Latest news with #SolomonIslands
RNZ News
a day ago
- Politics
- RNZ News
Solomon Islands PM Manele visiting New Zealand this week
Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone New Zealand's Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has announced Solomon Islands Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele is visiting Aotearoa this week. Luxon said Solomon Islands is an important partner for New Zealand and he is looking forward to furthering the bilateral relationship when he meets Manele. "It will also be good to hear about Solomon Islands' plans for hosting the Pacific Islands Forum Leaders Meeting in September," Luxon said. Manele will also meet with Foreign Minister Winston Peters and Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones. One thousand one hundred Solomon Islanders have taken up Recognised Seasonal Employer (RSE) scheme spots in Aotearoa in the last year. More than 1000 Solomon Islanders call New Zealand home. Manele was sworn in as Solomons prime minister on 2 May 2024 , following the resignation of Manasseh Sogavare. Shortly after Winston Peters arrived with a delegation on the first leg of his Pacific tour . He was first elected to parliament in 2014 and was the leader of the opposition in the country's 10th Parliament. Prior to entering parliament, Manele was a long-serving public servant and diplomat. He has since faced two leadership challenges but both were withdrawn.
The Guardian
6 days ago
- Politics
- The Guardian
The ICJ's ruling means Australia and other major polluters face a new era of climate reparations
Today, Australia has found itself on the wrong side of history. The International Court of Justice has handed down a landmark ruling in the most significant climate decision ever issued by a court. As a barrister representing Solomon Islands in the case, I was in the courtroom to hear the judges reshape the global fight for climate justice. The world's top court resoundingly rejected conservative arguments made by Australia and other high-emitting countries such as the United States, China and Saudi Arabia seeking to justify continued fossil fuel extraction. Instead, the court made a slew of progressive statements – ones that will have far-reaching implications. Under international law, countries are now bound to rapidly reduce their emissions below 1.5 degrees of warming. Failure to do so could result in developed countries like Australia having to pay monetary compensation to developing countries or being required to rebuild infrastructure and restore ecosystems damaged by climate change. This means we could be entering a new era of climate reparations. This is a watershed moment in the global environmental movement. In a breakthrough for climate campaigners, the court specifically targeted the fossil fuel industry in its ruling and held that countries failing to take action to protect the environment from greenhouse gases – including from fossil fuel production, consumption, exploration licences or subsidies – may commit an 'internationally wrongful act.' With today's decision, that can now be punished under international law. So what implications does this have for Australia? Australia is looking to host COP31 next year and stands on the brink of releasing its updated 2035 emissions reduction target in coming months. As it does so, it may have to change its legislation and policies to rapidly curb the emissions of companies in its jurisdiction. First, the ruling puts pressure on the Albanese government to increase its ambitions for emissions reduction. The court made clear that countries must set goals under the Paris agreement which align with the 1.5C temperature target. Climate Action Tracker has found that for Australia to carry its fair share of the global emissions reduction burden, it should reduce its emissions by 76% by 2035 against a 2005 baseline. This aligns with the upper range of possible targets identified by the Climate Change Authority, which has suggested an emissions target between 65% and 75% by 2035. In light of the ICJ decision, a failure to set a target close to 75% is likely to come under legal or political challenge by other countries and domestic campaigners. Second, to comply with its international obligations, Australia will have to curb its production and use of fossil fuels. Despite its tough talk on climate change, the Albanese government has continued to approve coal, oil and gas projects at an alarming rate. In recent months the government has approved the extension of Woodside's controversial North West Shelf development, a massive gas project which will operate to 2070 and emit an enormous 87.9m tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent each year. If Australia secures the hosting rights to COP31 it will come under intense pressure from its neighbours in the Pacific to live up to its rhetoric and rapidly transition away from fossil fuels. Third, and most importantly, today's ruling means that Australia could pay climate reparations in the future. Developing countries may bring claims against Australia seeking damages. As a high-emitting developed country and one of the largest exporters of coal, oil and gas in the world, Australia has both the historical responsibility for climate change and the means to pay other nations for compensation and restitution. While the scale of any reparations will depend on the amount of damage suffered