Latest news with #anti-Trump
Fox News
an hour ago
- Politics
- Fox News
WATCH: Texas Dem censured for heckling Trump renews push to impeach presidential 'Goliath'
Progressive Rep. Al Green, D-Texas, is once again renewing his call to impeach President Donald Trump, vowing to drop new articles of impeachment soon. He likened his crusade against Trump to the biblical David versus Goliath and anti-Trump activists as "one million Davids." "This is what's important, President Trump is a Goliath. He has military might. He has persons who are loyal to him in the military and the judiciary and in the Congress. But for every Goliath, there is a David," said Green, adding, "But in this case, we have nearly one million Davids, one million Davids willing to take on and challenge the president for his unconstitutional behavior. And I say to you that this number is growing." In June, the House of Representatives voted along bipartisan lines to quash Green's bid to impeach Trump. Lawmakers agreed to table the measure in a 344–79 vote. A vote to table is a procedural mechanism allowing House members to vote against consideration of a bill without having to vote on the bill itself. A majority of House Democrats joined Republican lawmakers to kill Green's resolution, a sign of how politically caustic the effort appears to be. Just 79 Democrats voted to proceed with the impeachment vote, while 128 voted to halt it in its tracks. Despite this, Green said he was undeterred, telling reporters on Wednesday "we're not going to make this a one-off" and "there's also a set of articles that I have not presented that I will be presenting. This is not the last time." Asked whether he believes pursuing impeachment is productive given the Republican House majority, Green answered, "it is always a good time to impeach." "I think focusing on impeachment is productive whenever there's a breach of the Constitution," he said. "The timing is not associated with when you have a majority in the House, it's not associated with when it feels good, it is always good to impeach when a president violates the Constitution. It really is that simple." Besides being known for repeatedly attempting to impeach Trump, the Texas Democrat is also known for infamously disrupting the president's joint address to Congress in March by shouting and waving his cane at him. Green was removed from the House floor after repeatedly disrupting the beginning of the president's speech, a move that the Democrat called "invidious discrimination." House lawmakers voted to censure Green over the disruption. Ten Democrats joined Republicans in voting for the measure. Green himself voted "present," along with first-term Rep. Shomari Figures, D-Ala. When reached for comment by Fox News Digital, the office of Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., referred to his comments on the censure on X, formerly Twitter, this week. Johnson posted, "Rep. Al Green's shameful and egregious behavior during President Trump's Joint Address disgraced the institution of Congress and the constituents he serves. Despite my repeated warnings, he refused to cease his antics and I was forced to remove him from the chamber. He deliberately violated House rules, and an expeditious vote of censure is an appropriate remedy. Any Democrat who is concerned about regaining the trust and respect of the American people should join House Republicans in this effort."
BBC News
an hour ago
- Politics
- BBC News
Trump assassination attempt suspect can represent himself in Florida trial, judge rules
A man accused of attempting to assassinate President Donald Trump at his Florida golf course last year will be allowed to represent himself at trial, a court has Routh, 59, is charged with trying to assassinate then-candidate Trump by aiming a rifle through a fence at his West Palm Beach golf course. US District Judge Aileen Cannon approved his request to represent himself at trial, but ordered court-appointed attorneys to remain on standby. "I strongly urge you not to make this decision," Judge Cannon told Routh, warning that his lawyers would represent him "far better". Routh says his attorneys were not answering his questions and that they were "a million miles apart". "[I]t was ridiculous from the outset to consider a random stranger that knows nothing of who I am to speak for me," he wrote in a letter to the judge asking to represent himself. Routh's public defenders had requested to be taken off the case because they said he had refused to meet them on several occasions. The trial is scheduled for 8 September. He has pleaded not guilty to charges of attempting to assassinate a major presidential candidate, assaulting a federal officer and several firearm convicted, he faces a maximum sentence of life in prison on the assassination has been held in a Florida jail since last September, when he was arrested on a main highway after fleeing Trump's golf course. He had been spotted with his rifle barrel poking through a fence at the oceanfront golf course before a Secret Service agent saw him and fired in his direction. Police say Routh hid for nearly 12 hours in the bushes waiting for Trump, who was playing records suggest Routh had been plotting his attack on the then-presidential candidate for has a long criminal record, including a felony gun conviction for owning a fully automatic machine gun, and was barred from owning firearms as a alleged plot was the second attempt on Trump's life as he ran for office. A gunman in Butler, Pennsylvania, shot Trump in the ear during a rally in July. Routh was active in recruiting volunteers to fight in Ukraine's war against Russia, and had a range of eclectic political views, although he was registered as a Democrat and made anti-Trump posts an earlier letter this year, the 59-year-old had asked to be used in a prisoner swap with another country like Russia so he could have a "swift and useful" death.
