Dame Joanna Lumley asked controversial US politician to be her Valentine
Dame Joanna Lumley asked Rudy Giuliani to be her Valentine.
The 78-year-old acting icon met the 80-year-old former Mayor of New York City - who served from 1994 until 2001 and later became an advisor for Donald Trump before being disbarred as an attorney last summer over charges related to false claims of voter fraud in the 2020 US election - at a Valentine's Day lunch during his time in office celebrating him after a past clean-up on the Big Apple, and she could not help but send a card with nothing in it to him.
She told Nick Grimshaw and Angela Hartnett on the latest episode of their 'Dish from Waitrose' podcast: "One of the New York mayors was over, Mayor Giuliani. He came over to London, I think when Boris Johnson was here.
"Anyway, after he'd done a great clean-up of New York, he was over here being fêted and there was a great big lunch celebrating him, and it was Valentine's Day.
"And we had all kinds of heart-related things all sprinkled about on the table. And so, I got one of the hearts and I wrote on the back of it: 'Be my Valentine XXXXX.' And I gave it to one of the waiters, and I said, [whispering] 'Take it to him.'
"Mayor Giuliani had got his girlfriend or his wife with him, and he received this, and he looked at it, and she went [whispering] 'What's that?'
"I felt so happy. It's so nice, just a little bit of, oh my god!'
The 'Amandaland' star has been married to her 70-year-old husband Stephen Barlow since 1986, and she has declared the secret to their long marriage is respect - and simply not getting divorced.
Dame Joanna added: "Adrian Edmondson [comedian] gave the answer to that. He said: 'Don't get divorced.' A long marriage is that. But actually, bless - I think a lot of it starts, rather boringly, on respect.
"You've got to respect your partner. You've got to love what they do; you never feel contempt. If you have contempt in your body at any stage, don't even start going out with them.
"You've got to pretty much adore them. Have a bit of a crush on them. And you've got to be endlessly forgiving about things, because knowing that you've got as many shortfalls as you think they may have."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ways to save on your wedding
SAVANNAH, Ga. (WSAV) — June is the traditional month for weddings, but no matter when you've set the date, one thing is for sure: getting to the big day takes a lot of planning. And a lot of money. According to the average wedding costs $33,900. That's up from $28,000 pre-pandemic. If you're going to spend the money, you should get the most for it. Here are some affordable ways to keep your wedding costs manageable. The reception: Many couples are opting to have their ceremony on a weekday to keep wedding costs down. They're also staying away from romantic holidays like Valentine's Day, a time when vendors may increase prices. Wedding planners advise looking for a venue that offers package deals (venue, catering, etc.). And always try to negotiate a price. The decor: Do you really need that ice sculpture in the shape of a swan? If the answer is yes, by all means get one. But if you're on a tight budget, think about renting flowers or greenery. Framed pictures of the bride, groom and their family members are a nice touch too. The flowers: Consider renting flower arrangements and greenery for the church ceremony. Many churches have more than one wedding on the same day. You could contact the other brides and see if you can either keep their flowers for your wedding (and, of course, compensating them!) or you could offer your flowers (at a nice price) to the bride whose wedding is after yours. If that's not possible, think about using the flower arrangements from your ceremony at the reception too. (Be sure to ask someone to handle transporting them for you.) The guests: Again, do you really need your cousin's best friend's sister's babysitter at your wedding? Be judicious. Try this test: if you close your eyes to imagine your wedding and don't see the person's face you're trying to decide on, move them to a backup list. You can always add them back in if your budget allows. The menu: If you want a formal dinner, that's wonderful. If you can't afford it, there are many classy alternatives. Check out your favorite restaurant's catering menu. Many times their cost includes set up and clean up. (Of course, check with your venue first. Many have an existing list of caterers they will only work with.) And consider a buffet. Not only can it be more affordable, but it also ensures your guests will mingle and not just talk to the people at their table. The bar: Everyone wants to toast the bride and groom! But if a fully stocked bar and big cocktail selection aren't a priority for the happy couple, consider sticking to wine and beer only. For variety, you could offer one or two signature cocktails. The cake: Your wedding cake can be extravagant or it can be understated. Either way, your it can be a showpiece without breaking the bank. Many couples choose a smaller cake to cut for pictures and then serve sheet cake slices or cupcakes to the guests. One sure way to keep the cake cost down is to opt for buttercream frosting instead of fondant. It's your special day. You don't have to go broke to have the wedding of your dreams. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Buzz Feed
21 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
Toddler Parenting Trends Parents Are Sick Of
