One dead, 14 hurt as Russia strikes Odesa, Ukraine drones headed for Moscow shot down
One person was killed in Russian strikes on Odesa, Ukraine.
Moscow mayor Sergei Sobyanin said two Ukraine drones were downed.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky appointed Gennadiy Shapovalov as commander of the country's ground forces.
One person was killed and at least 14 were injured when Russian drones attacked the Ukrainian Black Sea city of Odesa overnight, damaging high-rise buildings and railway infrastructure, local authorities and prosecutors said on Friday.
Odesa is Ukraine's largest Black Sea port, key for imports and exports, and has been under constant missile and drone attacks by Russia since the war began.
'Despite the active work of air defence forces, there is damage to civilian infrastructure, including residential buildings, a higher education institution, a gas pipeline and private cars,' local governor Oleh Kiper said on Telegram messenger.
Kiper released photos of burning houses and charred high-rise buildings.
Local emergencies service said that during the attack there were at least 10 drone strikes on residential buildings, causing massive fires.
Ukraine's air force said on Friday that Russia had launched 86 drones on Ukraine overnight.
The military noted its air defence units shot down 34 drones while another 36 drones were lost - in reference to the Ukrainian military using electronic warfare to redirect them - or they were drone simulators that did not carry warheads.
However, the military reported that drones hit eight locations.
Ukrainian state railways Ukrzaliznytsia reported that Odesa railway station was damaged during the attack, with power wires and rails damaged.
Russian drones also attacked Kharkiv in northeastern Ukraine overnight, damaging several private and multi-storey houses, Kharkiv officials said.
Moscow mayor Sergei Sobyanin said on Friday that air defence systems had downed two drones en route to Russia's capital.
AFP reported that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Thursday appointed Gennadiy Shapovalov as commander of the country's ground forces, replacing a previous commander who resigned following a deadly Russian strike on an army training ground.
Shapovalov worked as a military aid liaison in Germany and previously commanded Ukraine's southern military district.
In his evening address, Zelensky said he hoped Shapovalov would bring 'real combat experience' to the role and called for changes in the Ukrainian army, which is struggling to hold off Moscow's forces more than three years into Russia's invasion.
'Changes are needed, this is a mandatory issue,' Zelensky said in his evening address.
Moscow's forces have been advancing across the front line for over a year and have been making inroads in Ukraine's Sumy region, which the Kremlin had not occupied since the start of the war.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
How the AP decided to refer to the conflict between Israel and Iran as a war
The Associated Press is calling the current conflict between Israel and Iran a war, given the scope, intensity and duration of military activities on both sides. Other news organizations also have decided to refer to the conflict as a war, while some are still sticking with words such as 'conflict' or 'fighting.' When a conflict in the world spills into military action, it's important to use the correct terms to describe it. Sometimes a one-sided attack occurs without further action, or a conflict bubbles up and then ends quickly Using 'war' widely to describe these kinds of situations can diminish the word's importance. Then, when actual war breaks out, people might not understand its significance. The Merriam-Webster definition of war is quite broad: 'A state of usually open and declared armed hostile conflict between states or nations,' or 'a state of hostility, conflict, or antagonism.' The fight between Israel and Iran meets those criteria, though neither has officially declared war. Since Israel launched an air campaign targeting Iran's military and nuclear program, there has been a significant escalation in the conflict. Iran has launched hundreds of missiles and drones into Israel. Israel has assassinated high-level Iranian officials; targeted the country's infrastructure; called for hundreds of thousands of residents to evacuate Iran's capital, Tehran; and said it will continue its offensive. The AP provided guidance on the Russia-Ukraine war and the Israel-Hamas war in the days and weeks after fighting began. In both cases, editors considered the number of casualties, the intensity of fighting, the involvement of each party, and what each country was calling the conflict. In both cases, the AP started using the word 'war' to describe the conflicts. AP capitalizes the word 'war' only as part of a formal name, which as of now does not exist. Decisions on how AP uses the term 'war' happen in real time. AP's news leaders and standards editors will continue to monitor developments to see whether changes are necessary. At this point, the level of fighting constitutes the countries being at war, no matter what happens next. If fighting were to end soon, AP would continue saying the countries had been at war. News leaders would consider whether the level of fighting at that time amounted to being at war. If other countries intervene in the war, AP would describe the intervention as military action in support of Israel or military support of Iran. AP would also consider whether the action constitutes those countries also being at war.