7NEWS
5 hours ago
- Entertainment
- 7NEWS
South Park skewers Trump, Paramount hours after creators sign $2.3 billion deal
Paramount announced Wednesday afternoon that the creators of South Park had agreed to produce 50 new episodes over the next five years in a deal reportedly valued at $1.5 billion (A$2.3b). Ten hours later, South Park creators Matt Stone and Trey Parker excoriated Paramount — and aggressively skewered President Donald Trump — in the premiere episode of the Comedy Central show's 27th season. In the episode, Trump (voiced by Stone) sues the town of South Park for $5 billion after they push back on Jesus Christ's presence in their elementary school. The townspeople are prepared to fight back, but Jesus Christ (also voiced by Stone) urges them to settle. 'You guys saw what happened to CBS? Yeah, well, guess who owns CBS? Paramount,' Jesus Christ says at the episode's climax. 'Do you really want to end up like Colbert?' Paramount is under intense scrutiny for appearing to kowtow to the Trump administration ahead of a proposed blockbuster merger. Stone and Parker were clearly riffing on their corporate parent's eventful summer. On July 2, Paramount agreed to pay $16 million to settle a lawsuit from Trump, who alleged that CBS' 60 Minutes had deceptively edited an interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris. CBS denied that claim. On July 17, CBS announced that it planned to cancel The Late Show with Stephen Colbert in May, calling the move 'purely a financial decision.' But many of Colbert's fans cried foul, arguing that the comedian was being penalised for his years of anti-Trump humor. Both developments came as Paramount is preparing to be sold to Skydance Media, an entertainment production and finance company headed by David Ellison, the son of Oracle mogul (and Trump ally) Larry Ellison. The corporate tie-up requires federal approval. The premiere episode, titled Sermon on the 'Mount, took aim at other satirical targets, including the supposed death of 'wokeness,' the rise of ChatGPT and the debate over Christian teachings in public schools. Trump and Paramount were the focal points, however. In one scene, 60 Minutes reports on the social unrest roiling South Park amid Trump's lawsuit. The fictional hosts of the news show are visibly nervous as they introduce the segment, going out of their way to praise the president as 'a great man.' 'We know he's probably watching,' one of the hosts says. CBS is not the only network to reach a legal settlement with Trump. ABC agreed to pay $15 million as part of a settlement with Trump a month before he took office, effectively ending a case concerning alleged defamation. Paramount's settlement with Trump has drawn more attention, though. Colbert, three days before CBS announced the end of his show, blasted the arrangement as a 'big fat bribe.' Jon Stewart, the host of Comedy Central's The Daily Show, also assailed the deal. Paramount owns CBS, a venerable Hollywood movie studio, a suite of cable brands (including Comedy Central) and the Paramount+ streaming platform. South Park is widely known for jabbing politicians and social trends across the ideological spectrum. But the latest episode's depiction of Trump arguably went further than usual. Stone and Parker depict Trump as a petulant child, recycling the animation style they used for Saddam Hussein in the 1999 film South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut. They also make profane references to the president's anatomy. Sermon on the 'Mount closes with an apparently AI-generated video of Trump wandering in a desert and removing his clothes. Paramount spokespeople did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the episode.
