FTSE 350 firms achieve ‘gender-balanced' boardrooms but lack women in top jobs
The UK's biggest listed companies have achieved gender-balanced boardrooms, but a lack of women in top jobs has seen the number of female FTSE 100 chief executives fall below 10, according to a Government-backed report.
Progress comes despite more firms looking to 'weed out' costly or ineffective diversity goals amid a string of companies scaling back initiatives in the US, the boss of the FTSE Women Leaders Review said.
New data from the report shows that women now occupy 43.4% of boardroom positions across FTSE 350 companies.
This is up from 42.1% last year, and marks a steep increase from the 24.5% representation recorded in 2017 when the report was launched.
It also means listed companies continue to exceed the 40% voluntary target set by the review.
Vivienne Artz, chief executive of the FTSE Women Leaders Review, said a lack of resistance to diversity initiatives among the biggest UK corporates had propelled change in recent years.
She told the PA news agency: 'You can't ignore the fact that there's a lot of questioning going on, particularly from across the ocean, in relation to DEI (diversity, equality and inclusion).'
But she said the organisation was 'really pleased and impressed' with the willingness of companies to share their data, 'so we haven't encountered any resistance in the UK'.
The latest report comes as a number of large businesses in the US, including Google, Meta, Amazon and McDonald's, have scaled back diversity programmes amid political pressure after Donald Trump's presidential election victory.
Ms Artz said companies that were setting diversity targets 'to look good' were 'probably having an existential crisis' over DEI programmes.
But she said it could be 'healthy' for firms to review their initiatives and 'focus on what is actually working to help the business versus fluffy stuff, extra stuff, things that actually might be more irritating than effective'.
'I think it's helpful to weed out those practices that are not working,' Ms Artz added.
Meanwhile, the analysis also found that the proportion of women in leadership positions increased to 35.3% across FTSE 350 firms, from 34.5% the previous year, as of the end of October 2024.
This spans executive positions including chief executive and chief finance officer, as well as those directly reporting to the leaders.
But on the FTSE 100, the number of female chief executives decreased from 10 to nine, remaining 'few and far between, with little progress in a decade', according to the review.
There were 28 female finance directors and 16 chairs on the FTSE 100.
About 100 of the top 350 listed companies still had fewer than a third of their leadership positions occupied by women.
'Whilst FTSE 350 company boards are now gender-balanced, sustained effort and determination is required to achieve the 40% target for women in leadership by the end of this year,' Ms Artz said.
The listed firms with the highest proportion of female leaders include retailers Marks & Spencer, Next, and Burberry, and publishing giants Pearson and Bloomsbury, which all have more than 50% female representation.
Those at the bottom of the rankings include miners Fresnillo and Antofagasta, and Games Workshop and CMC Markets, which all have less than 25% female representation.
Some private companies such as chemicals giant Ineos, parcel firm Hermes and wholesaler Bestway have no women on their boards.
Across the G7 – the group of seven of the world's most advanced economies – the UK's FTSE 350 ranks in second place, behind France, for female boardroom representation.
France has gender quotas for its top 40 company boardrooms, while the UK has voluntary targets.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves said: 'The UK is leading the charge for gender equality in boardrooms, but we cannot rest on our laurels.
'We must break down the barriers that stop many women being represented in decision-making roles, so that top talent reaches the highest levels of leadership in businesses driving economic growth across Britain.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democratic lawmaker looks forward to Elon Musk 'turning his fire against MAGA Republicans' in 2026 midterms
Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., was optimistic on Friday that former Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) leader Elon Musk would be targeting Republicans instead of Democrats in the 2026 midterm elections after his feud with President Donald Trump. In an interview with Semafor, Khanna said that he spoke to some of the Tesla CEO's "senior confidants" about whether Musk would be interested in supporting Democratic candidates in 2026. Based on Musk's recent attacks against the Trump administration and his history of supporting Democrats, Khanna believed a change could be possible. "Having Elon speak out against the irrational tariff policy, against the deficit-exploding Trump bill, and the anti-science and anti-immigrant agenda can help check Trump's unconstitutional administration," Khanna said. "I look forward to Elon turning his fire against MAGA Republicans instead of Democrats in 2026." Booker Won't Accept Money From Elon Musk For Campaign, But Urges Him To 'Sound The Alarm' On Trump-backed Bill Khanna made similar comments to Politico on Wednesday where he implored the party to start trying to embrace Musk after he broke ranks with Trump. "We should ultimately be trying to convince him that the Democratic Party has more of the values that he agrees with," Khanna said. "A commitment to science funding, a commitment to clean technology, a commitment to seeing international students like him." Read On The Fox News App Fox News Digital reached out to a Musk spokesperson for a comment. While Democrats have largely framed Musk as a political enemy because of his support for Trump, Khanna has been a notable exception, calling for "bipartisan cooperation" with DOGE's efforts to cut federal spending prior to Trump taking office for the second time.. Not every progressive has encouraged reaching out to Musk ahead of the midterms. On CNN Sunday, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., told "State of the Union" host Dana Bash that he didn't believe Democrats should work with the "right-wing extremist." Elon Musk Biographer Believes Billionaire Is 'Frustrated' As He Exits Doge "Musk has evolved over the years. My understanding is he actually voted for Obama in 2008. But over the years, he has developed into a right-wing extremist," Sanders said. While Musk and Trump traded harsh barbs last week over Trump's massive tax and spending package, Musk has since shown signs of reconciling with the Trump administration on social media. On Sunday, Musk shared a Truth Social post from Trump regarding the Los Angeles riots that broke out on Friday. He also re-posted one of Vice President JD Vance's posts on X about the riots, signaling approval of the administration's handling of the article source: Democratic lawmaker looks forward to Elon Musk 'turning his fire against MAGA Republicans' in 2026 midterms
