Latest news with #Rule12
India Gazette
22-05-2025
- Business
- India Gazette
Celebi vs UoI: Govt defends decision to revoke security clearance; cites potential threats to civil aviation security
New Delhi [India], May 22 (ANI): The Delhi High Court on Thursday heard in detail the Celebi Airport Services' plea against the revocation of its security clearance by Bureau of Civil Aviation Security. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, argued that the government's plenary superintendence powers apply to national and airport security. He called the case a 'sui generis' situation, warranting careful judicial review due to potential threats across multiple airports. Mehta emphasised that measures preventing unlawful interference are crucial under aviation security laws, helping prevent incidents like explosions at airports or onboard aircraft. Discussing ground handling, he outlined the petitioner's role in operations and cargo, granting direct aircraft access. Most domestic flights use in-house staff, while international flights rely on contractors, making access to sensitive flight and VIP data critical. Mehta asserted that in some situations, hearings or explanations may not be feasible, justifying plenary power. He also cited rulings where freedom of speech and the right to know can be restricted when national security takes precedence. On Wednesday, Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, representing Celebi, stated that the company had extensive operations in India, employing over 10,000 personnel across multiple airports over the last 17 years. Rohatgi argued that Celebi's security clearance, originally granted in 2022 under Rule 15 for a five-year term, was abruptly revoked without prior notice or a hearing, violating the principle of procedural fairness. He argued that the lack of transparency surrounding the reasons for this decision, suggesting that the Turkish shareholding might have influenced the government's stance. He asserted that Celebi's workforce consists of Indian nationals and that the firm is not politically affiliated with the Turkish government. Rohatagi submitted during arguments that, 'You have violated every aspect of Rule 12, affecting my business and contracts, which are now facing cancellation. The Ministry of Home Affairs has removed us, leaving us with no recourse. The decision only targets the company, while the employees remain unchanged. I firmly submit that Rule 12 has not been properly applied.' The bench of Justice Sachin Datta will hear the matter on Friday. On Monday, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, defended the revocation, citing national security concerns. He highlighted intelligence inputs indicating potential risks associated with Celebi's operations, particularly in the handling of both passenger and cargo aircraft. Mehta justified withholding specific details, arguing that disclosing confidential security information could be detrimental to national interests. Recently, Union Civil Aviation Minister Ram Mohan Naidu assured measures to protect affected employees and maintain stability in aviation operations. The Ministry reaffirmed that the security clearance was revoked to safeguard national security while ensuring uninterrupted airport operations. (ANI)
India Gazette
21-05-2025
- Business
- India Gazette
Delhi HC hears Celebi's claims of unfair security clearance revocation, hearing to continue on Thursday
New Delhi [India], May 21 (ANI): The Delhi High Court on Wednesday heard in detail, the challenge filed by Turkish firm Celebi Airport Services against the revocation of its security clearance by the Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (BCAS). Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, representing Celebi, stated that the company's extensive operations in India, employing over 10,000 personnel across multiple airports over the last 17 years. Rohatgi argued that Celebi's security clearance, originally granted in 2022 under Rule 15 for a five-year term, was abruptly revoked without prior notice or a hearing, violating the principle of procedural fairness. He argued that the lack of transparency surrounding the reasons for this decision, suggesting that the Turkish shareholding might have influenced the government's stance. He asserted that Celebi's workforce consists of Indian nationals and that the firm is not politically affiliated with the Turkish government. Rohatagi during arguments stated that, 'You have violated every aspect of Rule 12, affecting my business and contracts, which are now facing cancellation. The Ministry of Home Affairs has removed us, leaving us with no recourse. The decision only targets the company, while the employees remain unchanged. I firmly submit that Rule 12 has not been properly applied.' The bench of Justice Sachin Datta to continue to hear the matter on Thursday. On Monday, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, defended the revocation, citing national security concerns. He highlighted intelligence inputs indicating potential risks associated with Celebi's operations, particularly in the handling of both passenger and cargo aircraft. Mehta justified withholding specific details, arguing that disclosing confidential security information could be detrimental to national interests. Recently, Union Civil Aviation Minister Ram Mohan Naidu assured measures to protect affected employees and maintain stability in aviation operations. The Ministry reaffirmed that the security clearance was revoked to safeguard national security while ensuring uninterrupted airport operations. (ANI)
Time of India
21-05-2025
- Business
- Time of India
Delhi HC hears Celebi's claims of unfair security clearance revocation, hearing to continue on Thursday
