Latest news with #WorldWarIII
Yahoo
a day ago
- General
- Yahoo
World-renowned psychics predict apocalyptic end to 2025: ‘The worst is yet to come'
They're the Four Horsemen/-women of the apocalypse. No need to seek a second opinion for Armageddon. The psychic stars aligned after four different prophets shared the same concerning prediction for an event that will allegedly transpire later this year. Blind Bulgarian mystic Baba Vanga,16th-century French astrologer Nostradamus, Brazilian psychic Athos Salomé and London hypnotherapist Nicolas Aujula all believe that we will see the outbreak of World War III before year's end. Vanga, who was born in 1911 as Vangeliya Pandeva Gushterova, has become known as the 'Nostradamus of the Balkans' for her eerily prescient premonitions, including 9/11, Princess Diana's death and, more recently, climate change-induced earthquakes in 2025 that were similar to the deadly tremors that rocked Myanmar and Thailand last month. Unfortunately, the doomsday seer also foresaw a war breaking out in Europe this year, which she saw as the start of 'humanity's downfall' and a major blow to the global population, the Daily Mail reported. Her warning was echoed by Nostradamus, better known as the 'Prophet of Doom,' who is credited with forecasting calamities from Adolf Hitler's rise to the COVID-19 pandemic in his famed 1555 book 'Les Prophéties.' The French fiasco foreteller believes that this year, the UK will be drawn into the conflict. 'When those from the lands of Europe, see England set up her throne behind,' Nostradamus wrote in the tome. 'Her flanks, there will be cruel wars. The kingdom will be marked by wars so cruel, foes from within and without will arise.' He added, 'A great pestilence from the past returns, no enemy more deadly under the skies.' Meanwhile, Brazilian psychic Athos Salomé, 38, who has been known as a living Nostradamus for predicting momentous events like Queen Elizabeth's death, also believes that WWIII is on our doorstep and that 'the worst is yet to come.' This conflict will be perhaps scarier than in years past, as tech and cyber warfare will become the modus operandi for 21st-century combatants. 'This is not just a war of men, but of machines, and in this aspect, what comes next?' lamented Salomé. He was seemingly echoing techsperts' 'Terminator'-esque warnings about the need to regulate artificial intelligence like nuclear weapons if humanity is to survive. The fourth member of this apocalyptic quartet, London hypnotherapist Nicolas Aujula, 38, believes that war could break out by the middle of this year due to a 'lack of compassion in the world.' Based on his psychic visions, 'We will see horrific acts of human evil and violence toward each other in the name of religion and nationalism.' These ominous warnings come at a particularly volatile time. Earlier this month, Pakistan and India launched strikes and counter-strikes against each other's military installations, prompting US calls for the nuclear-armed neighbors to begin talks and nip the escalating conflict in the bud. And while they agreed to a ceasefire, the truce was seemingly shaken just hours later by fighting in the disputed Kashmir region. Meanwhile, there appears to be no end in sight for the ongoing Russo-Ukraine War, which saw at least seven people killed last week during a massive Russian drone-and-missile attack on the Ukrainian capital of Kyiv and other regions in the country. President Trump gave Vladimir Putin a deadline to prove he's serious about ending the Ukraine war — after the Kremlin revealed Thursday the Russian leader has no plans to hash it out with his US counterpart. Putin had reportedly disclosed a list of demands for ending the conflict, which critics felt were identical to the leader's stance before launching his invasion more than three years ago.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- General
- Yahoo
Opinion - Does Trump know that Putin is using him as his puppet?
