Pakistani in Chandannagar
Videos
Pakistani in Chandannagar | চন্দননগরে পাকিস্তানি মহিলা গ্রেফতারে উঠছে অনেক প্রশ্ন! | Zee 24 Ghanta
Arrest of Pakistani woman in Chandannagar raises serious questions!
Arrest of Pakistani woman in Chandannagar raises serious questions!
|
Updated:
May 04, 2025, 10:25 PM IST
Advertisement
Arrest of Pakistani woman in Chandannagar raises serious questions!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
The Pakistan paradox: How the world's "terror exporter" became a counter-terrorism authority
The international community's approach to Pakistan presents one of the most glaring contradictions in modern geopolitics. While evidence continues to mount of Pakistan's systematic support for terrorism, the same nation has been entrusted with leading global counter-terrorism efforts at the United Nations. This paradox exposes not just Pakistan's duplicity, but the world's willingness to overlook state-sponsored terrorism when geopolitical convenience demands The architect of terror takes the Chair In a development that would be laughable if it weren't so dangerous, Pakistan—a country repeatedly labeled as the "global exporter of terror"—has been appointed to chair the United Nations Security Council's Taliban Sanctions Committee in 2025. Simultaneously, it will serve as vice-chair of the Council's Counter-Terrorism Committee. This appointment represents perhaps the most striking example of institutional hypocrisy in international relations, akin to appointing an arsonist as fire irony becomes even more pronounced when considering Pakistan's track record. This is the same nation where Osama bin Laden was found hiding near a military academy in Abbottabad, where he was eliminated by US forces in 2011. The discovery of the world's most wanted terrorist living comfortably in Pakistan, within walking distance of the country's premier military institution, should have been a wake-up call for the international community. Instead, it was treated as an unfortunate coincidence rather than evidence of systemic pattern of denial and deceptionPakistan's strategy in dealing with terrorism accusations follows a predictable script that has remained unchanged for decades. When confronted with evidence of harbouring terrorists, Pakistani officials invariably resort to one of three responses: outright denial, claims of mistaken identity, or calls for "neutral investigations." This pattern was on full display during former Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto's recent appearance at the United Nations, where he defended Hafiz Abdur Rauf, a designated Lashkar-e-Taiba photographic evidence showing Rauf leading funeral prayers for killed terrorists, and despite documentation from Pakistan's own military media wing (ISPR) that confirmed his identity matched US Treasury Department terrorist designations, Bhutto maintained that Rauf was merely a "local cleric" who happened to share a name with a sanctioned terrorist. This level of gaslighting would be impressive if it weren't so transparently evidence against Rauf is overwhelming. His computerised national identity card, shared by Pakistan's own ISPR, shows a date of birth and identification number that exactly match those on the US Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) list of designated global terrorists. The CNIC also confirms his affiliation with the Pakistan Markazi Muslim League (PMML), designated by the US as a front for Lashkar-e-Taiba. Yet Pakistan's representatives continue to maintain the fiction that this is all a case of mistaken decades of state-sponsored terrorPakistan's use of terrorism as a tool of foreign policy is not a recent development but a consistent strategy dating back to the country's independence in 1947. From the very beginning, Pakistan has employed proxy forces to achieve its geopolitical objectives, particularly regarding Kashmir. The tribal militia invasion of Jammu and Kashmir in 1947, Operation Gibraltar in 1965, and the Kargil infiltration in 1999 all followed the same playbook: use non-state actors to provide plausible deniability while pursuing state objectives through strategy has evolved and intensified over the decades. Pakistan has created, trained, and armed multiple terror groups including Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammad, and others that have carried out devastating attacks not just in India but across the globe. The 2008 Mumbai attacks, which killed 166 people, stand as perhaps the most brazen example of Pakistan's proxy warfare. Despite overwhelming evidence of Pakistani involvement, including captured terrorist Ajmal Kasab's confession and intercepted communications, Pakistan has steadfastly refused to prosecute the masterminds who continue to operate freely on its pattern is consistent across multiple attacks: the 1993 Mumbai blasts whose mastermind Dawood Ibrahim is still sheltered in Pakistan, the 