Latest news with #copycat
South China Morning Post
a day ago
- South China Morning Post
Man in Japan arrested over suspected attempt to repeat 1987 attack on reporters
Police in Japan have arrested a man over a parcel containing threats sent to a news outlet in a suspected copycat attempt of the most serious attack on the media in the country's modern history. Kazuhiro Muto, 38, was arrested at his home in the city of Fuji, Shizuoka prefecture, on June 3, a month after a parcel allegedly from him was delivered to an office of the Asahi Shimbun in Nishinomiya, the newspaper reported. The parcel arrived just after the anniversary of the May 3, 1987 attack in the same office, in which an Asahi reporter was shot dead and another seriously injured. A group calling itself 'Sekihotai' in a statement claimed responsibility for the attack, which killed 29-year-old Tomohiro Kojiri and severely wounded his colleague, Hyoe Inukai, then 42. A letter purportedly sent by the group carried the message: 'We do not accept anyone who betrays Japan. We sentence all Asahi Shimbun employees to death.' The gunman was never identified, and the statute of limitations in the case expired in 2002. The parcel that allegedly involved Muto contained photographs of Asahi reporters that had been defaced, a toy gun and a statement that quoted the original claim of responsibility for the 1987 attack. The statement was signed 'Reiwa Sekihotai', with Reiwa being the name of the present imperial era of Japan.
Daily Mail
13-05-2025
- Business
- Daily Mail
Sainsbury's embroiled in dupe row as independent flavoured butter brand accuses supermarket giant of making 'carbon copies' of its products
Sainsbury's has become embroiled in a bitter copycat spat with an independent butter brand. The British supermarket is facing claims from Sublime Butter that its new Taste the Difference butter range, released last week, comprises 'carbon copies' of its products. Sublime Butter offers premium butters in flavours such as garlic and herb and garlic, rosemary, and mint at prices of up to £4.95. While the brand has found success at various retailers and is stocked in Harrods and Selfridges, it has claimed that Sainsbury's has 'gone and accidentally made carbon copies of the ones we sent you last year.' Sainsbury's has denied the claims. Sublime Butter founder Tony Ho told The Grocer that Sainsbury's contacted his brand in July last year to consider stocking them, which led to conversations about flavours and them sending 'loads of samples', said Ho. Ho, who has approached the Groceries Code Adjudicator over the matter, said the retailer then went radio silent without offering an explanation as to why. Taking to Instagram, the brand publicly directed a letter to Sainsbury's after the retailer 'ghosted' their attempts of direct communication. 'Your 'new' range of flavoured butters look great,' the statement said, continuing, 'Particularly the Chimichurri and the Truffle, Parmesan & Black Pepper ones. Did you come up with those yourselves? Be honest now. 'Because it seems like you've gone and accidentally made carbon copies of the ones we sent you last year. You know, the ones you pretended you wanted to stock? We won awards for ours though. 'Not to cry over spilled milk but as a small producer, we're sick of having giant supermarkets swoop in, ask for samples, and then rip us off. 'We're good people working hard to make something we're proud of. We love what we do. We find joy in helping people to eat better. Bad sportsmanship from big players means that it's increasingly difficult to do.' Sublime Butter concluded the post by urging Sainsbury's to develop 'original' products in the future, writing, 'Imitation is the greatest form of flattery, so thank you. But also: stop and think. 'Take the £££s you've spent copying us and make something original. Go out on a limb. 'All these supermarket price wars and you've all forgotten the one true basis of any good brand: stand for something. Then, maybe you won't have to stoop to following in other people's wake.' A Sainsbury's spokesperson told MailOnline, 'There is no truth in these claims. We value our supplier relationships deeply - every supplier is an essential partner to our business and no matter their size or scale we are committed to fair treatment and trusted partnerships. 'We launched our Taste the Difference flavoured butter range in response to growing customer demand for more flavourful butter and joined several other retailers with launches in this category, based on customer insights and following well-established flavour trends in the market. 