Latest news with #dispute
South China Morning Post
13 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
China siblings fight over dad's US$420,000 inheritance, discover neither is biological child
An inheritance dispute in China took a dramatic turn when a brother and sister battling over a three million yuan (US$420,000) legacy inadvertently discovered that neither of them was the biological child of their deceased parents. Advertisement The case began after Sun, the family patriarch from the city of Tianjin in northern China, died in March 2025, according to the Henan Broadcasting System. Before his death, he had transferred ownership of a three million yuan property solely to his son. He also left a statement requesting that his son provide 'reasonable compensation' to his adopted daughter. The siblings, both of whom were adopted, were locked in battle over a residential property. Photo: AFP 'Our daughter is adopted, but we have always treated her as our own. In our later years, it was our son who took care of us. We gave the house to him, and he intends to compensate his sister. We hope you two can get along like true siblings,' the statement read.
SBS Australia
15 hours ago
- Politics
- SBS Australia
Thailand-Cambodia dispute: A historical perspective
LISTEN TO SBS Indonesian 17:53 Indonesian A day before the ceasefire was reached, SBS Indonesian talked to Dr Muhammad Rum, Head f Master's Study Program at the Department of International Relations at the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences at University of Gajah Mada. Dr Rum explained the historical context of the dispute and also the significance domestic political roles of both sides that play apart in the conflict. However, since both Thailand and Cambodia are members of ASEAN, Dr Rum believed that the dispute should be solved through a dialogue that could be mediated by the current ASEAN Chairmanship which is Prime Minister of Malaysia, Dr Anwar Ibrahim. Listen to SBS Indonesian every Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and Sunday at 3 pm. Follow us on Facebook and Instagram, and listen to our podcasts .
Irish Times
a day ago
- Business
- Irish Times
McKillen jnr sues receivers over taking possession of three properties
Paddy McKillen junior is in a dispute with receivers who took possession of three valuable Dublin office properties, allegedly due to millions of euro in rent arrears on them. Perfect Stripe Ltd, trading as Grafter, is suing Ken Fennell and Brendan O'Reilly, of Interpath Advisory, who were appointed joint receivers over three companies which rented the properties at Stephen's Green, Leeson Street and Ely Place from Perfect Stripe. The three companies, Wonderbay Ltd, Crossville Properties Ltd and Discovery Dawn Ltd (all in receivership) were McKillen group-related firms. Perfect Stripe claims that on the morning of June 23rd, agents of the receivers broke into the properties having unlawfully purported to have forfeit the leases. The locks were changed and Perfect Stripe and its agents were prevented from gaining access. The claim of breaking in is denied. READ MORE The purchase of the buildings was funded largely through loans from RELM Loan Opportunities DAC, which appointed the receivers after calling in the loans. Perfect Stripe says the forfeiture happened despite discussions with the defendants about rent adjustments. It believed the parties were negotiating in good faith and that no steps would be taken towards any enforcement until those negotiations concluded. The defendants claimed the sums due on each of the properties in rent arrears at the time was some €2.7 million for Stephen's Green, around €321,000 for Ely Place and some €530,000 for Leeson Street. Perfect Stripe, in its statement of claim, says the defendants have unlawfully forfeited the properties 'under the guise of seeking inflated amounts in excess of the interest due' under the loan agreements. It also says they have 'misappropriated the plaintiff's business in order to achieve a higher sales price for the properties'. On Monday, Mr Fennell and Mr O'Reilly, in their capacity as receivers of the three defendant companies, applied to have the dispute admitted to the fast track Commercial Court. James Doherty SC, for the defendants. said the total debt now due in arrears was in excess of €4.1 million and the leases were forfeited and possession taken some five weeks ago. Counsel said there was mediation for a short time which was unsuccessful. The claim of misappropriation by the defendants of the business to themselves is 'wholly without foundation', he said. Counsel also disputed a claim by Marcus Dowling SC, for Perfect Stripe, that from his client's perspective, what had happened was the receivers agents breaking into the premises in the middle of the night. Mr Dowling said his side was neutral on the application to admit the case to the commercial list. Mr Justice Mark Sanfey said it was clearly a matter suitable for entry to the Commercial Court. He approved agreed directions and adjourned the matter to later this year.
Irish Times
2 days ago
- General
- Irish Times
Dispute over elderly Wexford man's will leaving estate to 38 nieces and nephews should be decided in Circuit Court, judge rules
A dispute over the estate of a deceased Co Wexford man whose will left it to his 38 nieces and nephews is not appropriate for hearing in the High Court and should be heard in the Circuit Court, a judge has ruled. The dispute concerns the estate, including his home at Iskabeg, the Ballagh, Enniscorthy, of Michael Redmond (98), a widower with no children who died in a nursing home in December 2021. In a will dated June 22nd, 2015, Mr Redmond left his estate to his nieces and nephews and there are 38 beneficiaries, aged between 50 and 79, the judge said. In late 2022, the estate executors issued proceedings against the deceased's nephew, Michael Corrigan (76), and Mr Corrigan's daughter, Shinéad , seeking possession of the farmhouse property. The executors say the house was previously valued at €230,000, but this may have increased. READ MORE The defendants issued a defence and also counterclaimed for orders, including for specific performance of an alleged agreement by Mr Redmond the property would be left to Mr Corrigan, and damages of €60,000. In late 2023, Mr Corrigan issued separate High Court proceedings against the executors, seeking orders including payment of €286,000 quantum merit damages, which are damages for provision of goods or services without a formal contract. Mr Corrigan, who is among the beneficiaries of his uncle's will, claims Mr Redmond, his godfather, promised him the farmhouse property and, on foot of that, he had left Achill Island and has lived in it since 2017. He claims he has carried out extensive renovation and upkeep works to the house and curtilage and is the rightful owner. In her recently published High Court judgment, granting an application by the executors to have the dispute decided in the Circuit Court rather than the High Court, Ms Justice Cahill said the orders sought in the High Court claim are almost identical to those sought in the counterclaim to the Circuit Court case. The 'only noticeable' difference is between the sums of damages claimed, she said. There was 'no justification' stated in the court papers for this 'significant' jump on the amount of damages, she said. However, because the executors had consented to the Circuit Court having 'unlimited monetary jurisdiction' in a claim of the type advanced in the existing proceedings in that court, the monetary difference in both claims was not a material matter. For those reasons, and to avoid unnecessary and undesirable multiplicity of proceedings seeing substantially the same orders, and dealing with the same claims and the same property, she was satisfied it was appropriate to remit the High Court proceedings to Wexford Circuit Court. The imperative must be to have all disputes related to the estate resolved so it can be administered without further undue delay or unnecessary costs incurred, she said. Earlier in her decision, the judge noted Mr Corrigan had not attended the hearing of the executors' application. Ms Corrigan did attend but did not identify any 'exceptional circumstances' to justify her attempts to advocate for her father. The judge had ruled there was no basis established for adjourning the hearing of the application and Ms Corrigan had no right to make submissions to the court on the matter. The executors, the judge noted, refuted allegations, including of wrongdoing, made against them by Ms Corrigan in an affidavit which related mainly to the merits of the underlying dispute.
News24
3 days ago
- Business
- News24
Uber and FlySafair: The costly side of cheap flights and rides
FlySafair and Solidarity have been in crucial talks at the CCMA to resolve an ongoing dispute.