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday heard in detail, the challenge filed by Turkish firm Celebi Airport Services against the revocation of its security clearance by the Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (BCAS). Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, representing Celebi, stated that the company's extensive operations in India, employing over 10,000 personnel across multiple airports over the last 17 years. Rohatgi argued that Celebi's security clearance, originally granted in 2022 under Rule 15 for a five-year term, was abruptly revoked without prior notice or a hearing, violating the principle of procedural fairness. Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo He argued that the lack of transparency surrounding the reasons for this decision, suggesting that the Turkish shareholding might have influenced the government's stance. He asserted that Celebi's workforce consists of Indian nationals and that the firm is not politically affiliated with the Turkish government. Rohatagi during arguments stated that, "You have violated every aspect of Rule 12, affecting my business and contracts, which are now facing cancellation. The Ministry of Home Affairs has removed us, leaving us with no recourse. The decision only targets the company, while the employees remain unchanged. I firmly submit that Rule 12 has not been properly applied." Live Events The bench of Justice Sachin Datta to continue to hear the matter on Thursday. On Monday, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, defended the revocation, citing national security concerns. He highlighted intelligence inputs indicating potential risks associated with Celebi's operations, particularly in the handling of both passenger and cargo aircraft. Mehta justified withholding specific details, arguing that disclosing confidential security information could be detrimental to national interests. Recently, Union Civil Aviation Minister Ram Mohan Naidu assured measures to protect affected employees and maintain stability in aviation operations. The Ministry reaffirmed that the security clearance was revoked to safeguard national security while ensuring uninterrupted airport operations.
India Today
21-05-2025
- Business
- India Today
We are Indian, employees are Indians, Turkey-linked Celebi Aviation tells court
"We are an Indian company. Our employees are Indian," argued Celebi Aviation Services India Pvt Ltd in the Delhi High Court on Wednesday as the firm challenged the Bureau of Civil Aviation Security's (BCAS) decision to revoke its security clearance earlier this month in the "interest of national security".Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for Celebi Aviation, told Delhi High Court that the company has been operating in India for 17 years without a single blemish and that the move to revoke security clearance was arbitrary and in violation of the principles of natural is a matter of grave importance. My contracts with airport operators are being cancelled," he submitted. Justice Sachin Datta-headed High Court bench is hearing Celebi's petition against the May 15 order, which came shortly after Turkey publicly backed Pakistan and criticised India's strikes on terror camps, raising questions about whether the regulatory action was politically motivated. Rohatgi, however, confined his arguments to legal grounds and the procedural lapses in the government's the evolution of aviation security regulations, Rohatgi argued that the legal framework has changed significantly since earlier precedents. "Justice Kurian Joseph's judgment dealt with the Aircraft Rules of 1937, which are no longer applicable. There were new rules in 2011, and the current position is governed by Rule 12," he insisted that Rule 12 mandates a hearing before any drastic decision such as revocation of security clearance is such decisions are made, the principles of natural justice kick in. I wasn't even given notice, even though the rule says I have to be given one. I am not insisting on a copy of the reasons. I'm saying I was handicapped because the material wasn't supplied to me," the senior advocate pointed one point, the bench asked whether the rules allowed courts to direct the authorities to share documents. Rohatgi pointed to Rule 12 again, stating that an accused party must at least have an idea of what they are being accused of. "If I had known about the accusation, some solution could have been found. If the problem is that some of the people are from Turkey, I'll replace those people. What more can I say?" Rohatgi counsel also emphasised that Celebi does not operate shops or duty-free zones, but handles passengers, luggage, and check-ins at airports. "What they've done now is shifted my 10,000 employees to work under other ground handlers. The employees are still there, it's the company that's being thrown out," he DEFENDS MOVE Meanwhile, the central government defended its move, claiming that the decision was taken in the interest of national security in light of certain inputs that continuing the services of Celebi Aviation and other such companies would be hazardous in the current am saying that it is a national security issue and the order (revoking clearance) reflects the same. Enemy can make 10 attempts and has to succeed in one. While security agencies have to succeed on all 10 occasions. National security based upon civil aviation security has to be placed on the highest pedestal," Centre's Solicitor General Tushar Mehta INDIA BUSINESSFounded in Istanbul, Celebi operates across nine major Indian airports — including Mumbai, Delhi, and Bangalore — handling around 58,000 flights and 5.4 lakh tonnes of cargo Mumbai's Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport alone, it controls nearly 70 per cent of the ground-handling responsibilities include ground handling, cargo transport, and airside services — all tightly regulated due to the high-security nature of airport operations.