As America was observing Memorial Day, Russia launched its largest missile and drone attack of the three-year-old war on Kiev and other Ukrainian cities. Scores of men, women and children were killed, adding to the more than 600 civilian deaths that have occurred since the beginning of the year, despite President Trump's promise to end the war in a day. The deliberate targeting of civilians in schools, playgrounds and hospitals adds to the long list of Vladimir Putin's war crimes, none of which has motivated Trump to escalate either sanctions on Russia and the countries aiding its aggression or to augment and hasten the supply of effective weaponry to Ukraine. By contrast, when Ukranian President Volodymyr Zelensky hesitated before accepting Trump's ultimatum on a one-sided mineral-rights deal without a security guarantee, Trump immediately suspended intelligence and arms support to Ukraine (since partially restored). Trump has failed to follow through on any of his warnings to Russia, including its latest aerial attack on Ukraine's population and infrastructure. Instead, he has gone from warning Putin weeks ago, 'Vladimir, STOP!' to now declaring the Russian ruler 'has gone absolutely CRAZY.' Trump's latest declaration either serves to excuse himself for vastly misjudging a man he often claims to know well, and greatly admires, or, far less plausibly, to plead that Putin has somehow changed his nature. Trump is not the first U.S. president to claim to have been deceived by Putin and Russia. George W. Bush said he had peered into Putin's eyes and gotten 'a sense of his soul.' Even before Putin, Jimmy Carter said the 1979 invasion of Afghanistan changed his opinion of Russia 'more drastically in the last week than even the previous two and a half years.' The application of Richard Nixon's 'madman' theory, which he used to intimidate potential adversaries by making them think him illogical and volatile, can serve as a pretext for Trump's lack of action — not only for depredations Putin has already committed but to excuse any future outrages. Putin has cleverly fed those fears with his references to the use of nuclear weapons. Like Joe Biden before him, Trump fears provoking World War III more than Putin supposedly does, and so he is prepared to back down in a confrontation with a seemingly irrational adversary. In fact, Putin has shown no sign of suicidal tendencies. Rather, his provocative and escalatory behavior is quite rational, carried out with the confidence that 'responsible' leaders in Washington — Barack Obama, Biden, Trump — will always blink first to prevent the situation from getting out of control. Never has an American president so abjectly subordinated himself to a foreign leader — a proclaimed enemy of the U.S., no less — and been so publicly humiliated as has been the dynamic between Trump and Putin. Explanations for Trump's bizarrely un-American behavior range from the simplistically psychological (his fascination with the world's dictators) to the dangerously sinister 'Russian asset' theory, which posits that Putin has some nefarious hold on him through bribery or blackmail. That would certainly explain their kabuki dance on the war, where Putin pretends to want peace as he proceeds with his Ukraine demolition project while Trump pretends to care. If the latter explanation is closer to the truth than that Trump is entirely out of his depth and is simply overwhelmed by Putin's machinations, then the entire impetus of 'making America great again' is a gigantic subversive smokescreen for the opposite objective: diminishing America's strategic and moral leadership role in the world. Neither gross incompetence nor treasonous intent would be a cause for hope. Joseph Bosco served as China country director for the secretary of Defense from 2005 to 2006 and as Asia-Pacific director of humanitarian assistance and disaster relief from 2009 to 2010. He is a nonresident fellow at the Institute for Corean-American Studies, a member of the advisory board of the Global Taiwan Institute and member of the advisory board of The Vandenberg Coalition. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Perth Now
2 days ago
- General
- Perth Now
How do I have hard convos with my partner without arguing?
Every time I try to bring up something serious, like our finances, how often we're (not) having sex, or even my mental health, it somehow turns into a fight. I don't want to argue, I just want us to talk about the hard stuff without it becoming World War III. Why does this keep happening, and how can we actually have these conversations without it blowing up? Let's get one thing straight: hard conversations aren't the problem, how we approach them is. We all want connection, safety, and understanding, but when the topic feels heavy (money stress, unmet needs in the bedroom, emotional burnout), it's easy to slide into defensiveness or shutdown mode. And when one person gets defensive, the other usually doubles down… and boom…fight city! But it doesn't have to be that way. In fact, mastering these tough talks can deepen your relationship and build emotional intimacy like nothing else. So, why do serious topics often go sideways? There are typically a few main reasons: 1. Poor timing. Bringing up 'Why haven't we had sex in two months?' while your partner is trying to find parking or scroll Instagram isn't going to end well. Timing is everything. Research from The Gottman Institute shows that when partners feel emotionally flooded (i.e., overwhelmed), productive conversation is nearly impossible. 2. Tone over content. It's not what you say, it's how you say it. You can talk about the trickiest subjects, mental health, libido differences, debt, if you use a calm, compassionate tone. Leading with accusations ('You never listen') triggers defensiveness. Leading with vulnerability ('I've been feeling disconnected lately and want to talk about it') invites curiosity. 3. Lack of emotional safety. If either partner feels judged, shamed, or invalidated, conversations about sensitive issues can feel threatening. One 2022 study found that perceived criticism during emotional discussions was one of the top predictors of conflict escalation. So, what actually helps? Let's keep it simple and doable, because I don't want to set you up for failure. Start by using what we call the 'soft startup' technique: Start the conversation gently. Instead of 'We need to talk about your spending,' try 'I'd love for us to look at our finances together so we're on the same page.' Then set the scene: Pick a time when you're both relatively relaxed, not mid-argument, not while exhausted. Say, 'Hey, is now a good time to talk about something important to me?' One of the most basic and easiest to action is sticking to 'I' statements: It's Relationship Communication 101. 'I've been feeling…' vs. 'You always…'. I would recommend that you both avoid what we call 'kitchen-sinking' ie. don't bring up five years of grievances when you're trying to discuss one thing. Stay focused. Finally, validate before you disagree. Saying things such as 'I can see why that made you feel that way' is a magical sentence. It doesn't mean you agree, it means you care. Because after all, hard conversations aren't meant to be avoided, they're the glue that holds mature relationships together. If you can talk about the big three, mental health, sex, and money, without blowing up, you're not just surviving love… you're thriving in it. And remember: it's okay to ask for help. Whether it's a trusted therapist or a relationship coach, support can make all the difference in turning conflict into connection. Your Bestie, Amanda Amanda Lambros is a sexologist and relationship coach with almost two decades of experience who takes pride in her 'no b-s' approach to solving your problems. She is also a certified speaking professional and has written several books on relationships, health and business which have sold more than 150,000 copies. Do you have a question for Amanda? Email heybestie@ (don't worry, we won't publish your name!)
