logo
‘We're Already at the Limit' of a Livable Climate Warns Brazil's Marina Silva

‘We're Already at the Limit' of a Livable Climate Warns Brazil's Marina Silva

Marina Silva's achievements may seem borderline miraculous. Since taking office for a second run as Brazil's environment and climate minister in 2023, the country has quickly and dramatically reversed deforestation trends with strict enforcement of environment rules that had been abandoned by her predecessor. According to the most recent official account released last fall, Amazon deforestation had fallen to the lowest level in a decade. In 2023 alone, it dropped nearly in half from the prior year.
'When we took office, we had deforestation on an ascending curve that was out of control,' she told me on April 30. 'We had to rebuild institutions, command and control organizations, and increase public funding.'
And yet, as we met in her office in Brasília, she was careful not to linger too long on the success. The Amazon rain forest is dangerously close to a tipping point that could rapidly reshape not just the world's most famous rainforest biome but the whole planet. Once reached, the Amazon would lose the ability to sustain itself and vast swathes would transform into savannah, resulting in the loss of biodiversity and also a massive release of carbon dioxide. To halt it, she says, leaders will need to embrace new mechanisms to stop legal deforestation and catalyze efforts to reforest degraded land—all while continuing ongoing enforcement work. But, she says, saving the Amazon will require work beyond Brazil's borders: the world will need to slow its burning of fossil fuels.
'Even if we can nullify deforestation, with climate change, if we don't reduce carbon from fossil fuel emissions, the forest will be destroyed anyway,' she says.
For Silva, who was born and raised to a family of rubber tappers in the remote Amazonian state of Acre, this is the next step on a lifelong journey of Amazon protection. But it's also a key, potentially make or break moment as Brazil occupies the center of the climate movement this year as it hosts the annual U.N. climate conference, COP30, in November.
'We're already at the limit, at the changing, shifting point of the climate crisis,' she says. 'There was a window of opportunity of not shooting over the 1.5 degree limit, and now it's just a sliver.'
Even a seasoned climate expert would be forgiven for struggling to track all the work happening in Brazil ahead of COP30. Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, known simply as Lula, has made climate a top priority with ministers across the government focused on tackling the issue. Silva, a national figure in Brazil who finished third in the 2014 presidential election, has turned her ministry into a central node in the effort.
While I was in Brazil, the government announced a $2 billion financing program to reforest up to 1 million hectares (about the size of the island of Hawaii) of degraded land in the Amazon. And in recent months Silva has doubled down on work with her counterpart in the finance ministry on a $125 billion fund aimed at protecting tropical forests around the world. Beyond the rain forest work, the government has rolled out a carbon price for domestic industries—and talked about how it might work with other countries to harmonize equivalent policies elsewhere.
Silva hopes that these efforts all come together at COP30 as part of a broader effort to make the conference a pivotal moment for the implementation of climate initiatives globally. She described the emerging COP30 goal as a 'global ethical stocktake': Lula and U.N. Secretary General Antonio Guterres will hear from a wide group of stakeholders—from philosophers to Indigenous people to political leadership—with an eye to helping the world chart a plan for putting climate solutions into action. 'We can't keep pushing things off,' she says. 'We need to implement.'
It goes without saying that this year's climate negotiations will be rife with challenges—perhaps none more significant than the challenge posed by the U.S. pullback from the international Paris climate engagement. Silva did not mince words on the role of the U.S. and the Trump Administration in muddying global climate discussions. Without my prompting, she criticized everything from his exiting the Paris Agreement to his decision to ice the National Climate Assessment. All of that leaves a massive gap in the necessary climate action, she says: 'Things have become more difficult, especially with the decisions of the Trump Administration.'
My visit to Brasilia happened to coincide with a key meeting of the BRICS countries—a group of emerging market countries that cooperate as a counterweight to U.S. and European power. In my hotel, I spotted the Chinese foreign minister walking through the lobby with his entourage along with other country delegations. But Silva says the rest of the world can't replace the actions needed from the U.S. 'We can't be deniers, not with geopolitics, not with climate,' she told me. 'The vacuum created by the U.S. is the U.S.'s vacuum.'
She pointed to challenging geopolitics, in part, to respond to questions about Lula's own climate leadership. Despite his focus on the issue, some environmental activists have criticized him, saying he is moving too slowly and not doing enough. One area of particular concern: new oil exploration efforts in the Amazon region currently under consideration. Asked about the pending decision, Silva first pivoted to the stone-cold geopolitical realities. Oil demand remains high and supply is strained. The U.S. position has created a sense across the globe that fossil fuels will be around for a while.
The solution, she says, is a well-managed transition. 'What I defend is a fair transition, a planned transition for everybody,' she says. 'When I say fair and planned, it's because it's not magic.' COP30, with Brazil at the helm, is a good place to start implementing such a transition.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US vetoes UN Security Council resolution demanding an immediate Gaza ceasefire
US vetoes UN Security Council resolution demanding an immediate Gaza ceasefire

