US judge orders Trump administration to return wrongly deported gay man
A federal judge ordered the Trump administration late Friday night to facilitate the return of a Guatemalan man it deported to Mexico, in spite of his fears of being harmed there, and who has since been returned to Guatemala.
The man, who is gay, had applied for asylum in the US last year after he was attacked twice in homophobic acts of violence in Guatemala. He was protected from being returned to his home country under a US immigration judge's order at the time, but the Trump administration put him on a bus and sent him to Mexico instead.
The US district judge Brian Murphy found the man's deportation likely 'lacked any semblance of due process'. In a declaration to the court, the man, identified by his initials OCG in legal filings, said that since he was returned to Guatemala two months ago, 'I have been living in hiding, in constant panic and constant fear'.
An earlier court proceeding determined that OCG risked persecution or torture if returned to Guatemala, but he also feared returning to Mexico. He presented evidence of being raped and held for ransom there while seeking asylum in the US.
'No one has ever suggested that OCG poses any sort of security threat,' Murphy wrote in his order. 'In general, this case presents no special facts or legal circumstances, only the banal horror of a man being wrongfully loaded onto a bus and sent back to a country where he was allegedly just raped and kidnapped.'
Murphy's order adds to a string of findings by federal courts against recent Trump administration deportations.
Last week, Murphy, a Biden appointee, found that the Trump administration had violated an order he issued barring government officials from deporting people to countries not their own without first giving them sufficient time to object.
In a hearing, the homeland security department said that seven immigrants had been deported Tuesday on a flight to a third country, but they refused to say where the men were going. It was later revealed that the men were told they were being sent to South Sudan.
In that case, Murphy said that the government had given the seven men little more than 24 hours' notice that they were being removed from the US, which he called 'plainly insufficient', and could result in a finding of criminal contempt.
Other cases that have been spotlighted for rapid deportations include that of Kilmar Ábrego García, who was sent to El Salvador. The US supreme court ordered the government to 'facilitate' Ábrego García's return, but the White House has said it is not within its power to do so.
That case sparked a legal joust over the supreme court's practicable meaning of 'facilitate'.
In his ruling, Murphy noted the dispute over the use of the verb, saying that returning OCG to the US is not that complicated.
'The Court notes that 'facilitate' in this context should carry less baggage than in several other notable cases,' he wrote. 'OCG is not held by any foreign government. Defendants have declined to make any argument that facilitating his return would be costly, burdensome, or otherwise impede the government's objectives.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
New Jersey is removing Tesla chargers from its turnpike. What about Mass.?
The removal of more than 60 Tesla Superchargers is underway from the super highway connecting northern and southern New Jersey. The New Jersey Turnpike Authority (NJTA) made the decision to instead go with a sole third-party charging provider to serve the state's turnpike and has not allowed Tesla to co-locate, the business wrote on X. '... NJTA requested 64 existing Supercharger stalls on the New Jersey Turnpike to not be renewed and be decommissioned,' the post reads. 'We have been preparing for three years for this potential outcome by building 116 stalls off the New Jersey Turnpike, ensuring no interruption for our customers.' Service areas on the New Jersey Turnpike will begin transitioning fully to Universal Open Access EV chargers on June 6, NJTA wrote on May 30 in a statement. The chargers, provided by Applegren Electric, are compatible with all makes and models of EVs. Tesla called the decision to eliminate the charging stations a setback for EV users on the highway, adding that it offered the NJTA above-market commercial terms, including an offer to build Superchargers at all New Jersey service plazas and with equipment upgrades like screens and NACS with CCS1 'magic docks.' 'Tesla always advocates for more infrastructure and co-location with additional third-party charging providers,' Tesla wrote. 'This drives down costs through optionality and accelerates EV adoption by having sufficient capacity to shoulder peaks.' Meanwhile, in Massachusetts, there are 97 Tesla Supercharger locations, according to Loan Center. While the majority of these locations are contracted with a business, four are located in plazas owned by the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT), the agency told MassLive. 'MassDOT has contracted with Tesla to host Superchargers at 4 service plazas: Charlton East, Charlton West, Newton and Lexington,' the agency told MassLive. None of these locations will be canceled, MassDOT added. Tesla hopes that NJTA or New Jersey's Gov. Phil Murphy will change their minds regarding the state's cancelation. 'We are willing to invest in New Jersey Turnpike sites if the New Jersey Turnpike or Murphy want to reverse this decision,' the X post reads. 'Otherwise, we will continue to build out the best possible infrastructure off the Turnpike to serve Tesla owners and the electric vehicle drivers of New Jersey.' Read the original article on MassLive.
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Court's emergency docket is a familiar station for Trump administration appeals
The court is not being asked to render a final decision but rather to set the rules of the road while the case makes its way through the courts. The justices have issued orders in 11 cases so far, and the Trump administration has won more than it has lost. Among the administration's victories was an order allowing it to enforce the Republican president's ban on transgender military service members. Among its losses was a prohibition on using an 18th-century wartime law called the Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelans alleged to be gang members to a notorious prison in El Salvador. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The most recent emergency filing arrived May 27. Advertisement The Trump administration's latest appeal asks the high court to halt an order by US District Judge Brian Murphy in Boston. The White House violated his earlier order, Murphy found, with a deportation flight bound for the African nation carrying people from other countries who had been convicted of crimes in the U.S. Those immigrants must get a real chance to raise any fears that being sent there could put them in danger, Murphy wrote. Trump's top Supreme Court lawyer, Solicitor General D. John Sauer, asked for an immediate high court order that would allow the third-country deportations to resume. Advertisement Murphy has stalled efforts to carry out deportations of migrants who can't be returned to their home countries, Sauer wrote. Finding countries willing to take them is 'a delicate diplomatic endeavor,' and the court requirements are a major setback, he said. Lawyers for the deported men have until Wednesday to respond. The Department of Government Efficiency, overseen by billionaire Trump adviser Elon Musk until his departure on Friday, is resisting a lawsuit calling for it to publicly disclose information about its operations. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington argues in a lawsuit that DOGE, which has been central to Trump's push to remake the government, is a federal agency and must be subject to the Freedom of Information Act. CREW claims that DOGE 'wields shockingly broad power' with no transparency about its actions. The administration says DOGE is just a presidential advisory body that is exempt from FOIA disclosures. US District Judge Christopher Cooper had found that its role is likely more than just advisory, especially in helping to shutter the US Agency for International Development and cut billions of dollars in government contracts. The administration appealed Cooper's orders requiring documents be turned over and acting Administrator Amy Gleason to answer questions under oath. Last week, Chief Justice John Roberts agreed to temporarily pause the orders pending additional word from the Supreme Court. Social Security has personal data on nearly everyone in the country, including school records, bank details, salary information, and medical and mental health records for disability recipients, according to court documents. The Trump administration says DOGE needs access to Social Security's systems as part of its mission to target waste in the federal government. Advertisement But US District Judge Ellen Hollander in Maryland restricted the team's access to Social Security under federal privacy laws, saying DOGE's efforts at the agency amounted to a 'fishing expedition' based on 'little more than suspicion' of fraud. The judge is disrupting DOGE's work and interfering with decisions that belong to the executive branch, not courts, Sauer wrote in asking the high court to block Hollander's order in the suit filed by labor unions and retirees. The justices could act anytime. Several judges quickly blocked an executive order Trump signed on his first day in office that would deny citizenship to children who are born to people who are in the country illegally or temporarily. The administration appealed three court orders that prohibited the changes from taking effect anywhere in the country. Earlier in May, the justices took the rare step of hearing arguments in an emergency appeal. It's unclear how the case will come out, but the court seemed intent on keeping the changes on hold while looking for a way to scale back nationwide court orders. One possibility advanced by some justices was to find a different legal mechanism, perhaps a class action, to accomplish essentially the same thing as the nationwide injunctions blocking Trump's citizenship order. Nationwide injunctions have emerged as an important check on Trump's efforts to remake the government and a source of mounting frustration to the Republican president and his allies. The court could act anytime, but almost certainly no later than early summer.
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Rubio leading negotiations with Bukele on returning migrants
The Justice Department disclosed that Secretary of State Marco Rubio is leading negotiations for the return of a Venezuelan man sent to a Salvadoran prison. The disclosure, made in Monday court filings, is no guarantee the Trump administration will secure the return of a man known only in court documents as Cristian, who was deported in spite of court-ordered protections. But it strikes a less aggressive tone as the Trump administration has otherwise resisted efforts to comply with various court orders requiring them to return migrants who were wrongly removed. The filing notes Rubio's long-standing relationship with Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele. 'Based on his deep diplomatic experience with El Salvador and the secretary's familiarity with political and diplomatic sensitivities in that country, he is personally handling the discussions with the government of El Salvador regarding persons subject to the court's order detained in El Salvador,' the State Department said in a statement included in the filing. It adds that Rubio has 'read and understands this court's order and wants to ensure the court he is making prompt and diligent efforts' to comply. Cristian was the second publicly reported case of someone mistakenly deported to El Salvador. The 20-year-old Cristian was among those who entered the U.S. as an unaccompanied minor, part of a lawsuit that protected him and others from removal while they were permitted to seek asylum. In another case, Salvadoran man Kilmar Abrego Garcia was sent to a prison in the country despite a 2019 order from an immigration judge protecting him from being removed and sent to his native country. In that case, the Trump administration has resisted a Supreme Court order to return the man, saying the directive to 'facilitate' his return requires only sending a plane to receive him should El Salvador wish to release him. Bukele has said he will not release Abrego Garcia. In a third case, the Justice Department has said it is working to return a Guatemalan man who was deported to Mexico, despite having previously been raped and extorted in the country. In court filings last week, the administration said it was arranging for him to come back to the U.S. on the return leg of a deportation flight.