Newsweek
2 days ago
- Politics
- Newsweek
Zelensky Eyes Stunning Diplomatic Comeback
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. U.S. President Donald Trump's growing criticism of Russian President Vladimir Putin in recent days could point to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky gaining the upper hand diplomatically as wrangling over negotiations to end the war continue. When asked which leader caused more irritation for Trump, Zelensky said, according to Ukrainian media: "I may say nasty things, but I'm telling the truth," compared with Putin, who "may sometimes say very nice things, but they are false." In a week in which Trump called Putin "crazy" and accused him of "playing with fire" Ukrainian experts told Newsweek that Zelensky may exploit the U.S. president's growing frustration with his Russian counterpart to strengthen Kyiv's position. Another expert said Trump's words do not mean Zelensky is in his favor, but the U.S. president is running out of patience with Putin. Newsweek has contacted the White House for comment. This combination photo created on May 25, 2025, shows (from left) Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. This combination photo created on May 25, 2025, shows (from left) Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Getty Images Why It Matters After Russia rejected the U.S. administration's proposal for a 30-day ceasefire ahead of talks for a more permanent agreement, a plan backed by Kyiv, Trump has questioned publicly whether Putin is stringing him along. Zelensky's comments that Trump preferred dealing with him as a straight talker over Putin's delaying tactics suggest that Ukraine's president could be trying to highlight greater diplomatic leverage. What To Know Kyiv and its allies were worried about what Trump's return to the White House would mean for U.S. support for Ukraine's fight against Russian aggression. The U.S. president has criticized his Ukrainian counterpart, no more so than when he accused him of risking "World War III" in a fiery White House exchange on February 28. But since then, the leaders have struck a minerals deal and held a widely reported conversation in the Vatican on the sidelines of Pope Francis' funeral which signaled that the air between them had been cleared. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on May 28, 2025, in Berlin. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on May 28, 2025, in may continue to issue jibes at Zelensky, but the U.S. president took a pointed swipe at Putin following Moscow's missile and drone barrage on Kyiv and other parts of Ukraine last week, calling the Russian leader "crazy." Trump doubled down on his criticism of Putin, whom he said would do well to remember that if it were not for the U.S. leader, "lots of really bad things would have already happened to Russia," prompting derision from Russian state media. Zelensky told reporters Tuesday that despite a sometimes-testy relationship with Trump, the White House is still more irritated by Putin than him because in dialogue with the Russian leader, "you are really alone." Viktor Kovalenko, a Ukrainian military veteran who produces the Ukraine Decoded Substack, told Newsweek that Zelensky will attempt to exploit Trump's growing frustration with Putin to strengthen Kyiv's position. He believes that Zelensky will also try to portray himself domestically as an influential leader who "played Trump like a fiddle" as Kyiv works hard to win over U.S. Republicans, capitalizing on any small opportunity to achieve that. But frustration with Putin does not automatically mean that Trump is becoming a fan of Zelensky as the U.S. administration keeps a "diplomatic, healthy distance" from both leaders, Kovalenko added. Mark Temnycky, non-resident fellow at the Atlantic Council think tank, said Putin and his officials frustrated Trump at the same time as Zelensky and his administration had met U.S. officials for proposals on how to end the war. This meant a more favorable relationship between Zelensky and Trump and make Kyiv's prospects for achieving a peace plan with the U.S. more promising, Temnycky told Newsweek. Also, Russia's latest deadly strikes on Ukraine that Trump condemned may persuade U.S. officials to further cooperate with Kyiv, he added. Peter Rough, director, at the Center on Europe and Eurasia at the Hudson Institute, a Washington-based think tank, told Newsweek that Putin had fallen out of favor with Trump, but that did not mean that Zelensky was in the U.S. leader's good graces. The White House is less optimistic about the chances for a negotiated agreement than before and most of that is a result of Putin's intransigence, he added. What People Are Saying Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, on his relationship with Trump: "I may say unpleasant things, but I tell the truth. And I say what I think." Ukrainian geopolitical analyst Viktor Kovalenko: "Zelensky will attempt to exploit Trump's growing frustration with Putin to strengthen Ukraine's position before the second round of negotiations, and to portray himself domestically as an influential leader who 'played Trump like a fiddle.'" Peter Rough, director of the Center on Europe and Eurasia at the Hudson Institute, told Newsweek: "I don't think Zelensky is in Trump's favor, but Putin is increasingly out of the president's favor. "The White House appears less sanguine about the prospect of a negotiated agreement than it was months ago, and most of that is now attributed to Putin's intransigence." Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, on the prospect of peace talks: "We need to wait for an answer from the Ukrainian side. Only then can we begin to move forward." What Happens Next Trump said Putin has an additional two-week deadline to take a ceasefire proposal seriously before the U.S. imposes new sanctions and other penalties, although it is unclear if this ultimatum may shift. Meanwhile, Moscow said Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov presented to U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio "specific proposals" for the next round of peace talks. Moscow had earlier proposed talks with Ukraine in Istanbul to take place on June 2, as a follow-up to the first round on May 16 that Putin notably did not attend. Rough said that Trump is hoping for a negotiated outcome in the coming months and is awaiting the Russian offer that Putin promised in a phone call.