by the country bringing the claim, the breadth of climate change impacts mean that Australia and other countries could be faced with very high-value cases. Money is a strong motivator. The world court's decision today means that the threat of reparations can now be used to compel action from the worst, most stubborn climate offenders – Australia included. That is transformative for climate lawyers, giving us a powerful tool to pressure governments and corporations to acknowledge the realities of our warming planet. But it is a victory for everyone – a clear statement that the status quo isn't sufficient. We must act now to confront the climate crisis. And in a moment when hope feels hard to come by, that's very good news indeed. Harj Narulla is a barrister and leading global expert on climate litigation at Doughty Street Chambers and the University of Oxford. He represented Solomon Islands before the ICJ but is writing in his personal capacity
BBC News
7 days ago
- General
- BBC News
'Whether you win or lose, some fights are worth fighting': The largest ever climate case's unlikely origins
In 2019, a group of Pacific Island students took a classroom idea on climate change and turned it into a massive global operation. It all began with a bold student idea. Cynthia Houniuhi speaks fondly about her childhood growing up in one of the remoter parts of the Solomon Islands. Her earliest memories are of wading through warm seas to get to school, trapping wild birds with her older brothers, and sowing sweet potatoes and cassava. "I love planting vegetables, although I'm not really a fan of eating my vegetables," she laughs. "I can eat fruit all day." It was only later that Houniuhi realised something was amiss. She recalls a particular trip to Fanalei, the island her father is from, where she was shocked to see houses standing deep in salt water. She learned that some families had been forced to move. It was the beginning of an awareness of climate change that would shape the next years of Houniuhi's life. It would also help bring the largest ever climate case to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), sometimes known as the UN world court. The ICJ, which is based in the Netherlands, is today due to give its advisory opinion on states' legal obligations to tackle climate change under international law, and lay out the consequences of breaching them. It's the largest case the court has ever considered – but it began with the spark of an idea in a university lecture theatre. Even a decade ago, most people in Houniuhi's community had no technical terms for what was happening to them, she says, "just observations" of climate impacts on their daily lives. There is a growing body of evidence that rising seas and intensifying storms, exacerbated by climate change, are displacing coastal communities on the Solomon Islands and other low-lying Pacific island states. "The only reason I made those connections was because I kept asking," Houniuhi says. She asked lots of questions of her family and neighbours: Was it always like this? How fast have things changed? Where are all the fish? "The value that was instilled in me, the curiosity that was always there from an early age, really pushed me on to ask more," she says. Motivated by a sense of justice and unafraid to speak up, Houniuhi decided to study law at the University of the South Pacific, in Fiji. In 2019, during her third year, lecturer Justin Rose tasked Houniuhi's class with the extracurricular task of promoting climate justice. One of the practical ideas they considered was seeking an advisory opinion from the ICJ, a formal document setting out the court's view on a particular topic. Other major courts – such as the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights – have also been asked for such opinions, which are politically influential and set the framework for future legal action. Most recently, the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights has been asked for its opinion, and has just begun the process. Houniuhi was hesitant at first, thinking the idea of approaching the ICJ was far too ambitious for a small group of students from the Pacific region. But she felt a sense of responsibility as part of a community on the frontlines of climate change and knew this was a problem that had to be tackled on a global scale. "What is the use of learning all this knowledge if it's not for our people to fight the single greatest threat to their security?" she asked herself. "This was an opportunity to do something bigger than ourselves, bigger than our fears." Houniuhi was one of 27 students to form an organisation called Pacific Island Students Fighting Climate Change (PISFCC), and soon agreed to be its president. The group petitioned teachers and lecturers about the idea, and crowdfunded 80 Fijian dollars (£26/ $35) to pay for its first banner. The timing was right, recalls Rose. A previous attempt to garner an advisory opinion from the ICJ by Palau and the Marshall Islands failed due to a lack of political support. But Houniuhi and her peers rode high on the global wave of youth climate activism begun by Greta Thunberg, and Rose was sure he could count on the support of Ralph Regenvanu, then Vanuatu's minister of foreign affairs and trade. Regenvanu was already an outspoken advocate for climate justice, who had threatened to sue fossil fuel companies and states. Regenvanu