Latest news with #WorldUniversityRankings2026
Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Business
- Straits Times
NUS retains 8th spot, NTU climbs to 12th in latest global university rankings
This year's ranking, the 22nd edition, covers 1,500 universities across 106 countries and territories. ST PHOTO: BRIAN TEO SINGAPORE - The National University of Singapore (NUS) has retained its spot in the top 10 in a global ranking of institutions, with Nanyang Technological University (NTU) hot on its heels. NUS kept its eighth place in the latest Britain-based Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) World University Rankings 2026, released on June 19, while NTU rose three places to 12th, building on its 11-position jump the year before. This year's ranking, the 22nd edition, covers 1,500 universities across 106 countries and territories. NUS stood out as the highest-ranked Asian university, having been the first in Asia to break into the global top 10. The leaderboard was dominated by universities from the US and Britain, with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in first place for the 14th consecutive year, followed by Imperial College London retaining second place. Stanford University climbed three positions to take third place, while the University of Oxford and Harvard University both dropped one place to rank fourth and fifth respectively. The QS rankings are based on nine indicators: academic reputation, employer reputation, faculty-student ratio, citations per faculty, international faculty ratio, international student ratio, international research network, employment outcomes and sustainability. The three highest-weighted indicators in the QS rankings are academic reputation, citations per faculty and employer reputation, with weightages of 30 per cent, 20 per cent and 15 per cent respectively. Academic reputation refers to perceptions of a university's excellence by academic experts, while the employer reputation indicator measures employers' regard for the university. NUS ranked 14th globally for academic reputation, 32nd for employer reputation, and 64th for citations per faculty. It rose one spot for academic reputation and 16 spots for employer reputation, but dropped three places for citations, compared with the previous QS rankings. NUS president Tan Eng Chye said the university's ranking affirms its unwavering commitment to excellence, and reflects the strength of its forward-looking approach to education, research and innovation. 'We are particularly heartened to be ranked amongst the best in Asia for academic reputation, and to have made notable advances in employer reputation and international research partnerships,' he said. These improvements signal growing confidence in NUS graduates and the expanding impact of its global research network, added Professor Tan. NTU climbed three places to 12th, after its re-entry into the top 20 in the previous edition of the rankings. This was driven largely by an improved score in employer reputation, where it moved from 92nd place to 67th, and in its international student ratio. 'NTU's strong showing in this year's QS rankings reflects its constant efforts to reimagine itself amidst a rapidly changing world,' said NTU president Ho Teck Hua. He cited recent initiatives such as the launch of the College of Computing and Data Science and the Honours College, which prepare students to better harness technology. Professor Ho added that NTU continues to grow its global academic talent by recruiting promising early-career researchers and drawing leading scholars from around the world. Singapore Management University (SMU) climbed 74 places in the 2026 QS rankings to 511th, up from 585th in the 2025 edition. Meanwhile, the Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD) fell 79 places, dropping from 440th to 519th. All four local universities included in the rankings – NUS, NTU, SMU and SUTD – saw their scores remain the same or drop in four indicators: faculty-student ratio, citations per faculty, employment outcomes and sustainability. QS senior vice-president Ben Sowter said Singapore has firmly established itself as a global higher education powerhouse, and that its universities' rankings are a reflection of its exceptional research output and globally collaborative ethos. The city-state's success is driven by a focus on skills development, innovation and adapting to workforce needs, he added. 'By broadening access to lifelong learning, strengthening partnerships and enhancing graduate support, Singapore is not only boosting graduate employability, but also advancing its ambition to lead the world in future-ready, skills-first higher education,' he said. Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Hindustan Times
6 hours ago
- Business
- Hindustan Times
QS World University Rankings 2026: MIT tops, Imperial College London 2nd; IIT Delhi best Indian varsity
QS World University Rankings 2026: With an overall score of 100, Cambridge (United States)-based Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has topped the World University Rankings 2026 announced by Quacquarelli Symonds. London's Imperial College has come second with a score of 99.4. Also read: THE Impact Rankings 2025: These are the world's top 10 sustainable varsities Over 1,500 universities, representing over 100 locations worldwide, are included in the 2026 edition of the QS World University Rankings. Stanford University is in third place with a score of 98.9. Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi is at the 123rd place and tops among Indian universities that have been featured in the list. IIT Bombay is at the 129th rank, and IIT Madras is at the 180th rank. These are the only three Indian varsities in the global list of top 200. Also read: Beyond the Brochure: What to research before choosing a UK university Rank 1: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Rank 2: Imperial College London Rank 3: Stanford University Rank 4: University of Oxford Rank 5: Harvard University Rank 6: University of Cambridge Rank 7: ETH Zurich Rank 8: National University of Singapore (NUS) Rank 9: University College London (UCL) Rank 10: California Institute of Technology (Caltech) Rank 11: The University of Hong Kong Rank 12: Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) Rank 13: University of Chicago Rank 14: Peking University Rank 15:University of Pennsylvania Rank 16: Cornell University Rank 17: Tsinghua University, University of California, Berkeley (UCB) Rank 19: The University of Melbourne Rank 20: The University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney) Also read: The power of pause: Why summer breaks really matter Nearly 500 universities have improved their performance since last year in WUR 2026, QS said. Of these, the biggest climber is Sunway University in Malaysia, which has risen over 120 places, it added.
