Latest news with #Wessex
BBC News
6 days ago
- Entertainment
- BBC News
King & Conqueror trailer and new picture released for epic drama starring James Norton and Nikolaj Coster-Waldau
The trailer and a new picture have been released for King & Conqueror, a new eight-part historical epic coming to BBC iPlayer and BBC One this year. The 60-second trailer shows Harold, Earl of Wessex (James Norton) and William, Duke of Normandy (Nikolaj Coster-Waldau) as they battle for the throne alongside their respective wives, Edith Swan-neck (Emily Beecham) and Matilda (Clémence Poésy). The trailer also features allies and enemies such as King Edward (Eddie Marsan), Lady Emma (Juliet Stevenson), Morcar (Elander Moore), Gytha (Clare Holman), Tostig (Luther Ford), Queen Gunhild (Bo Bragason) and Godwin (Geoff Bell). King & Conqueror is produced by The Development Partnership, Rabbit Track Pictures, Shepherd Content, RVK Studios and CBS Studios, in association with the BBC. The series is created and written by Michael Robert Johnson with the opening episode directed by Baltasar Kormákur. The series also stars Jean-Marc Barr as King Henry, Elliott Cowan as Sweyn, Bjarne Henriksen as Earl Siward, Oliver Masucci as Baldwin, Indy Lewis as Margaret, Jason Forbes as Thane Thomas, Ingvar Sigurdsson as Fitzosbern, Ines Asserson as Judith, Sveinn Ólafur Gunnarsson as Hardrada and Léo Legrand as Odo. King & Conqueror is the story of a clash that defined the future of a country – and a continent – for a thousand years, the roots of which stretch back decades and extend out through a pair of interconnected family dynasties, struggling for power across two countries and a raging sea. Harold of Wessex and William of Normandy were two men destined to meet at the Battle of Hastings in 1066; two allies with no design on the English throne, who found themselves forced by circumstance and personal obsession into a war for possession of its crown. The 8x60' series is created and executive produced by Michael Robert Johnson and executive produced by James Norton and Kitty Kaletsky for Rabbit Track Pictures, Baltasar Kormákur and Magnus Sigurdsson for RVK Studios, Robert Taylor for The Development Partnership, Dave Clarke and Richard Halliwell for Shepherd Content, Lindsay Martin for CBS Studios, Ed Clarke and Nikolaj Coster-Waldau. Baltasar Kormákur directed the premiere episode and, as executive producer, has steered the creative across the series. King & Conqueror was acquired by Sue Deeks, Head of BBC Programme Acquisition. The BBC has acquired broadcasting rights for the series in the United Kingdom and it is distributed outside of the UK by Paramount Global Content Distribution. King & Conqueror will premiere on BBC iPlayer and BBC One this August. Watch King & Conqueror on iPlayer and add to your Watchlist MF3 Follow for more
The Standard
23-07-2025
- General
- The Standard
Science and local sleuthing identify a 250-year-old shipwreck on a Scottish island
In this image provided by Wessex Archaeology, the Sanday Wreck is seen on the shores of Sanday on Orkney, Feb. 2024. (Wessex Archaeology via AP)
Daily Mail
23-07-2025
- Science
- Daily Mail
Stonehenge's biggest remaining mysteries: The 5 key unanswered questions – as scientists crack how enigmatic boulder was transported from Wales
It is one of ancient Britain's most iconic and puzzling landmarks. But scientists are now finally starting to solve some of Stonehenge's most baffling mysteries. This week, a group of leading experts announced that they had finally settled the debate over the origin of the landmark's iconic bluestones – the group of smaller stones that are dotted around the site. However, as much as we learn about this enigmatic structure, there are still many questions yet to be answered. Dr Rob Ixer, an archaeologist from UCL, told MailOnline: 'In some cases we know where they came from within 100 metres or even 10 metres. 'But, in a sense, that's trivial information compared to why did they bring the stones from the Preseli Hills in Wales to the centre of Wessex.' Likewise, scientists say we still have much to learn about the people who undertook this epic feat of engineering over 5,000 years ago. These are the five key unanswered questions that archaeologists need to finally solve this enduring puzzle. 1. How did they move the stones? Scientists believe that the stones which make up Stonehenge come from three distinct locations. First are the enormous standing stones, known as the sarsens, which make up the pillars and lintels of the structure. These sandstone blocks, weighing 10 to 30 tonnes and standing up to 23 feet (seven metres) tall, come from the West Woods, south-west of Marlborough - about 20 miles (32 km) from Stonehenge. Second are the bluestones - smaller stones dotting the site, which weigh between two and four tonnes. A team of researchers recently concluded that these stones came from a known neolithic quarry site at Craig Rhos-y-Felin in the Preseli Hills, Wales, about 125 (200km) away. Finally, the most mysterious of all of the rocks is the six-tonne Altar Stone, which researchers now believe came from the Orcadian Basin in the north-east of Scotland. This means the Altar Stone travelled at least 435 miles (700 km) before it became part of the site. Dr Ixer says: 'People used to think that the bluestones were brought along the coast, being rafted up through the Bristol Channel. 