Latest news with #Seeking
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- General
- Yahoo
Would you prioritize an emotional connection over physical chemistry? 1 in 3 of us are doing that right now.
Turns out a good personality is the most important factor for a lot of us! Is emotional compatibility more important to you than chemistry in the bedroom? For 1 in 3 of us, it already is. This data is based on a study from luxury dating site Seeking, which found that 1 in 3 people have deprioritized sexual satisfaction for a good personality; just about 1 in 5 are actually doing it right now. In fact, only 31% of all 2,000 respondents claim they've never made this kind of compromise. So why is it that so many people—especially younger generations—are willing to sacrifice sexual satisfaction for emotional compatibility? "In the long run, sex is still just a physical connection," said Emma Hathorn, dating and relationship expert at Seeking. It is an important connection to many, but there will be periods in life when it falls off. "The core of a relationship is about admiration, connection, and essentially doing life together," said Hathorn, which means through the ups and downs of a relationship, you are still committed to the person for who they are, and this includes the aspects of the relationship between you as not only as a couple but as friends and humans. "Younger generations understand this; they focus on the overall depth of their relationships, of which sex is an aspect, but not the whole thing," said Hathorn. There are, of course, potential long-term risks and rewards of prioritizing personality over physical chemistry in relationships. "In reality, physical chemistry can fade with time. People change, they age, and the physical connection might wane. Prioritizing personality means that you care for the individual, and that your admiration for them is greater than their physical state, and yours," said Hathorn. "Dating someone who you consider a close friend as well as a lover means that as you both age, as situations change, and the natural cadence of life throws you out of the 'honeymoon period', the admiration and love you have for your partner as an individual will remain," said Hathorn. So what would be Hathorn's advice to daters who feel like they're constantly 'settling' for one trait at the expense of another? This question is self-fulfilling. "If you feel like you're settling, then you are. Trying to justify that with one redeeming trait doesn't change the fact that it's still settling. There are too many people in the world to accept anything less than what you know you deserve.," said Hathorn. Solve the daily Crossword
Time of India
17-07-2025
- Politics
- Time of India
From drain the swamp to 'Epstein Hoax': How Epstein files broke MAGA - and turned some in the base against Donald Trump
Donald Trump has always styled himself as a magician of American politics—a man who could escape any scandal, dodge every consequence, and emerge not only unscathed but stronger. Impeachments? He shrugged them off. Criminal indictments? He wore them as badges of honour. Assassination attempts? They only reinforced his legend. But now, with the renewed firestorm over the Jeffrey Epstein files, Trump looks less like Houdini and more like a cornered conjurer. The chains are tighter, the audience is booing, and the trapdoor under the stage is creaking. The Epstein scandal, long believed to be politically neutralised, has returned—resurrected not by the liberal media or Democrats, but by Trump's own people. And unlike in previous crises, the president is finding it hard to control the narrative, let alone escape it. His responses have become erratic, his tone defensive, and for the first time since 2015, cracks are appearing in the MAGA base. On Truth Social, Trump lashed out at his own supporters, calling those demanding transparency over Epstein's files 'weaklings' who had 'bought into this b*******, hook, line, and sinker.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Many Are Watching Tariffs - Few Are Watching What Nvidia Just Launched Seeking Alpha Read More Undo The insult stunned many longtime allies. Even the usually sycophantic Trump War Room refused to repost the outburst, a silent sign of discomfort within the inner sanctum. What was once a unified political religion now resembles a schismatic cult. The New Heretics of MAGA The Epstein controversy has exposed a fault line running through the MAGA movement. On one side are the populists who believe in the original Trump promise: drain the swamp, expose the elites, punish the predators. For them, Epstein is not just a disgraced financier or a dead man in a cell—he is the symbol of a system that shields the powerful from accountability. Leading this insurgent camp are firebrand congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene and libertarian-leaning Thomas Massie. Together, they have introduced a discharge petition that would force a House vote to release the Epstein files. Greene, never one to mince words, declared, 'I will never protect pedophiles or the elites and their circles.' Massie has echoed the demand for transparency, noting that government secrecy in such matters breeds only suspicion and rage. Former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn has gone even further, hinting at foreign intelligence entanglements and accusing the political establishment of facilitating crimes against children. Online influencers like Mike Cernovich and Jack Posobiec, once loyal foot soldiers in Trump's culture war, now suggest that Trump is betraying the very anti-elite values that brought him to power. Julie Kelly, a MAGA-aligned journalist best known for her reporting on the January 6 trials, has expressed deep frustration at the vague and evasive statements coming from the Justice Department under Attorney General Pam Bondi. Her implication is clear: something is being