2001 Indian Parliament attack, the 2016 Pathankot airbase attack, and the 2019 Pulwama bombing that killed 40 Indian paramilitary personnel. In each case, Pakistan follows the same script—deny involvement, obstruct investigations, ignore legal requests for information, and eventually claim to be a victim of terrorism economic dimension of complicityPakistan's recent diplomatic breakthrough with Afghanistan, mediated by China, reveals another layer of the international community's complicity in Pakistan's terror enterprise. The agreement to reinstate diplomatic ties and invite Afghanistan to join the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) demonstrates how economic interests can override security concerns and moral role as mediator is particularly telling. Despite being well aware of Pakistan's terror connections—Chinese nationals have been repeatedly targeted by Pakistan-based militants—Beijing continues to invest billions in CPEC projects. The calculation is purely transactional: China values Pakistan's strategic location and willingness to serve as a conduit for Chinese influence more than it concerns itself with Pakistan's support for economic dimension helps explain Pakistan's immunity from serious international consequences. Countries and institutions find it easier to work around Pakistan's terror problem than to confront it directly. The result is a system where Pakistan faces minimal costs for its behaviour while reaping significant benefits from international UN's Institutional FailureThe decision to place Pakistan in leadership roles within UN counter-terrorism bodies represents a fundamental failure of institutional logic. How can an organisation committed to fighting terrorism place a known state sponsor of terrorism in charge of its efforts? The answer lies in the UN's structural weaknesses and the dominance of political considerations over principled appointment to these positions is not an oversight but a deliberate choice that reflects the international community's prioritisation of geopolitical stability over justice and accountability. By allowing Pakistan to lead counter-terrorism efforts, the UN is essentially legitimising the very behaviour it claims to combat. This sends a dangerous message to other state sponsors of terrorism: that there are no real consequences for supporting violence against persistence of plausible deniabilityPakistan's strategy relies heavily on maintaining plausible deniability—the ability to support terrorism while avoiding direct responsibility. This approach allows Pakistan to claim it is fighting terrorism even as it sponsors it. The use of proxy groups provides a thin veneer of separation between the Pakistani state and terrorist activities, which international actors seem all too willing to recent Pahalgam attack, which killed 26 civilians, followed this familiar pattern. Despite clear evidence of cross-border terrorism emanating from Pakistan-controlled territory, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif called for a "credible, neutral probe"—the same deflection tactic Pakistan has used for decades. This response ignores the mountain of evidence linking Pakistani territory and proxies to terrorist activities while attempting to shift the burden of proof away from cost of international inactionThe international community's failure to hold Pakistan accountable has had devastating consequences. By allowing Pakistan to maintain its terror infrastructure without facing meaningful consequences, the world has enabled decades of violence and instability. The human cost has been enormous—thousands of lives lost in terrorist attacks linked to Pakistani proxies, ongoing instability in South Asia, and the persistence of non-state actors who threaten regional and global Financial Action Task Force (FATF) briefly placed Pakistan on its "grey list" for terror financing, but even this limited action was eventually reversed without Pakistan making fundamental changes to its behaviour. This pattern of limited pressure followed by rehabilitation has become the norm, reinforcing Pakistan's belief that it can continue supporting terrorism without facing serious calculated complicityChina's role in enabling Pakistan's behavior deserves particular scrutiny. Despite repeated attacks on Chinese nationals and projects by Pakistan-based militants, China continues to deepen its partnership with Pakistan through CPEC and other initiatives. This relationship reveals how major powers prioritise their strategic interests over counter-terrorism mediation between Pakistan and Afghanistan appears designed not to end terrorism but to create stability that serves Chinese economic interests. By helping Pakistan and Afghanistan reach an accommodation that allows both to continue harbouring different terrorist groups while avoiding direct conflict with each other, China is essentially facilitating a division of the