CNBC
5 hours ago
- Entertainment
- CNBC
'South Park' mocks Paramount's settlement with Trump after creators sign $1.5B deal
Paramount announced Wednesday afternoon that the creators of "South Park" had agreed to produce 50 new episodes over the next five years in a deal reportedly valued at $1.5 billion. Ten hours later, "South Park" creators Matt Stone and Trey Parker excoriated Paramount — and aggressively skewered President Donald Trump — in the premiere episode of the Comedy Central show's 27th season. In the episode, Trump (voiced by Stone) sues the town of South Park for $5 billion after they push back on Jesus Christ's presence in their elementary school. The townspeople are prepared to fight back, but Jesus Christ (also voiced by Stone) urges them to settle. "You guys saw what happened to CBS? Yeah, well, guess who owns CBS? Paramount," Jesus Christ says at the episode's climax. "Do you really want to end up like Colbert?" Paramount is under intense scrutiny for appearing to kowtow to the Trump administration ahead of a proposed blockbuster merger. Stone and Parker were clearly riffing on their corporate parent's eventful summer. On July 2, Paramount agreed to pay $16 million to settle a lawsuit from Trump, who alleged that CBS' "60 Minutes" had deceptively edited an interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris. CBS denied that claim. On July 17, CBS announced that it planned to cancel "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert" in May, calling the move "purely a financial decision." But many of Colbert's fans cried foul, arguing that the comedian was being penalized for his years of anti-Trump humor. Both developments came as Paramount is preparing to be sold to Skydance Media, an entertainment production and finance company headed by David Ellison, the son of Oracle mogul (and Trump ally) Larry Ellison. The corporate tie-up requires federal approval. The premiere episode, titled "Sermon on the 'Mount," took aim at other satirical targets, including the supposed death of "wokeness," the rise of ChatGPT and the debate over Christian teachings in public schools. Trump and Paramount were the focal points, however. In one scene, "60 Minutes" reports on the social unrest roiling South Park amid Trump's lawsuit. The fictional hosts of the news show are visibly nervous as they introduce the segment, going out of their way to praise the president as "a great man." "We know he's probably watching," one of the hosts says. CBS is not the only network to reach a legal settlement with Trump. ABC agreed to pay $15 million as part of a settlement with Trump a month before he took office, effectively ending a case concerning alleged defamation. Paramount's settlement with Trump has drawn more attention, though. Colbert, three days before CBS announced the end of his show, blasted the arrangement as a "big fat bribe." Jon Stewart, the host of Comedy Central's "The Daily Show," also assailed the deal. Paramount owns CBS, a venerable Hollywood movie studio, a suite of cable brands (including Comedy Central) and the Paramount+ streaming platform. "South Park" is widely known for jabbing politicians and social trends across the ideological spectrum. But the latest episode's depiction of Trump arguably went further than usual. Stone and Parker depict Trump as a petulant child, recycling the animation style they used for Saddam Hussein in the 1999 film "South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut." They also make profane references to the president's anatomy. "Sermon on the 'Mount" closes with an apparently AI-generated video of Trump wandering in a desert and removing his clothes. Paramount spokespeople did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the episode.
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Politics
- Time of India
From Epstein to Obama: Is Donald Trump using Russiagate as a smokescreen? And how Tulsi Gabbard is changing the conversation...