was on board. With Vanuatu taking the diplomatic helm, PISFCC campaigned relentlessly over the next few years alongside a growing network of young activists across Europe, Asia, Africa and the Americas. PISFCC members, especially a few of the most dedicated, traipsed through the corridors of power with posters and pitches at climate meetings around the world. They gradually gathered pledges of support from Pacific and Caribbean nations and then further afield. Rose was supportive, encouraging PISFCC to keep true to its youth roots to remain grounded and to be able to tell an authentic story. Having followed the ups and downs of environmental politics for years, he says he was inwardly sceptical. But the group "just kept forging ahead", he says. The bet paid off. By March 2023, 132 countries had agreed to co-sponsor a resolution to go before the UN General Assembly. Later that month the body unanimously called on the ICJ to provide its opinion on two key questions: what obligations do states have to tackle climate change under international law and what are the legal consequences if they fail to do so? At the time PISFCC called it an "unprecedented step towards fighting the climate crisis". Its urgency was immediately apparent; Vanuatu was in a national state of emergency caused by two devastating tropical cyclones in 2023. This was far from the end of the road for the young activists. The court now asked for states to set out their written views on the key questions. PISFCC realised the advisory opinion would only be as good as the quality of submissions received, but they were not allowed to participate directly. Together with peers at World's Youth for Climate Justice, they undertook intensive lobbying under the slogan: "We're bringing the world's biggest problem to the world's highest court". They developed a handbook with legal experts to guide states in compiling their submissions, encouraged governments with fewer resources and less experience with the ICJ to get involved, and even managed to get into some Pacific island drafting rooms to discuss key topics affecting frontline communities. In November 2024, the ICJ finally announced it would advance to the next step – holding a public hearing where states could present their views orally to the court. The young activists mobilised again, raising awareness of what could have been an obscure legal process and encouraging people to attend in person or through virtual "watch parties". Battling visa problems and on a shoestring budget, a group of campaigners arrived in The Hague, the Netherlands, in early December to be greeted by drizzle. Before the hearing began, they held an opening ceremony that set the stage for the hearing through song and dance, bringing the warmth of the Pacific to the Netherlands. PISFCC had a slot on the first day of the hearing. The group worked together on their speech and Houniuhi was the obvious person to present it. It was a heavy burden and she says she felt nervous going into the court alongside veterans of international law and a forbidding panel of 15 senior judges from across the ICJ's jurisdiction. But thinking of her beloved nieces and nephews and seeing the excited youth team gave her courage. She had also been granted permission from Solomon Island chiefs to share their sacred knowledge, and knew that this was a special honour. "I am privileged enough to have an education that got me into this," Houniuhi recalls thinking to herself. "I have the opportunity right here." On the day, only her parents noticed that she could barely remember her own name. "The Pacific people really were my support system at that time. And they showed up in colours as well," she says, noting the array of traditional clothing that was on display in the room. Houniuhi herself wore her family's rorodara, a headdress encrusted with tiny shellsonly worn on special occasions. As her moment to speak came, Houniuhi suddenly felt the power shift. Stepping up to a podium in the middle of the room, she told the court how her people's land of Fanalei was on the verge of being completely engulfed by the rising seas. "Without our land, our bodies and memories are severed from the fundamental relationships that define who we are," she said. Over the next two weeks, just shy of 100 states gave oral statements to the court, alongside the World Health Organization, the International Union for Conservation of Nature and the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), and other groups. Most states argued that a wide range of international law applied to climate change, including treaties and customary rules on due diligence, the duty to cooperate and the prevention of transboundary harm, as well as the right to self-determination. Human rights are being harmed, they argued, including those of children and future generations. Speaking on behalf of a group of Melanesian nations – which include Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands and Vanuatu – all vulnerable to rising seas and temperatures, Regenvanu (now Vanuatu's special envoy for climate change), pointed the blame squarely at "a handful of readily identifiable states". These nations had produced the vast majority of greenhouse gas emissions but stood to lose the least from their impacts, Regenvanu said. That "handful" hit back. Australia, the US, the UK, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, China and Russia