logo
#

Latest news with #StudentCompensationAndOpportunityThroughRightsandEndorsements

Despite criticism, college sports bill codifying NCAA rules clears first procedural hurdle
Despite criticism, college sports bill codifying NCAA rules clears first procedural hurdle

USA Today

time4 days ago

  • Politics
  • USA Today

Despite criticism, college sports bill codifying NCAA rules clears first procedural hurdle

A bill in the U.S. House of Representatives that would codify critical aspects of college sports has cleared its first procedural hurdle − albeit along party lines, and despite pointed questions about its impact. At a markup hearing on Tuesday, July 15, the Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade voted to advance the college sports bill − known as the "SCORE Act" − to a full committee hearing, moving it one step closer to a potential vote on the House floor. The vote to advance the bill was 12-11, split along party lines. While the outcome of the markup will be welcomed by the bill's proponents, including subcommittee chair Gus Bilirakis, R-Fla., it also came with plenty of pushback − both in the 24 hours prior to the hearing, and during it. Rep. Lori Trahan, D-Mass., was among those who spoke out most frequently and ardently against the bill, which includes antitrust protections for the NCAA and federal parameters around name-image-and-likeness (NIL) deals, among a number of other provisions. Trahan, a former college athlete, proposed several unsuccessful amendments to the legislation and expressed concern that, as written, it would put too much power in the hands of the NCAA, at the expense of athletes. "There is no enforcement mechanism. There is no recourse, right now, for states or for individuals. There is a liability shield into perpetuity, with no susnset, no revisiting by Congress," Trahan said of the SCORE Act (Student Compensation And Opportunity Through Rights and Endorsements). "So I want us all to understand that deeply before we go ahead. Because it doesn't feel pro-player, to me. It doesn't feel like this is an extension of athletes' rights. It feels like we're putting a couple of modest player protections into a bill based on what we know right now, and not being able to revisit it later and not giving them tools to advocate for themselves." Trahan's remarks echoed some of the criticism levied against the bill on July 14, ahead of the markup. Several union groups, including the unions that represent the five largest professional sports leagues in the United States, released statements opposing the bill, as did Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., who is the top Democrat on the Senate Commerce Committee. "'If you thought the dissolution of the Pac-12 was a heist, the SCORE Act is the National Championship of all heists," she said in a statement accompanying a letter to House subcommittee leaders, which was co-signed by Rep. Michael Baumgartner, R-Wash. Proponents of the bill, meanwhile, argued during the markup that the SCORE Act is the best avenue to restore order and structure to an increasingly chaotic college sports landscape. "This legislation will ensure that the integrity of college sports is maintained, while leveling the playing field and providing nationwide consistency," Rep. Brett Guthrie, R-Kentucky, said. Following the subcommittee's markup, the bill will now be put up for discussion before the full House Committee on Energy and Commerce. Rep. Guthrie said some of its provisions and impacts, including its potential impact on gender equity and Title IX, will receive further discussion from the Committee on Education and Workforce. After passing through those committees, the bill would then be eligible for discussion and a vote on the floor of the House. But it would likely face more questions and criticism in the Senate, where the Republicans hold a slim majority and Democrats have repeatedly expressed concerns about bills that grant too much power to the NCAA. "Now, I remember School House Rock, right? 'I'm just a bill, yeah, I'm only a bill, I'm sitting here on Capitol Hill,'" Southeastern Conference commissioner Greg Sankey said July 14. "So congratulations; we have a bill on Capitol Hill that is sitting and requires a great deal of more work. But I think the bipartisan effort represents an indication that college athletics, just as it does in football stadiums every Saturday can bring people together for conversation, and we hope the restoration of national standards for college athletics." Contact Tom Schad at tschad@ or on social media @

College sports bill introduced by bipartisan group of House members
College sports bill introduced by bipartisan group of House members

Yahoo

time10-07-2025

  • Politics
  • Yahoo

College sports bill introduced by bipartisan group of House members

A bipartisan group of lawmakers from the U.S. House of Representatives announced on Thursday, July 10, that they have introduced a bill that would establish a set of national rules for college sports. The announcement said that the bill is backed by leaders of three House committees, but it follows the basic contours of a discussion draft circulated in June by Reps. Gus Bilirakis, R-Fla., and Brett Guthrie, R-Ky. Advertisement Guthrie chairs the Energy and Commerce committee. Bilirakis chairs that panel's Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade subcommittee. In a show of Bilirakis' and Guthrie's desire to get the bill moving in the Republican-controlled House, Bilrakis' subcommittee will hold a markup hearing on the measure on Tuesday, July 15, said Matt VanHyfte, the communications director for the full committee. Dubbed the SCORE Act (Student Compensation And Opportunity Through Rights and Endorsements), the bill includes language that specifically would allow the NCAA, and potentially the new Collegiate Sports Commission, to make operational rules affecting schools and athletes in areas that have come into legal dispute in recent years and in areas that the NCAA wants to shield from future legal dispute. To back up that authority, the bill has specific language designed to shield the NCAA, the Commission, conferences and schools from antitrust and state-court lawsuits that could come from rules. It states that the adoption and/or enforcement of any rule established in concert with the bill 'shall be treated as lawful under the antitrust laws and any similar State law, rule, regulation, requirement, standard, or other provision having the force and effect of law.' This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: College sports bill governing NCAA introduced in Congress

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store