Latest news with #copyright
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Business
- Yahoo
Microsoft Gains As Trump Seeks Uniform AI Rule
Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) and OpenAI hit by suits, prompting Trump to demand one uniform federal AI training president pointed to mounting copyright battleslike The New York Times'(NYSE:NYT) suit against Microsoft?backed OpenAIand argued you can learn from articles without copying them. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with NVDA. He said rules can't vary from state to state just before signing an AI Action Plan built on 3 pillars: innovation, infrastructure and international security. At the Washington summit Trump likened the AI race to the space race and vowed to clear regulation?prone roadblocks. He told Nvidia's (NASDAQ:NVDA) Jensen Huang and AMD's Lisa Su he'll fast?track data centers, chip plants and energy projects while rolling back burdensome rules. A single federal standard could cut legal headaches and speed AI rollout for Microsoft and its will be watching for draft AI regulations due this fall. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Entertainment
- Yahoo
Did Dave Franco and Alison Brie's new horror flick ‘Together' rip off another movie? Here's what both sides are saying.
In a copyright lawsuit, the producers of "Better Half" claim that the premise of "Together" was stolen from their 2022 romantic comedy. Filmmaker Michael Shanks's debut feature Together is one of the most anticipated horror films of the summer — but it's not without controversy. The Sundance Film Festival darling — it sold for a reported $17 million to distributor Neon following a bidding war — stars real-life husband and wife Dave Franco and Alison Brie as a married couple whose vacation takes a turn when (spoiler alert!) a supernatural force causes their bodies to merge. It's a funny, albeit terrifying premise — and one that another production company alleges was stolen from its film, Better Half. Shanks, as well as the talent agency behind the Together team, deny the allegations. But that hasn't stopped people from talking about whether Together is really a rip-off. With Together heading to theaters on July 30, here's an explainer of the drama. What is the team alleging? Back in May, producers of the indie movie Better Half, Jess Jacklin and Charles Beale, filed a lawsuit against the producers of Together, alleging copyright infringement. (Better Half was written and directed by Patrick Henry Phelan, however, Jacklin and Beale's production company, StudioFest, is the only plaintiff named in the suit.) According to an article in Entertainment Weekly, Jacklin and Beale claim that the makers of Together stole the concept of Better Half, in which a couple 'wake up to find their bodies physically fused together as a metaphor for codependency.' While the main characters in Together are married and in Better Half they are strangers who just had a one night stand, both films show how the couple at the center 'navigate daily life as their physical attachment progresses and they start to control each other's body parts,' per the lawsuit. The suit also notes that both couples attempt to use chainsaws to separate themselves from one another. The Better Half producers also note a number of other details that the movies share, including a reference to the Spice Girls, the professions of the main characters and bathroom scenes in which both couples attempt to hide their intertwined condition from a third party. According to the suit, the films also include references to Plato's Symposium, which dissects the meaning and significance of love. The Better Half team also claims that Franco's and Brie's agents at WME were sent a copy of the script for Better Half in 2020, but they ultimately passed on the project. It's worth noting that while Together is described as a horror movie, Better Half is billed as a romantic comedy. The Brooklyn Film Festival, where Better Half premiered in 2022, features the following description for the film on its website: 'According to Greek mythology, humans were once two-faced, four-armed, four-legged creatures, until Zeus split us in two, leaving us in an endless search for our other halves. Fast forward to modern day: Arturo, a hopeless romantic in search of true love, and Daphne, a serial polygamist allergic to commitment, meet for what should be a one-night stand, and quite literally find their other half when their bodies fuse during sex. The haphazard journey to come undone might just reveal what they'd been missing all along.' Better Half appears not to have received distribution after its festival run and is unable to be viewed online at this point in time. What the team has said WME, the talent agency representing Franco, Brie and filmmaker Shanks, has vehemently denied the Better Half allegations. Speaking to IndieWire, a spokesperson for WME stated, 'This lawsuit is frivolous and without merit. The facts in this case are clear and we plan to vigorously defend ourselves.' In a joint statement on June 18, Neon and WME alleged that the plaintiffs are doing 'nothing more than drumming up 15 minutes of fame for a failed project, demonstrated by the fact they contacted the press before filing their lawsuit, and did so without doing the most basic due diligence.' They accused Jacklin and Beale of searching for a payday by making waves in the press. 'We look forward to presenting our case in court,' they said. That same day, Shanks, who wrote and directed Together, shared his own statement on Neon's Instagram and X accounts, calling the accusations 'devastating.' He said Together came from a 'deeply personal' place as, like Franco's and Brie's characters, Shanks said he is in a long-term relationship, and that his own experience of the 'entanglement of identity, love, and codependence' is what inspired Together. 'Tim's story, his love for Millie, his relationship to his family, his relationship to unfulfilled ambitions as a musician, is completely rooted in my own personal life,' Shanks said in his statement. 