Parenting in the age of social media is a unique beast. Between information overload and influencer overwhelm, there's a fervor for particular trends or products that can be A Lot. Recently, Reddit user ActualEmu1251 shared the toddler parenting trends they've HAD it with, and they made some points. Here's what they had to say: ActualEmu1251 also asked other parents what trends they're so done with, and even more points were made: "The 'holiday baskets' for every single holiday like Valentine's Day, St. Patrick's Day, Easter, July 4…Like, your child does not need a new book and holiday t-shirt and toy every time there is a special day!" "Over-the-top, elaborate birthday parties. No, I am not going to make a balloon arch or rent a bouncy castle or have a snack table with an array of different colored matching desserts and an original cocktail named after my child." "The gift opening at parties drives me nuts! It just makes all the other kids jealous that they can't play with all the stuff at the party." "Sad beige/grey/'pastel' toys and clothes for babies and toddlers because parents want their homes to look cute on social media instead of letting their kids enjoy color." "Not saying 'good job/well done' to kids and instead saying stuff like 'you really worked hard at that'." "I used to think wooden toys were cute and fancy, and now I just think of how dangerous they can be when turned into projectiles." "I hate the whole Montessori toddler thing, like please don't show me a video about how my 3-year-old should have a whole functional miniature kitchen so she can cook eggs by herself. I can just cook her eggs for her. She's 3." "Why do I need to create fake mud with cereal when we have real mud, grass, stones, etc., outside for free?" "Someone telling you, 'you only get 18 summers with them' when every day feels like 12 days and every year feels like a century." "I hate being called 'mama' by anyone but my child. Hate." "I kept trying to get into a toy rotation habit and then realized that I don't care to spend my energy making sure my kid is excited about his toys. Some get naturally kind of hidden or put away for a while, and then he's happy to see them again, but I truly don't care if he's bored with them — he can go find something else to do in that case. I don't need to curate a selection of toys every week." "The mommy wine culture and promoting the idea that there is no other way to relax and that you need to drink excessively to parent your children." "I hate how boy clothes have essentially two vibes as they get older, sad beige baby or sport mode (black and other primary colors). It takes so much effort to dress a boy in bright colors." "The gendered everything! I'm not super hippy dippy or anything, but mine was never into astronauts, monster trucks, dinosaurs, etc., at all, but somehow it seemed like we had no choice but to buy items with these printed on them. And the fact that everything still has to be either bright blue or pink in this day and age. Just annoying." "Feeling like I have to research everything to death to find 'the best'. Last summer I spent WEEKS trying to find a sunscreen that was 'clean', reef-safe, etc. and not horrifically expensive. This summer I bought the Banana Boat 360 because I'm not wrestling my toddler every time we want to go in the sun to spread mineral goo all over his body and then ultimately have to scrub the excess off in the bath that night. I spray him, use a makeup brush to put some Up&Up brand mineral lotion on his face, and we go out. End of story." "Consultants. On any possible topic. Sleep consultant, potty training consultant, weaning consultant, lactation consultant, first bath consultant, you name it! This whole industry feels predatory. They make moms/dads feel incapable of parenting mostly through social media, just to monetize all these services." "I've seen moms on Instagram put makeup on their toddlers (I'm not talking makeup for pageants) like blush, eyelash extensions and tinted gloss." "Exploiting children on social media for likes, attention and/or $$$." Do you agree with being done with these trends? What parenting trends have you absolutely had it with? Share in the comments or anonymous form below!


Boston Globe
2 days ago
- Boston Globe
Trump administration races to fix a big mistake: DOGE fired too many people
Across the government, the Trump administration is scrambling to rehire many federal employees dismissed under DOGE's staff-slashing initiatives after wiping out entire offices, in some cases imperiling key services such as weather forecasting and the drug approval process. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Since Musk left the White House last week, he and Trump have fallen out bitterly, sniping at each other in public over the cost of Trump's sweeping tax legislation and government subsidies for Musk's businesses. But even before that, the administration was working to undo some of DOGE's highest-profile actions. Advertisement Trump officials are trying to recover not only people who were fired, but also thousands of experienced senior staffers who are opting for a voluntary exit as the administration rolls out a second resignation offer. Thousands more staff are returning in fits and starts as a conflicting patchwork of court decisions overturn some of Trump's large-scale firings, especially his Valentine's Day dismissal of all probationary workers, those with one or two years of government service and fewer job protections. A federal judge in April ordered the president to reinstate probationary workers dismissed from 20 federal agencies, although a few days later the Supreme Court - in a different case - halted another judge's order to reinstate a smaller group. Advertisement Some fired federal employees, especially those at retirement age or who have since secured jobs in the private sector, are proving reluctant to return. So the administration is seeking work-arounds and stopgaps, including asking remaining staff to serve in new roles, work overtime or volunteer to fill vacancies, according to interviews with 18 federal workers across eight agencies and messages obtained by The Washington Post. A Post review found recent messy re-hirings at agencies including the Food and Drug Administration, the IRS, the State Department and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. The ever-shifting personnel changes are yet another strain on a workforce already weary of Trump-induced uncertainty, said current and former employees, most of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation. 