Time of India
19-05-2025
- Sport
- Time of India
The ‘tush push' may not survive much longer—NFL owners prepare for a game-changing vote
NFL owners to decide fate of the Eagles' controversial 'tush push' after intense league-wide debate (Getty Images) The NFL's most debated short-yardage tactic—the infamous " tush push "—is back under the spotlight as team owners prepare to revisit a potential ban this week in Eagan, Minnesota. What began as a strategic weapon for the Philadelphia Eagles has grown into one of the league's most polarizing topics. The play, which features quarterback Jalen Hurts receiving a push from teammates after the snap to power forward for a first down or touchdown, has sparked fierce debate across NFL circles. Eagles' 'tush push' could be history soon as NFL owners ready a defining vote Originally proposed by the Green Bay Packers ahead of the league's annual meetings, the rule change aimed to permanently outlaw the play under Rule 12, Section 1, citing concerns over "player safety and pace of play." Yet despite being discussed heavily in March, the proposal never reached a vote. It was tabled for additional research and consideration, with league insiders confirming that a vote was finally expected during the May meetings. — AdamSchefter (@AdamSchefter) According to ESPN's Adam Schefter, NFL owners are set to cast their votes on Tuesday and Wednesday. The proposal needs 24 of 32 votes to pass, and insiders believe the support might finally be there. Jonathan Jones of CBS Sports reported that 16 teams had already voted in favor of the ban during earlier deliberations, although the league chose to delay the official decision at that time. Supporters of the ban argue that the play offers an unfair advantage and disrupts the rhythm of the game. Yet, those in favor of keeping the tush push argue that it's a legal and effective tactic that simply capitalizes on smart coaching and physical strength. Despite all the fuss, ESPN notes there's been no conclusive injury data linked directly to the play—only theoretical discussions about player safety. The controversy erupted in full force after the Eagles used the play to perfection during their Super Bowl showdown against the Kansas City Chiefs. Jalen Hurts, aided by his staggering 600-pound squat strength and seamless coordination with teammates, turned the quarterback sneak into an almost automatic first-down machine. The effectiveness is hard to ignore—Hurts finished tied for fifth in rushing touchdowns in 2024 with 14, pushing his career total to 55 in just four seasons as a starter. During Day 1 of the offseason meetings, ESPN's Kalyn Kahler reported 'heated' exchanges in the football operations session, highlighting just how divisive this rule change has become. Coaches, owners, and executives remain split, with the Eagles bearing the brunt of the league's scrutiny. Whether seen as a stroke of innovation or a blemish on the sport's integrity, the tush push has undeniably forced the NFL to rethink how physicality and fairness coexist on the field. As league officials prepare for what could be a decisive vote, one thing is clear—whatever happens next will have long-lasting implications for how football is played in the trenches. Also Read: Browns' crowded quarterback room could force a surprising roster decision soon Get IPL 2025 match schedules , squads , points table , and live scores for CSK , MI , RCB , KKR , SRH , LSG , DC , GT , PBKS , and RR . Check the latest IPL Orange Cap and Purple Cap standings.