The Hill
2 days ago
- Politics
- The Hill
Does Trump know that Putin is using him as his puppet?
As America was observing Memorial Day, Russia launched its largest missile and drone attack of the three-year-old war on Kiev and other Ukrainian cities. Scores of men, women and children were killed, adding to the more than 600 civilian deaths that have occurred since the beginning of the year, despite President Trump's promise to end the war in a day. The deliberate targeting of civilians in schools, playgrounds and hospitals adds to the long list of Vladimir Putin's war crimes, none of which has motivated Trump to escalate either sanctions on Russia and the countries aiding its aggression or to augment and hasten the supply of effective weaponry to Ukraine. By contrast, when Ukranian President Volodymyr Zelensky hesitated before accepting Trump's ultimatum on a one-sided mineral-rights deal without a security guarantee, Trump immediately suspended intelligence and arms support to Ukraine (since partially restored). Trump has failed to follow through on any of his warnings to Russia, including its latest aerial attack on Ukraine's population and infrastructure. Instead, he has gone from warning Putin weeks ago, 'Vladimir, STOP!' to now declaring the Russian ruler 'has gone absolutely CRAZY.' Trump's latest declaration either serves to excuse himself for vastly misjudging a man he often claims to know well, and greatly admires, or, far less plausibly, to plead that Putin has somehow changed his nature. Trump is not the first U.S. president to claim to have been deceived by Putin and Russia. George W. Bush said he had peered into Putin's eyes and gotten 'a sense of his soul.' Even before Putin, Jimmy Carter said the 1979 invasion of Afghanistan changed his opinion of Russia 'more drastically in the last week than even the previous two and a half years.' The application of Richard Nixon's 'madman' theory, which he used to intimidate potential adversaries by making them think him illogical and volatile, can serve as a pretext for Trump's lack of action — not only for depredations Putin has already committed but to excuse any future outrages. Putin has cleverly fed those fears with his references to the use of nuclear weapons. Like Joe Biden before him, Trump fears provoking World War III more than Putin supposedly does, and so he is prepared to back down in a confrontation with a seemingly irrational adversary. In fact, Putin has shown no sign of suicidal tendencies. Rather, his provocative and escalatory behavior is quite rational, carried out with the confidence that 'responsible' leaders in Washington — Barack Obama, Biden, Trump — will always blink first to prevent the situation from getting out of control. Never has an American president so abjectly subordinated himself to a foreign leader — a proclaimed enemy of the U.S., no less — and been so publicly humiliated as has been the dynamic between Trump and Putin. Explanations for Trump's bizarrely un-American behavior range from the simplistically psychological (his fascination with the world's dictators) to the dangerously sinister 'Russian asset' theory, which posits that Putin has some nefarious hold on him through bribery or blackmail. That would certainly explain their kabuki dance on the war, where Putin pretends to want peace as he proceeds with his Ukraine demolition project while Trump pretends to care. If the latter explanation is closer to the truth than that Trump is entirely out of his depth and is simply overwhelmed by Putin's machinations, then the entire impetus of 'making America great again' is a gigantic subversive smokescreen for the opposite objective: diminishing America's strategic and moral leadership role in the world. Neither gross incompetence nor treasonous intent would be a cause for hope. Joseph Bosco served as China country director for the secretary of Defense from 2005 to 2006 and as Asia-Pacific director of humanitarian assistance and disaster relief from 2009 to 2010. He is a nonresident fellow at the Institute for Corean-American Studies, a member of the advisory board of the Global Taiwan Institute and member of the advisory board of The Vandenberg Coalition.
