logo
Facing Trump's threats, Columbia investigates students critical of Israel

Facing Trump's threats, Columbia investigates students critical of Israel

Nahar Net07-03-2025

by Naharnet Newsdesk 07 March 2025, 12:34
Columbia University senior Maryam Alwan was visiting family in Jordan over winter break when she received an email from the school accusing her of discriminatory harassment. Her supposed top offense: writing an op-ed in the student newspaper calling for divestment from Israel.
The probe is part of a flurry of recent cases brought by a new university disciplinary committee — the Office of Institutional Equity — against Columbia students who have expressed criticism of Israel, according to records shared with The Associated Press.
In recent weeks, it has sent notices to dozens of students for activities ranging from sharing social media posts in support of Palestinian people to joining "unauthorized" protests.
One student activist is under investigation for putting up stickers off campus that mimicked "Wanted" posters, bearing the likenesses of university trustees. Another, the president of a campus literary club, faces sanction for co-hosting an art exhibition in a private building that focused on last spring's occupation of a campus building.
In Alwan's case, investigators said the unsigned op-ed in the Columbia Spectator, which also urged the school to curtail academic ties to Israel, may have subjected other students to "unwelcome conduct" based on their religion, national origin or military service. They promised a thorough investigation, with sanctions ranging from a simple warning to expulsion.
"It just felt so dystopian to have something go through rigorous edits, only to be labeled discriminatory because it's about Palestine," said Alwan, a Palestinian-American comparative studies major. "It made me not want to write or say anything on the subject anymore."
The new disciplinary office is raising alarm among students, faculty and free speech advocates, who accuse the school of bowing to President Donald Trump's threats to slash funding to universities and deport campus "agitators."
"Based on how these cases have proceeded, the university now appears to be responding to governmental pressure to suppress and chill protected speech," said Amy Greer, an attorney who is advising students accused of discrimination. "It's operating as a business by protecting its assets ahead of its students, faculty and staff."
Columbia is under financial pressure
On Monday, federal agencies announced they would consider cutting $51 million in contracts to the school — along with billions more in additional grants — due to its "ongoing inaction in the face of relentless harassment of Jewish students."
"We are resolute that calling for, promoting, or glorifying violence or terror has no place at our university," Columbia said in a statement following the announcement.
House Republicans have also launched their own review of Columbia's disciplinary process. Their most recent letter gave administrators until Feb. 27 to turn over student disciplinary records for nearly a dozen campus incidents, including protests it claimed "promoted terrorism and vilified the U.S. military," as well as the off-campus art exhibition.
A spokesperson for Columbia declined to specify what, if any, records were turned over to Congress and whether they included the names of students. The spokesperson also declined to comment any on pending investigation of students.
The new disciplinary committee was created last summer to "fairly and expeditiously" address cases of discrimination, with the first notices going out in late November. Under its policy, speech against another country may be considered harassment if "directed at or infused with discriminatory comments about persons from, or associated with, that country."
Jewish students at Columbia are among those who have received the notices for taking part in pro-Palestinian protests. Other Jewish students have said that rhetoric at protests has crossed into antisemitism and that the administration has been too tolerant of demonstrators who created a hostile environment for people who support Israel.
In August, Columbia's task force on antisemitism issued a report that said Jews and Israelis at the school were ostracized from student groups, humiliated in classrooms and subjected to verbal abuse as pro-Palestinian demonstrations shook the campus. In one instance, pro-Palestine protesters forced their way into a campus building, prompting university to call in the police and shut down campus.
The task force has also offered its own definition of antisemitism, which includes discrimination or exclusion based on "real or perceived ties to Israel," as well as "certain double standards applied to Israel," such as calls for divestment solely from the country.
That definition was intended to apply to education and training, rather than discipline, according to the task force.
Disciplinary committee works in secret
Under the office's policies, students are required to sign a nondisclosure agreement before accessing case materials or speaking with investigators, ensuring the process has remained shrouded in secrecy since it began late last year. Aspect of the committee's work were first reported this week by the online publication Drop Site News.
Those who have met with investigators say they were asked to name other people involved in pro-Palestinian groups and protests on campus. They said the investigators did not provide clear guidance on whether certain terms — such as "Zionist" or "genocide" — would be considered harassment.
Several students and faculty who spoke with the AP said the committee accused them of participating in demonstrations they did not attend or helping to circulate social media messages they did not post.
Mahmoud Khalil, a graduate student who served as a negotiator for pro-Palestinian protesters during the previous spring's encampment, said he was accused by the office of misconduct just weeks before his graduation this December. "I have around 13 allegations against me, most of them are social media posts that I had nothing to do with," he said.
After refusing to sign the nondisclosure agreement, Khalil said the university put a hold on his transcript and threatened to block him from graduating. But when he appealed the decision through a lawyer, they eventually backed down, Khalil said.
"They just want to show Congress and right-wing politicians that they're doing something, regardless of the stakes for students," Khalil said. "It's mainly an office to chill pro-Palestine speech."
According to some students, the disciplinary push may be reigniting the pro-Palestinian protest movement that roiled campuses last year.
In recent days, students have occupied multiple buildings at Barnard College, an affiliate of Columbia University, to protest the expulsion of two students accused of disrupting an Israeli history class. Several students were arrested following an hourslong takeover of a building Wednesday night.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hezbollah Denounces Israeli Interception of 'Madleen' Aid Ship: Statement
Hezbollah Denounces Israeli Interception of 'Madleen' Aid Ship: Statement