GMA Network
6 hours ago
- General
- GMA Network
Adamson, Mapua make debut in 2026 QS World University Rankings
Six Philippine universities have secured spots in the latest Quacquarelli-Symonds (QS) World University Rankings 2026 as two more educational institutions made a debut. Adamson University and Mapúa University entered the global rankings for the first time. Adamson landed in the 1,001–1,200 bracket while Mapúa was listed in the 1,401+. The University of the Philippines remained the country's highest-ranked university, placing 362nd globally despite a slight dip from its previous rank of 336th. Ateneo de Manila University saw a modest rise, climbing to 511th from 516th World, making it the only Philippine institution to improve its global standing this year. De La Salle University placed third among Philippine schools, landing at 654th, a minor drop from its previous placement in the 641–650 bracket. The University of Santo Tomas held steady in the 851–900 bracket, maintaining its position as the fourth highest-ranked Philippine university. The QS World University Rankings evaluate institutions based on academic reputation, employer reputation, faculty-student ratio, citations per faculty, international faculty and student ratios, and additional performance metrics related to sustainability and impact.—Sherylin Untalan/AOL, GMA Integrated News
The Star
8 hours ago
- Business
- The Star
70% of Malaysian varsities rise in latest QS global rankings
PETALING JAYA: Malaysia achieved the world's highest rate of improvement - more than any other country with 10 or more ranked universities - with 70% of its 32 institutions climbing in the Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) World University Rankings 2026. Of the 32 universities ranked, 19 rose, five remained stable in their ranks or bands, five featured for the first time, and three dropped. Leading the nation is Universiti Malaya (UM), which is the only Malaysian university in the top 100. It rose two positions to 58th globally and is ranked 16th in Asia. UM is also the country's top performer in five of the nine QS indicators, most notably in Academic Reputation, where it placed 58th, and Employer Reputation, where it ranked 40th. Coming in second is Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), which climbed 12 spots from 138th to 126th. Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) and Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) are third in Malaysia, tied in 134th spot globally, climbing 14 and 12 spots, respectively. Rounding out the institutions in the top 200 is Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), which climbed 28 spots to place 153rd In the top 300, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP) rose 18 places to secure 251st, making it the highest-ranking private institution in Malaysia, followed by Taylor's University at 253rd and UCSI University at 269th. Meanwhile, Sunway University and Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM) broke into the global top 500, placing 410th and 491st, respectively. These institutions make up Malaysia's 10 top 500 universities, up from eight last year. SEGi University achieved Malaysia's highest rank in any individual indicator, placing 13th globally in International Students Ratio - the third-highest ranking in Asia. In a statement on Thursday (June 19), QS said Malaysia outperformed the global average in five indicators, most notably in International Student Ratio. "This indicator marked a significant strength for the country, with an exceptional six Malaysian universities among the top 50. "Malaysia also improved overall in five indicators, most prominently in Academic Reputation and International Research Network. It dropped overall in four indicators, with the sharpest drop seen in Employment Outcomes, marking a challenge for the country in this indicator, in which it also achieved its lowest average score. "No Malaysian universities placed among the top 100 in Sustainability, Employment Outcomes or International Research Network, reflecting areas for improvement for the country's universities," it said. QS senior vice president Ben Sowter said employability, sustainability strategy, and research are three pillars that are central to the rankings and sustained higher education excellence. 'As Malaysia competes with regional peers like Singapore, South Korea and Vietnam, investing in these areas will not only enhance its global reputation but also ensure its universities play a transformative role in shaping a skilled, future-ready workforce,' he said. Sowter added that as the country advances towards a high-income economy, its higher education institutions must equip graduates with both the technical skills and human competencies required to excel in the workforce and drive innovation. The QS World University Rankings 2026 featured more than 1,500 universities across 106 countries and territories, evaluated across nine indicators: Academic Reputation, Employer Reputation, Faculty Student Ratio, Citations per Faculty, International Faculty Ratio, International Students Ratio, International Research Network, Employment Outcomes, and Sustainability. The United States is the most represented higher education system, with 192 ranked universities, followed by the United Kingdom (90) and Mainland China (72). The Massachusetts Institute of Technology topped the rankings for the 14th consecutive year. Imperial College London stayed in second place while Stanford University climbed three positions to third. The University of Oxford and Harvard University each dropped one spot, placing fourth and fifth, respectively. Singapore is the only Asian country featured among the world's top 10, with the National University of Singapore ranked 8th globally. The full 22nd edition of the rankings, released today, can be found at