terrorism market rather than its way forward: Accountability or complicityThe international community faces a clear choice: continue enabling Pakistan's behaviour through engagement without consequences, or finally demand genuine accountability. The current approach—combining harsh rhetoric with continued cooperation—has clearly failed. Pakistan continues to support terrorism because it faces no meaningful costs for doing accountability would require sustained pressure across multiple dimensions: diplomatic isolation, economic sanctions, and removal from international bodies where Pakistan can obstruct counter-terrorism efforts. Most importantly, it would require consistency—not the current pattern of brief pressure followed by world's treatment of Pakistan reveals uncomfortable truths about international priorities. Despite decades of rhetoric about fighting terrorism, major powers continue to prioritise their narrow interests over principled opposition to state-sponsored violence. This hypocrisy not only enables Pakistan's behaviour but undermines the entire international counter-terrorism emperor's terrorist clothesPakistan's appointment to lead UN counter-terrorism efforts while simultaneously supporting terrorism represents the ultimate expression of international hypocrisy. Like the emperor's new clothes, everyone can see the truth, but institutional interests prevent anyone from stating it clearly. Pakistan is not a partner in fighting terrorism—it is one of terrorism's primary the international community finds the courage to confront this reality directly, Pakistan will continue to play its double game with impunity. The victims of Pakistani-sponsored terrorism deserve better than a system that rewards their tormentors with positions of authority. The world's credibility in fighting terrorism depends on ending this charade and finally holding Pakistan accountable for its Pakistan paradox exposes more than just one country's duplicity—it reveals a system where power matters more than principles, where convenience trumps justice, and where those who enable terrorism can simultaneously claim to fight it. This is not just Pakistan's shame; it is the world' Watch
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Espionage case: Punjab YouTuber remanded to police custody
Haryana Police had summoned Punjab-based YouTuber Jasbir Singh on June 6 in the Jyoti Malhotra espionage case but before he could join the investigation, he was arrested by Punjab Police, Singh's counsel claimed on Saturday (June 7, 2025). He also denied the charge that Singh was an agent of Pakistan's spy agency ISI. A Mohali court on Saturday (June 7, 2025) extended for two days the police remand of Singh, who was arrested on espionage charges on June 4. Singh was produced before the court after his three-day police remand ended on Saturday (June 7, 2025). Police sought a seven-day remand of Singh but the court granted them two days, said his counsel. Jasbir Singh alias Jaan Mahal (41), a resident of village Mahlan in Rupnagar district, was running a YouTube channel 'JaanMahal Video' with over 11 lakh subscribers, ostensibly posting travel and cooking vlogs. Also read: Jyoti Rani's police didn't have access to secret information, says Police Singh was allegedly in close touch with Haryana-based influencer Jyoti Malhotra, who is in custody on charges of spying for Pakistan. After Singh's arrest, Punjab police had claimed that it unearthed a 'terror-backed espionage network' linking him to Pakistani intelligence and army officials. Police had said that the YouTuber was allegedly spying for Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). Speaking to reporters on Saturday (June 7, 2025), Singh's counsel, Mohit Dhupar, said he met him in the court on Saturday (June 7, 2025). 'We spoke to him. There is no such thing that is being said in the media that he was an ISI agent,' said Dhupar, claiming he was just a vlogger. Dhupar said Singh was summoned by Punjab Police from May 17 till May 30. He had already given his mobile phone and laptop to the police, said the counsel. Dhupar said on June 2, Hisar police summoned Singh to join the investigation in the Jyoti Malhotra case on June 6. When Punjab Police came to know about him being summoned by the Haryana police, Singh was asked to appear on June 3 and he was arrested on June 4, said the counsel. 'Punjab Police might have felt that if Haryana Police arrested Singh, it would be their insult', claimed Dhupar. The counsel said there was no mention of Singh being summoned from May 17 to May 30 in the FIR. Hisar native Malhotra (33) who was running a YouTube channel 'Travel with JO' was arrested last month. To a question on Punjab Police claiming that 150 Pakistani contacts were retrieved from his phone, Dhupar said there was no such thing. 