Al Manar

time15 hours ago

  • Al Manar

Hezbollah Denounces Israeli Interception of 'Madleen' Aid Ship: Statement

Hezbollah issued on Monday a statement to condemn the crime of piracy committed by the Zionist enemy through seizing 'Madleen' Aid Ship in the international waters, arresting international activists, and preventing the entry of humanitarian and relief aid on board into the besieged Gaza Strip. This is a flagrant violation of international laws, norms, and humanitarian values, the statement maintained. The enemy's interception of the ship and the detention of its civilian crew as well as the free activists on board reflect the moral and political bankruptcy of this temporary entity and its inability to break the will of the people of Gaza and their resistance, according to Hezbollah statement. Hezbollah expressed its full solidarity with the brave, free people on board the ship, calling on the international community and human rights and humanitarian institutions to condemn this heinous crime, and to take urgent and immediate action to ensure the release of the kidnapped, hold the occupation entity accountable for its ongoing aggression, force it to allow humanitarian aid into Gaza and lift the siege on the Strip. Israeli occupation forces attacked a humanitarian aid ship bound for Gaza as the vessel approached the coastal waters of the besieged Palestinian territory.

Iran to Respond to US' Proposal in Days: Tasnim News Agency
Iran to Respond to US' Proposal in Days: Tasnim News Agency

Al Manar

time15 hours ago

  • Al Manar

Iran to Respond to US' Proposal in Days: Tasnim News Agency

Iran will reportedly give its response to a recent proposal that the US has submitted via Oman within the next two days. Tasnim has learned that Iran's formal response to the American proposal will be sent within the next two days. Iran's written reply to the US will be reportedly given through diplomatic channels. Iran's response is said to include a proposal for an ultimate nuclear agreement that entails the maintenance of uranium enrichment inside Iran as well as a series of measures by Iran to allay the US' concerns in exchange for the effective removal of sanctions. It appears that Iran will also express its readiness for the next round of indirect nuclear talks with US provided that Tehran's red lines are not crossed. Last week, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said an American proposal has been delivered by the Foreign Minister of Oman Badr bin Hamad Al Busaidi. 'My dear brother Badr bin Hamad Al Busaidi, distinguished Foreign Minister of Oman, paid a short visit to Tehran today to present elements of a US proposal which will be appropriately responded to in line with the principles, national interests and rights of the people of Iran,' Araqchi said in an X post. Iran and the US have held five rounds of talks since April 12, mediated by Oman, with the purpose of reaching a deal on Iran's nuclear program and the removal of sanctions on Tehran.

Reports: US, Israel mulling end to UNIFIL's presence
Reports: US, Israel mulling end to UNIFIL's presence

Nahar Net

time18 hours ago

  • Nahar Net

Reports: US, Israel mulling end to UNIFIL's presence

by Naharnet Newsdesk 09 June 2025, 13:18 U.S. officials are considering pulling American support from UNIFIL, the United Nations peacekeeping force in southern Lebanon, in a bid to cut costs associated with its operations, the Israel Hayom newspaper reported Sunday evening, with US sources later confirming to The Times of Israel that the option was on the table. Should the U.S. move ahead with its decision to pull support from the U.N. body, Israel will back the decision, Israel Hayom reported, both out of a desire to align itself with the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump and in light of the Israeli security establishment's 'cooperation with the Lebanese army since the ceasefire in November,' the Times of Israel said. According to Israel Hayom, the presence of the Lebanese Armed Forces in southern Lebanon has proven relatively effective in 'beating back the threat of Hezbollah' and keeping the group from rearming itself, making 'redundant' much of UNIFIL's operations in the region. Sources familiar with the matter told The Times of Israel that the U.S. has not yet made up its mind regarding its future support for UNIFIL, but that it wants to see major reforms, which could mean pulling support. As UNIFIL's mandate is granted through a U.N. Security Council resolution each year, the U.S. could simply veto the next resolution, due to be put forward in August. UNIFIL has been operating in southern Lebanon since 1978, when it was created to oversee the withdrawal of Israeli troops from the area following the end of Israel's first invasion of south Lebanon. The U.N. peacekeeping force expanded its mission following the 2006 war between Israel and Hezbollah, allowing peacekeepers to deploy along the Israeli border to help the Lebanese military extend its authority into the country's south for the first time in decades. Aimed at ending the 2006 war, Resolution 1701 also called for a full cessation of Israeli-Hezbollah hostilities and the disarmament of Hezbollah. UNIFIL's mandate has been renewed annually ever since, although critics have questioned the efficacy of the force. Following the ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon, which put an end to more than a year of hostilities with Hezbollah, including two months of all-out war, the Lebanese Army moved into southern Lebanon to enforce the terms of the ceasefire, which itself is based on Resolution 1701. The resolution requires Hezbollah to withdraw its fighters north of the Litani River — about 30 kilometers (19 miles) from the border — and dismantle all military infrastructure in southern Lebanon. Prime Minister Nawaf Salam told the Wall Street Journal last month that his government had achieved 80 percent of its objectives regarding the disarmament of Hezbollah and other militias in the country's south. At the same time, the Israeli army has continued to launch strikes on Hezbollah operatives and infrastructure, alleging violations of the truce agreement. According to the Israeli army, over 180 Hezbollah operatives have been killed since the truce came into effect.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store