'They wanted to show they were gutting the government, but there was no thought about what parts might be worth keeping,' said one FDA staffer who was fired and rehired. 'Now it feels like it was all just a game to them.' A White House official said in an interview that it is no secret Trump arrived in Washington determined to streamline the government. During that downsizing, the official acknowledged, some people were fired who shouldn't have been. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity to candidly discuss a complex issue that spans many federal agencies. Advertisement 'Each agency has made an appropriate determination as to who should be on the payroll in the respective agency,' the official said. 'If by chance mistakes were made and critical employees were dismissed, each individual agency is working diligently to bring these people back to work to continue the adequate functions of the federal government.' In statements, some agencies also admitted to errors, while promising the government is working to fix them. 'During this process,' said an Agriculture Department spokesperson, 'USDA has been transparent about any mistakes that were made.' 'They need some of the expertise' Lynn McKerral holds a sign in support of Social Security Administration workers in front of the agency's headquarters in Woodlawn, Maryland, on May 20, 2025. Wesley Lapointe/For The Washington Post The administration has already had to race to undo its own cuts. In February, the Agriculture Department launched a campaign to rehire bird flu response workers after avian influenza sent egg prices soaring. That same month, the Trump administration fired nearly 17 percent of the National Nuclear Security Administration's workforce, temporarily imperiling the safety and security of America's 5,000 nuclear warheads - before hiring them back after an outcry. In recent weeks, other agencies have seen similar patterns. At the start of April, the FDA let go of thousands, including laboratory staff, librarians and those who helped manage the budget. The dismissals hit particularly hard at the Office of Drug Policy, the Office of Regulatory Policy and teams that worked on Freedom of Information Act requests and patent extensions, according to interviews with eight current and former FDA employees. But three weeks later, fired workers began getting calls on their personal cellphones - and soon, a message to their personal emails: They were all due back. The 'Notice of Reduction in Force (RIF) issued to you … is officially RESCINDED [and] you will not be separated from employment,' read an email sent to terminated staff in May and obtained by The Post. 'You are expected to return to duty the next business day following your receipt of this notice.' Advertisement One FDA worker said she complied only because she hadn't found other employment yet. 'Being back feels like a funeral,' she said. 'Morale is terrible. Everyone is stressed and feels the absence of our colleagues. … I'm looking for another job.' At the IRS, managers received a notice on May 19, a Monday, that all probationary workers would be coming back to the office on Friday, according to a copy obtained by The Post. The turnaround was so swift that some probationary staff probably wouldn't have a desk or a laptop initially, the announcement acknowledged: 'If a seat assignment is not available … your employees should begin teleworking until local management secures a seat assignment for them.' Asked about the FDA's back-and-forth, a Health and Human Services spokesperson wrote in a statement that 'any reassignment or restructuring is being done to strengthen outcomes. Our restructuring is delivering leaner and better government services to the American people.' The IRS did not respond to requests for comment. At USAID, thousands have been out of work since early this year, when their agency became ground zero for Trump and Musk's overhaul of government. But at the start of this month, some ex-USAID officials began hearing from former colleagues about potential new jobs at the State Department, which has assumed responsibility for distributing foreign aid, once USAID's task. The outreach soon morphed into formal offers, with an application deadline of May 19. One former senior USAID official said she decided to go for it. Advertisement 'I was like, well, I definitely don't want to work for this administration, but, yes, I need a job, so put my name down,' she said. 'Why not? I have nothing to lose.' Overall, few USAID workers are expected to return. According to documents shared with The Post, less than 200 total positions were advertised, a tiny fraction of the roughly 10,000 people employed by USAID before it was torn apart. Though the Trump administration has cut more than 80 percent of USAID programs, the State Department has taken over the remainder, controlling billions in foreign assistance. A State Department spokesperson, who declined to be named, said Secretary of State Marco Rubio 'approved the hiring of a small number of positions … in connection with the Department assuming responsibility for limited former USAID programming. 'I'm not risking it again' Meteorologist Joe DeLizio prepares to release a weather balloon for the National Weather Service in Gaylord, Michigan, on April 28, 2025. Marvin Joseph/The Washington Post As other agencies grapple with fallout from dismissals and departures, managers are leaning on remaining employees to fill the gaps - and in some cases, hiring new workers to replace those who have left. At the National Weather Service, waves of DOGE-led early retirements and probationary firings left some local forecasting offices without enough staff to maintain 24/7 operations, while others lost the ability to launch as many weather balloons, a key forecasting tool. In one Kentucky office, the agency had to stagger shifts ahead of a tornado outbreak to ensure enough meteorologists were working to cover the overnight threat. Last month, as meteorologists and Democrats in Congress warned that staffing cuts could leave the Weather Service unable to fulfill its mission of saving lives and protecting property from extreme weather, the agency sought to make up for the cuts by reassigning staff from across the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Weather Service director Ken Graham, meanwhile, assured employees throughout the spring that the agency was close to securing a public safety exemption to the government-wide hiring freeze. Advertisement It finally arrived Monday, Graham told Weather Service staff in an email, obtained by The Post, that began: 'Big news! Fantastic news!' The agency will soon post job listings for 126 meteorologist, hydrologist, physical scientist and electronics technician roles, which Graham described as 'a targeted number of critical positions' that would 'further stabilize front line operations.' 