Trump shut down program to end human waste backing into Alabama homes, calling it 'illegal DEI'
For the last 14 years, when it rains in Lowndes County, Alabama, contaminated standing water builds up around Annye Burke's home. When the septic tank breaks down, raw sewage backs up into her toilet, she said.
Although 'frustrated' by the unhealthy and inconvenient conditions, Burke said she doesn't let it get her down. Human wastewater contaminating homes and yards in these rural parts of central Alabama 'has become a way of life,' she said. The problem has existed so long and was so pervasive that a 2017 study determined 1 in every 3 adults in the county had the intestinal parasite hookworm.
The Biden administration investigated and allocated nearly $26 million to rebuild Lowndes County's water infrastructure, with the Department of Justice declaring the majority-Black area was suffering from 'environmental racism.'
But earlier this month, President Donald Trump issued an executive order to kill the deal, calling it 'illegal DEI.'
The DOJ's Harmeet K. Dhillon, the assistant attorney general for civil rights under Trump, said the agency 'will no longer push 'environmental justice' as viewed through a distorting, DEI lens,' referring to diversity, equity and inclusion programs.
A 2023 investigation sparked by environmental activist Catherine Coleman Flowers and conducted by the DOJ found that low-income residents of the county, most of whom are Black, have lacked basic sanitation services for generations. Given the area's especially hard, impermeable soil and the high cost of installing private wastewater systems, many residents have resorted to straight piping to deal with human wastewater. This method involves guiding human wastewater away from the home into a series of ditches and crude piping systems, according to the DOJ report. That water collects in nearby yards, open areas and woods.
In more recent years, heavier rainfall related to climate change has meant that contaminated water floods into the home, spills across open areas, and contaminates local vegetation and water, exposing residents to illness.
And so, Burke and more than 300 other families in Lowndes County — located about 40 miles southwest of Montgomery — are forced to live with a failing water infrastructure that has led to serious health concerns, including hookworm, which at one point had been thought to be eradicated from the United States, according to a 2021 study by the Baylor College of Medicine and the Alabama Center for Rural Enterprise.
Hookworms are mainly contracted by walking barefoot on soil contaminated with infected feces. It can cause abdominal pain, skin rashes, diarrhea, fever and other ailments.
'We have to be extra sanitary because people getting sick can be a problem,' Burke, 58, said. 'The health concerns are real. In 2025 we shouldn't have to deal with this, but it is what it is.'
She said she uses various disinfectants multiple times a day to clean her home and protect her family, which includes her children and grandchildren who come to visit.
This environmental quagmire has persisted for more than 20 years in this rural part of the state, where 72.4% of the population is Black and the median household income is $35,160, according to the latest census; one-third of residents live below the poverty line. Flowers said that much of the problem started back in 1866 with the passage of the Southern Homestead Act, when Black people were first allowed to purchase land there and were offered mostly places that were environmentally unsafe.
In recent decades, it's not uncommon for untreated sewage to flow from some residents' toilets into their yards or back up into their homes through sinks or bathtubs. Drinking water from the tap is out of the question. Some residents have dug ditches in an attempt to drain rainwater away from their homes.
Flowers, who grew up in Lowndes, has been fighting for 23 years to fix the water infrastructure in the county. Her efforts led to the Biden administration's $26 million commitment. She said Trump's cancelation of the agreement did not surprise her.
'There are some people who are not going to make it a priority to get this work done,' Flowers said. 'That's the way it's always been.'
Alabama Rep. Terri Sewell, a Democrat who represents the area, said in a statement that the DOJ's reason for abandoning the deal was weak.
'This agreement had nothing to do with DEI,' Sewell said. 'It was about addressing a public health crisis that has forced generations of children and families to endure the health hazards of living in proximity to raw sewage, as the DOJ itself documented. By terminating it, the Trump Administration has put its blatant disregard for the health of my constituents on full display.'
When announcing the results of the 2023 investigation, former Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke said the Justice Department found evidence that suggested Alabama's Department of Public Health showed 'a consistent pattern of inaction and/or neglect concerning the health risks associated with exposure to raw sewage.'
Sewell added that the burden to 'remedy this injustice' fell to the Alabama Department of Public Health. But the ADH said in a statement to NBC News that 'the installation of sanitation systems and related infrastructure is outside the authority or responsibilities.'
A second statement from ADH said the department had received $1.5 million of the funds from the Biden agreement and used it in part to pay for three septic tank installations. With the remainder of that money, ADH will pay a contractor to complete more work by May 2026, according to the statement. Trump killed the agreement before any additional funds could be distributed toward fixing the water infrastructure.
Annye Burke said her daughter, who lives next door, is in a dilemma because she was hoping to receive a new septic tank when hers recently collapsed. She's lived the last four years with her water issues.
'Being raised in the country and at one point of having to use outside facilities, I know how to make do,' Burke said. 'I just take one day at a time and pray about it and keep moving on. I don't let it get me down. But my daughter grew up differently, so I worry about how she deals with this stuff.'