'We now think that the stones were transported overland, along what is now the A40 and that they were carried there.' We know from modern anthropological studies of traditional groups, such as those in Indonesia, that enormous stones can be moved without machinery, provided enough people work together. However, we don't know the exact method that the Stone Age people of Britain used to move these stones such great distances. To explain how the stones may have been moved, researchers at Newcastle University suggest that the Stonehenge builders could have used 'greased sledges'. Pottery found at the nearby Durrington Walls, near Stonehenge, was discovered to have strangely high residues of pig fat soaked into the clay. While it had been assumed that this grease was from cooking, the shape of the pottery suggests that these dishes were more like buckets than plates. The researchers argue that this could be evidence that the Stonehenge builders used greased wooden sleds rolled over logs, which would only require 20 people. What technology could have been used to move the bluestones? To reach Wiltshire each of the two to five-tonne stones would need to have been dragged around 140 miles over rough terrain. Some suggest the Neolithic builders could have used ropes and wooden rollers. This would take a large number of people but not as many as the 500 suggested by some calculations. To make things easier the builders may have used wooden sledges lubricated with pig fat. Or they may have used cricket ball-sized stones on wooden runners to act like ball bearings. However, any wooden sleds or rollers would have long since decayed, meaning the exact method will likely remain a mystery. 2. Why was Stonehenge constructed? Archaeologists are absolutely certain that Stonehenge was built so that it aligns with movement of the sun during the summer and winter solstices. However, this doesn't tell us why people would go to such enormous lengths to do this. 'We know that it does have this solar function, but it's an enormous effort for something that doesn't seem to be needed,' says Dr Ixer. 'The true answer is that nobody really knows why it was that they built it.' What makes Stonehenge so puzzling is that it is far more elaborate than it needs to be to perform its astrological function. Dr Ixer says that it is the neolithic equivalent of putting gold decoration on an astrolabe; it's vastly expensive and simply not necessary. Stonehenge is so over-complicated that some researchers think that its shape and function were not the real reason for its construction. Instead, the act of building this monument might have been much more important than the finished product. Recently, researchers have suggested that the construction of Stonehenge might have been intended to unify the different groups in Stone Age Britain. Professor Mike Parker Pearson, an archaeologist from UCL, suggests that the fact that the stones come from all the different regions of the UK means it had a political as well as spiritual purpose. Similarly, Dr Ixer says that the best modern analogy for Stonehenge is how the spaceship Endeavour was paraded through the streets of LA. He says: 'That really is what Stonehenge is about. It's about the ceremony, it's the taking part and the doing that's important.' 3. Why the Salisbury Plain? Scientists believe that the Salisbury Plain might have been used for sun worship for hundreds of years before the first stones were laid. In fact, Stonehenge would have once been at the heart of a bustling religious site. In 2016, archaeologists unearthed a large sacred complex just 1.5 miles (2.4 km) from Stonehenge. This settlement is believed to be 1,000 years older than Stonehenge and was a sacred place where Neolithic people performed ceremonies, including feasting and the deliberate smashing of ceramic bowls. This 'enclosure' is one of about 70 found across England and the second in the Stonehenge landscape. The site is unique in a number of ways that ancient people might have recognised. For example, at this latitude, the sun rises directly in the East on the midsummer solstice and sets directly in the West during the midwinter solstice. Likewise, there are deep natural grooves in the landscape which run along this east-west axis, travelling in line with the direction of the sun during the solstice. However, archaeologists still aren't sure why the Salisbury Plain became important enough to bring stones from all over the country to it. Timothy Daw, co-author of the research into the Bluestones and Stonehenge expert, told MailOnline: 'There are things about the site that are special, but is it where the different west and east cultures and tribes came together? 'Or is it a centre for people from all over the Isles and that is why they brought their stones?' 4. Why did people keep changing Stonehenge? Perhaps one of the strangest things about Stonehenge is that it isn't one single completed structure. Instead, what we see today is the product of thousands of years of adjustments and alterations made by successive cultures living in the area. Dating back to around 3000 BC, the Stonehenge site was already one of the largest Neolithic burial complexes in Britain. This original complex was made of 56 holes surrounded by a bank that may have held stones or wooden posts. It wasn't until about 2500 BC that the sarsens and bluestones were erected at the site. However, even this monumental construction didn't last for long. Just 200 or 300 years afterwards, another group of people dug up all the bluestones and moved them from a circle into a large oval. Then, a few hundred years later, another group dug up the stones again and arranged them into a horseshoe shape. Dr Ixer says: 'They were time and time again changing the shape of it and, presumably, by changing the shape of it, they were also changing the meaning of it. 