In Mad Men, the fictional adman Don Draper was given a unique problem: sell Madison Square Garden to the public. The plot was based on real-life developers tearing down Penn Station to make way for MSG, prompting an outcry that—this being the 1960s—manifested not in tweets, but in New York Times op-eds. Draper, ever the magician of misdirection, reassures the developers: 'If you don't like what they're saying, change the conversation.' And now another Donald who knows how to sell it in Madison Square Garden is borrowing from the Draper playbook. Faced with growing anger from his own base over the heavily redacted Epstein files and a Justice Department that insists there's 'no client list,' Donald Trump 's administration suddenly rolled out a batch of declassified Russiagate documents. The revelations—pushed by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard—claim that Barack Obama 's intelligence chiefs orchestrated a political hit job on Trump in 2016. No matter how damning they may appear, the timing is unmistakable. Gabbard wasn't just releasing documents. She was changing the conversation. Mad Men - Change the conversation Throwing a Punch to Hide a Bruise There's a phrase in politics borrowed from boxing: 'throwing a punch to hide a bruise.' The Trump administration—known more for punches than cover-ups—is now doing both. On one side, you have Gabbard, the newly-minted DNI, swaggering into the White House press room with a folder of declassified Russiagate material, naming Obama, Brennan, Clapper, and Comey as conspirators in a grand anti-Trump hoax. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Nikoo Homes: Luxury Starts @ ₹1.2 Cr* Nikoo Homes Sadahalli Learn More Undo On the other side, you have the Epstein files—the infamous 'client list' Trump once vowed to expose—now censored, redacted, and buried by his own Justice Department. The question practically asks itself: is Trump using Russiagate to change the subject from Epstein? And perhaps more importantly: is it working? The Epstein Reversal: From 'We'll Release Everything' to 'There Is No List' In 2024, Donald Trump made a campaign promise so red-meat red it sizzled on contact: he'd expose 'everyone' involved with Jeffrey Epstein . 'We'll declassify it all,' he told reporters. 'And no one will be spared.' His base cheered. The Q crowd posted memes of Hillary Clinton behind bars. Even swing voters, sickened by the Epstein-Maxwell horror show, leaned in. Fast-forward to 2025. Trump is back in office. His Attorney General, Pam Bondi, holds up thick black binders at a press conference—hundreds of pages, she says, from the first 'phase' of Epstein disclosure. She hands them to hand-picked right-wing influencers like it's a game show giveaway. Except there's a catch: the documents are redacted into oblivion. Names are blacked out. The infamous 'client list'? Nowhere in sight. When asked why, Bondi's Justice Department offered a legal fig leaf: the files contain 'highly sensitive victim information' and potentially child sexual abuse material. There's no list, they insisted. Case closed. It didn't go down well. Even Trump's most loyal followers turned on him. You promised transparency, they roared. You said you weren't part of the swamp. Former allies like Steve Bannon and Laura Loomer sounded the alarm. If you don't release those files, Loomer warned on X, it will consume your presidency. By June, the outrage had reached critical mass. The House Freedom Caucus revolted. MAGA influencers trended #ReleaseTheList. Faced with rebellion, Trump backpedaled, promising that the rest of the files were 'being reviewed.' Bondi, meanwhile, admitted the FBI had initially turned over only 200 pages—then, oops, 'forgot' thousands more. The excuse? Bureaucratic oversight. The reality? Panic. The files were radioactive. They named names. Big names. So the Trump administration stalled—and stalled hard. Enter Tulsi Gabbard: The Distractress-in-Chief Just as the Epstein backlash hit fever pitch, Tulsi Gabbard showed up with a manila folder and a message: Forget the pedophile billionaire. Let's talk about Obama. Standing at the same podium where Bondi had fumbled, Gabbard held up her own bombshell: a House Intelligence Committee report alleging that Obama's intel chiefs 'manufactured' the claim that Putin wanted Trump to win in 2016. She used all the right words: 'treasonous conspiracy,' 'weaponized intelligence,' 'Obama-led plot.' The MAGA base swooned. Trump, desperate for narrative control, seized on it like a drowning man clutching a life raft. In a speech to Republican lawmakers, he thundered: 'Barack Hussein Obama cheated. They all cheated.' He called it proof of a 'coup.' Fox News dutifully reoriented its programming. The chyron war