What NIO's Q1 Earnings Could Reveal About Its Breakeven Dream
Nio Inc. (NIO) has been a disappointing stock this year, underperforming the broader market and particularly its Chinese peers, despite a moderate rebound following the tariff war shock that hit the EV sector. While the company has made progress on deliveries and shown some improvement in margins, the bold target set by management to stabilize losses in Fiscal 2025 still feels out of reach, even with three quarters left.
Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions
Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter
The upcoming launch of several new models with better margins, along with ongoing cost-cutting strategies, is the main hope for doubling margins by year-end.
With Q1 results set to drop on June 3rd, I think investors will be watching closely for any shifts in margin trends or cost structure. That said, I remain skeptical that Nio can consistently maintain steady losses, move toward profitability, and generate healthy cash flow in such a short timeframe. For now, I'd rate the stock as a Hold.
Investors are closely monitoring Nio's investment thesis, which hinges on the company achieving financial breakeven by 2025 and potentially turning profitable by 2026.
According to Nio's CEO and founder, William Li, the company is expected to hit breakeven in the fourth quarter of this fiscal year based on three key factors: (1) the launch of nine new models to fully diversify the product portfolio; (2) the rollout of new vehicle technologies aimed at gradually boosting gross margins; and (3) perhaps the most challenging, the aggressive expansion of its battery swapping network, with plans to install stations in every county across China's 27 provinces—an initiative that's expected to drive sales.
In Q1, Nio reported a solid 42,094 vehicle deliveries, marking a 40% year-over-year increase. The company is also seeing early momentum with its new Onvo and Firefly brands. Between March 19 and 27, out of 6,530 vehicles delivered, 2,690 came from these two brands, even though Nio had not officially started ramping up production of these new models yet. These brands are expected to play a significant role in helping Nio reach its ambitious profitability goals. Management has also reaffirmed its target to double deliveries in 2025 compared to the 2024 goal of 222,000 units.
Still, Q1 financials raise some serious questions about how realistic the breakeven by year-end really is. Nio reported a net loss of $977 million, a 24% increase year-over-year, pushing its total projected loss for fiscal 2024 to between $3.1 billion and $3.2 billion—about 4% more than in 2023. Gross margins came in at 11.7%.
That helps explain why Nio's ADR has been underperforming. Most analysts covering the stock expect the company to keep reporting annual losses per share until 2027, with the first potential for a positive figure coming in 2028. As for Q1, estimates suggest Nio will report a loss per share of 35 cents, which, while still a loss, would actually be a 7% improvement over the same period last year.
Given that analyst consensus seems to clash with Nio management's promise to reach breakeven within the next three quarters, gross margins are likely to be the sore spot come earnings day.
Management has already warned in advance that vehicle margins will be under pressure in Q1 due to seasonal factors and a product transition period. They also noted that the NIO brand's vehicle margins are currently under stress, while the ONVO brand has been impacted by weaker-than-expected sales and higher amortization costs.
Despite these headwinds, the company aims to improve margins throughout the year, with targets of a 20% vehicle margin for the NIO brand and 15% for ONVO by Q4 2025. In theory, those margin levels are what's needed to hit breakeven.
To achieve this, Nio is implementing several cost-cutting measures, such as standardizing platforms across different models and brands (for example, utilizing common seat structures) and reducing hardware costs by consolidating smart vehicle interfaces. Therefore, it'll be essential to monitor the evolution of the cost of sales. Last quarter, it was already up 9.9% year-over-year and 4.4% sequentially.
However, management is primarily relying on the launch of higher-margin models in the second half of the year. They're also tightening up pricing and cost controls, which have already led to a 10% drop in the bill of materials in 2024—a trend they say will continue into 2025.
Still, it feels like Nio doesn't fully have its business under control. There are just too many internal and external moving parts for the company to realistically double gross margins in such a short time frame.
One thing that stood out to me in Nio's story (maybe not in a good way) is how vague the company is when it comes to detailing its cash flows. For a business that annually burns through cash on R&D, infrastructure like battery swaps, and relies on government subsidies, it's a bit surprising how little clarity they provide.
