Latest news with #redwall


The Guardian
3 days ago
- Business
- The Guardian
Farage's 'leftwing' pose is flimsy – but so are Labour's own governing fantasies
In a much-publicised press conference last week in London, Nigel Farage invited Keir Starmer to a one-to-one debate at 'a working man's club' anywhere 'in the red wall'. The suggested location was more noteworthy than the debate-me machismo. Its message was clear: having trampled over the Tories in the recent local elections, Reform UK is coming for Labour and nowhere is safe. 'Let's go to one of the former mining communities, let's go somewhere that Labour has held the seat pretty much consistently since 1918,' Farage said, and then let's 'test' whether Labour or Reform is the real 'party of the workers'. If Starmer felt brave enough, they could even 'enjoy a few beers with the lads' – a nod to what has always been Farage's favourite interpretation of what 'standing with workers' entails. Farage's speech made waves for, among other things, calling for the two-child benefit cap to be overhauled and for Starmer's restrictions to the winter fuel allowance to be reversed. For the Thatcherite fanboy and former City trader, these were unusual positions, and the Westminster lobby lapped up the controversy – suggesting that, for parts of the Tory press, deviations from austerity will only be permissible when delivered with Farageist chutzpah. 'How Farage's fiery speech signals a seismic shift in UK politics – and the end for Starmer,' the Daily Express declared. 'Nigel leans left and hits the bullseye,' Tim Stanley cooed in the Daily Telegraph. The Sun wondered whether they should now call Farage 'Red Nigel'. But in reality, rather than represent an unprecedented reconfiguration of British politics, the speech was a typically opportunistic and cynical intervention from Farage: he noisily supported two policies that mounting reports suggested Labour were set to implement anyway, within a broader message that was far more George Osborne than Jeremy Corbyn. 'The great divide that is opening up in British society,' Farage claimed, was between those who wake up early and go to work and those who stay in bed and enjoy a similar quality of life. Workers and shirkers, in other words – same as it ever was. How worried should Labour be by Reform's overtures to the left? Farage's star is clearly rising and Reform has already surpassed Ukip's electoral achievements. After triumphing in the recent local elections, with more than 670 new council seats and a third of the vote, Reform now leads the pack in many national opinion polls. But Labour should first and foremost be worried by itself. Starmer's government appears to be in a permanently defensive state, commanding an enormous majority in parliament and yet rarely seeming to do more than react to events around it – sometimes left, often right. The prime minister's personal approval rating has suffered the consequences of this hapless strategy, reaching record lows with 38-point drop since last year's election. Meanwhile Red Nigel circles like a vulture. The two-child cap is illustrative. Since entering government with the promise of 'change', Labour maintained it would have to keep the policy – a transparently cruel inheritance from Osborne that made child poverty levels soar. Now the party appears increasingly likely to lift the cap, but what could have been a historic moment of rupture with Cruel Britannia – a move that will lift half a million children out of poverty, according to the Resolution Foundation – may easily be seen by the public as a reluctant concession to various Labour MPs and now Farage: not an empowered rebuttal of Tory austerity and the dawn of a new era, but yet more flip-flopping and an affirmation of Farage's influence. In his speech, Farage claimed that Reform represented the biggest revolution in British politics since Labour overtook the Liberal party in the 1920s – and there are some parallels. Back then, the Tories saw Labour as both an existential threat and an opportunity: Labour was a foreboding movement, but the Tories could take fleeting comfort in the knowledge that it was the Liberals who would suffer the severest blow. Labour now treats Reform with a similar ambivalence: worried yet reassured that the Tories will be the main victim. But an irreverent and vengeful Farage, powered by grievances and resentment from both deindustrialised Britain and the elite will have a far more corrosive effect on British politics and wider society than Labour ever threatened. For now, after the fallout of his 'island of strangers' speech, Starmer's strategy to deal with Reform will be to call out its economics as a fantasy. Farage's economic programme – binning net zero, waging war on asylum seekers and abolishing inheritance tax – is indeed reminiscent of Liz Truss. But it is not enough for Labour to play the role of the miserly Tories, saying to Reform what the Tories have historically said to them: we can't afford that, we must live within our means, and so on. Labour needs its own positive vision of the country. For now, the party indulges its own set of fantasies: that it can outflank the Tories and even Reform on the right without being outflanked on the left; that it is enough to be the least unpopular party, no matter how uninspiring one is; and that you can break with the harsh inequities of Tory Britain, as promised, without upsetting anyone important. Before Starmer's podiums were emblazoned with dispiriting slogans like 'fixing the foundations' and 'securing Britain's future' they carried various versions of a more optimistic one: 'it's time for change.' A major reason for its massive majority in 2024 was that, after 14 years of joyless Conservative misrule, Labour better embodied that spirit of feeling than any other party. But unless Labour can show they are that change from the Tories – and that will involve taking Britain beyond its overfed interests in tightening immigration controls and the welfare state – this spirit of feeling will only endure and deepen, and the answer to it will no longer be Labour. Samuel Earle is the author of Tory Nation: How One Party Took Over


The Independent
6 days ago
- Business
- The Independent
Government's multi-billion plan to take on Reform UK
Chancellor Rachel Reeves is expected to announce changes to the government 's spending assessment process to favour the north and Midlands, potentially unlocking tens of billions of pounds for investment in these regions. The spending review aims to shift focus from the southeast to 'red wall' seats that Labour won in the last election but are now threatened by the Reform UK party. Reeves previously tweaked fiscal rules in last year's Budget, freeing up a £100 billion pot for infrastructure investment, with the changes designed to ensure the benefits of investment are considered alongside the costs. The government's Green Book, which assesses project costs and benefits, will be reviewed to prioritise public sector investment in areas with lower economic productivity. This red wall investment drive follows pressure from Labour MPs to allocate more funds to the north and Midlands, as the party seeks to counter the rising support for Nigel Farage 's Reform UK.


Times
09-05-2025
- Politics
- Times
Meet the mother and daughter who ditched the Tories to join Reform
Emma Hunt's HGV driver father is old-school Labour, and her mother, Cathy, was once a longtime Tory supporter. Now the two women, born and bred in the red wall, have been voted in as Reform councillors in the same ward in County Durham. The story of how they became disillusioned with the two major parties is a cautionary tale for Kemi Badenoch and Sir Keir Starmer. They are also part of a new cohort of councillors that Nigel Farage hopes will prevent his party being disparaged as a band of 'fruitcakes and loonies', as David Cameron referred to his Ukip contingent in 2006. 'My dad and his side are from Consett, my mum is from Sunderland, we were all massive Labour supporters,' Miss Hunt, 24,


Times
06-05-2025
- Politics
- Times
Brexit voters can see the need for deals with the EU
The idea that closer relations with the European Union is impossible without alienating voters who supported Brexit is wrong. The political bubble always lags behind public opinion and often fights the last battle. The Brexit paradigm is history and the government must pursue a better, deeper relationship with our European partners to improve living standards, offer economic protection and ensure our country's security. In my red wall constituency, 66 per cent of voters supported Brexit. There is little desire to return as members of the EU and even less to embrace freedom of movement. These are off the table. But my constituents also recognise the rapidly changing world since Brexit: war in Europe, a new wave of mass migration from the Middle East and Africa,