hidden, and the people deserve to know. Tucker Carlson, once the nightly voice of MAGA America, has returned to the Epstein issue with renewed fervour. On his independent show, Carlson revived the long-simmering theory that Epstein was working for foreign intelligence, accused the Justice Department of covering up evidence, and hinted that senior officials—including those in the current administration—are shielding names to protect themselves. Then there is Elon Musk. The tech billionaire, who once flirted with Trump-world alliances, has become one of the loudest critics. In a now-deleted post, Musk wrote: 'Amazing how Ghislaine's in prison for a hoax. Not a single Epstein client has been prosecuted.' He went further, openly questioning why Trump refuses to release the files and suggesting that his name may appear in them. The implication was explosive: that the man who built his brand on exposing the system may himself be part of it. The Gatekeepers of Denial Against this rising tide, Trump's defenders have circled the wagons. The official line from the administration is clear: there is nothing more to see in the Epstein files. Pam Bondi, the attorney general and longtime Trump loyalist, has insisted that the unreleased files are either non-incriminating or contain sensitive material such as child sexual abuse content that cannot be made public. In her telling, there is no smoking gun—only smouldering innuendo. Kash Patel, a key figure in Trump's inner legal circle, has echoed this view, calling the renewed Epstein obsession 'overblown media manipulation.' Steve Bannon, once the high priest of MAGA populism, has been conspicuously silent, redirecting his energies toward anti-China messaging and avoiding the Epstein minefield entirely. Lara Trump, co-chair of the Republican National Committee, dismissed the scandal as a 'distraction from Biden's border crisis.' Charlie Kirk, president of Turning Point USA and a reliable barometer of MAGA talking points, has shifted from occasional Epstein criticism to defending the administration's decision to keep the files sealed. Their argument is consistent: the Epstein narrative is a trap laid by Democrats, amplified by hostile media, and swallowed by naïve populists. Trump, they argue, has nothing to hide—his critics are merely indulging conspiracy theories that serve Joe Biden's reelection bid. The Silent and the Calculating In the wings of this unfolding drama are the political figures who have opted for strategic ambiguity. Vice President JD Vance, long seen as the intellectual heir to Trump's populist legacy, has remained silent, even as the scandal grows louder. MAGA-friendly podcaster Theo Von took note, asking Vance pointedly on X why he has not addressed the issue. Vance's office declined to comment, but the silence is beginning to speak for itself. Tucker Carlson's return to the fray suggests he is no longer interested in preserving the peace within Trumpworld. Elon Musk, though more volatile, continues to signal that the Epstein issue is far from resolved. Whether they remain merely critical voices or evolve into catalysts for a broader rebellion remains to be seen. The Political Stakes and a Bipartisan Alliance If Trump thought this was just another media storm to ride out, he may want to rethink. Ro Khanna, the Democratic congressman from California and a declared contender for the 2028 presidency, has seized the opportunity to outflank Trump from the populist left. In a rare bipartisan move, he partnered with Massie to introduce legislation that would force the declassification of all Epstein-related government documents. Khanna told Politico that the bill already has the support of over 200 Democrats and at least seven Republicans. 'People voted for Trump in part because they were so disgusted with a system that protects the wealthy and powerful,' he said. 'Epstein is the symbol of that system.' The bill ensures that the Epstein controversy will remain in the headlines through August and beyond, especially if the House is forced to take a vote. Trump, meanwhile, has shown no signs of conceding to pressure. When asked by CNN's DJ Judd whether he would consider appointing a special counsel to investigate the matter, he replied simply: 'I have nothing to do with it.' Yet sources within the White House suggest the idea of a special counsel is being floated—and just as quickly dismissed. Not only is it legally complicated, but it would also imply a conflict of interest that the Justice Department vehemently denies exists. Ed Martin, a senior DOJ official, has been rumoured as a potential candidate, but a spokesperson declined to comment. Then came the firing of Assistant US Attorney Maurene Comey, who had prosecuted both Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Her dismissal—reportedly issued without explanation and not initiated by her immediate supervisor—has only deepened the public's suspicion that something is being concealed. That she is the daughter of former FBI Director James Comey only adds to the conspiracy-theatre feel of it all. Finale: The Crisis of Faith Donald Trump's rise was powered by a sense of betrayal—by elites, institutions, and the hidden hand of the powerful. Now, he is on the other side of that mirror. For the first time, a large segment of his base sees him not as a saviour but as part of the cover-up. This is no longer about files or client lists. It is about whether the man who promised to burn down the castle has become just another occupant of the throne. The magician's greatest trick was always getting the audience to believe he was one of them. But now the chains are visible, the trapdoor is sealed, and the crowd is not applauding. In the Epstein files, Trump is facing the one thing he has never encountered: a scandal he cannot control because it was never his to begin with. And this time, it's not the media or the Democrats he has to worry about. It's his own believers.