maintained that any legal responsibility was limited exclusively to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Paris Agreement agreed under it in 2015. Many denied that human rights had any bearing on the questions at stake. Houniuhi says she found it hard to hear these arguments. "Being in the room… is different from seeing them on paper." Far from being an abstract problem deep in the future, representatives of nations across the Pacific and Caribbean, Africa, South America and Asia described the physical, economic and cultural impacts that climate change is already having on their people: deaths in the choking heat, poorer crops of staple foods of huge local significance such as yam and coconut, graveyards being washed away, forced relocations and livelihoods under threat. This group of nations appealed for climate justice to the ICJ, arguing that the states that have done the most damage do not just have a moral responsibility to those that have done the least, but a legal one. Many called for financial reparations to address it. (Read more about what the world would look like if polluters paid for climate damages). The court's decision builds on the opinions of the two other international courts. The first was the International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea, which stated in 2024 that greenhouse gases are pollutants that are wrecking the marine environment. Second, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights concluded in July that there is a human right to a healthy climate that states have a duty to protect. The ICJ's opinion is not binding, but it will likely be used to back up climate lawsuits and as diplomatic fuel during international negotiations – particularly at COP30 in Brazil in November. However, the process of collecting statements and hearing state submissions has been important in and of itself. Joie Chowdhury is a senior attorney at the Center for International Environmental Law, a non-profit which supported PISFCC and helped write daily legal briefings during the December hearing. She says the process led to unprecedented collaboration and built legal capacity among states not previously used to the ICJ. "The law creates the stage to build power, to build alliances, to bring alignment, and there can be great power in that." It also gave vulnerable communities an opportunity to tell their stories and was a way of explaining the injustice of climate change to a wider audience. Houniuhi stresses that most people on the Solomon Islands, particularly in rural areas, are struggling to make ends meet. So while climate change is threatening their economic, social and cultural rights, they did not have the luxury of following a highly technical process unfolding in a court 15,000 miles (24,140km) away. But the conversations that she and others had as a result of the ICJ process have helped raise awareness of what is happening and why. "The language has changed," she says. "The campaigners were thinking about the law in a way that really shifts how it is usually practiced," says Chowdhury. "They have been talking about ways of building movements rooted in the Pacific, identity and solidarity, and justice." Despite expressing a weariness at the reality of climate politics, Rose still supports the campaign. "There's lots of people offering you hope," he tells the young activists. "What you'll get from me is that, whether you win or lose, some fights are worth fighting." More like this:• What if polluters footed the climate bill?• The world's largest environmental restoration plan• Five nature wins that have actually worked Houniuhi too remains a "stubborn optimist" about it all. She has started teaching at the same law school where she studied five years ago, and plans to step down as president of PISFCC, handing it over to another young person to lead the organisation into its next phase. But she always knew this would be a role for life. She says the group dynamics are grounded in trust and always focused on the bigger picture. It's a message that comes time and again from the young people involved, who stress how collaborative the task has been. "I'm not going to lie – there are times when someone accidentally dropped a laptop and there was a whole lot of looking for funding to buy a new one," says Houniuhi. "But most of the members have held my hand so many times. The nature of the work you're dealing with means sharing your personal stories. This made us realise we need to be the support for each other." PISFCC is tussling with its next steps, trying to work out how it can ensure the advisory opinion makes a difference in the real world while remaining a youth-driven organisation. Whatever happens, this network of passionate activism and friendship that has grown around the campaign in the Pacific Islands is likely to remain. -- Update: This article was updated on 23 July 2025 to add that the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights has also been asked for an advisory opinion on climate change, in addition to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. -- For essential climate news and hopeful developments to your inbox, sign up to the Future Earth newsletter, while The Essential List delivers a handpicked selection of features and insights twice a week. For more science, technology, environment and health stories from the BBC, follow us on Facebook, X and Instagram.