'I lost my father at a young age in the same way our main character does, his trauma is rooted in my own. To have this called into question is not only deeply upsetting but entirely untrue.' Shanks also stated that he completed and registered the first draft of Together in 2019 — before Better Half was sent to Franco's team at WME — and began developing it with Screen Australia in 2020. Franco came onboard in 2022 after meeting with Shanks, and Brie, Franco's real-life wife, joined the project shortly after. 'To now be accused of stealing this story — one so deeply based on my own lived experience, one I've developed over the course of several years — is devastating and has taken a heavy toll,' Shanks said. Check out the trailer for Together below: Is it common for movies to be accused of plagiarism? Plagiarism accusations occur fairly often in Hollywood, and they occasionally receive a lot of attention. Last year, the Alexander Payne film The Holdovers was accused of stealing elements of Simon Stephenson's script Frisco, which was on the 2013 Blacklist of the most popular scripts circulating in the industry. Stephenson filed a complaint with the Writers Guild of America, which said it was not within the scope of the organization to handle. In the case of Frisco and The Holdovers, both scripts are available online, allowing people to make their own judgments on social media about the similarities — with many saying the scripts were too different to make plagiarism claims. Payne, who directed The Holdovers from a script written by David Hemingson, spoke at the Sarajevo Film Festival in August 2024 about the situation. Payne claimed there was no merit to the plagiarism allegations, which never materialized into a lawsuit. 'I didn't even pay attention to it because kooky accusations come out of the woodwork all of the time and this didn't even bother me but then it kind of kept coming, I thought, 'Well, that's dumb,'' Payne said, according to Deadline. Filmmaker and actor Justin Baldoni was also accused of plagiarizing his 2019 directorial debut Five Feet Apart, about teenagers with cystic fibrosis falling in love, from screenwriter Travis Flores' script Three Feet Distance. The case was settled in 2022 and Baldoni has not spoken about the situation publicly. Flores died in 2024. The legal threshold for plagiarism — especially in film and television — is quite high, even if someone is able to prove that the accused had access to an original work like a script. That's because ideas themselves cannot be copyrighted — only the specific expression of an idea, such as the exact script or dialogue. This means that two people can have very similar story concepts without it being considered theft, as long as the execution is different. And it's not unusual for similar films and TV shows to come out at almost the same time. The romantic comedies Friends With Benefits and No Strings Attached, about friends who fall for one another after promising to stay emotionally uninvolved, both hit theaters in 2011. On the TV side, The Wilds and Yellowjackets — which debuted less than a year apart, in 2020 and 2021, respectively — both centered on teen girls who must survive the wilderness after a plane crash. Solve the daily Crossword
BBC News
a day ago
- General
- BBC News
Wales' papers: 4.8% teacher pay award rejected and hero dad risks life to save boy
Copyright 2025 BBC. All rights reserved. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.
CNET
2 days ago
- Entertainment
- CNET
Spotify Takes Down Fake AI Song Credited to Famous Country Singer Who's Been Dead for Years
Country music fans may know Blaze Foley from his outlaw country Austin shows in the '80s, but they wouldn't recognize the track, "Together," that mysteriously appeared under Foley's Spotify profile a few days ago. That's because it's an AI-generated song uploaded by Syntax Error, and the sign of a growing problem in music apps. AI can easily create songs and imitate certain styles, but in addition to copyright issues, that creates legal problems when AI pretends to be an existing artist. It's not clear what Syntax Error is exactly, but it's certainly not Blaze Foley, who was killed in 1989. The song and the album art accompanying it are fairly obviously AI-generated, drawing the ire of subscribers, as reported earlier by 404 Media. It's not Spotify's first run-in with AI controversy. There's also the popular AI band The Velvet Sundown, which has already been banned from music contests after raising questions about the future of artificial music and threats to non-AI-powered musicians. There are also reports that fake songs have appeared under the profiles of other real artists in Spotify, like Guy Clark. "We flagged the issue to SoundOn, the distributor of the content in question, and it was swiftly removed," a Spotify spokesperson told us when CNET reached out to learn more. "This violates Spotify's policies and is not allowed. We take action against licensors and distributors who fail to police this kind of fraud, and those who commit repeated or egregious violations can and have been permanently removed from Spotify." It seems like Spotify relies on third parties to prevent songs from being uploaded to the wrong artist profile, but questions remain on how this process works. Fans may soon have to start double-checking when a new song drops from popular artists they follow: Is it an AI fake or the real deal from a favorite band? Lost Art Records, the company that manages Blake Foley's collection, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Syntax Error doesn't appear to exist outside of Spotify, and could not be reached for comment.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Business
- Yahoo
Adobe's CTO is getting more creative on the software maker's approach to generating ‘safe' AI tools