Time of India
17-07-2025
- General
- Time of India
Tsunami alert in Alaska cancelled after 7.3-magnitude earthquake: What travellers need to know
A significant 7.3-magnitude earthquake struck the Alaska Peninsula, prompting an immediate tsunami warning for southern coastal areas. Residents in Kodiak, Unalaska, and Sand Point were urged to evacuate, but the warning was later cancelled as tsunami waves remained minimal. On the afternoon of July 16, the Alaska Peninsula was hit by a strong 7.3-magnitude earthquake, which immediately triggered a tsunami warning across parts of southern Alaska. However, the tsunami warning is now cancelled completely by the U.S. National Tsunami Warning Center (NTWC). What we know so far? According to local news, the U.S. state was hit around by a powerful quake at 12:37 PM (local time). The epicenter was in the ocean south of Sand Point. The quake sent tremors across hundreds of kilometres, including regions near Anchorage. The NTWC, soon after, issued a tsunami warning for coastal areas from Kennedy Entrance to Unimak Pass. Not only this, the communities living by the sea areas including in Kodiak, Unalaska, and Sand Point were asked to evacuate low-lying areas immediately and move to higher places. Emergency sirens were also heard in the region. Alaska Earthquake Centre took to X and shared a video of the quake mentioning no one was injured: 'We got this incredible footage of today's earthquake from a resident in Sand Point, about 50 miles from the epicenter. We are grateful to those who shared their experiences -- it allows others to understand what an earthquake is like, and be better prepared. We are also grateful that we have not heard of anyone injured from this fairly large earthquake for Alaska.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Many Are Watching Tariffs - Few Are Watching What Nvidia Just Launched Seeking Alpha Read More Undo But within a couple of hours, the NTWC reduced the warning to a tsunami advisory and cancelled it. The waves were minimal, which is less than a foot high in most parts of the region. No reports of damage or injuries have been reported so far. However some residents mentioned mild aftershocks and shaky buildings. What travellers should know Alaska is set along the Pacific Ring of Fire. It is naturally prone to earthquakes given the place is one of the most seismically active regions on the planet. Earthquakes and tsunamis are not unheard of in Alaskan regions, which is why it is important for travellers to be aware of safety measure, especially in coastal zones. Those planning a trip to Alaska, here are some important tips: Understand your evacuation path : Coastal towns in Alaska often have clearly marked tsunami evacuation signs leading to higher ground. Sign up for alerts : Travellers can also sign up for alerts to receive emergency updates via apps like NOAA Weather Alerts or local government services. Follow the instructions : If a warning is issued, don't wait. Stay updated with the current situation : Monitor updates from reliable sources like the National Tsunami Warning Center or U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Though there is no more tsunami threat, the incident is a stark reminder of how quickly conditions can change in Alaska's regions. Being cautious.