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
No Urgent Need for Key Producers to Aid Oil Market, Putin Says
The global oil market so far does not call for any additional steps from producers amid the conflict between Israel and Iran as the tensions have had only a limited effect on prices, according to Russia's President Vladimir Putin. Many OPEC+ members, including the Gulf states, are able to step in and increase their production if needed, yet 'as a rule, we do that in a coordinated manner,' Putin said Friday when asked if Russia is ready to hike output to support the market amid the Mideast conflict.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why peace may not be the solution in the Israel-Iran conflict
Britain, France, Germany and the European Union are all rushing their foreign ministers to Geneva for talks with Iran in a desperate attempt to give peace a chance. But it is not clear that peace now is the best option. A week into Israel's bombardment of Iran, and its assassination of the country's top nuclear scientists and securocrats, the Islamic state has tightened its grip – and the nuclear facility half a mile underground in Fordow remains intact. If Iran is brought back to the negotiating table at Geneva, whatever it says, the past week has shown that the only hope for the survival of the current rulers of Tehran is for them to build a nuclear weapon. From the Israeli and American perspective, the feeling may be that the only way to ensure this doesn't happen is to double down on the targeting of Iran and change the regime. On top of that, Russia, a close ally of Tehran and part of a Fearsome Foursome that also includes North Korea and China, will see diplomacy now as an opportunity to stop regime change and reinforce its waning influence in the Middle East. Before the planned Geneva meeting, David Lammy said: 'We are determined that Iran must never have a nuclear weapon.' Trying to slow the sense of global war being imminent, Donald Trump has said that he's pausing any decision on backing Israel for a couple of weeks because he wants to give diplomacy a chance. In terms of strikes, the US has the only weapon that could, conceivably, destroy the Fordow nuclear facility, which is located 18 miles north of the central Iranian city of Qom and half a mile underground: the GBU-57/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP), a precision-guided 'bunker-busting' bomb. It weighs 13.6 tonnes, is 6.2 metres long but only 0.8m wide, and carries about 2.5 tonnes of explosive. It can penetrate 60 metres of rock before exploding, as it hits the ground like a needle travelling at around double the speed of sound. It would take several MOPs to clear up Fordow and wipe away Iran's nuclear programme – with no guarantee of a clean slate. If the Iranian government that took power after the 1979 revolution – and maintains control through a vast network of military and security services underpinned by the Basij citizens' militia – survived such an assault, it would be surprising if it did not secretly restart building nuclear weapons to ensure that Israel would think twice when it next considered bombing Iran's capital and killing the country's commanders. 'A window now exists within the next two weeks to achieve a diplomatic solution,' said Lammy. 'Now is the time to put a stop to the grave scenes in the Middle East and prevent a regional escalation that would benefit no one." But would it? Assuming that Trump's advisers have somehow got round the bizarre characters he has put in charge of defence (Pete Hegseth) and the intelligence services (Tulsi Gabbard), they will be helping him to wrestle with a conundrum. Should America go back into the business of regime change – which failed horribly in Iraq and Afghanistan, and left both nations ruined, riddled with extremism, and deeply anti-American? In theory, the US could join the Israeli effort at low physical risk to pilots; it could bomb Fordow, break the back of the regime, and stand back to watch Iranians themselves rise against their oppressors. That's what Benjamin Netanyahu would like. Or the US could stay back, give Israel every help in defending itself against Iranian counterattacks, and hope that Iran's ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who may be on an Israeli kill list, realises that the long-term survival of his regime may depend on it not returning to the pursuit of a nuclear weapon. The gamble for the US is that the Iranian government will still harbour the dream of annihilating Israel and, unless it agrees to a 100 per cent intrusive inspection programme by nuclear experts 24/7, it can never be trusted not to clamber back onto a horse of the apocalypse. Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, is expected to join the European talks in Geneva. They are an opportunity to shoulder the US out of talks, which the Trump administration hoped would persuade Tehran to give up its nuclear programme. But Araghchi has also signalled that while Israel continues to bombard his country, Iran won't get involved in diplomacy. This is a moment when Russia can get back in the game. Moscow and Tehran are military bedfellows, sharing intelligence and missile technology, and Russia is Iran's civilian nuclear power contractor. Vladimir Putin lost his most valuable military foothold in the West – the port at Tartus – when Bashar al-Assad, Syria's former dictator, fled to safety in Moscow. Assad was Iran's most important regional client, and the regime also controls Hezbollah in Lebanon and Iraq. Putin needs to get back in the game, and if he can bring the Iranians to the table, he can stymie US and Israeli hopes for regime change by making it impossible for America to join the bombing campaign while talks about peace are going on. A third option for all is to jaw-jaw while really giving Israel's war a chance.