'Among the Stonehenge people, there must have been such a radical shift in belief systems that they actually pulled up all these stones and rearranged them; and we don't know why.' 5. Where are the missing stones? As archaeologists have excavated the area around Stonehenge, they have found more and more pits which seem to have once held large stones. Although we know that the stones had been moved, what is unusual is that there don't seem to be enough stones to fill all the holes. Professor Richard Bevins, a geologist from Aberystwyth University, told MailOnline: '. There are currently around 45 known bluestones. It is thought that the bluestones were brought to Stonehenge around 3000 BC and placed in a circle of holes known as the Aubrey Holes, of which there were 56. 'So potentially there might be some bluestones missing.' However, archaeologists currently have no idea where these missing stones might have gone. Many of the stones show extensive damage from tourists chipping away chunks to take as souvenirs. In fact, during the 19th century, visitors were said to be able to rent hammers from the nearby town of Amesbury for this specific purpose. But this doesn't seem to account for the absence of entire six-tonne stones. Nor do pieces of the stones show up in nearby farm walls and buildings as they do near other stone circles in the UK. So, until one is found, the whereabouts of those enormous stones remains a complete mystery. Britain began the move from 'hunter-gatherer' to farming and settlements about 7,000 years ago as part of the 'Neolithic Revolution' The Neolithic Revolution was the world's first verifiable revolution in agriculture. It began in Britain between about 5000 BC and 4500 BC but spread across Europe from origins in Syria and Iraq between about 11000 BC and 9000 BC. The period saw the widespread transition of many disparate human cultures from nomadic hunting and gathering practices to ones of farming and building small settlements. The revolution was responsible for turning small groups of travellers into settled communities who built villages and towns. Some cultures used irrigation and made forest clearings to better their farming techniques. Others stored food for times of hunger, and farming eventually created different roles and divisions of labour in societies as well as trading economies. In the UK, the period was triggered by a huge migration or folk-movement from across the Channel. Today, prehistoric monuments in the UK span from the time of the Neolithic farmers to the invasion of the Romans in AD 43. Many of them are looked after by English Heritage and range from standing stones to massive stone circles, and from burial mounds to hillforts. Stonehenge, the most famous prehistoric structure in Europe, possibly the world, was built by Neolithic people, and later finished during the Bronze Age. Neolithic structures were typically used for ceremonies, religious feasts and as centres for trade and social gatherings.
Yahoo
19-07-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Wessex Water praised for no serious pollution incidents last year
Wessex Water has been commended for not causing any serious pollution incidents last year. The Environment Agency (EA) found the utility company was one of only two water and sewerage firms not to commit any major incidents in 2024. However, a 53 per cent increase in pollution incidents of lesser severity (category one to three) has been recorded for Wessex Water. This comes amid a wider critique of the water sector, with serious pollution incidents rising 60 per cent from 2023. The EA said it was aware of 75 major and significant incidents in 2024, up from 47 the previous year. Altogether, 2,801 incidents were recorded by water companies last year, up 29 per cent from 2023. The EA said persistent underinvestment in infrastructure, poor asset maintenance, and climate change were reasons for the sector's poor performance. Despite this, the EA praised the positive efforts of Wessex Water. Ed Lockington, the EA's water industry regulation manager, said: "We're pleased to see that by not causing any serious pollution incidents last year, Wessex Water has met not just our expectation but the public's. "That is a high bar to maintain, but nothing less is acceptable for the environment we all rely on." However, Mr Lockington said Wessex Water still has room for improvement. He added: "It is disappointing to see its total number of pollutions rose by just over half - there is clearly more work to be done." The EA carried out 422 inspections of Wessex Water sites last year, 35 per cent more than targeted. The findings from these inspections are shared with the company to help focus efforts on improving its network, customer service, and environmental obligations. The EA stated that 24 per cent of sites breached their permits last year. The agency is clear that none of these factors, including wet weather, can excuse the high number of incidents last year. Water companies are required to meet their legal obligations to the environment and communities or face enforcement action. Alan Lovell, chair of the EA, said: "This report demonstrates continued systemic failure by some companies to meet their environmental targets. "The water industry must act urgently to prevent pollution from occurring and to respond rapidly when it does." The EA has more powers to take action against polluting companies under the Water (Special Measures) Act. To boost funding for water regulation, the EA is considering a levy on the water sector to recover the cost of enforcement activities. The act also requires companies to produce annual pollution incident reduction plans to address persistent problems and prevent future incidents.
Yahoo
14-07-2025
- Entertainment
- Yahoo
Prime Video's ‘Bloodaxe' Adds Six To Cast
Prime Video's Viking drama Bloodaxe has added five as series regulars: Karlis Arnolds Avots (January), Rod Hallett (Suspect: The Shooting of Jean Charles De Menezes), Alina Tomnikov (Donna), Sisse Marie (Rebel Moon), and Rune Temte (Eddie the Eagle). Additionally, Jesper Christensen (Spectre) has boarded as recurring. Avots plays Egil, a poet, farmer, murderer, sorcerer, ladies' man, and a bit of a psychopath, who is seeking revenge on Erik Bloodaxe (Molyneux) for the exile of his family to Iceland by Erik's father, King Harald Fairhair. More from Deadline 'The Summer I Turned Pretty' Season 2 Recap: What To Remember Ahead Of Season 3 'Upload' Sets Release Date For Fourth & Final Season At Prime Video All The Taylor Swift Songs In 'The Summer I Turned Pretty' So Far ... & Our Predictions On Season 3's Needle Drops Hallett plays Athelstan, the shrewd and powerful King of Wessex, who is also a formidable warrior. Years ago, he formed a strategic alliance with King Fairhair concerning his young son Haakon, and has been grooming him for future leadership, and to ensure his influence extends beyond Wessex. Tomnikov portrays the dual roles of Greta and The Seer. Greta is an esteemed shield maiden and close member of Bloodaxe's trusted group of warriors. However, it's revealed that she has the ability to transform into the form of an ancient woman, known as The Seer, who possesses an all-seeing power, and the ability to divine the future as ordained by the gods themselves. Marie is Thyra, the Queen of Denmark, wife of Gorm, and mother to Gunnhild. She is an admired figure, cunning and steadfast, and will do whatever she can to ensure the longevity of her and Gorm's power and rule. Temte plays Gorm, the King of Denmark, husband to Thyra, and father to Gunnhild. Sharp and devious, Gorm lacks the brash, hot-headedness prized in many Norsemen, but his calculating, diplomatic, and occasionally brutal approach to rule has made him one of the most formidable powers in Scandinavia. Christensen portrays King Harald Fairhair. The First King of all Norway who conquered his many powerful rivals, nearing the end of his legendary reign. Fairhair relies on the love and support of his son, Bloodaxe, and begins to fear that many of his sons are now plotting against him. As previously announced, Jessica Madsen and Levi Miller will also star, playing the respective roles of Bloodaxe's wife Gunnhild, aka the Mother of Kings, and his younger half-brother Haakon the Good. Created, written, and exec produced by Vikings creator Michael Hirst and his son, Horatio Hirst, Bloodaxe follows Erik Bloodaxe, one of history's most famous Norse raiders, and his formidable wife, Gunnhild as they fight for the throne of Norway. In the process, the land is torn apart by fierce rivals, shifting loyalties, and bloody betrayals. With war looming and chaos consuming the kingdom, drawing in the ruthless Kings of other Scandinavian countries, and even a powerful English ruler, the stage is set for a thundering, cataclysmic, compelling and utterly magical new Norse Saga. Officially ordered in March, the show will be produced by MGM Television, a division of Amazon MGM Studios, with production beginning in Ireland and Iceland later this summer. Michael and Horatio Hirst will showrun and write, exec producing alongside Morgan O'Sullivan under his O'Sullivan Productions label, Steve Stark under his Toluca Pictures label, Arturo Interian, John Weber, Sheila Hockin, and Fred Toye. Avots and Tomnikov are repped by Lisa Richards Agency and Subtitle Talent; Hallett by United Agents, Luber Roklin Entertainment, and Jackoway Austen Tyerman; Marie by Panorama Agency, Authentic Talent and Literary Management, and Felker Toczek Suddleson; Temte by Actors in Scandinavia and Jackoway Austen Tyerman; and Christensen by Tavistock Wood Management and Spielkind. Best of Deadline 2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Tonys, Emmys, Oscars & More Men of Steel: Every Actor Who Has Played Superman - Photo Gallery 'Michael' Cast: Who's Who In The Michael Jackson Biopic