'Our own label product development process operates entirely separately and the team has no contact or discussion with suppliers over the brands we stock.' It comes after Aldi encountered dupe allegations after an independent company accused the supermarket giant of ripping off its product last year. Joe Moruzzi, managing director of Surrey-based brand Pleese, claimed the supermarket giant had designed a dupe of his brand Freezecakes. Taking to Instagram the the dessert company shared a clip saying Aldi even 'had the cheek' to call their dupe the same name, just dropping the 's' and used its slogan, 'It's not ice cream', which Pleese claims it has trademarked. Freezecakes, available in Waitrose, Co-op and Consort Frozen Foods, are frozen cheesecakes in a tub, made from 40 percent cream cheese with flavoured sauces and biscuit pieces. FEMAIL understands the product is not currently on sale in Aldi and the supermarket giant was in touch with Pleese. Joe claimed that he was alerted to the Aldi product when customers sent them photos via social media. Commenting on a picture of a very similar cheesecake product found in Aldi, which was shared by uknewestfoods on Instagram, one person said, 'The nerve! Freezecakes are an amazing little company. Get f**** Aldi.' Another wrote, 'Oh that is so naughty to rip off a new fledgling company, I supported you with the Colin/Cuthbert cake, but this is low! Very disappointed in you!' Meanwhile, another said, 'This is not cool at all. Ripping off a small business so blatantly, make sure you pick up the original, and best from @freezecakes' Speaking to FEMAIL, Pleese boss Joe said, 'Initially I thought great, the frozen dessert category is growing, I then looked closer and saw Freezecakes and 'it's not ice cream', two names and phrases we use and have trademarked. They're also exactly the same flavours. 'We're all about growing the category, but when large companies just copy tiny companies like for like it's disheartening for us and potentially off putting for new entrepreneurs. 'We're here to stand up for small businesses and I hope this is a note to encourage any copycat ideas to be less intrusive and detrimental to small brands that have worked so hard and made many sacrifices to get to where they are.' A Pleese employee took to Instagram to address the controversy saying, 'For those that don't know us, we are Pleese and we had to concept for a Cheesecake dessert that could be eaten like ice cream back in 2017. 'We started making overload cheesecakes which were loved by all, and we even made one for The Queen. 'Fast forward to 2020, we finally had the concept of creating a frozen cheesecake that could be eaten like ice cream from a tub, layers of cheesecake with biscuit chunks, fancy inclusions and sauces, we sold these via our website. 'Three years later we finally launched in the supermarkets and we were over the moon as we are still a startup brand with less the five employees. ' After receiving snaps of the dupe from their loyal followers on social media the Pleese team said they had a feeling it was going to happen. They said: 'Products get duped all the time, but we are the little guys, we are not a massive company with thousands of staff. 18 months ago we were still making this product by hand in a little kitchen in Redhill. 'The thing that got us was the name, Freezecake, not Freezecakes with an S, singular, that and 'it's not ice cream' which is trademarked by us, is featured on their tub. The brand said they refuse to be 'bullied' and want to 'raise awareness' for all the small brands this is happening to. FEMAIL understands the product is not currently on sale in Aldi stores.
Fast Company
07-05-2025
- Entertainment
- Fast Company
What happens when you mix random stuff in a bowl for 100 days? TikTok found out
Ever wondered what happens when you add random household items to the same bowl every day for 100 days straight? Well, you're in luck. One TikTok account has made it their mission to find out—so you don't have to. The anonymous account, known simply as Bowl of Danger, adds 'random stuff' to a bowl each day until they 'get in danger.' The experiment began in January with a dollop of sunscreen. Each day, something new entered the mix: sugar, whipped cream, deodorant, lit firecrackers, batteries, nail polish, vodka, a whole pizza, a Big Mac. 'Can't imagine how bad that reeks,' someone wrote in the comments. 'I just unlocked a new facial expression,' added a second. Another warned, 'No cuz I genuinely think we're making a pandemic' (check out day 25 at your own risk). For every person who scrolls past in horror, plenty are invested. Some of the most viral Bowl of Danger videos have racked up millions of views, with fans suggesting new items to add. As for Day 100? The video was taken down, but according to the comments, it involved a firecracker and an explosion. Since Bowl of Danger went viral, a number of copycat accounts have emerged. There's The Danger Bowl, naturally, and Bowl of Living —an organic version of the original series. 'Mold is just a simple form of life,' the creator says. 'I want to create something more—like a new species.'