CBS News
22-07-2025
- General
- CBS News
Explorers find torpedoes, bell from U.S. destroyer that sank with 167 crew on board during WWII
Explorers on a quest to study a famed wartime shipwreck site have discovered new artifacts from one lost American destroyer. The USS DeHaven, which was sunk during an attack off the Solomon Islands in World War II, still has torpedoes and a bell that are still largely intact, according to the Ocean Exploration Trust, a nonprofit that recently surveyed and filmed the wreckage with remotely operated vehicles. The DeHaven went down in February 1943, after operating out of Guadalcanal throughout the U.S. military campaign there, according to the Destroyer History Foundation. The ship was bombed multiple times and eventually sank, with 167 crew members on board, near Iron Bottom Sound, a section of the ocean near the Solomon Islands known for its WWII-era shipwrecks. The Ocean Exploration Trust set out to learn more about the maritime history of Guadalcanal and Iron Bottom Sound — the site of five pivotal naval battles between August and December 1942. The team used a sonar device to locate wreckage from the surface of the sea before dispatching a pair of remotely operated vehicles down to the seabed. Those ROVs were able to capture high-resolution footage of what remains of the DeHaven, more than 80 years after it plunged to the ocean floor. Video of the expedition has now been published online. During their mission, explorers identified a number of relics among the wreckage of the DeHaven, including propellers, artillery and torpedo mounts, and multiple torpedo warheads, the organization said. They also spotted the ship's bell with help from viewers watching a livestream of the deep-sea initiative, which the organization called "a very unique sighting." Team leaders said the data gathered from the project can provide important frameworks for historians, as well as resource managers of heritage areas "to understand this site's history and future." The Ocean Exploration Trust partnered with NOAA Ocean Exploration, the U.S. Naval History and Heritage Command, the Solomon Islands Government and a number of archaeological centers at universities around the world to help carry out the expedition. The Ocean Exploration Trust has explored the wreckage of World War II warships in the Solomon Islands before. Its teams recently discovered a famed Japanese destroyer sunk by U.S. torpedoes as well as the severed bow of another well-known American warship called the USS New Orleans, which also sank in the Iron Bottom Sound.
CNN
22-07-2025
- Politics
- CNN
Japanese World War II warship discovered
Japanese World War II warship discovered The first known images of the Japanese World War II era warship, the Teruzuki, have been released by the Ocean Exploration Trust. The ship was discovered by scientists off the coast of the Soloman Islands. Teruzuki was sunk in December 1942 by American patrol boats while it was on a mission to resupply the Japanese Army. 01:16 - Source: CNN Vertical World News 17 videos Japanese World War II warship discovered The first known images of the Japanese World War II era warship, the Teruzuki, have been released by the Ocean Exploration Trust. The ship was discovered by scientists off the coast of the Soloman Islands. Teruzuki was sunk in December 1942 by American patrol boats while it was on a mission to resupply the Japanese Army. 01:16 - Source: CNN China cracks down on fake "Lafufu" Labubus Fake Labubu plush toys, dubbed "Lafufu," have gained popularity due to shortages of the original dolls made by China's Pop Mart. 02:05 - Source: CNN Child flees Israeli strike on Gaza refugee camp Video shows a child running away as Israeli munitions struck near a UNRWA school in Bureij Refugee Camp behind her. 00:36 - Source: CNN Jair Bolsonaro denies coup charges as police raid home Police in Brazil raided the home of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro and enforced a ruling from the country's Supreme Court that Bolsonaro wear an electronic ankle tag. Bolsonaro is being accused of plotting to overturn the results of the 2022 presidential election. 