AsiaOne
9 hours ago
- Business
- AsiaOne
NUS ranked 8th in the world, SUTD drops to 519 — but do employers still care about university rankings?, Singapore News
Her graduation ceremony is still a month away, but Singapore Management University (SMU) student Britney Kon is already working full-time. The 25-year-old Economics major landed a business analyst role at a tech firm in March — after submitting more than 270 job applications since December. Kon believes that most of her applications were not seen by employers. Still, at one point, she was landing up to three interviews a day. "Some had five rounds of interviews. I had to wait a week between each round," she said. "A few ghosted me after round four. Companies posting job listings on LinkedIn are also farming for followers. It's a new type of hell altogether." Kon first received a job offer from a tech firm about two weeks after finishing her final examinations. "I later got an email saying the company would be winding up due to legal troubles," she said. "I basically lost my first job soon after signing for it." Kon's job hunting struggles are in contrast to her university's rising reputation in global rankings. In the latest Britain-based Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) World University Rankings 2026, released on Thursday (June 19), SMU climbed to 511th place, up from 585th the year before. The QS rankings, now in its 22nd edition, features over 1,500 universities across 106 countries, assessing institutions based on several indicators, including employer reputation and graduate employment outcomes. While SMU made significant gains, Singapore's other autonomous universities saw mixed results. The National University of Singapore (NUS) remained eighth in the world and the highest-ranked university in Asia, while Nanyang Technological University (NTU) emerged 12th, up from its previous ranking of 15th. But the Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD) fell from 440th to 519th in the 2026 rankings. Two other autonomous universities — the Singapore Institute of Technology (SIT) and the Singapore University of Social Sciences (SUSS) — are not featured in the rankings. While Kon eventually secured a job before graduation, she initially assumed that employers favour graduates from NUS, NTU, and SMU, which she described as Singapore's "big three" universities. "The general consensus was that as long as it was an autonomous university, I could feel safer in terms of job prospects," she said. Assessing job applicants by uni rankings The question on whether employers should refer to university rankings in assessing job applicants is not new, but remains unsettled. Responding to AsiaOne's queries about its recruitment process, the Public Service Division (PSD) said it does not specifically consider university rankings in its hiring guidelines, and there are no preferred educational institutions. One of Singapore's biggest employers, the Public Service employs about 154,000 public officers working in 16 ministries and more than 50 statutory boards. "Recruitment has always been based on merit, through fair and open competition," said a PSD spokesperson. "Candidates are shortlisted based on a holistic review of their relevant skills, competencies, work experience, and alignment with the job's requirements. Academic background is one of the many factors taken into consideration." In contrast, one local company with 11 full-time staff still relies on university rankings to screen job applicants. Jerry Lee, co-founder of Grade Solution Learning Centre, which offers online tuition classes, said the name of a candidate's alma mater "matters" when he is reviewing a resume, especially for "very academic" roles such as tutors or curriculum heads. "In my 13 years of running the business, I can see that those who have strong academic results, they get into top-ranking universities," he said. "If I'm getting a chemistry teacher and you come from NUS Chemistry, that's a very good sign on our checklist." When it comes to employers hiring foreign talent, the Ministry of Manpower continues to use the QS World University Rankings as a reference. Under the Complementarity Assessment Framework, individuals holding degrees from universities ranked in the global top 100 are awarded points that contribute to their eligibility for an Employment Pass. Limitations of rankings Ben Sowter, senior vice-president at QS, told AsiaOne that university rankings are still a "necessity" for employers trying to narrow down a large pool of candidates to a more manageable number. He likened the process to buying a car: "You might be looking for cabin space or top speed. There's so much information and so many options out there that you need a way to shortlist them. Then maybe take a few for a test drive. "The rankings doesn't provide the full decision for you, but it just enables you to take hundreds of choices and get it down to the last three or four that you're going to do your own personal research on." Sowter cautioned against using university rankings to unfairly discriminate against candidates or treat them as a strict "pass-fail" metric. "I've met plenty of graduates from top 10 universities I wouldn't hire, and I've met people from universities outside the top 500 who I'd definitely hire, and even congratulate myself for doing so," he said. "The skills and capabilities of an individual may be shaped by the institution they attended, but they aren't defined by it." Several