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

US vetoes UN Security Council resolution demanding an immediate Gaza ceasefire

The U.S. vetoed the last resolution on Gaza in November, under the Biden administration, also because the ceasefire demand was not directly linked to the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages. Similarly, the current resolution demands those taken by Hamas and other groups be released, but it does not make it a condition for a truce. President Donald Trump's administration has tried to ramp up its efforts to broker peace in Gaza after 20 months of war. However, Hamas has sought amendments to a U.S. proposal that special envoy Steve Witkoff has called 'totally unacceptable.' Advertisement The vote followed a decision by an Israeli and U.S.-backed foundation to pause food delivery at its three distribution sites in the Gaza Strip after health officials said dozens of Palestinians were killed in a series of shootings near the sites this week. Israel and the United States say they supported the establishment of the new aid system to prevent Hamas from stealing aid previously distributed by the U.N. Advertisement The United Nations has rejected the new system, saying it doesn't address Gaza's mounting hunger crisis, allows Israel to use aid as a weapon and doesn't comply with the humanitarian principles of neutrality, impartiality and independence. The U.N. says its distribution system throughout Gaza worked very well during the March ceasefire and is carefully monitored. The resolution demanded the restoration of all essential humanitarian services in line with humanitarian principles, international humanitarian law and U.N. Security Council resolutions. Israel's U.N. Mission said Ambassador Danny Danon, who will speak after the vote, will say the resolution undermines humanitarian relief efforts and ignores Hamas, which is still endangering civilians in Gaza. He also will say the resolution disregards the ceasefire negotiations that are already underway, the mission said. Gaza's roughly 2 million people are almost completely reliant on international aid because Israel's offensive has destroyed nearly all food production capabilities. Israel imposed a blockade on supplies into Gaza on March 2, and limited aid began to enter again late last month after pressure from allies and warnings of famine. 'The world is watching, day after day, horrifying scenes of Palestinians being shot, wounded or killed in Gaza while simply trying to eat,' U.N. humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher said in a statement Wednesday. He called for a flood of aid to be let in and for the world body to be the one delivering it. The Security Council has voted on 14 Gaza-related resolutions and approved four since the war began. That is when Hamas-led militants stormed into southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducting 251. Advertisement They are still holding 58 hostages, a third of them believed to be alive, after most of the rest were released in ceasefire agreements or other deals. Israel's military campaign has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which doesn't say how many of the dead were civilians or combatants. The ministry is led by medical professionals but reports to the Hamas-run government. Its toll is seen as generally reliable by U.N. agencies and independent experts, though Israel has challenged its numbers. AP writer Farnoush Amiri at the United Nations contributed to this report.

U.S. Vetoes U.N. Resolution Demanding Immediate Gaza Cease-Fire
U.S. Vetoes U.N. Resolution Demanding Immediate Gaza Cease-Fire

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

U.S. Vetoes U.N. Resolution Demanding Immediate Gaza Cease-Fire

The United States on Wednesday vetoed a U.N. Security Council resolution demanding an immediate and unconditional cease-fire in Gaza, the release of all hostages and the resumption of full-scale humanitarian aid deliveries to the enclave. Ten nonpermanent members of the 15-seat Council had put forth the resolution for a vote. It was the first time since President Trump took office that the Council had considered a cease-fire resolution on the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza. The United States was the only member to vote against the measure; the other 14 members of the Council, including Russia, voted in favor, once again highlighting Washington's isolation on the global stage over its policy of unconditional support of Israel. 'We believe this text reflects the consensus shared by all Council members that the war in Gaza has to come to an immediate halt, all hostages must be immediately and unconditionally released, and civilians in Gaza must not starve and must have full and unimpeded access to aid,' said a joint statement from the 10 nonpermanent members, which was read by Slovenia's ambassador to the U.N., Samuel Zbogar, at the Council meeting ahead of the vote. A Security Council resolution must receive nine votes in favor and no vetoes from the five permanent members — Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States — to be adopted. Since the war broke out after the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas-led attack on Israel, the United States has vetoed four Council resolutions calling for a cease-fire and has abstained from one, allowing it to pass, last June. Dorothy Camille Shea, the interim U.S. representative at the U.N., repeated Washington's message that Israel had the right to defend itself, and she blamed Hamas for the suffering of Palestinians, saying the war would end if the group surrendered. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Haley on Trump call with Putin: ‘A backhanded slap to all of our allies'
Haley on Trump call with Putin: ‘A backhanded slap to all of our allies'

The Hill

time2 hours ago

  • The Hill

Haley on Trump call with Putin: ‘A backhanded slap to all of our allies'

Former United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley (R) sharply criticized President Trump on Wednesday for suggesting Russia could play a mediating role in nuclear negotiations with Iran. 'Russia has been receiving drones and ballistic missiles from Iran to use in its kidnapping of Ukraine,' Haley wrote in a post on X. 'Iran and Russia are partners,' Haley continued. 'It is ludicrous to think we would allow Putin to be chief negotiator between the US and Iran on the Iran deal in exchange for the US helping Russia with Ukraine.' 'That is a backhanded slap to all of our allies,' she added. Trump on Wednesday spoke by phone with Russian President Vladimir Putin for roughly one hour and 15 minutes. The president said in a Truth Social post that they discussed the recent Ukrainian drone attack on Russian bombers, as well as 'various other attacks that have been taking place by both sides.' They also discussed ongoing efforts by the Trump administration to reach a nuclear deal with Iran, Trump said. 'President Putin suggested that he will participate in the discussions with Iran and that he could, perhaps, be helpful in getting this brought to a rapid conclusion,' Trump wrote. 'It is my opinion that Iran has been slowwalking their decision on this very important matter, and we will need a definitive answer in a very short period of time!' Haley — the final candidate standing in the 2024 GOP presidential primary against Trump — has been a fierce and consistent critic of Iran and of the previous nuclear deal brokered during the Obama administration. Before Trump withdrew the U.S. from the deal in 2018, Haley urged him to do so, in her capacity as ambassador to the U.N. Haley has recently expressed skepticism of the Trump administration's efforts to strike a fresh deal with Tehran. 'Iran has violated every agreement they have ever been a part of. We can't trust them to have any amount of nuclear production,' Haley said in April, adding, 'Iran should not have a nuclear program, period.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store