacturers are inflating the values when they really ought to be a bit more conservative," Mr Jones said. "I would have thought a 10 per cent difference was reasonable but 20 per cent is pretty bad." Electric vehicle range is typically tested in Australia using the older New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) laboratory test, but this will be replaced by the more accurate Worldwide Harmonised Light Vehicle Test Procedure (WLTP) from December. The Australian Automobile Association's vehicle-testing program, funded by the federal government, has examined 114 fuel-powered vehicles since it began in 2023 and found 88 models, or 77 per cent, failed to meet their advertised energy consumption.
Perth Now
3 hours ago
- Automotive
- Perth Now
Electric cars pull up short in road test of range claim
Some of Australia's best-selling electric vehicles fail to meet their advertised range and consume significantly more power than manufacturers promise, on-road tests reveal. One popular SUV performed particularly poorly, stopping short of its advertised range by more than 100km. The Australian Automobile Association released the results on Thursday after testing five electric vehicles as part of its $14 million Real-World Testing Program. The findings come one week after the program revealed 25 out of 30 petrol and hybrid vehicles tested had consumed more fuel than their lab results showed and more than three in every four vehicles examined had failed to meet expectations. The motoring body road-tested five electric vehicles in its first trial of the technology, using a 93km circuit around Geelong in Victoria in damp and dry conditions, and measuring the vehicles' energy consumption. BYD's Atto 3 SUV produced the worst result of the models tested, falling short of its promised range by 111km or 23 per cent, and using 21 per cent more power than advertised. Tesla's entry-level electric car, the Model 3, also failed to meet its promised range by 14 per cent, or 72km, and used six per cent more electricity than lab results showed. The Tesla Model Y and Kia EV6 SUVs also failed to meet their range by eight per cent, or just over 40km, while the Smart #3 electric car came the closest to its lab test results, falling within five per cent or 23km of the advertised range. The results could help families and fleet managers make choices about their next vehicle purchases, association managing director Michael Bradley said, as research showed range anxiety remained a significant concern for buyers. "As more EVs enter our market, our testing will help consumers understand which new market entrants measure up on battery range," he said. An electric car's range could be affected by a number of factors, Australian Electric Vehicle Association national president Chris Jones said. These include high or low temperatures, headwinds, steep terrain, and the use of air conditioning and heating features. Car makers should seek to "under-promise and over-deliver" when it comes to vehicle range, he said, to allow buyers to make informed choices about the models that will suit their needs. "It is frustrating that manufacturers are inflating the values when they really ought to be a bit more conservative," Mr Jones said. "I would have thought a 10 per cent difference was reasonable but 20 per cent is pretty bad." Electric vehicle range is typically tested in Australia using the older New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) laboratory test, but this will be replaced by the more accurate Worldwide Harmonised Light Vehicle Test Procedure (WLTP) from December. The Australian Automobile Association's vehicle-testing program, funded by the federal government, has examined 114 fuel-powered vehicles since it began in 2023 and found 88 models, or 77 per cent, failed to meet their advertised energy consumption.
Courier-Mail
3 days ago
- Automotive
- Courier-Mail
Revealed: The car type that lies most about fuel consumption
Don't miss out on the headlines from On the Road. Followed categories will be added to My News. New data has exposed a startling truth about fuel consumption claims among popular vehicles in Australia. The Australian Automobile Association (AAA) has released results from its Real-World Testing Program, a $14 million government-funded scheme that examines models for their fuel consumption and emissions standards. New vehicle testing by the nation's peak motoring body has shown consumers cannot rely on the fuel consumption and emissions information provided at the point of sale. Many cars use more fuel than manufacturers claim. MORE: The hybrid delivering more for less Of the latest 30 cars tested, 25 consumed more fuel than advertised. Among these vehicles, 11 cars were found to consume 10 per cent or more fuel than advertised. Interestingly, hybrids exhibited the most significant discrepancy in fuel efficiency, consuming more than laboratory results. The Hyundai Kona Hybrid showed the highest discrepancy, consuming 33 per cent more fuel on the road than its advertised laboratory figure. Hyundai Kona Hybrid. Following closely was the Kia Stonic, which recorded a fuel consumption that was 26 per cent higher than advertised, and the Hyundai i30 Hybrid, which showed a result that was 17 per cent more fuel-efficient than its lab results, indicating a discrepancy between real-world consumption and lab results. AAA Managing Director Michael Bradley says the latest findings have revealed a concerning trend that indicates a widespread issue in the industry. 'It's becoming clear that carmakers continue to optimise their vehicles' performance for lab testing, meaning new cars are too often overstating their improvements in fuel use and environmental performance,' Michael said. 'Some vehicles perform as advertised, but most do not, and our Program is seeking to reward carmakers that deliver genuine financial and environmental savings.' New data has revealed some cars in Australia consume more fuel than advertised. Picture: NCA NewsWire / Daniel Pockett MORE: Japanese fav returns to Aus as a hybrid The Australian Automobile Association says it has now tested 114 cars, vans, and utes since August 2023 and has found that more than 77 per cent use more fuel than advertised. In addition to fuel consumption, the latest Real-World Testing results also discovered that six out of the 30 vehicles tested emitted more noxious emissions than allowed under the Australian standard. Out of the 30 cars tested, 25 consumed more fuel than advertised. Picture: Nigel Hallett MORE: The ugly truth about this new ute These vehicles included the Ford Ranger, the Toyota Hi-Ace and the Toyota Fortuner. The AAA Program plans to release its first electric vehicle results next month, which will test the distance vehicles can travel on a single charge in real-world driving conditions. 'Range anxiety continues to be a significant barrier to EV uptake, and we hope these independent results will give Australian car-buyers far greater confidence about the real-world range of new EVs on the market,' Mr Bradley said. Originally published as Revealed: Popular cars are using more fuel than advertised