A good example is from Q3, when Nio reported positive free cash flow (FCF), despite still posting negative operating margins. In that case, the most likely explanation was changes in working capital, rather than any real improvement in profitability. FCF can still be positive if depreciation is high (a non-cash expense) or if the company boosts payables or books early revenue through pre-sales.
In Nio's case, all signs point to this kind of financial maneuvering. And while it's not inherently bad since plenty of companies do it to ease short-term pressure, it's also not a reliable sign of financial health. If FCF is being propped up by accounting maneuvers rather than genuine operational improvements, it's something investors should be wary of.
So while Nio's FCF might not look bad at first glance, especially with profitability still lagging, it's likely more of a temporary boost than a true turnaround. The real challenge, which is building a profitable core business, still lies ahead.
Analyst sentiment around Nio remains cautious. Among the ten analysts covering the stock, seven recommend holding, two suggest buying, and just one advises selling. Despite this generally conservative outlook, NIO carries an average stock price target of $5.07, implying a significant upside of approximately 38% from the current share price.
Investing in Nio remains highly speculative. Currently, management appears to be chasing ambitious targets that may be overly optimistic given the timeframes they've outlined. While Nio is undeniably improving—the delivery ramp-up is a positive sign, and efforts to boost margins are promising—expecting gross margins to double within a year feels unrealistic.
Such progress depends not only on internal execution but also on external factors in the EV market, which is grappling with fierce competition, supply chain disruptions, and evolving regulatory challenges.
Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
Vermilion Energy (VET) Receives a Hold from RBC Capital
RBC Capital analyst Gregory Pardy maintained a Hold rating on Vermilion Energy (VET – Research Report) yesterday and set a price target of C$14.00. Confident Investing Starts Here: Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter Pardy covers the Energy sector, focusing on stocks such as Canadian Natural, Imperial Oil, and Vermilion Energy. According to TipRanks, Pardy has an average return of 18.3% and a 58.50% success rate on recommended stocks. In addition to RBC Capital, Vermilion Energy also received a Hold from BMO Capital's Jeremy Mccrea in a report issued on May 23. However, on May 20, J.P. Morgan maintained a Sell rating on Vermilion Energy (NYSE: VET). VET market cap is currently $1.03B and has a P/E ratio of -42.58.


Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
RBC Capital Reaffirms Their Sell Rating on Laurentian Bank (LRCDF)
In a report released yesterday, Darko Mihelic from RBC Capital maintained a Sell rating on Laurentian Bank (LRCDF – Research Report), with a price target of C$25.00. Confident Investing Starts Here: Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter According to TipRanks, Mihelic is a 5-star analyst with an average return of 7.2% and a 60.22% success rate. Mihelic covers the Financial sector, focusing on stocks such as Great-West Lifeco, Sagicor Financial, and Bank Of Montreal. In addition to RBC Capital, Laurentian Bank also received a Sell from National Bank's Gabriel Dechaine in a report issued on May 16. However, yesterday, Jefferies maintained a Hold rating on Laurentian Bank (Other OTC: LRCDF). The company has a one-year high of $22.57 and a one-year low of $16.46. Currently, Laurentian Bank has an average volume of 8,937.


Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
Morgan Stanley Remains a Hold on Nomura Holdings (NRSCF)
In a report released on May 29, Mia Nagasaka from Morgan Stanley maintained a Hold rating on Nomura Holdings (NRSCF – Research Report), with a price target of Yen940.00. Confident Investing Starts Here: Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter According to TipRanks, Nagasaka is an analyst with an average return of -1.6% and a 42.86% success rate. Nagasaka covers the Financial sector, focusing on stocks such as Chiba Bank, MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings, and Nomura Holdings. The word on The Street in general, suggests a Hold analyst consensus rating for Nomura Holdings. Based on Nomura Holdings' latest earnings release for the quarter ending June 30, the company reported a quarterly revenue of $1217885000 thousand and a net profit of $68.94 billion. In comparison, last year the company earned a revenue of $317.42 billion and had a net profit of $23.33 billion