Flowers, the activist, said that while she hopes the agreement will be reinstituted, she has seen communities come together to make change. Last week, she pointed out, she was in Mount Vernon, New York, where sewage issues were resolved with the combined work of the city, county and state government.
'They fixed it because they should have,' Flowers said. The problem was discovered in 2021 'and it's fixed five years later. I've been working on this in Lowndes County since 2002.'
Some families have been able to afford to move away, but many cannot. Then the connection to the land is also a factor, said Flowers, who spent her childhood there and whose father was raised in Lowndes County.
'My family has been in Lowndes County since slavery,' Flowers said. 'It's home for people. Why would we want to move? That's where our people are buried.'
Changing homes is not just about occupying another house.
'We're talking about giving up a culture,' she said. 'So, we will continue this fight.'
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Residents call for reopening of CC Augustus Pool
TUPELO — Park Hill residents, elected officials and others are pushing for the city of Tupelo to either upgrade or outright replace the popular but currently shuttered C.C. Augustus Pool. Built around 60 years ago, the public pool sits in the heart of Ward 4's Park Hill neighborhood. After two evaluations and a determination that it needed significant repairs, the city announced earlier this month the pool would not open this summer. For Ward 4 Councilwoman Nettie Davis, the pool's closure is a blow to the community. '(The pool) was very special to us," Davis said. "The people in our community feel it is a necessity.' Davis, who said she wants to see the pool completely replaced at the C.C. Augustus Center, is not alone in feeling that it needs to be prioritized. After receiving multiple calls regarding the pool's closure, Davis and Bridgett 'Miss Bam' Shelly, president of the Park Hill Neighborhood Association, called a neighborhood meeting on the topic. During the meeting, Shelly and Davis spoke with neighborhood residents and Tupelo Parks and Recreation Director Alex Farned about the situation. While some solutions were proffered, the main thrust, Shelly said, is that residents want their community pool back. '(The closure) was a big disappointment because we had plans for the children to swim,' Shelly said, adding the community had to cancel multiple events scheduled at the pool this summer. 'Children look forward to it (opening) because it is the only one where they can get there without transportation.' Farned said the previous meeting won't be the last about the pool, adding that discussion on what to do with the pool will begin with this budget session for the next fiscal year, which is already underway. He said more information will be available to the public as the details get settled. Shelly noted that the pool would have opened on June 3, the day of the municipal general election. While working the polls that day at the C.C. Augustus Center precinct, she said she had to turn away multiple children who wanted to swim. Davis and Shelly also talked about its history as a place for Black children to swim safely. Davis noted that before the pool was built, her friends and family swam in creeks in town. 'It's sentimental to me. It's been in our neighborhood since I was a child,' Shelly said. 'Residents are not going to be quiet about them closing the pool.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump and Newsom on collision course as fight over National Guard intensifies in court
President Donald Trump and California Gov. Gavin Newsom are headed for another legal clash next week after the president activated the National Guard to respond to anti-immigration enforcement protests and riots in Los Angeles. The anticipated showdown will take place on Tuesday and comes after Judge Charles Breyer, a Clinton appointee, ruled Thursday night that Trump's use of the National Guard was illegal and ordered the president to temporarily relinquish control of the soldiers. Newsom, a Democrat, celebrated the ruling, saying Trump had deployed the National Guard to his state out of "vanity" and to "instill fear" and to "incite a response." But Newsom's win was short-lived as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit quickly put Breyer's decision on hold in a matter of hours. The appellate court's stay will remain in place at least through Tuesday, when attorneys for the California Attorney General's Office and the Trump administration argue before a three-judge panel about whether the court should grant a longer-term stay. Retired Justice Stephen Breyer's Brother Assigned To Newsom National Guard Lawsuit Judges Mark Bennett and Eric Miller, both Trump appointees, and Judge Jennifer Sung, a Biden appointee, will hear the arguments. Read On The Fox News App For now, Trump and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth can continue to deploy thousands of National Guard soldiers in California, as well as hundreds of Marines. Trump and Hegseth indicated in court papers that military forces would be used strictly to protect federal personnel and federal buildings as they faced attacks by anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) rioters in recent days. Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys argued that a judge's decision to block the Trump administration from carrying out these military activities "would judicially countermand the Commander in Chief's military directives," especially if the decision were issued through a temporary restraining order, like what Breyer issued Thursday night. "That would be unprecedented. It would be constitutionally anathema. And it would be dangerous," the DOJ attorneys said. Former Ag Barr Shreds Gavin Newsom's 'Nonsense' Legal Claims As Trump Sends In Troops To Quell La Riots The decision by Breyer, the 83-year-old brother of retired liberal Justice Stephen Breyer, was met with skepticism by some. Attorney Ed Whelan, a right-of-center former DOJ official, said in remarks online that it was "far more sweeping" than he had expected. Whelan said a significant legal fight could be brewing over the provision of Title 10 that Trump used to federalize the National Guard. Typically, presidents deploy National Guard members with a governor's consent, but the law leaves room for debate on whether the governor's permission is required. Whelan speculated that Trump could attempt to use another provision of Title 10, the Insurrection Act, to bypass the court proceedings. "10 USC 252 seems to give him much freer authority," Whelan said, citing the insurrection law. The National Guard fight comes against the backdrop of Trump hosting a major military parade in Washington, D.C. on Saturday. The event, slated to cost tens of millions of dollars, will showcase U.S. military power and commemorate the Army's 250th birthday. Trump's birthday is also that day. Judge Mulls Trump's Authority Over National Guard, Warns Us Is Not 'King George' Monarchy Trump's critics have coined the day "No Kings Day" and are planning to voice their objections to the president's show of force at protests around the country on Saturday. California alone is expected to see dozens of protests. While Trump is in the nation's capital, the protesters will be "literally everywhere else," Ezra Levin, one of the organizers, told the left-leaning Contrarian on Substack. "It's the 250th anniversary of the Continental Army, which was formed to push back against a mad king," Levin said, noting the protests would be peaceful and serve as a recruitment tool in the "pro-Democracy fight" against article source: Trump and Newsom on collision course as fight over National Guard intensifies in court


The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Our schools have a ‘boy problem' and we need to talk about it
These days it's impossible to avoid the avalanche of evidence about young men falling behind in America. Within the last month, the New York Times laid out the dismal data, the Wall Street Journal noted the rising misogyny among boys and Bloomberg documented their rising anger. One thing you won't read about the boys dilemma, this month or any other month: serious solutions to the problem. After a couple of decades as an education reporter, my first book was 'Why Boys Fail.' That was in 2011, one of several books written at the time about boys falling behind. Back then, it appeared we were on the cusp of finally doing something about it. But apparently not. Fourteen years later, all we have are more studies and op-eds. No solutions. Why? The boys dilemma has three components, and the reasons for inaction are different for each component. My focus for 'Why Boys Fail' was schooling. I traced the effects of well-intended education reforms that date back to the 1989 education summit in Charlottesville, Va., where President George H.W. Bush and 49 governors laid out a national plan for ramping up education achievement. The most notable goal was boosting early literacy skills to get all students on track for a shot at higher education. It was a noble goal, but President Bush and the governors overlooked a small but important detail: Girls are ready for early literacy challenges, but boys are not. Doubtful? Ask mothers of both boys and girls about who was the early reader. As schools pushed reading skills down by about two grades, boys faltered. They looked at the happy girls, who thrived on early reading, and concluded that school was for girls. Cue a massive school tap-out among boys, who found solace in video games. Why has nothing been done about this? Simply put, schools have no interest. Principals are overwhelmed by multiple challenges, boys being the least of them. Teachers, mostly women, have limited interest in the issue. They often see boys as discipline problems and prefer to focus on easier-to-teach girls. Groups such as the American Association of University Women (think of them as the 'thought leaders' behind the female-dominated teachers unions) see the boy problems as politically inconvenient. (It has to be a little awkward promoting women in higher education when, in fact, they are already dominating it to an almost embarrassing degree.) Second comes the problem of fatherless families, which by far hits Black males hardest. More than 70 percent of Black children grow up in families without a father. Strong mothers inspire the girls to pursue school success, but the boys appear to need more — far more. Why has nothing been done about this? That dilemma touches on issues that have long resisted solutions: race and economic inequity. Third, there's the self-image issue. Boys get thrown horribly off-track by confusing social cues. Are we supposed to be muscle-bound Jason Stathams, mowing down bad guys with punches and kicks, or sensitive Alan Aldas, whispering soothing life lessons to the ladies in his life? Why has nothing been done about this? Actually, there's been regression here. Do you really expect the current White House occupant, who brags about never having changed a diaper, praises the uneducated, bashes top universities and revels in UFC fights, to advise boys to tone down their masculinity? So, nothing gets done, and the spinoff problems fester. The biggest of those, the lack of 'marriageable mates' for women, is the little-mentioned driver behind the falling birth rate. Why would a woman take on a husband who is less likely to have a college degree than she is, and who has comparatively less to contribute to a family? Being realistic, the last two drivers of the boy problems may very well be intractable. That leaves schooling, which I would argue is the biggest factor and one that can actually be addressed. How? It all starts with convincing (in some cases, forcing) superintendents and principals to redirect schooling in boy-friendly directions. There's proof that it can be done. Roughly 15 years ago, when the alarm sounded that girls were falling behind in math and science schools engineered a turnaround for girls. Today, there's test evidence of that math-science gender turnaround everywhere. There are plenty of alarms sounding today about boys. So the question becomes: Why not do for boys what you already did for girls? Richard Whitmire is the author of six books on education issues.