began: 'OBAMA'S DEEP STATE EXPOSED' replaced 'WHERE IS EPSTEIN'S LIST?' in primetime. But while the headlines changed, the facts didn't. Because if you actually read the report Gabbard declassified, it says—brace yourself—that Russia did interfere in 2016, that Putin did want to destabilize Clinton, and that the hacking of the DNC was real. The only thing under debate? Whether US intelligence had enough basis to say Putin preferred Trump. It's not the smoking gun Trump wants. It's a footnote in an old argument. But that doesn't matter. The purpose was never truth. It was smoke. Glorious, pluming smoke to hide the fire underneath. The Timing Was No Coincidence Gabbard's release came hours after Bondi's disastrous Epstein presser. That's not a coincidence. That's stagecraft. The DOJ had just enraged the far-right by quietly announcing that it was 'closing' the Epstein investigation. No new charges. No prosecutions. Just a neat little bow and a promise of privacy. But the optics? Catastrophic. Trump had painted himself as the anti-elite crusader. Now, he looked like just another gatekeeper. So Gabbard was deployed. Not to protect national security. Not to expose wrongdoing. But to give the base a new villain. Obama. The Deep State. Russiagate, Season 6. Even the visuals were calibrated: Tulsi with a binder, flanked by flags, echoing the Bondi moment—except this time, with fire instead of fizzle. It was the political equivalent of throwing chum to sharks. The Loyalty Trap The most dangerous threat to Trump isn't Democrats or the media—it's his own base turning on him. And they are. It's not the left calling him out. It's the conspiracy crowd. The Infowars faithful. The Elon Musk fanboys. The 'sovereign citizen' types. The ones who believed him when he said he'd burn it all down. Now they see him protecting the very secrets they thought he'd expose. When Trump tweets about Gabbard's revelations, they reply: 'Cool. Now release the Epstein files.' When he posts about Russia, they comment: 'Where's the client list?' Even Speaker Mike Johnson had to cancel votes in the House because Republican members refused to proceed unless the Epstein files were released. One White House insider put it bluntly: 'The issue is screwing up the schedule.' Trump is boxed in. If he releases the full Epstein files, he risks implicating allies—or worse, himself. If he doesn't, he loses the one thing he's always relied on: the unwavering loyalty of his base. Obama's Ghost vs Epstein's Island The contrast couldn't be sharper. On one side: a seven-year-old intelligence memo that Trump wants to re-litigate like a bitter ex replaying a fight from 2016. On the other: a dead man in a jail cell, a network of underage victims, and a 'little black book' that reads like a Bond villain's contact sheet. Guess which one the public cares about? Gabbard's Russiagate revival is a calculated political play. But it's not a cure. It's a sedative. And it doesn't answer the question that gnaws at everyone from reporters to Redditors: What was Epstein protecting, and who protected him? Until that question is answered, no amount of Deep State declassifications will suffice. The Final Gamble There's a tragic irony here. Trump was once the guy who asked the uncomfortable questions. What happened to Epstein? Why wasn't he on suicide watch? Where's the tape? Now he's the one hiding the answers. He gave the base a villain in 2016: Hillary Clinton. He gave them a mission in 2020: Stop the Steal. In 2025, he promised justice for Epstein's victims. Now, he's offering redacted PDFs and reruns of Russiagate. It's not enough. Gabbard's document drop might buy headlines. It might fire up the base. But it won't shake the creeping sense that Trump—once the human Molotov cocktail hurled at the system—has become just another fire marshal. He lit a fuse in 2016. Now he's trying to smother the smoke with paperwork. And in politics, there's no greater sin than looking like the thing you swore to destroy. One Last Mad Men Lesson When Don Draper was told Lucky Strike cigarettes were poisonous, he didn't argue with the facts. He didn't deny the damage. He simply changed the conversation. He pointed at the manufacturing process and said, 'It's toasted.' Everyone knew all cigarettes were toasted. That wasn't the point. The point was to make people feel like they knew something others didn't. To take something toxic—and rebrand it as reassuring. The Trump administration is doing the same thing now. The Epstein files are radioactive. So they dusted off an old Russiagate memo, slapped a 'declassified' stamp on it, and fed it to the press with a wink and a flag. It's not transparency. It's not accountability. It's just toasted. "It's Toasted" scene - Mad Men - Pilot