'Many people visited Pakistan multiple times. Did they become guilty (of doing wrong) by visiting the neighbouring nation,' he said while replying to a question. On Pakistani YouTuber Nasir Dhillon's alleged link to a spy network, Dhupar said the police did not take Dhillon's name in the court while seeking Singh's remand. Nasir Dhillon, a former Pakistani police official, runs a YouTube channel 'Punjabi Lehar'. He has claimed to unite families divided during partition in 1947. His role is reportedly under investigation for possible links to the espionage network unearthed by Indian authorities. Asked whether Singh gave his laptop to Pakistani official Ehsan-ur-Rahim alias Danish, Dhupar denied it and said when Singh visited Pakistan, his laptop was examined for a routine security check. On May 13, India expelled Danish, who was posted at the Pakistan High Commission, for allegedly indulging in espionage. Jasbir Singh was allegedly found to be associated with a Pakistani Intelligence Operative (PIO). He was in contact with a Pakistan High Commission official who was recently expelled from New Delhi on charges of spying and had met Pakistan Army officials during one of his three visits to the neighbouring country, police had earlier said. He was allegedly in close contact with Jyoti Malhotra, who was earlier arrested by Haryana Police on espionage charges. Singh was found to be associated with Pakistani Intelligence Operative (PIO) Shakir, alias Jutt Randhawa. The accused had also travelled to Pakistan on three occasions including in 2020, 2021 and 2024, and came into direct contact with ISI officers, who subsequently cultivated and recruited him to carry out espionage activities within India, police had said. Investigations revealed that Singh attended the Pakistan National Day event in Delhi on Danish's invitation, where he met Pakistani Army officials and vloggers. After Jyoti Malhotra's arrest, accused Singh had attempted to erase all traces of his communications with these PIOs to avoid detection, police had said. The police had alleged that Singh was in touch with many Pakistan-based entities, including ISI agents and had been providing sensitive information about the movement of the Indian Army and other inside activities of the country to Pakistan.
India Gazette
3 hours ago
- India Gazette
Mohali Court remands YouTuber Jasbir Singh to 2-day custody in Pak-linked espionage case
Chandigarh (Punjab) [India], June 7 (ANI): A Mohali court on Saturday remanded YouTuber Jasbir Singh, arrested on June 4 on espionage charges, to two days of police custody. The arrested accused, identified as Jasbir Singh alias Jaan Mahal (41), a resident of Village Mahlan in Rupnagar, has been operating a YouTube channel 'JaanMahal Video' with over 11 lakh subscribers, ostensibly posting travel and cooking vlogs. On Jasbir's remand, his lawyer said, 'The police had asked for 7 days remand... We asked the police through the court what they did in 3 days. Today, he has been sent to a 2-day police remand.' Jasbir Singh, who runs the YouTube channel 'Jaan Mahal,' is allegedly linked to a terror-backed espionage network involving Pakistani intelligence operative Shakir alias Jutt Randhawa, as per police sources. He is also said to have maintained close contact with Haryana-based YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra, previously arrested for spying, and Ehsan-ur-Rahim alias Danish, a Pakistani national and expelled Pakistan High Commission official, said the police. On Wednesday, Punjab Police's State Special Operation Cell (SSOC), SAS Nagar has arrested a YouTube influencer for spying for Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), said Director General of Police (DGP) Punjab Gaurav Yadav, Information and Public Relations Department, Punjab, in an official statement. Earlier, DGP Gaurav Yadav said that the accused, Jasbir Singh, has been found associated with Pakistani Intelligence Operative (PIO) Shakir alias Jutt Randhawa, part of a terror-backed espionage network. He also maintained close contact with Haryana-based YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra-- arrested for spying by Haryana Police-- and Ehsan-ur-Rahim alias Danish, a Pakistani national and expelled Pak High Commission official, as per the statement. He said that investigations have revealed that Jasbir attended the Pakistan National Day event in Delhi on Danish's invitation, where he met Pakistani Army officials and vloggers. The accused has also travelled to Pakistan on three occasions, including in 2020, 2021 and 2024, and came into direct contact with ISI officers, who subsequently cultivated and recruited him to carry out espionage activities within India, he added earlier. The DGP said that after Jyoti Malhotra's arrest, the accused, Jasbir, had attempted to erase all traces of his communications with these PIOs to avoid detection. Further investigations are underway to dismantle the broader espionage-terror network and identify all collaborators, he added. (ANI)