Yahoo
16-07-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
One in five daters say financial stability is more important than appearance
One in five daters say financial stability is more important than physical appearance. Of the 2,000 Gen Z and Millennial Americans polled, they also put kindness (25%) and emotional maturity (25%) ahead of looks. With 34% admitting in the past, they chose a partner based on certain characteristics or traits, even if it meant an unfulfilling sex life. When it comes to deal breakers, 39% put bad hygiene top of the list, along with poor communication (36%) and the other person avoiding commitment (30%). The research was commissioned by luxury dating site Seeking, to look at radical honesty in dating for younger Americans, with 22% saying they'd spell their dealbreakers out before the first date. Co-CEO Dana Rosewall said: 'There's something radical about saying what you really want. 'It can seem difficult to do, but really, what's harder – being honest upfront, or realizing later that you were deeply connected to someone with whom you had major ideological differences? 'Being radically honest is a cornerstone of what our members are looking for and is something everyone should apply to their relationships.' While 70% of daters say good finances matter, it's less about a luxurious lifestyle and more about reducing stress and feeling secure in a relationship, each cited by 37%. The study also found 18% would find honesty 'good to hear' if they dated someone who was very candid initially about wanting a wealthy or ambitious partner. It's not always about overall financial situations though, those polled said a partner who has a generous nature (42%), budgets well (39%) and has ambition (36%) are also deemed attractive traits. However, 68% wouldn't choose to not date someone just because the person earned less than them, according to the data. Among these individuals, two-thirds openly admit to researching a potential partner online before meeting them for the first time, which demonstrates that many of today's singles want as much information on someone from the start. But there are instances where honesty isn't considered the best policy, as 62% confess to telling someone what they thought they wanted to hear on a date, even if it may not have been completely true. Co-CEO Brandon Wade added: 'From time-to-time people paint a picture of themselves which has been slightly inflated, but honesty is always the foundation of any strong relationship. 'This starts from the first date whether it's being upfront about your intentions, your lifestyle, or even your Friday night TV habits, being genuine helps build trust and connection from the very start. 'It's completely normal to want to put your best foot forward, but pretending to be someone you're not, can cause issues down the line. 'Compatibility doesn't mean agreeing on absolutely everything, but it can mean having similar values, goals and openness around what's important.' Solve the daily Crossword
New York Post
16-07-2025
- General
- New York Post
One in five daters say financial stability is more important than appearance
One in five daters say financial stability is more important than physical appearance. Of the 2,000 Gen Z and Millennial Americans polled, they also put kindness (25%) and emotional maturity (25%) ahead of looks. Advertisement With 34% admitting in the past, they chose a partner based on certain characteristics or traits, even if it meant an unfulfilling sex life. 5 Of the 2,000 Gen Z and Millennial Americans polled, they also put kindness (25%) and emotional maturity (25%) ahead of looks. PinkCoffee Studio – When it comes to deal breakers, 39% put bad hygiene top of the list, along with poor communication (36%) and the other person avoiding commitment (30%). The research was commissioned by luxury dating site Seeking, to look at radical honesty in dating for younger Americans, with 22% saying they'd spell their dealbreakers out before the first date. Advertisement Co-CEO Dana Rosewall said: 'There's something radical about saying what you really want. 5 34% admitted in the past, they chose a partner based on certain characteristics or traits, even if it meant an unfulfilling sex life. Katielee Arrowsmith / SWNS 'It can seem difficult to do, but really, what's harder – being honest upfront, or realizing later that you were deeply connected to someone with whom you had major ideological differences? 'Being radically honest is a cornerstone of what our members are looking for and is something everyone should apply to their relationships.' Advertisement While 70% of daters say good finances matter, it's less about a luxurious lifestyle and more about reducing stress and feeling secure in a relationship, each cited by 37%. 5 When it comes to deal breakers, 39% put bad hygiene top of the list, along with poor communication (36%) and the other person avoiding commitment (30%). LIGHTFIELD STUDIOS – The study also found 18% would find honesty 'good to hear' if they dated someone who was very candid initially about wanting a wealthy or ambitious partner. It's not always about overall financial situations though, those polled said a partner who has a generous nature (42%), budgets well (39%) and has ambition (36%) are also deemed attractive traits. Advertisement However, 68% wouldn't choose to not date someone just because the person earned less than them, according to the data. 5 While 70% of daters say good finances matter, it's less about a luxurious lifestyle and more about reducing stress and feeling secure in a relationship. Syda Productions – Among these individuals, two-thirds openly admit to researching a potential partner online before meeting them for the first time, which demonstrates that many of today's singles want as much information on someone from the start. But there are instances where honesty isn't considered the best policy, as 62% confess to telling someone what they thought they wanted to hear on a date, even if it may not have been completely true. Co-CEO Brandon Wade added: 'From time-to-time people paint a picture of themselves which has been slightly inflated, but honesty is always the foundation of any strong relationship. 5 However, 68% wouldn't choose to not date someone just because the person earned less than them. Innovated Captures – 'This starts from the first date whether it's being upfront about your intentions, your lifestyle, or even your Friday night TV habits, being genuine helps build trust and connection from the very start. Advertisement 'It's completely normal to want to put your best foot forward, but pretending to be someone you're not, can cause issues down the line. 'Compatibility doesn't mean agreeing on absolutely everything, but it can mean having similar values, goals and openness around what's important.'