01:17 - Source: CNN Taiwan conducts 10-day military drill The Taiwanese government is preparing for a war they hope will never happen. For the first time this year, Taiwan combined two major civil defense exercises, with the drills lasting ten days. These drills have included urban combat, mass casualty simulations, emergency supply drops and cyber defense that could be enacted if an invasion was to occur. CNN's Senior International Correspondent, Will Ripley, reports. 01:44 - Source: CNN Surgeon shows humanitarian crisis in Gaza's hospitals A surgeon working in southern Gaza says babies are arriving at hospital so malnourished that 'skin and bones doesn't do it justice.' He also describes what appears to be a disturbing pattern in the gunshot wounds of children arriving from food distribution sites. CNN's Nada Bashir reports. 02:55 - Source: CNN Brazil's Lula tells Christiane Amanpour: Trump 'Was not elected to be emperor of the world' Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva tells CNN's Christiane Amanpour in an exclusive interview it was 'a surprise' to see President Donald Trump's letter posted to Truth Social, threatening Brazil with a crippling tariff of 50% starting August 1st. Lula says that he initially thought the letter was 'fake news.' Watch the full 'Amanpour' interview on CNN. 01:33 - Source: CNN Gaza's only Catholic church hit by Israeli strike Gaza's only Catholic church was struck by an Israeli tank, killing three and injuring many more, church officials said. It became internationally recognized after reports emerged that the late Pope Francis used to call the church daily. CNN's Nada Bashir reports 00:53 - Source: CNN Prince Harry recreates his mother's historic landmine walk Following in his mother's footsteps, Prince Harry visited Angola's minefields just as Princess Diana did 28 years ago. The Duke of Sussex was in Angola with The Halo Trust as part of the group's efforts to clear landmines. 00:39 - Source: CNN Massive fire destroys Tomorrowland's main stage Tomorrowland's main stage went up in flames just days ahead of the festival's opening in Boom, Belgium. 00:38 - Source: CNN How Trump's image is changing inside Russia Once hailed as a pro-Kremlin figure, President Donald Trump's image is changing inside Russia. It comes after Trump vowed further sanctions on the country if a peace agreement with Ukraine is not reached in 50 days. CNN's Chief Global Affairs Correspondent is on the ground in Moscow with the analysis. 01:41 - Source: CNN Who are the armed groups clashing in Syria? Dozens were killed in Syria this week after clashes between government loyalists and Druze militias in the southern city of Suwayda, prompting Syrian forces to intervene. That, in turn, triggered renewed Israeli airstrikes. 01:57 - Source: CNN Syrian anchor takes cover from airstrike live on TV An airstrike on the Syrian Ministry of Defense was captured live on Syria TV, forcing the anchor to take cover. Israel has been carrying out airstrikes on Syria as part of its commitment to protect the Druze, an Arab minority at the center of clashes with government loyalists. 00:30 - Source: CNN Video shows machine gun fire near Gaza aid site A video from social media shows machine gun fire spraying the ground near an aid distribution site in southern Gaza as crowds of Palestinians lie on the ground for safety. Although the source of the gunfire is not seen in the video, multiple eyewitnesses say it shows the Israeli military opening fire on Palestinians as they waited for food on Saturday. In a statement, the IDF said, 'The details of the video are under review.' 01:02 - Source: CNN Analysis: Moscow's reaction to Trump's 50-day peace deadline President Donald Trump has vowed further sanctions on Russia if a peace deal is not reached in 50 days. CNN's Chief Global Affairs Correspondent breaks down the Russian reaction and perspective on Monday's announcement from Moscow. 01:13 - Source: CNN Trump attends FIFA Club World Cup final CNN's Patrick Snell reports on President Trump's visit to MetLife Stadium for the FIFA Club World Cup Final between Paris Saint-Germain and Chelsea. 00:52 - Source: CNN Top Russian diplomat is in North Korea. What does this mean? Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov is in North Korea for a three-day visit. CNN's Will Ripley explains why this could be a sign of deepening relations between Moscow and Pyongyang. 01:16 - Source: CNN