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Labour MPs in call for benefits U-turn after change to winter fuel payment cut
Labour backbenchers have called for a Government U-turn on planned disability benefit cuts, after Chancellor Rachel Reeves restored winter fuel payments to a majority of pensioners. Ms Reeves' £1.25 billion plan unveiled on Monday will see automatic payments worth up to £300 given to pensioners with an income less than £35,000 a year. It followed last year's decision to strip pensioners of the previously universal scheme, unless they claimed certain benefits, such as pension credit. Nadia Whittome, the Labour MP for Nottingham East, warned ministers they risked making a 'similar mistake' if they tighten the eligibility criteria for personal independence payments, known as Pip. Leeds East MP Richard Burgon called on pensions minister Torsten Bell to 'listen now' so that backbenchers can help the Government 'get it right'. In her warning, Ms Whittome said she was not asking Mr Bell 'to keep the status quo or not to support people into work' and added: 'I'm simply asking him not to cut disabled people's benefits.' The pensions minister, who works in both the Treasury and Department for Work and Pensions, replied that the numbers of people receiving Pip is set to 'continue to grow every single year in the years ahead, after the changes set out by this Government'. In its Pathways to Work green paper, the Government proposed a new eligibility requirement, so Pip claimants must score a minimum of four points on one daily living activity, such as preparing food, washing and bathing, using the toilet or reading, to receive the daily living element of the benefit. 'This means that people who only score the lowest points on each of the Pip daily living activities will lose their entitlement in future,' the document noted. Mr Burgon told the Commons: 'As a Labour MP who voted against the winter fuel payment cuts, I very much welcome this change in position, but can I urge the minister and the Government to learn the lessons of this and one of the lessons is, listen to backbenchers? 'If the minister and the Government listen to backbenchers, that can help the Government get it right, help the Government avoid getting it wrong, and so what we don't want is to be here in a year or two's time with a minister sent to the despatch box after not listening to backbenchers on disability benefit cuts, making another U-turn again.' Mr Bell replied that it was 'important to listen to backbenchers, to frontbenchers'. Opposition MPs cheered when the minister added: 'It's even important to listen to members opposite on occasion.' Liberal Democrat MP Mike Martin warned that 'judging by the questions from his own backbenchers, it seems that we're going to have further U-turns on Pip and on the two-child benefit cap'. The Tunbridge Wells MP asked Mr Bell: 'To save his colleagues anguish, will he let us know now when those U-turns are coming?' The minister replied: 'What Labour MPs want to see is a Labour Government bringing down child poverty, and that's what we're going to do 'What Labour MPs want to see is a Government that can take the responsible decisions, including difficult ones on tax and on means testing the winter fuel payment so that we can invest in public services and turn around the disgrace that has become Britain's public realm for far too long.' Conservative former work and pensions secretary Esther McVey had earlier asked whether the Chancellor, 'now that she and the Government have got a taste for climbdowns', would 'reverse the equally ridiculous national insurance contribution (Nic) rises, which is destroying jobs, and the inheritance tax changes, which is destroying farms and family businesses'. Mr Bell said: 'This is a party opposite that has learned no lessons whatsoever, that thinks it can come to this chamber, call for more spending, oppose every tax rise and expect to ever be taken seriously again – they will not.' Labour MP Rebecca Long-Bailey pressed the Government to make changes to the two-child benefit cap, which means most parents cannot claim for more than two children. 'It's the right thing to do to lift pensioners out of poverty, and I'm sure that both he and the Chancellor also agree that it's right to lift children out of poverty,' the Salford MP told the Commons. 'So can he reassure this House that he and the Chancellor are doing all they can to outline plans to lift the two-child cap on universal credit as soon as possible?' Mr Bell replied: 'All levers to reduce child poverty are on the table. 'The child poverty strategy will be published in the autumn.' He added: 'If we look at who is struggling most, having to turn off their heating, it is actually younger families with children that are struggling with that. 'So she's absolutely right to raise this issue, it is one of the core purposes of this Government, we cannot carry on with a situation where large families, huge percentages of them, are in poverty.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Barclays Just Cut 200 Bankers--Here's Why Investors Are Cheering
Barclays (NYSE:BCS) is shaking up its investment bankagain. Over 200 roles are on the chopping block, mostly at the managing director level, as the firm sharpens its focus on higher-return business lines. While the headlines say cuts, the subtext is reallocation: Barclays is redirecting capital toward areas where it believes it can punch harderthink M&A, equity capital markets, and sectors like tech, health care, and energy transition. This isn't a retreat from its full-service model. Insiders suggest it's about shedding lower-yield headcount to go heavier in places with more upside. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Sign with BCS. The move fits squarely into CEO C.S. Venkatakrishnan's longer-term playbook. Last year, he laid out a plan to strip 2 billion in costs by 2026 and hand back 10 billion to shareholders. The investment bankstill Barclays' biggest revenue engine at 11.8 billion in 2024is being told to do more with the same capital base. That means no fresh risk-weighted assets from the parent, despite higher regulatory buffers. Instead, Barclays is betting on talent upgrades: recently tapping ex-Centerview dealmaker Andrew Woeber to lead M&A and poaching RBC's John Kolz to co-run equity capital markets. And so far? The early signals look promising. The firm has started inching back into bigger league tables, landing mandates on high-profile deals like Alphabet's (NASDAQ:GOOG) $32 billion acquisition of Wiz and Sunoco's $9.1 billion buyout of Parkland. In markets, Q1 revenues popped 16%stock trading notched its best quarter in nearly three years. Barclays shares have climbed 24% year-to-date, handily beating the FTSE 100's 8% gain. Investors could be warming up to Venkat's bet: cut costs, reload talent, and go leaner but meaner into the next earnings cycle. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio