Court hearing set on Trump's use of National Guard and Marines to help with immigration raids in LA
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A federal court hearing is scheduled for Thursday on whether the Trump administration can use the National Guard and Marines to assist with immigration raids in Los Angeles.
California Gov. Newsom has depicted the federal military intervention in the nation's second largest city as the onset of a much broader effort by Trump to overturn political and cultural norms at the heart of the nation's democracy. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass has echoed that, saying the deployment of troops was unnecessary and meant to undermine local jurisdictions and intimidate the city's large immigrant population.
Newsom filed an emergency motion requesting the court's intervention after President Donald Trump ordered the deployment of roughly 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines to Los Angeles following protests over his stepped-up enforcement of immigration laws.
The Trump administration called the lawsuit a 'crass political stunt endangering American lives' in its official response on Wednesday.
The Democratic governor argued the troops were originally deployed to protect federal buildings and said sending troops to help support immigration raids would only promote civil unrest.
The protests over immigration raids in Los Angeles intensified after Trump called up the National Guard and have since spread to other cities, including Boston, Chicago and Seattle.
Federal immigration agents have been arresting people at Home Depot parking lots and other businesses, sparking fear in immigrant communities, after the Trump administration said it wanted to dramatically increase arrests under its immigration crackdown.
Trump has described Los Angeles in dire terms that Bass and Newsom say are nowhere close to the truth.
Most demonstrations have been peaceful but this weekend some turned raucous with protesters setting cars on fire in downtown Los Angeles. The city has imposed a nightly curfew covering a 1-square-mile (2.5-square-kilometer) section where protests have occurred in the sprawling metropolis of 4 million people.
The Marines have not yet been spotted in Los Angeles and Guard troops have had limited engagement with protesters.
Newsom filed the motion Tuesday, the same day the military announced some members of the National Guard were now standing in protection around federal agents. The change moves troops closer to engaging in law enforcement actions like deportations as Trump has promised as part of his administration's immigration crackdown. The Guard has the authority to temporarily detain people who attack officers but any arrests ultimately would be made by law enforcement.
Senior U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer chose not to rule immediately but set the hearing for Thursday in federal court in San Francisco.
Dozens of mayors from across the Los Angeles region banded together Wednesday to demand the raids stop and the troops leave.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
38 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump is finally getting his chance to try to top France with a grand military parade in DC
For Trump, a media-attuned real estate developer who was a reality television star and beauty pageant owner, it's a chance to flex his skills as a showman. But the muscular display of military might also comes as Trump is increasingly flexing the powers of his office, including with the deployment of thousands of National Guard troops to respond to protests in Los Angeles over his immigration crackdown. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The Republican president's desire for a grand military parade was scuttled in his first term over concerns about the high cost for the event. This time around, he is barreling past objections just like the tanks that will roll down Constitution Avenue. Advertisement Trump has dismissed concerns about the cost, about what message the display of military power sends and about the fact that it will take place on his 79th birthday. One potential obstacle the president can't control is the weather. There's a chance the parade could be interrupted by thunderstorms. The White House has said it will go on rain or shine, but it could be delayed by lightning. Advertisement Trump said Thursday night that he hopes the weather is OK but if it's not, 'That's OK too.' 'Doesn't matter,' he said at the White House. 'Doesn't affect the tanks at all. Doesn't affect the soldiers. They're used to it.' Parade plans emerge after joining Army bash, donors defraying costs The parade was initially conceived as a July 4 event, but Trump found occasion this year to add it onto a long-planned celebration of the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army that coincides with Flag Day and Trump's birthday. 'This parade will honor all of the military men and women who have bravely served our country, including those who made the ultimate sacrifice to defend our freedom,' White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said in a statement. 'No event can fully capture our gratitude for those who have worn the uniform, but this grand parade will ensure our veterans and active-duty service members are recognized with the respect and magnificence they deserve.' The White House has not offered details about when and how the administration first began pushing this year to turn Trump's parade vision into reality, but the president has been briefed regularly on its progress and made suggestions about details of the plans, according to press secretary Karoline Leavitt. Private donations from companies like Lockheed Martin, Amazon and UFC are helping defray some of the costs, but the government still is expected to spend $25 million to $45 million. Some members of Congress have questioned the high cost at a time when the administration has been pushing for deep spending cuts throughout the government. Advertisement Defense officials and the White House have justified the cost as a worthy expense to pay tribute to service members and inspire patriotism, and Trump has called it 'a great expenditure.' 'We're going to have to try and top it' Outside of wartime, there isn't much of a tradition of military parades in the U.S., with some critics likening the planned pageantry to the jingoistic displays seen in North Korea. But Trump's inspiration was the 2017 Bastille Day procession he attended in France, which he declared at the time to be 'magnificent' and 'one of the greatest parades I have ever seen.' 'We're going to have to try and top it,' he said then. With the parade now set to occur on his 79th birthday, Trump said he is 'taking a little heat' over the overlapping occasions. But he said the festivities are meant to celebrate the Army and Flag Day, not his birthday. His imprint Saturday will be clear, though. Trump requested aircraft and military equipment that capture the might of the military, according to the White House. He is expected to view the synchronized flyovers, along with the processions of tanks, historical reenactments and marching soldiers, from a special reviewing stand. Toward the end of the day's events, he is set to deliver remarks during a nationally televised ceremony capped by fireworks. One of Trump's favorite musical acts, " God Bless the USA" singer Lee Greenwood, is on tap to perform. Greenwood's song is one of the president's preferred walk-on tunes at events. The singer has performed in person at campaign rallies, and Trump even partnered with Greenwood on a business deal to sell 'God Bless the USA' Bibles for $59.99. Advertisement Protests expected to counter the military show Though the president has blown past the logistical and financial barriers that stopped his parade in the past, the pageantry still is expected to draw pushback. With predictions of as many as 200,000 attendees, the Secret Service is preparing for protests by erecting 18 miles of anti-scale fencing and deploying drones to the city's skies to keep watch. Multiple protests to counter the event were being planned, including a march to the White House. Immigration-related clashes between protesters and law enforcement in Los Angeles have spread to other cities this week and heightened the possibility of tensions in the Washington area. The president this week said that if protesters show up at the parade, 'they will be met with very big force.' It was not clear what he meant by that remark, but it added to the alarm of critics who claim the policies of Trump's administration and the planned lavish display of militarism smack of authoritarian politics. Organizers of 'No Kings' protests are planning demonstrations around the country Saturday to counter an event they contend is meant to feed Trump's ego. 'The flag doesn't belong to President Trump. It belongs to us,' the 'No Kings' website says. But they're not planning to hold an event in Washington. Instead, their flagship event will be in Philadelphia, and organizers said they hope to draw attention away from what they paint as a strongman spectacle designed for Trump's birthday, like a king. Trump laughed off the idea Thursday. 'I don't feel like a king,' he said. 'I have to go through hell to get stuff approved.' ___ Associated Press writers Darlene Superville and Chris Megerian contributed to this report.
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Homeland Security secretary pledges to carry on with Trump's immigration crackdown
LOS ANGELES (AP) — Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem pledged Thursday to carry on with the Trump administration's immigration crackdown despite waves of unrest across the U.S. Hours later a judge directed the president to return control to California over National Guard troops he deployed after protests erupted over the immigration crackdown, but an appeals court quickly put the brakes on that and temporarily blocked the order that was to go into effect on Friday. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals scheduled a hearing on the matter for Tuesday. The federal judge's temporary restraining order said the Guard deployment was illegal and both violated the Tenth Amendment and exceeded President Donald Trump's statutory authority. The order applied only to the National Guard troops and not Marines who were also deployed to the LA protests. The judge said he would not rule on the Marines because they were not out on the streets yet. Gov. Gavin Newsom who had asked the judge for an emergency stop to troops helping carry out immigration raids, had praised the order before it was blocked saying 'today was really about a test of democracy, and today we passed the test" and had said he would be redeploying Guard soldiers to 'what they were doing before Donald Trump commandeered them.' White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said the president acted within his powers and that the federal judge's order 'puts our brave federal officials in danger. The district court has no authority to usurp the President's authority as Commander in Chief." The developments unfolded as protests continued in cities nationwide and the country braced for major demonstrations against Trump over the weekend. 'This is only going to continue,' DHS chief says of raids Noem said the immigration raids that fueled the protests would move forward and agents have thousands of targets. 'This is only going to continue until we have peace on the streets of Los Angeles,' she said during a news conference that was interrupted by shouting from U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla, a California Democrat who was forcibly removed from the event. Newsom has warned that the military intervention is part of a broader effort by Trump to overturn norms at the heart of the nation's democracy. He also said sending Guard troops on the raids has further inflamed tensions in LA. So far the protests have been centered mostly in downtown near City Hall and a federal detention center where some immigrants are being held. Much of the sprawling city has been spared from the protests. On the third night of an 8 p.m. curfew, Los Angeles police arrested several demonstrators who refused orders to leave a street downtown. Earlier in the night, officers with the Department of Homeland Security deployed flash bangs to disperse a crowd that had gathered near the jail, sending protesters sprinting away. Those incidents were outliers. As with the past two nights, the hours-long demonstrations remained peaceful and upbeat, drawing a few hundred attendees who marched through downtown chanting, dancing and poking fun at the Trump administration's characterization of the city as a 'war zone.' Elsewhere, demonstrations have picked up across the U.S., emerging in more than a dozen major cities. Some have led to clashes with police and hundreds have been arrested. Noem calls action in LA a blueprint The immigration agents conducting the raids in LA are 'putting together a model and a blueprint' for other communities, Noem said. She pledged that federal authorities 'are not going away' even though, she said, officers have been hit with rocks and bricks and assaulted. She said people with criminal records who are in the country illegally and violent protesters will 'face consequences.' 'Just because you think you're here as a citizen, or because you're a member of a certain group or you're not a citizen, it doesn't mean that you're going to be protected and not face consequences from the laws that this country stands for," she said. Noem criticized the Padilla's interruption, calling it "inappropriate.' A statement from her agency said the two met after the news conference for about 15 minutes, but it also chided him for 'disrespectful political theater.' Padilla said later that he was demanding answers about the 'increasingly extreme immigration enforcement actions' and only wanted to ask Noem a question. He said he was handcuffed but not arrested. 'If this is how this administration responds to a senator with a question, I can only imagine what they are doing to farmworkers, to cooks, to day laborers throughout the Los Angeles community,' he said. Military involvement escalates in LA The administration has said it is willing to send troops to other cities to assist with immigration enforcement and controlling disturbances — in line with what Trump promised during last year's campaign. Some 2,000 Guard soldiers were in the nation's second-largest city and were soon to be joined by 2,000 more, along with about 700 Marines, said Maj. Gen. Scott Sherman, who is in charge of the operation. About 500 of the Guard troops deployed to the Los Angeles protests have been trained to accompany agents on immigration operations, Sherman said Wednesday. The Guard has the authority to temporarily detain people who attack officers, but any arrests must be made by law enforcement. States face questions on deploying troops With more demonstrations expected over the weekend, and the possibility that Trump could send troops to other states for immigration enforcement, governors are weighing what to do. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, has put 5,000 National Guard members on standby in cities where demonstrations are planned. In other Republican-controlled states, governors have not said when or how they may deploy troops. A group of Democratic governors earlier signed a statement this week calling Trump's deployments 'an alarming abuse of power.' Hundreds arrested in LA protests There have been about 470 arrests since Saturday, the vast majority of which were for failing to leave the area at the request of law enforcement, according to the police department. There have been a handful of more serious charges, including for assault against officers and for possession of a Molotov cocktail and a gun. Nine officers have been hurt, mostly with minor injuries. ___ Rodriguez reported from San Francisco and Seewer from Toledo, Ohio. Associated Press writers Julie Watson in San Diego, Jesse Bedayn in Denver, and Jim Vertuno in Austin, Texas, and Hallie Golden in Seattle contributed. Krysta Fauria, Olga R. Rodriguez And John Seewer, The Associated Press
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration can keep control of California National Guard troops for now, appeals court rules
The Trump administration can maintain control of several thousand National Guard troops in California and continue to deploy them in Los Angeles, a federal appeals court ruled late Thursday, pausing a lower court ruling that determined President Donald Trump's federalization of the guardsmen was unlawful. The ruling by a three-judge panel on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals keeps in place Trump's directives authorizing the deployment of at least 4,000 California National Guard troops and several hundred Marines pending further litigation, even as state leaders cast the military presence as unnecessary and escalatory. The appeals court will hold a hearing on the matter Tuesday. Hours before the appeals court ruling, a federal judge temporarily halted the deployment in Los Angeles, writing Thursday evening that the federal government did not have the authority to nationalize California's National Guard. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer issued the temporary restraining order after an hourlong hearing in a San Francisco federal court. It marked a significant setback for Trump, who in recent days increased the number of California National Guard troops under his command by thousands as he sought to flex his executive power and blunt volatile protests in Los Angeles triggered by Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids. California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, steadfastly opposed Trump's decision to deploy the troops, arguing that the presence of militarized law enforcement would only intensify protests and that the administration did not take command of the National Guard members in accordance with federal law. 'The Department of Defense did not transmit this directive to the Office of the Governor, nor was it approved or ordered by the Governor of California,' as required by the law, Newsom wrote in a letter urging the administration to relinquish control of the troops. A day after the letter was sent, California Attorney General Rob Bonta challenged the deployment in federal court, formalizing Newsom's concern that the administration failed to properly follow the statute that permits the federalization of a state's National Guard. In his ruling, Breyer appeared to agree with that argument, delivering a decision broader than the state had sought. Bonta had wanted to ensure that the guard members weren't participating in civilian law and immigration enforcement, acts that they are typically federally prohibited to do. But Breyer determined that Trump exceeded his authority in federalizing the troops because he did not notify Newsom, as the statute cited by the administration requires. During a hearing in San Francisco this afternoon, a lawyer for the federal government argued the administration had met the requirements of a federal statute that governs when the National Guard can be called into federal service. However, in his order Thursday evening, Breyer said the Trump administration had in his view met none of those requirements. "His actions were illegal—both exceeding the scope of his statutory authority and violating the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution' Breyer wrote. 'He must therefore return control of the California National Guard to the Governor of the State of California forthwith,' the judge continued. Newsom praised the ruling at an evening news conference, calling it "a big day for the Constitution of the United States" and "our democracy." 'I hope it's the beginning of a new day in this country where we push back against overreach," Newsom said. "We push back against these authoritarian tendencies of a president that has pushed the boundaries, push the limit, but no longer can push this state around.' The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Attorneys for the Justice Department framed Breyer's ruling as an attack on Trump's presidential powers. "The district court has entered an unprecedented order enjoining the President from deploying National Guardsmen to protect federal officers from ongoing violent protests and attacks, and to protect federal property from further damage," the attorneys wrote. They added that the "order is an extraordinary intrusion on the President's constitutional authority as Commander in Chief to call forth the National Guard as necessary to protect federal officials." 'The district court concluded that the statutory conditions were not satisfied,' the Justice Department attorneys wrote. 'But that sort of second-guessing of the Commander in Chief's military judgments is a gross violation of the separation of powers. Nearly 200 years ago, the Supreme Court made clear that these judgment calls are for the President to make—not a Governor, and certainly not a federal court' Breyer's order does not apply to the deployment of 700 Marines to Los Angeles. In the hearing Thursday afternoon, he expressed skepticism that he was able to control their movements, because the governor of California does not have authority over the Marine Corps. 'I don't understand how I'm supposed to do anything with the Marines, to tell you the truth,' he said. This article was originally published on