'Together, these hiring authorities and staffing flexibilities will allow us to continue meeting our foundational mission, including issuing timely and accurate forecasts and warnings,' he added. The agency confirmed the hiring in a statement and said it was part of a series of steps to address staff losses. At the Department of Housing and Urban Development, some offices saw so many people take Trump's early resignation offer that officials are now seeking to redeploy staff to cover the absences. Community Planning and Development, a HUD department that responds to wildfires and hurricanes and administers billions of dollars in grants, is especially strained. That department's Office of Field Operations has 13 field offices with two or fewer employees left, according to an internal presentation from May 27 obtained by The Post. More than 30 field offices have broader staffing concerns, the presentation showed. Department staff sent a 'voluntary reassignment' offer to employees within Community Planning and Development, where about 40 percent of employees had already resigned. Headcount dropped from 936 employees at the start of Trump's term to 560 by May, according to a staffer who attended the presentation. Officials 'learned that certain Regions and Field Offices have lost serious staffing capabilities,' according to a May 23 message to staff obtained by The Post, which noted the reassignment offers are meant to 'immediately cover skill gaps and critical functions.' Staffers would be required to work in person but will not have moving costs covered, according to the employee. 'In some cases, supervisors are left with no staff, or staff are left with no supervisors, or offices are left with nobody to keep programs delivered,' the email to staff read. A HUD spokesperson wrote in a statement that, given roughly 2,300 employees are 'taking the opportunity to find a new path, it only makes sense that the department would have a plan in place to ensure that mission critical functions and the highest quality service to rural, tribal and urban communities remain uninterrupted.' Within the FDA, the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research is struggling to recover from the loss of too many 'timekeepers,' personnel who handle pay, leave and travel logistics, emails show. A plaintive message sent to the center's staff in early May noted the department 'is still working on a long-term solution for our timekeeping needs.' It asked for volunteers. 'If folks are willing to be trained as a timekeeper or have prior timekeeping experience (does not need to be recent),' the missive said, 'please respond back to this email to let us know if you are interested.' In other agencies, managers are having to fix problems from Trump- or DOGE-driven restructurings. At the Social Security Administration's call center in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, IT workers were told by managers in mid-April that they needed to request a transfer or face possible firing, said Barri Sue Bryant, president of the American Federation of Government Employees Local 2809. Nearly all of the 40-plus workers in that office did so, sending their laptops and spare equipment to the agency's Baltimore headquarters and awaiting a new assignment while the union attempted to explain to leadership how essential these employees were, Bryant said. 'We are critically understaffed in all of our departments,' Bryant wrote in an email to leadership. 'Having systems and employees down is not contributing to the goals of this agency.' But management would soon find out on their own. A specialized scanner that can quickly input forms and scan barcodes broke down and was unusable for a day. A customer service representative who was supposed to answer the 800 number couldn't take calls for three days while her computer was in disrepair. 'It really sent everyone for a loop,' Bryant said. After three days, the agency told the union the decision had been reversed. The employees got back their equipment and resumed their normal jobs in Wilkes-Barre. Asked about the IT workers, Social Security provided an emailed statement from an unnamed official, whom it declined to identify. The statement did not address the reassignments but criticized 'the fake news media, specifically the Washington Post' for 'pushing a false narrative about Social Security. The truth is that President Trump is protecting and strengthening Social Security just like he promised.' Federal workers caught in similar situations described being on an unsettling roller coaster. One USDA safety inspector remembered answering a call from their manager one weekend to learn they were fired for 'performance,' even though they had received positive reviews, according to personnel documents reviewed by The Post. But by Monday - the day before the employee was supposed to turn in their badge - the manager called back to say the termination was rescinded. In April, when the Trump administration offered early retirement, the employee leaped at it and was soon placed on administrative leave. A few days later, former colleagues reached out: The government was now looking to fill the person's job again. Did they want back in? 'I was like, yep, nope, I'm not risking it again,' the employee said. 'I'm gonna try to take the money and try to find something else.'