The proliferation of artificial intelligence image and video generators has made it easy for online users to create billions of memes ranging from baby versions of The Real Housewives of Atlanta to humorous takes on the Coldplay kiss cam viral moment just a few days ago. But these tools have raised serious legal questions about the copyright protection for the assets that these AI models are trained on. That has resulted in numerous lawsuits being filed by individual artists, Hollywood studios, and media companies, who all assert that some of the most popular AI systems are trained on unauthorized images and videos. Ongoing litigation includes Disney and Universal suing image generation tool Midjourney, the New York Times squaring up against ChatGPT owner OpenAI and Microsoft, and the Wall Street Journal and New York Post versus AI startup Perplexity. Ely Greenfield, chief technology officer at software maker Adobe's digital media business, has spent over two years pitching a different path. Ever since the debut of a text-to-image model known as Firefly in March 2023, Adobe has touted the company's own creative generative AI models that are only trained on content that it has rights to use, including Adobe Stock photos and licensed artistic content. Firefly's models have been integrated in Adobe's suite of apps including Photoshop and Illustrator, and thus far, businesses and individual creators have generated over 26 billion assets. Big names including toy maker Mattel and cosmetics manufacturer Estée Lauder have signed on to Firefly for creative ideation, editing, and asset generation purposes. 'Every piece of content that we train on is something that we have acquired the license of, or that is published under a verifiable and known license,' says Greenfield. This approach does come with some limitations. If Firefly were asked to generate an image of a Disney cartoon character, like say Mickey Mouse, 'it would do a horrible job of it,' concedes Greenfield. 'And that's by design and on purpose.' Greenfield says that AI tools based on every image found on the internet produce less desired outputs, not just for potentially infringing on IP, but because it is representative of a vast trove of data that doesn't always have the best quality. 'There's the raw science of how you build the model, but a massive amount of work goes into data curation and preparation,' says Greenfield. 'The average piece of content on the internet isn't necessarily what you want to put in your ad.' Adobe's buttoned-up AI approach means the company's off-the-shelf Firefly offering would have little use to a consumer-facing company like Coca-Cola. But under an enterprise licensing agreement, Adobe says it can train a private version of Firefly that's exclusively trained on the beverage company's branding and style. Since Firefly's launch, Adobe has had to make some modifications to the images in the company's asset bank. Early on, generative AI wasn't great at producing clear images of hands, so Adobe had to reach out to the photographers it works with to get more licensed pictures of hands to train the AI properly. All Firefly content also goes through a moderation process that includes a mix of human and computer oversight, eliminating harmful images, but also those that may contain sensitive IP. A photographer may have exclusive license to an image that they produced, but if there's a trademark asset like a Nike Swoosh or Starbucks Siren logo, Adobe will nix the image. Adobe has lauded the proliferation of Firefly, reporting in the most recent second fiscal quarter ending May 30 that traffic to the Firefly App grew 30% from the prior quarter, with paid subscriptions nearly doubling over the same period. More recently, Adobe has integrated image and video models from OpenAI, Google, Pika Luma AI, and Runway into the company's Firefly app. This runs parallel with the public's shifting views on the ethical uses of AI, as well as some recent court decisions that AI hyperscalers have won. Anthropic, in one example, saw a ruling go its way last month that said the company could train models using published books without consent from the authors. To be sure, it will be years before the courts resolve these thorny legal matters, and the right use of images, text, and audio assets will almost certainly vary across the globe. For Adobe, Greenfield says pulling in these partnership models reflected an evolution to how creative professionals are working with AI today. He says that customers want access to a wide variety of AI models, especially as these technologies quickly advance. This is similar to the multi-modal approach most CTOs and chief information officers have embraced when deploying AI coding tools for software developers or the application of other uses of AI in marketing, legal, and communications to improve worker productivity. Adobe has added content credentials to make it clear to marketers when the assets they are creating are safe to use for commercial production (with Firefly) versus for ideation purposes (the external partner models). Customers have the final say on what path works best for them. 'We have a lot of customers who have different opinions on when to use different types of models and how they feel about commercial safety,' says Greenfield. 'A lot of them feel that in ideation, they're open to using anything.' John Kell Send thoughts or suggestions to CIO Intelligence here. Fortune recently unveiled a new ongoing series, Fortune AIQ, dedicated to navigating AI's real-world impact. Our third collection of stories explores how businesses across virtually every industry are putting AI to work—and how their particular field is changing as a result. How Walmart, Amazon, and other retail giants are using AI to reinvent the supply chain—from warehouse to checkout. Read more Meet the legacy players and upstarts using AI to reinvent the energy business. Read more AI isn't just entering law offices—it's challenging the entire legal playbook. Read more How a bulldozer, crane, and excavator rental company is using AI to save 3,000 hours per week. Read more AI is already touching nearly every corner of the medical field. Read more This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