human resource experts AsiaOne spoke to echoed Sowter's view and warned against relying solely on rankings when screening candidates. Ilse Clement, senior consultant for HR and Business Support from Robert Walters Singapore, said that some employers may associate graduates from top-ranked universities with exposure to rigorous academics and stronger networks. "Investment banking and elite law firms… the prestige of your university can serve as a filter in early hiring rounds," she said, adding that these companies often partner with top universities to recruit fresh blood. Such practices, Clement said, perpetuates a misconception that only certain universities produce "worthy" candidates. As a result, job seekers from less prestigious universities may also face longer job searches, or will have to "prove" their worth through job interviews or internships. "That being said, many Singaporean employers value performance, experience and certifications. Once in the workforce, actual work results quickly become more important than alma mater," she added. Aslam Sardar, chief executive officer of the Institute for Human Resource Professionals, said that placing too much weight on university prestige can unintentionally narrow companies' access to qualified talent. "This narrow lens may hinder innovation, limit workforce diversity and stall business resilience," he said. "In contrast, organisations that have adopted skills-first hiring practices report significant improvements in quality of hire, talent pipeline diversity, employee performance and retention." Online tuition provider co-founder Lee said he also hires tutors from private institutions and lesser-known universities. Regardless of their academic background, all candidates have to pass a written test and go through mock lessons to assess their interpersonal skills. New hires are also placed on probationary period of three months. "At the end of the day, when they do the job, the resumes don't tell the full picture," added Lee. "It's not just the degree." 'True value of uni education not in rankings' Similarly, local universities told AsiaOne they still pay attention to rankings, but they are now placing more emphasis on preparing students for the workforce. This includes offering career guidance, mandatory internships, and work-study programmes. Professor Gan Chee Lip, NTU's associate provost (undergraduate education), said that rankings offer young universities a useful benchmark to assess their progress and development when compared to established universities. Professor Chee Yeow Meng, chief academic and innovation officer and provost of SUTD, however, said that rankings do not fully capture the value of what a university can provide to society. "We believe that the true value of a university education lies not just in rankings, but in how ready and relevant our graduates are for the future," he added. Professor John Thong, deputy president (academic) and provost of SIT, said that the university opts out of participating in global rankings altogther. "These rankings primarily emphasise academic research output and citation metrics. Our focus is on applied learning, and industry-oriented competency-based education, along with applied research that address real-world industry problems," he added. SMU provost Alan Chan said that instead of university rankings, students should choose a university that fits their interests, where the academic culture aligns with their learning style and aspirations. In a first among universities here, SMU's graduating class of 2025 will receive in July a transcript recording their co-curricular activities (CCAs) on top of their academic transcript. "Students should consider whether the university offers a holistic undergraduate experience… as well as career and mentoring support and the graduate employment outcomes," said Prof Chan. According to the Joint Autonomous Universities Graduate Employment Survey released in February, about 79.5 per cent of graduates from autonomous universities secured full-time permanent roles within six months of graduation in 2024, with six per cent doing part-time or temporary work, and 1.6 per cent working freelance. Are PEIs less prestigious? In contrast, less than half of fresh graduates from private education institutions (PEI) found full-time employment in 2024. A separate survey released by SkillsFuture Singapore in April showed that only 46.4 per cent secured full-time jobs, while 24.2 per cent took on part-time roles, and 4.2 per cent were working freelance. Unlike publicly funded autonomous universities, PEIs in Singapore that offer degree programmes from overseas universities are not listed in QS' World University Rankings. Does that mean the likes of Kaplan and the Singapore Institute of Management are deemed "less prestigious"? For Rajbir Singh, 25, he is familiar with the stereotype that often follows students from private universities. But he said it did not influence his decision when he chose to pursue further education in 2022. Rajbir did a three-year course with SIM and graduated in December last year with a psychology degree from the University of Buffalo. He is currently in a contract role at a consultancy firm and will be starting a full-time position at audit, tax, and advisory firm KPMG Singapore in July. Rajbir credits the career guidance and support he received at SIM, including career and internship fairs, as well as mentorship programmes. "It's not really about autonomous universities versus private universities," he said. "Ultimately, you can be in whatever institution. If you put in the work, eventually you will be rewarded for your efforts." chingshijie@
